[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Friday, August 23, 2013

Explain FRA to me

I have nothing good to say about Fair RA.  Momma told me I should stop there, but, who listens to their mother really?

***

While the idea behind it seems reasonable, the results are frankly ludicrous (see the whole thread, but especially the comments starting at comment 21 if you are short on time).? 

So in the end, I can't explain the methodology nor the results.  And yet FRA is the central component to WARP.  Outside of Colin, I doubt there's a single person at BPro that can explain FRA that can be understood by any one of us. (That's a challenge.  Crickets will be here until it's taken on.)  But it is being referenced by its authors, most visibly in their book (where they highlight the metric by showing that Doc Halladay wasn't as good a pitcher as the rest of us think). 

The thing is that FRA has been around for three years now (Happy belated Birthday!), and I haven't seen any effort at all in moving the understandinging of the metric forward.  It simply exists, and it is simply being referenced.  I think outside of the original article, no article has ever been devoted to it since.  The sellers can't sell the metric, and the buyers aren't buying the metric.  So, why does it even exist?

SIERA in contrast made a splash at BPro when it came out, and Matt had several articles that delved into SIERA and what made it tick.  And almost as quickly, it was gone, in a takedown by Colin himself.  (SIERA survives at Fangraphs.) 

The last time I took out the daggers was to eviscerate the PECOTA percentiles.  They were wrong from the start, and they were wrong for several years.  And yet, there they stood, existing without explanation.  Until Colin proved that they were wrong.

When will the FRA obituary be finally written?   Until then, someone, anyone, explain FRA to me, in a way that I can explain it to someone else.

(25) Comments • 2013/09/26 • Linear_Weights

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

August 23, 2013
Explain FRA to me