[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.255341acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards reactive augmented reality exposure treatment

Published: 20 May 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Various ways for delivering exposure treatment to phobic people have been developed and investigated. These range from traditional live exposure to mixed reality exposure to fully virtual exposure approaches, each with specific advantages and disadvantages in delivering exposure of phobia inducing stimuli. In previous research we have argued for specific advantages in creating interactive augmented reality based exposure treatment. We have extended this approach by integrating psychophysiology-based sensor data to add more interactivity, or reactivity in the system. By integrating galvanic skin response data as a real-time measurement of the user's arousal, the stimulus (a virtual spider) can automatically 'react' to the user's state. Such a system offers interesting opportunities for creating new kinds of interactive and ecologically valid exposure treatment systems that can adapt to the client's treatment needs without the need for external intervention. This paper describes our proposed approach, an initial system that we have developed and a pilot study to test the feasibility of this technology.

References

[1]
Ang, K. K., Guan, C., Chua, K. S. G., et al. A Large Clinical Study on the Ability of Stroke Patients to Use an EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 42, 4 (2011), 253--258.
[2]
Bretón-López, J., Quero, S., Botella, C., García-Palacios, A., Baños, R. M., and Alcañiz, M. An augmented reality system validation for the treatment of cockroach phobia. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 13, 6 (2010), 705--710
[3]
Chittaro, L. and Sioni, R. Affective computing vs. affective placebo: Study of a biofeedback-controlled game for relaxation training. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2014).
[4]
Corbett-Davies, S., Dünser, A., Green, R., and Clark, A. An advanced interaction framework for augmented reality based exposure treatment. Virtual Reality (VR), 2013 IEEE, 9--22.
[5]
Côté, S. and Bouchard, S. Virtual reality exposure for phobias: A critical review. Journal of CyberTherapy & Rehabilitation 1, 1 (2008), 75--91.
[6]
Dünser, A., Grasset, R., and Farrant, H. Towards immersive and adaptive augmented reality exposure treatment. Studies in health technology and informatics 167, (2011), 37--41.
[7]
Fairclough, S. H. Fundamentals of physiological computing. Interacting with Computers 21, 1--2 (2009), 133--145
[8]
De Jong, P. J. and Muns, P. Spider phobia: Interaction of disgust and perceived likelihood of involuntary physical contact. Journal of anxiety disorders 16, 1 (2002), 51--65.
[9]
Juan, M. C., Alcaniz, M., Monserrat, C., Botella, C., Baños, R. M., and Guerrero, B. Using augmented reality to treat phobias. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 25, 6 (2005), 31--37.
[10]
Kivikangas, J. M., Ekman, I., Chanel, G, et al. Review on psychophysiological methods in game research. Proc. of 1st Nordic DiGRA, (2010).
[11]
Kolassa, I.-T., Musial, F., Mohr, A., Trippe, R. H., and Miltner, W. H. R. Electrophysiological correlates of threat processing in spider phobics. Psychophysiology 0, 0 (2005)
[12]
Lueken, U, Kruschwitz, J. D., Muehlhan, M., Siegert, J., Hoyer, J., and Wittchen, H.-U. How specific is specific phobia? Different neural response patterns in two subtypes of specific phobia. NeuroImage 56, 1 (2011), 363--372.
[13]
Matthews, A. J., Scanlan, J. D., and Kirkby, K. C. Online Exposure Treatment for Spider Fear: The Effects of Moving Versus Static Images on Treatment Adherence, Fear Elicitation and Habituation. Behaviour Change 29, 01 (2012), 15--24.
[14]
Mingyu, L., Jue, W., Nan, Y., and Qin, Y. Development of EEG biofeedback system based on virtual reality environment. Proc IEEE-EMBS. (2006), 5362--5364.
[15]
Mühlberger, A. and Wiedemann, G. Subjective and Physiologic Reactions of Flight Phobics during VR Exposure and Treatment Outcome: What Adds Motion Simulation? Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine, (2005), 185.
[16]
Nacke, L. E., Kalyn, M., Lough, C., and Mandryk, R. L. Biofeedback game design: using direct and indirect physiological control to enhance game interaction. Proc. ACM CHI. (2011), 103--112.
[17]
Picard, R. W. Affective Computing for HCI. Proc. of HCI International, L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. (1999), 829--833.
[18]
Regenbrecht, H., Botella, C., Banos, R., and Schubert T. Mixed Reality Experience Questionnaire v1.0. Unpublished. http://www.hci.otago.ac.nz/mreq/MixedRealityExperienceQu estionnaireWeb.htm; last accessed 24/Feb/2014.
[19]
Repetto, C., Gorini, A., Vigna, C., Algeri, D., Pallavicini, F., and Riva, G. The use of Biofeedback in Clinical Virtual Reality: The INTREPID Project. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 33 (2009).
[20]
Scheirer, J., Fernandez, R., Klein, J., and Picard, R. W. Frustrating the user on purpose: a step toward building an affective computer. Interacting with computers 14, 2 (2002), 93--118.
[21]
Szymanski, J. and O'Donohue, W. Fear of spiders questionnaire. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 26, 1 (1995), 31--34.
[22]
Tao, J. and Tan, T. Affective computing: A review. In Affective computing and intelligent interaction. Springer, 2005, 981--995.
[23]
Wilhelm, F. H., Pfaltz, M. C., Gross, J. J., Mauss, I. B., Kim, S. I., and Wiederhold, B. K. Mechanisms of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy: The Role of the Behavioral Activation and Behavioral Inhibition Systems. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 30, 3 (2005), 271--284.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
PervasiveHealth '14: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
May 2014
459 pages
ISBN:9781631900112

In-Cooperation

Publisher

ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering)

Brussels, Belgium

Publication History

Published: 20 May 2014

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. GSR
  2. affective computing
  3. augmented reality
  4. biofeedback
  5. exposure treatment
  6. psychophysiology
  7. spider phobia

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

PervasiveHealth '14

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 116 submissions, 47%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 134
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 22 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media