Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints

• Arya, S. and Mount, D.M. 1993. Approximate nearest neighbor queries in fixed dimensions. In Fourth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA'93),pp. 271–280.

• Arya, S., Mount, D.M., Netanyahu, N.S., Silverman, R., and Wu, A.Y. 1998. Anoptimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching. Journal of the ACM, 45:891–923.

  Google Scholar 

• Ballard, D.H. 1981. Generalizing the Hough transform to detect arbitrary patterns. Pattern Recognition, 13(2):111–122.

  Google Scholar 

• Basri, R. and Jacobs, D.W. 1997. Recognition using region correspondences. International Journal of Computer Vision, 25(2):145–166.

  Google Scholar 

• Baumberg, A. 2000. Reliable feature matching across widely separated views. In Conference on ComputerVision andPattern Recognition, Hilton Head, South Carolina, pp. 774–781.

• Beis, J. and Lowe, D.G. 1997. Shape indexing using approximate nearest-neighbour search in high-dimensional spaces. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Puerto Rico, pp. 1000–1006.

• Brown, M. and Lowe, D.G. 2002. Invariant features from interest point groups. In British Machine Vision Conference, Cardiff, Wales, pp. 656–665.

• Carneiro, G. and Jepson, A.D. 2002. Phase-based local features. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 282–296.

• Crowley, J.L. and Parker, A.C. 1984. Arepresentation for shape based on peaks and ridges in the difference of low-pass transform. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6(2):156–170.

  Google Scholar 

• Edelman, S., Intrator, N., and Poggio, T. 1997. Complex cells and object recognition. Unpublished manuscript: http://kybele.psych.cornell.edu/~edelman/archive.html

• Fergus, R., Perona, P., and Zisserman, A. 2003. Object class recognition by unsupervised scale-invariant learning. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 264–271.

• Friedman, J.H., Bentley, J.L., and Finkel, R.A. 1977. An algorithm for finding best matches in logarithmic expected time. ACMTransactions on Mathematical Software, 3(3):209–226.

  Google Scholar 

• Funt, B.V. and Finlayson, G.D. 1995. Color constant color indexing. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(5):522–529.

  Google Scholar 

• Grimson, E. 1990. Object Recognition by Computer: The Role of Geometric Constraints, The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

  Google Scholar 

• Harris, C. 1992. Geometry from visual motion. In Active Vision, A. Blake and A. Yuille (Eds.), MIT Press, pp. 263–284.

• Harris, C. and Stephens, M. 1988. Acombined corner and edge detector. In Fourth Alvey Vision Conference, Manchester, UK, pp. 147–151.

• Hartley, R. and Zisserman, A. 2000. Multiple view geometry in computer vision, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

  Google Scholar 

• Hough, P.V.C. 1962. Method and means for recognizing complex patterns. U.S. Patent 3069654.

• Koenderink, J.J. 1984. The structure of images. Biological Cybernetics, 50:363–396.

  Google Scholar 

• Lindeberg, T. 1993. Detecting salient blob-like image structures and their scales with a scale-space primal sketch: A method for focus-of-attention. International Journal of Computer Vision, 11(3):283–318.

  Google Scholar 

• Lindeberg, T. 1994. Scale-space theory: A basic tool for analysing structures at different scales. Journal of Applied Statistics, 21(2):224–270.

  Google Scholar 

• Lowe, D.G. 1991. Fitting parameterized three-dimensional models to images. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13(5):441–450.

  Google Scholar 

• Lowe, D.G. 1999. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In International Conference on Computer Vision, Corfu, Greece, pp. 1150–1157.

• Lowe, D.G. 2001. Local feature view clustering for 3D object recognition. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Kauai, Hawaii, pp. 682–688.

• Luong, Q.T. and Faugeras, O.D. 1996. The fundamental matrix: Theory, algorithms, and stability analysis. International Journal of Computer Vision, 17(1):43–76.

  Google Scholar 

• Matas, J., Chum, O., Urban, M., and Pajdla, T. 2002. Robust wide baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions. In British Machine Vision Conference, Cardiff, Wales, pp. 384–393.

• Mikolajczyk, K. 2002. Detection of local features invariant to affine transformations, Ph.D. thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble, France.

• Mikolajczyk, K. and Schmid, C. 2002. An affine invariant interest point detector. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 128–142.

• Mikolajczyk, K., Zisserman, A., and Schmid, C. 2003. Shape recognition with edge-based features. In Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, Norwich, U.K.

• Moravec, H. 1981. Rover visual obstacle avoidance. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 785–790.

• Nelson, R.C. and Selinger, A. 1998. Large-scale tests of a keyed, appearance-based 3-D object recognition system. Vision Research, 38(15):2469–2488.

  Google Scholar 

• Pope, A.R. and Lowe, D.G. 2000. Probabilistic models of appearance for 3-D object recognition. International Journal of Computer Vision, 40(2):149–167.

  Google Scholar 

• Pritchard, D. and Heidrich,W. 2003. Cloth motion capture. Computer Graphics Forum (Eurographics 2003), 22(3):263–271.

  Google Scholar 

• Schaffalitzky, F. and Zisserman, A. 2002. Multi-view matching for unordered image sets, or 'How do I organize my holiday snaps?'” In European Conference on Computer Vision, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 414–431.

• Schiele, B. and Crowley, J.L. 2000. Recognition without correspondence using multidimensional receptive field histograms. International Journal of Computer Vision, 36(1):31–50.

  Google Scholar 

• Schmid, C. and Mohr, R. 1997. Local grayvalue invariants for image retrieval. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(5):530–534.

  Google Scholar 

• Se, S., Lowe, D.G., and Little, J. 2001. Vision-based mobile robot localization and mapping using scale-invariant features. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Seoul, Korea, pp. 2051–2058.

• Se, S., Lowe, D.G., and Little, J. 2002. Global localization using distinctive visual features. In International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2002, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 226–231.

• Shokoufandeh, A., Marsic, I., and Dickinson, S.J. 1999. View-based object recognition using saliency maps. Image and Vision Computing, 17:445–460.

  Google Scholar 

• Torr, P. 1995. Motion segmentation and outlier detection, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK.

• Tuytelaars, T. and Van Gool, L. 2000. Wide baseline stereo based on local, affinely invariant regions. In British Machine Vision Conference, Bristol, UK, pp. 412–422.

• Weber, M., Welling, M., and Perona, P. 2000. Unsupervised learning of models for recognition. In European Conference on Computer Vision, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 18–32.

• Witkin, A.P. 1983. Scale-space filtering. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 1019–1022.

• Zhang, Z., Deriche, R., Faugeras, O., and Luong, Q.T. 1995. Arobust technique for matching two uncalibrated images through the recovery of the unknown epipolar geometry. Artificial Intelligence, 78:87–119.

  Google Scholar 

Download references