[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Thursday, December 19, 2013

Increase in Hall of Fame standards

Dave makes the point that since historically, we have 1% to 2% of MLB players in the Hall of Fame, then we should uphold that standard.  And if a voter thinks that Bonds/Clemens is in the way, then vote for someone else in their place.  As it stands, we won't even get to the 1% level.

While I have normally thought that we should have about 20-25 players voted in for any 10year time period, regardless of expansion, I think I am wrong on that one.  As I posted in the comments:

For those who asked: the number of US-born players is the same in 1969 as it is today, more or less. The expansion from 24 to 30 teams has been entirely consumed by foreign-born players.

This is also true in the NHL (Canada/US-born players), when it expanded from 21 teams to eventually 30. All of the expansion teams covered by foreign-born players.

And, since the number of live-births has been a constant for several decades, there is actually NO dilution in talent.

Basically, ?if we accept that expansion does not dilute talent, then we have to accept that we should select based on a percentage of the pool, rather than some constant number as I originally have thought.  The 30-team era should have nearly double the number of hall of famers of the 16-team era.

Now, my research would at least suggest that the 24-team and 30-team leagues had no dilution in talent.  I don't know if that's true of the 16-team league.  But, I'd think it's true, at least pre-Jackie.  After all, about 35%-40% of the great players in the Hall of Fame born since Willie Mays are non-whites.  That would mean that expanding from 16 to 24 teams would be completely covered by what would have been segregated players, if not for Jackie.

So, yeah, I'd go with a percentage basis.

I don't know about the NHL, since they went from 6-teams to 30-teams rather quickly.  Someone will have to look into that one.

(3) Comments • 2013/12/20 • Awards History Hockey

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

December 19, 2013
Increase in Hall of Fame standards