[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.5555/2664360.2664364acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Simulation-based decision support for bringing a project back on track: the case of RUP-based software construction

Published: 02 June 2012 Publication History

Abstract

RUP-based development has proven successful in various contexts. The iterative and phased development approach provides a framework for how to develop software efficiently and effectively. Yet, there are plenty of occasions that the projects go off-track in terms of the key parameters of the project such as quality, functionality, cost, and schedule. The challenge for the software project manager is to bring the project back on track. Simulation, in general, and system dynamics based simulation in particular, is established as a method to pro-actively evaluate possible scenarios and decisions. The main contribution of this paper is a method called SIM-DASH; it combines three established techniques for providing decision support to the software project manager in the context of RUP-based development. SIM-DASH consists of (i) a system dynamics modeling and simulation component for RUP-based construction, (ii) dashboard functionality providing aggregated and visualized information for comparing actual versus targeted performance, and (iii) knowledge and experience base describing possible actions that have proven successful in the past for how to bring a project back on track. As part of (iii), decision trees and experience-based guidelines are used. The interplay between these three components provides pre-evaluated actions for bringing the current project iteration back on track. As proof-of-concept, a case study is provided to illustrate the key steps of the method and to highlight its principal advantages. For this purpose, SIM-DASH was substantiated retrospectively for a real-world SAP web system development project within the banking field. While the method is applicable for different issues and scenarios, we study its impact for the specific issue of adding personnel to testing and/or development in order to ensure improved project performance to achieve established quality levels of feature development.

References

[1]
R. T. Futrell, D. F. Shafer, and L. Shafer, Quality software project management. Prentice Hall Professional, 2002.
[2]
J. S. Aguilar-Ruiz, J. C. R. Santos, D. Rodríguez, and I. Ramos, "Generation of management rules through system dynamics and evolutionary computation," Proc. 4th Int. Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement, 2002, pp. 615--628.
[3]
X. Meilong, L. Congdong, and J. Chen, "System dynamics simulation to support decision making in software development project," Proc. 4th International Conference of Networking and Mobile Computing on Wireless Communications, 2008, pp. 1--4.
[4]
H. Zhang, B. Kitchenham, and D. Pfahl, "Software Process Simulation Modeling: An Extended Systematic Review," New Modeling Concepts for Today's Software Processes, vol. 6195, 2010, pp. 309--320.
[5]
R. J. Madachy, Software Process Dynamics, 28th ed. Wiley-IEEE Press, 2008.
[6]
M. I. Kellner, R. J. Madachy, and D. M. Raffo, "Software process simulation modeling:Why? what? how?," Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 46 (2/3), 1999, pp. 91--105.
[7]
F. P. Jr. Brooks, The mythical of man-month, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1978.
[8]
R. N. Charette, "Why Software Fails," IEEE Spectrum, vol. 42, 2005, pp. 36--43.
[9]
C. Y. Lin, T. Abdel-Hamid, and J. S. Sherif, "Software-engineering process simulation model (SEPS)," Journal of systems and software, vol. 38 (3), 1997, pp. 263--277.
[10]
D. Pfahl, G. Ruhe, K. Lebsanf, M. Stuppeerich, "Software process simulation with system dynamics - a tool for learning and decision support," New Trtends in Software Process Modelling, Series on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 18, 2006, pp. 57--90.
[11]
M. Wu and H. Yan, "Simulation in Software Engineering with System Dynamics: A Case Study," Journal of Software, vol. 4 (10), 2009.
[12]
T. K. Abdel-Hamid, "Investigating the Cost/Schedule Trade-Off in Software Development," IEEE Software., vol. 7 (1), 1990, pp. 97--105.
[13]
T. K. Abdel-Hamid, "The dynamics of software project staffing: a system dynamics based simulation approach," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 15 (2), 1989, pp. 109--119.
[14]
B. G. Ambrósio, J. L. Braga, and M. A. Resende-Filho, "Modeling and scenario simulation for decision support in management of requirements activities in software projects," Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 2010.
[15]
B. W. Boehm, "Software Risk Management: Principles and Practices," IEEE Software, vol. 8 (1), 1991, pp. 32--41.
[16]
D. Rubenstein, Standish group report: There's less development chaos today. SD Times, http://www.sdtimes.com/article/story-20070301-01.html.
[17]
R. L. Glass, Software Runaways. Prentice-Hall, New York, 1998.
[18]
J. Verner, J. Sampson, and N. Cerpa, "What factors lead to software project failure?," Proc. 2nd International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, 2008, pp. 71--80.
[19]
P. Kruchten, The rational unified process: An introduction. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004.
[20]
P. Rook, E. Rook, "Controlling software projects," IEEE Software Engineering Journal, vol. 1 (1), 1986, pp. 7--16.
[21]
http://people.ucalgary.ca/~epaikari/SDModel
[22]
Ventana Systems Corp., http://www.vensim.com/index.html.
[23]
E. M. Bennatan, On Time Within Budget, John Wiley and Sons, 2000.
[24]
L. A. Kappelman, R. Mckeeman, and L. Zhang, "Early warning signs of it project failure: the dominant dozen," Information Systems Management, vol. 23 (4), 2006, pp. 31--36.
[25]
N. Cerpa, J. Verner, "Why Did Your Project Fail?," Communications of the ACM, vol. 52 (12), 2009.
[26]
K. Ishikawa, (Translator: J. H. Loftus); Introduction to Quality Control; 448 p, 1990.
[27]
W. Humphrey, "Managing the software process," Addison-Wesley: Reading, 1990.
[28]
Seaman, C. B., Mendonça, M. G., Basili, V. R., Kim, Y.-M., "User interface evaluation and empirically-based evolution of a prototype experience management tool," EEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 29 (9), 2003, pp. 838--850.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICSSP '12: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and System Process
June 2012
238 pages
ISBN:9781467323529

Sponsors

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 02 June 2012

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. RUP
  2. case study
  3. construction phase
  4. decision support
  5. effort reallocation
  6. project management
  7. system dynamics modeling and simulation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICSE '12
Sponsor:

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 66
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media