Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, R.A., 2002. The political economy of the Kuznets curve. Review of Development Economics, 6(2), pp.183–203.
- Aigbokhan, B.E., 2008. Growth, inequality and poverty in Nigeria. ACGS/MPAMS Discussion Paper, 3.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Aktan, C.C. and Yasar, V.D., 2002. Gelir dagiliminda adalet(siz)lik ve gelir esit(siz)ligi: Terminoloji, temel kavramlar ve olcum yontemleri [(In)Justice and income (in)equality in income distribution: Terminology, basic concepts and methods of measurement]. C.C. Aktan ed., Yoksullukla mucadele stratejileri [Poverty reduction strategies]. Ankara: Hak-Ä°s Konfederasyonu Yayinlari.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Alesina, A., and Rodrik, D., 1994. Distributive politics and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), pp.465–489.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and Gelan, A., 2008. Kuznets inverted-U hypothesis revisited: A time-series approach using US data. Applied Economics Letters, 15(9), pp.677–681.
Banerjee, A.V. and Duflo, E., 2000. Inequality and growth: What can the data say? NBER Working Paper, 7793, pp.2–27.
Barro, R.J., 1999. Inequality, growth and investment. NBER Working Paper, 7038, pp.2–32.
Basher, S.A. and Westerlund, J., 2009. Panel cointegration and the monetary exchange rate model. Economic Modelling, 26(2), pp.506–513.
Beyaert, A. and Camacho, M., 2008. TAR Panel unit root tests and real convergence: An application to the EU enlargement process. Review of Development Economics, 12(3), pp.668–681.
- Branco, K.J. and Williams, J.B., 1988. Economic development and income distribution-a cross national analysis. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 47(3), pp.277–297.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Breitung, J., 2005. A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegrating vectors in panel data. Econometric Reviews, 24(2), pp.151–173.
Breuer, B., Mcnown, R., and Wallace, M., 2002. Series-specific unit root test with panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64(5), pp.527–546.
Breusch, T.S. and Pagan, A.R., 1980. The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification tests in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), pp.239–253.
Carrion-I-Silvestre, J.L., del Barrio-Castro, T. and Lopez-Bazo, E., 2005. Breaking the panels: An application to the GDP per capita. Econometrics Journal, 8(2), pp.159–175.
Charemza, W.W. and Deadman, D.F., 1997. New directions in econometric practice: General to specific modelling, cointegration and vector auto regression. Second Edition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Chen, B., 2003. An inverted-u relationship between inequality and long run growth. Economic Letters, 78(2), pp.205–212.
- Choi, I., 2001. Unit roots tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), pp.229–272.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Disbudak, C. ve Suslu, B., 2007. Turkiye’de kisisel gelir dagilimini belirleyen makroekonomik faktorler [Macroeconomic factors that determines personal income distribution in Turkey]. Ekonomik Yaklasim, 65(18), pp.3–25.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Dollar, D. and Kraay, A., 2001. Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(3), pp. 195–225.
Dollar, D. and Kraay, A., 2004. Trade, growth, and poverty. Economic Journal, 114(493), pp.22–49.
- Dulgeroglu, E., 1991. Kalkinma ekonomisi. [Development economics] Bursa: Bursa Uludag Universitesi Guclendirme Vakfi Yayini.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Eberhardt, M. and Bond, S., 2009. Cross-section dependence in non-stationary panel models: A novel estimator. MPRA (Munich Personal RePEc Archive), 17692. [online] Available at: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/17692/ [Accessed 12 December 2012].
Forbes, K., 2000. A reassessment of the relationship between inequality and growth. The American Economic Review, 90(4), pp.869–886.
Gelaw, F., 2009. The relationship between poverty, inequality and growth in the rural Ethiopia: Micro evidence. In: International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference. Beijing, China, 16–22 August, 2009.
Gundlach, E., Jose, N.P., and Natasscha, W., 2004. Education is good for the poor: A note Dollar and Kraay. In: S. Anthony and R. Hoeven Van Der eds. Growth, inequality and powerty. London: Oxford Press, pp.92–106.
- Gunes, S., 2007. Functional income distribution in Turkey: A cointegration and VECM’ analysis. Journal of Economic and Social Research, 9(2), pp.23–36.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Guran, S., 1989. Makroekonomik analize giris [Introduction to macroeconomic analysis]. Istanbul: Der Yay?nları.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hadri, K., 2000. Testing for stationarity in heterogenous panels. Econometrics Journal, 3(2), pp.148–161.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Huang, H.C., 2004. A flexible nonlinear inference to the Kuznets hypothesis. Economics Letters, 84(2), pp.289–296.
Im, K., Pesaran, H., and Shin, Y., 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), pp.53–74.
- Konukman, A. and Ciftci, C., 2008. Kuresellesmenin gelir dagilimi uzerindeki etkileri [The effects of globalization on income distribution]. Ekonomik Yaklas?m Dergisi, 19(Ozel Sayi), pp.59–83.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kuznets, S., 1955. Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), pp.1–28.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Laszlo, M., Laszlo, K., and Macquarie, L., 1998. The Kuznets U-curve hypothesis: Some panel data evidence. Applied Economics Letters, 5(11), pp.693–697.
Levin, A., Lin, C., and Chu, C.J., 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), pp. 1–24.
Lombardo, V., 2011. Growth and inequality effects on poverty reduction in Italy. Rivista Italiana Degli Economisti, 16(2), pp.241–280.
Maddala, G.S. and Wu, S., 1999. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), pp.631–652.
- Miynat, M. 2003. Liberalizasyon surecinde uygulanan istikrar politikalarinin gelir dagilimina etkisi (1980 sonrasi Turkiye ornegi) [The effect of stabilization programs on income distrubution during liberalization process (The case of Turkey after 1980)] Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Celal Bayar University, Social Sciences Institute, Department of Finance.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Morrisson, C. and Murtin, F., 2013. The Kuznets curve of human capital inequality: 1870–2010. Journal of Economic Inequality, 11(3), pp. 283–301.
- Ogus, A., 2004. Turkiye’de ekonomik buyume ve gelir dagilimi [Economic growth and income distribution in Turkey]. In: IV. Iktisat Kongresi, Turkiye, Izmir, 5–9 Mayis 2004.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Persson, T. and Tabellini, G., 1994. Is inequality harmful for growth: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 84(3), pp.600–621.
Pesaran, H., 2004. General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 0435.
Pesaran, H., 2006a. Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), pp.967–1012.
- Pesaran, H., 2006b. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), pp.265–312.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Pesaran, M.H., Ullah, A., and Yamagata, T., 2008. A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. Econometrics Journal, 11(1), pp.105–127.
Shin, I., 2012. Income inequality and economic growth. Economic Modelling, 29(5), pp.2049–2057.
Syed, M.K. and Jalil, M.M., 2004. Revisiting Kuznets hypothesis: A time series and panel data approach. Bangladesh Development Studies, 30(3–4), pp.89–112.
Taylor, M. and Sarno, L., 1998. The behaviour of real exchange rates during the Post-Bretton woods period. Journal of International Economics, 46(2), pp.281–312.
Thornton, J., 2001. The Kuznets inverted-U hypothesis: Panel data evidence from 96 countries. Applied Economics Letters, 8(1), pp.15–16.
- Uysal, Y., 1999. Bolusum iliskileri ve bu iliskilerin duzenlenmesinde etkili olabilecek iktisat politikalarinin degerlendirilmesi -Turkiye ornegi [Distribution relations and evaluation of the economic policies that can be successful in managing these relations: The case of Turkey]. [online]. Available at: http://www.sbe.deu.edu.tr/Yayinlar/dergi/dergi02/bolum1.htm [Accessed 3 November 2012].
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Westerlund, J., 2009. Panel cointegration tests of the fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), pp.193–233.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Yasin, D., 2010. Turkiye’de buyume, gelir dagilimi ve issizlik arasindaki iliskinin analizi (1987–2009): Buyume, daha adil gelir dagilimini getirdi mi? İssizligi azaltti mi? [The analysis of relationship among growth, income distribution and unemployment in Turkey (1987–2009): Has growth brought a fairer income distribution? Has it decreased unemployment?]. [pdf]. Available at: http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/yeni/iletisimgm/dilek_yasin.pdf [Accessed 01 January 2013].
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Zaman, K. and Khilji, B.A., 2013. The relationship between growth-inequality-poverty triangle and pro-poor growth policies in Pakistan: The twin disappointments. Economic Modelling, 30, pp.375–393.