[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495 (1952), also referred to as the Miracle Decision, was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that largely marked the decline of motion picture censorship in the United States. It determined that provisions of the New York Education Law that had allowed a censor to forbid the commercial showing of a motion picture film that the censor deemed "sacrilegious" were a "restraint on freedom of speech" and thereby a violation of the First Amendment.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495 (1952), also referred to as the Miracle Decision, was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that largely marked the decline of motion picture censorship in the United States. It determined that provisions of the New York Education Law that had allowed a censor to forbid the commercial showing of a motion picture film that the censor deemed "sacrilegious" were a "restraint on freedom of speech" and thereby a violation of the First Amendment. In recognizing that a film was an artistic medium entitled to protection under the First Amendment, the Court overturned its previous decision in Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, which found that movies were not a form of speech worthy of First Amendment protection, but merely a business. (en)
  • ジョゼフ・バースティン社対ウィルソン事件(ジョゼフバースティンしゃたいウィルソンじけん、Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson)343 U.S. 495 (1952)は、奇跡の判決(Miracle Decision)とも呼ばれる、合衆国最高裁判所による画期的な判決であり、主にアメリカでの映画検閲の拒絶を示した。検閲官が映画作品の商業上映を禁止することを許可したニューヨーク教育法の規定は、検閲官による「言論の自由の制限」を許すものであり、アメリカ合衆国憲法修正第1条に違反していると判断した。 最高裁は、映画が合衆国憲法修正第1条に基づく保護を受ける資格のある芸術的媒体であることを認めた上で、映画は単なるビジネスであり、合衆国憲法修正第1条の保護に値する言論の形式ではないと判断した判決を覆した。 (ja)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 3983843 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 10416 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1082916464 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-04-24 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1952 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Joseph Burstyn, Inc v. Wilson , (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Reed (en)
  • Frankfurter (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:date
  • 2004-10-19 (xsd:date)
  • 2006-01-27 (xsd:date)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-05-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1952 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Joseph Burstyn, Incorporated v. Wilson, Commissioner of Education of New York, et al. (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • Provisions of the New York Education Law that allow a censor to forbid the commercial showing of any non-licensed motion picture film, or revoke or deny the license of a film deemed to be "sacrilegious", were a "restraint on freedom of speech", and thereby a violation of the 1st Amendment. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Jackson, Burton (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Vinson, Black, Douglas, Burton, Minton (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Clark (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • Boston College (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:overturnedPreviousCase
  • Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 72 (xsd:integer)
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:title
  • First Amendment Center (en)
  • Freedom Forum: Landmark decision brought freedom to films (en)
dbp:url
dbp:uspage
  • 495 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 343 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • ジョゼフ・バースティン社対ウィルソン事件(ジョゼフバースティンしゃたいウィルソンじけん、Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson)343 U.S. 495 (1952)は、奇跡の判決(Miracle Decision)とも呼ばれる、合衆国最高裁判所による画期的な判決であり、主にアメリカでの映画検閲の拒絶を示した。検閲官が映画作品の商業上映を禁止することを許可したニューヨーク教育法の規定は、検閲官による「言論の自由の制限」を許すものであり、アメリカ合衆国憲法修正第1条に違反していると判断した。 最高裁は、映画が合衆国憲法修正第1条に基づく保護を受ける資格のある芸術的媒体であることを認めた上で、映画は単なるビジネスであり、合衆国憲法修正第1条の保護に値する言論の形式ではないと判断した判決を覆した。 (ja)
  • Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495 (1952), also referred to as the Miracle Decision, was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that largely marked the decline of motion picture censorship in the United States. It determined that provisions of the New York Education Law that had allowed a censor to forbid the commercial showing of a motion picture film that the censor deemed "sacrilegious" were a "restraint on freedom of speech" and thereby a violation of the First Amendment. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson (en)
  • ジョゼフ・バースティン社対ウィルソン事件 (ja)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Joseph Burstyn, Incorporated v. Wilson, Commissioner of Education of New York, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License