[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Game Score leaderboards

Matt gives us the leaderboards for Bill's Game Score, and my 4 different versions.

He does something interesting though: he simply adds up each score by pitcher for the season.  No dividing by number of starts.  No averaging.  Just a straight addition.  So, the league leader in any of the version ends up with a score like 2077 or something.

Now, if you think about the scale of game score, the average is 50, and the scale is created to be 0 to 100, and to mirror win%.  That is a game score of 75 means that you'll win 75% of the time, or, 0.75 wins.  So, if Kershaw ends up with a Game score of 2077 for the season, then that implies 20.77 wins.  That is, 21 wins.

(It's not exactly like W/L because of the no-decisions.)

You could therefore have the flip-side of 100 minus Game Score for each start.  Kershaw had 33 starts, and if his Game Score suggests 21 wins, then it would suggest 12 losses.  Hence, his Game Score translates to 21-12, which is certainly much more appealing to look at than "2077".

Anyway, the power of Game Score is really at the single-start level.  If you start to aggregate it like this, well, you are simply converting his RA9 (or FIP or whatever) into its presumed W/L record.  Which is fine, but you wouldn't necessarily have to go through each Game Score to get there.

So, what you want to see if say Verlander is streaky or not, does he have alot of bad games, etc.  Things like that, at the single-game level.  Aggregation hides all that.

?

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

April 18, 2013
Game Score leaderboards