[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.5555/1599773.1599795dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

The progress Portfolio: promoting reflective inquiry in complex investigation environments

Published: 10 December 1997 Publication History

Abstract

Scientific inquiry in complex data-rich environments is a goal of much educational reform, but students require supports to manage the complexity of such investigations. We propose an approach to providing this support by making the processes and products of an investigation into explicit objects for reflection. We describe design research exploring ways to promote reflective inquiry among middle-school and high-school science students. We outline obstacles facing students in conducting investigations and give an overview of the design principles for our inquiry-support software environment, the Progress Portfolio. The specific tools provided by the Progress Portfolio for capturing, annotating, organizing, and presenting data are described in detail. We conclude with a discussion of pilot studies conducted with middle-school and high-school students.

References

[1]
Collins, A., & Brown, J. S. (1988). The computer as a tool for learning through reflection. In H. Mandl & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 1-18). New York: Springer-Verlag.
[2]
Davis, E. (1996, April). Metacognitive scaffolding to foster scientific explanations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
[3]
Edelson, D. C., & O'Neill, D. K. (1994). The CoVis Collaboratory Notebook: Computer support for scientific inquiry. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
[4]
Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 1-48.
[5]
Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674-689.
[6]
Kuhn, D., Schauble, L., & Garcia-Mila, M. (1992). Cross-domain development of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 285-327.
[7]
Linn, M. C., Songer, N. B., & Eylon, B. S. (1996). Shifts and convergences in science learning and instruction. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 438-490). New York: Macmillan.
[8]
Loh, B., Radinsky, J., Reiser, B. J., Edelson, D. C., & Gomez, L. M. (1997a). The Progress Portfolio Project: Designing reflective supports for different phases of classroom investigations. Manuscript submitted for publication.
[9]
Loh, B., Radinsky, J., Russell, E., Gomez, L. M., Reiser, B. J., & Edelson, D. C. (1997b). The design of the Progress Portfolio: Steps toward a classroom-centered design framework. Manuscript submitted for publication.
[10]
NRC (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
[11]
O'Sullivan, C. Y., Reese, C. M., & Mazzeo, J. (1997). NAEP 1996 science report card for the nation and the states. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
[12]
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R. S., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 51-68.
[13]
Schauble, L. (1990). Belief revision in children: The role of prior knowledge and strategies for generating evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 31-57.
[14]
Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Raghavan, K., & Reiner, M. (1991). Causal models and experimentation strategies in scientific reasoning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 201-238.
[15]
Schauble, L., Raghavan, K., & Glaser, R. (1993). The discovery and reflection notation: A graphical trace for supporting self-regulation in computer-based laboratories. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 319-337). Erlbaum.
[16]
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[17]
Shute, V. J., & Glaser, R. (1990). A large-scale evaluation of an intelligent discovery world: Smithtown. Interactive Learning Environments, 1, 51-77.
[18]
Shute, V. J., Glaser, R., & Raghavan, K. (1989). Inference and discovery in an exploratory laboratory. In P. L. Ackerman, R. J. Sternberg, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Learning and Individual Differences (pp. 279-326). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)The Research Diary, Supporting Pupils' Reflective Thinking during Design ActivitiesProceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children10.1145/2930674.2930702(206-217)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2016
  • (2013)Going digitalProceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work10.1145/2441776.2441925(1319-1328)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2013
  • (2010)Reflecting on reflectionProceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/1952222.1952269(216-223)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2010
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
CSCL '97: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning
December 1997
316 pages
  • Editors:
  • Rogers Hall,
  • Naomi Miyake,
  • Noel Enyedy

Publisher

International Society of the Learning Sciences

Publication History

Published: 10 December 1997

Author Tags

  1. design and interface issues
  2. instructional strategies and approaches
  3. tools for open-ended learning

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 182 of 334 submissions, 54%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)35
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)The Research Diary, Supporting Pupils' Reflective Thinking during Design ActivitiesProceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children10.1145/2930674.2930702(206-217)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2016
  • (2013)Going digitalProceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work10.1145/2441776.2441925(1319-1328)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2013
  • (2010)Reflecting on reflectionProceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/1952222.1952269(216-223)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2010
  • (2002)Reflective inquiryProceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community10.5555/1658616.1658648(227-236)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2002
  • (1998)The progress portfolioProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/274644.274728(627-634)Online publication date: 1-Jan-1998
  • (1998)National Geographic unpluggedProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/274644.274702(424-431)Online publication date: 1-Jan-1998

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media