[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Monday, August 18, 2014

Better BBWAA Cy model

I'd like for someone to develop this algorithm.  I've discussed it how to do it manually, and I tried to come up with a simple point-system.  The simple point-system simply isn't going to cut it for the nuances we need.

This is what the aspiring saberist should try to think about (and you should best fit to data 2006-2013):

1. Figure out how to balance the "L" in a W/L record.  Presumably, the L will carry a weight of -1/2 or -1/3 points to 1 point for the W

2. Figure out how to balance ERA and W/L, and at what point is it "too close" to call, and tie-breakers are needed.  For example, say that you have one pitcher with a 2.00 ERA and another is at 3.00 ERA.  But the second guy has a 20-10 record while the first guy is at 16-10.  As we know, we declare the winner if a pitcher leads in both.  But, with the huge ERA advantage, is that enough to also declare a winner, even though he was 4 fewer wins? 

So, that's what you  have to figure out: at what point is it too close to call when one player leads in one category and the second leads in the other?

3. Then decide on all the tiebreakers, notably, IP, K, and CG, and maybe shutouts and team finish.

You may also find that how it works for the top 2 pitchers won't necessarily work for the rest of the pitchers.  It might become more of a jumble in the down-ballot votes.

***

Now, you may think: what's the practical purposes of this for the aspiring saberist?  Well, it's important to get into trying to create models.  It makes you think in different ways, and gets you to approach the issue in a different way.  You may even get into a paradigm shift, in which case, you'll have succeeded, regardless of what you come up with.

?

(3) Comments • 2014/08/18 • History

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

August 18, 2014
Better BBWAA Cy model