About: Martin v. Mott

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Martin v. Mott, 25 U.S. 19 (1827) was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the president of the United States’ emergency powers and the authority to activate state militias for federal service. The court heard the case of Jacob E. Mott, a militia private who disobeyed orders to mobilize for service during the war of 1812 and then appealed his subsequent court-martial. The court’s ruling in the case against the militiaman had a significant impact on executive powers during national emergencies, according to legal scholars, and has been used to interpret the Insurrection Act of 1807.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Martin v. Mott, 25 U.S. 19 (1827) was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the president of the United States’ emergency powers and the authority to activate state militias for federal service. The court heard the case of Jacob E. Mott, a militia private who disobeyed orders to mobilize for service during the war of 1812 and then appealed his subsequent court-martial. The court’s ruling in the case against the militiaman had a significant impact on executive powers during national emergencies, according to legal scholars, and has been used to interpret the Insurrection Act of 1807. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/85514/martin-v-mott/
dbo:wikiPageID	72099024 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	7108 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1118461215 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Marshall_Court dbr:Poughkeepsie dbr:President_of_the_United_States dbr:New_York_Supreme_Court dbr:Brennan_Center_for_Justice dbr:Joseph_Story dbr:Replevin dbr:United_States_Congress dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Federalist_No._29 dbr:War_of_1812 dbr:Daniel_D._Tompkins dbr:James_Madison dbr:Court-martial dbr:Insurrection_Act_of_1807 dbr:Militia_(United_States) dbc:1827_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Militia_Act_of_1792 dbr:Militia_Act_of_1795
dbp:argueyear	1827 (xsd:integer)
dbp:decidedate	0001-02-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	1827 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname	Martin, Plaintiff m Error, v. Mott, Defendant :n Error (en)
dbp:holding	Mott had no legal standing to disobey orders to assemble; President holds power to declare exigencies. (en)
dbp:litigants	Martin v. Mott (en)
dbp:prior	New York Supreme Court rules for Mott; brought to court on appeal. (en)
dbp:uspage	19 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	25 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist
dct:subject	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Marshall_Court dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1827_in_United_States_case_law
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Martin v. Mott, 25 U.S. 19 (1827) was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the president of the United States’ emergency powers and the authority to activate state militias for federal service. The court heard the case of Jacob E. Mott, a militia private who disobeyed orders to mobilize for service during the war of 1812 and then appealed his subsequent court-martial. The court’s ruling in the case against the militiaman had a significant impact on executive powers during national emergencies, according to legal scholars, and has been used to interpret the Insurrection Act of 1807. (en)
rdfs:label	Martin v. Mott (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Martin_v._Mott?oldid=1118461215&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Martin_v._Mott
foaf:name	(en) Martin, Plaintiff m Error, v. Mott, Defendant :n Error (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Martin_v_Mott
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Insurrection_Act_of_1807 dbr:Martin_v_Mott
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Martin_v._Mott