[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

About: Klayman v. Obama

An Entity of Type: WikicatUnitedStatesDistrictCourtCases, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Klayman v. Obama, 957 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C., 2013), was a decision by the United States District Court for District of Columbia finding that the National Security Agency's (NSA) bulk phone metadata collection program was unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment. The ruling was later overturned on jurisdictional grounds, leaving the constitutional implications of NSA surveillance unaddressed.

thumbnail
Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Klayman v. Obama, 957 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C., 2013), was a decision by the United States District Court for District of Columbia finding that the National Security Agency's (NSA) bulk phone metadata collection program was unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment. The ruling was later overturned on jurisdictional grounds, leaving the constitutional implications of NSA surveillance unaddressed. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 41799295 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 18657 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1124616754 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:court
dbp:dateDecided
  • 2013-12-16 (xsd:date)
dbp:defendant
  • Klayman I: Verizon Communications, President Barack Obama, NSA director , Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr., US District Judge Roger Vinson; Klayman II: Facebook, Yahoo!, Google, Microsoft, YouTube, AOL, PalTalk, Skype, Sprint, AT&T, Apple and the same government defendants as in Klayman I (en)
dbp:holding
  • Warrantless telecommunications surveillance is not permitted under the Fourth Amendment. (en)
dbp:imagesize
  • 150 (xsd:integer)
dbp:judge
dbp:name
  • Klayman v. Obama (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Klayman v. Obama, 957 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C., 2013), was a decision by the United States District Court for District of Columbia finding that the National Security Agency's (NSA) bulk phone metadata collection program was unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment. The ruling was later overturned on jurisdictional grounds, leaving the constitutional implications of NSA surveillance unaddressed. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Klayman v. Obama (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License