[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
Controlling for the effects of information in a public goods discrete choice model. (2014). LaRiviere, Jacob ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj.
In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
RePEc:sss:wpaper:2014-04.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 12

Citations received by this document

Cites: 61

References cited by this document

Cocites: 25

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Environmental attitudes and place identity as simultaneous determinants of preferences for environmental goods. (2018). Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Martin-Ortega, Julia ; Glenk, Klaus ; Faccioli, Michela.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2018-08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The relationship between perceived difficulty and randomness in discrete choice experiments: Investigating reasons for and consequences of difficulty. (2017). Börger, Tobias ; Weiss, Soren ; Fror, Oliver ; Borger, Tobias.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2017-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Sad or Happy? The Effects of Emotions on Stated Preferences for Environmental Goods. (2017). Tucker, Steven ; Noussair, Charles ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Townsend, Michael ; Boyce, Christopher.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:68:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-016-0048-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Disentangling the influence of knowledge on attribute non-attendance. (2017). Sandorf, Erlend Dancke ; Hanley, Nick ; Campbell, Danny.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:24:y:2017:i:c:p:36-50.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Linking perceived choice complexity with scale heterogeneity in discrete choice experiments: home heating in Finland. (2016). Ruokamo, Enni ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Svento, Rauli ; Juutinen, Artti.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2016-30.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Information and Learning in Stated-Preference Studies. (2016). Needham, Katherine ; Neilson, William ; LaRiviere, Jacob ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Simpson, Katherine .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2016-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Giving respondents “time to think” reduces response randomness in repeated discrete choice tasks. (2016). Börger, Tobias ; Cook, Joseph ; Borger, Tobias .
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2016-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Are Fast Responses More Random? Testing the Effect of Response Time on Scale in an Online Choice Experiment. (2016). Börger, Tobias ; Borger, Tobias.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:65:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-015-9905-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Preference and WTP stability for public forest management. (2016). Hanley, Nick ; Giergiczny, Marek ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Budzinski, Wiktor ; Budziski, Wiktor ; Barczak, Anna .
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:71:y:2016:i:c:p:11-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The value of familiarity: Effects of knowledge and objective signals on willingness to pay for a public good. (2014). LaRiviere, Jacob ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Tinch, Dugald ; Aanesen, Margrethe ; Falk-Petersen, Jannike .
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:68:y:2014:i:2:p:376-389.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aadland, D., Caplan, A., and Phillips, O., 2007. A Bayesian examination of information and uncertainty in contingent valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 35(2):149-178.

  2. Alberini, A., Rosato, P., Longo, A., and Zanatta, V., 2005. Information and Willingness to Pay in a Contingent Valuation Study: The Value of S. Erasmo in the Lagoon of Venice. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48(2):155-175.

  3. Applied Ecology, 34(4):1081-1105. Fiebig, D. G., Keane, M. P., Louviere, J., and Wasi, N., 2010. The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 29(3):393-421.

  4. Applied Economics, 41(22):2915-2924. Swait, J., and Adamowicz, W., 2001. Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2):141-167.

  5. Bergemann, D., and Välimäki, J., 1996. Learning and Strategic Pricing. Econometrica, 64(5):1125-1149.

  6. Bergemann, D., and Välimäki, J., 2006. Dynamic Pricing of New Experience Goods. Journal of Political Economy, 114(4):713-743.

  7. Bradley, M., and Daly, A. (1992). Estimation of logit choice models using mixed stated preference and revealed preference information. In: 6th International Conference on Travel Behaviour, Quebec.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bradley, M., and Daly, A., 1994. Use of the logit scaling approach to test for rank-order and fatigue effects in stated preference data. Transportation, 21(2):167-184.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Breffle, W. S., and Rowe, R. D., 2002. Comparing Choice Question Formats for Evaluating Natural Resource Tradeoffs. Land Economics, 78(2):298-314.

  10. Brouwer, R., Dekker, T., Rolfe, J., and Windle, J., 2010. Choice Certainty and Consistency in Repeated Choice Experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 46(1):93-109.

  11. Carson, R. T., and Czajkowski, M. (2013). A New Baseline Model for Estimating Willingness to Pay from Discrete Choice Models. In: International Choice Modelling Conference, Sydney.

  12. Carson, R. T., and Czajkowski, M., 2014. The Discrete Choice Experiment Approach to Environmental Contingent Valuation. In: Handbook of choice modelling, S. Hess and A. Daly, eds., Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA.

  13. Carson, R. T., Wilks, L., and Imber, D., 1994. Valuing the Preservation of Australias Kakadu Conservation Zone. Oxford Economic Papers, 46:727-749.

  14. Caussade, S., Ortúzar, J. d. D., Rizzi, L. I., and Hensher, D. A., 2005. Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 39(7):621-640.

  15. Christie, M., and Azevedo, C. D., 2009. Testing the Consistency Between Standard Contingent Valuation, Repeated Contingent Valuation and Choice Experiments. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(1):154-170.

  16. Christie, M., and Gibbons, J., 2011. The effect of individual ‘ability to choose’ (scale heterogeneity) on the valuation of environmental goods. Ecological Economics, 70(12):2250-2257.

  17. Combining revealed and stated preferences data. Marketing Letters, 5(4):335-349. Ben-Akiva, M., and Morikawa, T. (1990). Estimation of travel demand models from multiple data sources. In: 11th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Yokohama.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Czajkowski, M., Giergiczny, M., and Greene, W. H., 2014a. Learning and fatigue effects revisited.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., LaRiviere, J., and Katherine Simpson, 2014c. What is the Causal Effect of Information and Learning about a Public Good on Willingness to Pay? Evidence from a Field Experiment. University of Tennessee Working paper.

  20. Dellaert, B. G. C., Brazell, J. D., and Louviere, J. J., 1999. The Effect of Attribute Variation on Consumer Choice Consistency. Marketing Letters, 10(2):139-147.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. DeShazo, J. R., and Fermo, G., 2002. Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44(1):123-143.

  22. Economics and Management, 56(1):19-32. Watson, A., Payne, S., and Rae, R., 1989. Golden Eagles Aquila chrysætos: Land Use and Food in Northeast Scotland. Ibis, 131:336–348.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Etheridge, B., Summers, R. W., and Green, R. E., 1997. The effects of illegal killing and destruction of nests by humans on the population dynamics of the hen harrier Circus cyaneus in Scotland.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Fieller, E. C., 1932. The Distribution of the Index in a Normal Bivariate Population. Biometrika, 24(3/4):428-440.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  25. Fosgerau, M., and Bierlaire, M., 2009. Discrete choice models with multiplicative error terms.

  26. Hanley, N., Czajkowski, M., Hanley-Nickolls, R., and Redpath, S., 2010. Economic Values of Species Management Options in Human-Wildlife Conflicts: Hen Harriers in Scotland. Ecological Economics, 70(1):107-113.

  27. Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., and Greene, W. H., 2008. Combining RP and SP data: biases in using the nested logit ‘trick’ – contrasts with flexible mixed logit incorporating panel and scale effects.

  28. Hensher, D., and Bradley, M., 1993. Using stated response choice data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models. Marketing Letters, 4(2):139-151.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. Hensher, D., and Greene, W., 2003. The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice. Transportation, 30(2):133-176.

  30. Hensher, D., Louviere, J., and Swait, J., 1998. Combining sources of preference data. Journal of Econometrics, 89(1–2):197-221.

  31. Hoehn, J. P., Lupi, F., and Kaplowitz, M. D., 2010. Stated Choice Experiments with Complex Ecosystem Changes: The Effect of Information Formats on Estimated Variances and Choice Parameters.

  32. Investigating the effects of accounting for unobservable preference and scale heterogeneity. Land Economics, 90(2):323-350. Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., and LaRiviere, J., 2014b. The Effects of Experience on Preferences: Theory and Empirics for Environmental Public Goods. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  33. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 35(3):568-590. Krinsky, I., and Robb, A. L., 1986. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(4):715-719.

  34. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21(2):227-244. Milgrom, P. R., 1981. Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications. The Bell Journal of Economics, 12(2):380-391.

  35. Journal of Environment Economics and Management, forthcoming. Louviere, J., Street, D., Carson, R., Ainslie, A., Deshazo, J. R., Cameron, T., Hensher, D., Kohn, R., and Marley, T., 2002. Dissecting the Random Component of Utility. Marketing Letters, 13(3):177-193.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Journal of Transport Geography, 16(2):126-133. Hess, S., and Rose, J. M., 2012. Can scale and coefficient heterogeneity be separated in random coefficients models? Transportation, 39(6):1225-1239.

  37. LaRiviere, J., Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., Aanesen, M., Falk-Petersen, J., and Tinch, D., 2014. The Value of Familiarity: Effects of Knowledge and Objective Signals on Willingness to Pay for a Public Good.

  38. MacMillan, D., Hanley, N., and Lienhoop, N., 2006. Contingent valuation: Environmental polling or preference engine? Ecological Economics, 60(1):299-307.

  39. Manski, C. F., 1977. The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision, 8(3):229-254.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. McFadden, D., 1974. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualititative Choice Behaviour. In: Frontiers in Econometrics, P. Zarembka, ed., Academic Press, New York, NY, 105-142.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. McFadden, D., 1976. The Revealed Preferences of a Government Bureaucracy: Empirical Evidence. The Bell Journal of Economics, 7(1):55-72.

  42. McFadden, D., and Train, K., 2000. Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15(5):447-470.

  43. Meijer, E., and Rouwendal, J., 2006. Measuring welfare effects in models with random coefficients.

  44. Morikawa, T., 1989. Incorporating stated preference data in travel demand analysis. MIT, Cambridge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  45. Nelson, P., 1970. Information and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2):311-329.

  46. Newton, I., 1998. Population limitation in birds. Academic Press, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  47. Olsen, S., 2009. Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-Market Goods. Environmental and Resource Economics, 44(4):591-610.

  48. Payne, J. W., 1976. Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2):366-387.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Redpath, S. M., Arroyo, B. E., Leckie, F. M., Bacon, P., Bayfield, N., GutiÉRrez, R. J., and Thirgood, S. J., 2004. Using Decision Modeling with Stakeholders to Reduce Human–Wildlife Conflict: a Raptor– Grouse Case Study. Conservation Biology, 18(2):350-359.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Redpath, S., Amar, A., Smith, A., Thompson, D., and Thirgood, S., 2010. People and nature in conflict: can we reconcile hen harrier conservation and game management? In: Species Management: Challenges and Solutions for the 21st Century, J. M. Baxter and C. A. Galbraith, eds., The Stationery Office, 335-350.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  51. Sándor, Z., and Train, K., 2004. Quasi-random simulation of discrete choice models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 38(4):313-327.

  52. Salisbury, L. C., and Feinberg, F. M., 2010. Alleviating the Constant Stochastic Variance Assumption in Decision Research: Theory, Measurement, and Experimental Test. Marketing Science, 29(1):1-17.

  53. Savage, S. J., and Waldman, D. M., 2008. Learning and fatigue during choice experiments: a comparison of online and mail survey modes. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(3):351-371.

  54. Scarpa, R., and Rose, J. M., 2008. Design Efficiency for Non-Market Valuation with Choice Modelling: How to Measure it, What to Report and Why. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 52(3):253-282.

  55. Scarpa, R., Ruto, E. S. K., Kristjanson, P., Radeny, M., Drucker, A. G., and Rege, J. E. O., 2003. Valuing indigenous cattle breeds in Kenya: an empirical comparison of stated and revealed preference value estimates. Ecological Economics, 45(3):409-426.

  56. Shen, J., 2009. Latent class model or mixed logit model? A comparison by transport mode choice data.

  57. Swait, J., and Louviere, J., 1993. The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(3):305-314.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  58. Taylor, L., Morrison, M., and Boyle, K., 2010. Exchange Rules and the Incentive Compatibility of Choice Experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 47(2):197-220.

  59. Thirgood, S. J., Redpath, S. M., Rothery, P., and Aebischer, N. J., 2000. Raptor predation and population limitation in red grouse. Journal of Animal Ecology, 69(3):504-516.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Thirgood, S., and Redpath, S., 2008. Hen harriers and red grouse: science, politics and human–wildlife conflict. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45(5):1550-1554.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Whitfield, D. P., Fielding, A. H., McLeod, D. R. A., Morton, K., Stirling-Aird, P., and Eaton, M. A., 2007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. What is the causal impact of information and knowledge in stated preference studies?. (2018). LaRiviere, Jacob ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Hanley, Nick ; Needham, Katherine.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:54:y:2018:i:c:p:69-89.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. What is the Causal Impact of Knowledge on Preferences in Stated Preference Studies?. (2016). Needham, Katherine ; LaRiviere, Jacob ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Simpson, Katherine .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2016-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. What is the Causal Impact of Knowledge on Preferences in Stated Preference Studies?. (2016). Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2016-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. What is the Causal Effect of Knowledge on Preferences?. (2015). Needham, Katherine ; LaRiviere, Jacob ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Simpson, Katherine .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2015-14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. What is the Causal Effect of Knowledge on Preferences?. (2015). Needham, Katherine ; LaRiviere, Jacob ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Simpson, Katherine .
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2015-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Do Respondents Adjust Their Expected Utility in the Presence of an Outcome Certainty Attribute in a Choice Experiment?. (2015). Rolfe, John ; Windle, Jill.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:60:y:2015:i:1:p:125-142.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Social norms, morals and self-interest as determinants of pro-environment behaviour. (2014). Nyborg, Karine ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj.
    In: Stirling Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:stl:stledp:2014-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. What is the Causal Effect of Information and Learning about a Public Good on Willingness to Pay?. (2014). Needham, Katherine ; LaRiviere, Jacob ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Simpson, Katherine .
    In: Stirling Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:stl:stledp:2014-05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Controlling for the effects of information in a public goods discrete choice model. (2014). Lariviere, Jacob ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:201404.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Controlling for the effects of information in a public goods discrete choice model. (2014). LaRiviere, Jacob ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2014-04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. What is the Causal Effect of Information and Learning about a Public Good on Willingness to Pay?. (2014). Needham, Katherine ; LaRiviere, Jacob ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Simpson, Katherine .
    In: SIRE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:edn:sirdps:553.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Behavioral foundations of environmental economics and valuation. (2013). Murphy, James J. ; McConnell, Kenneth E. ; Horowitz, John K..
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:12964_4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Japanese Consumers Valuation of Rice and Pork from Domestic, U.S., and Other Origins. (2013). Peterson, Hikaru ; Fox, John ; Bernard, John.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:148248.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Behavioral Foundations of Environmental Economics and Valuation. (2012). Murphy, James ; Horowitz, John K. ; McConnell, Kenneth E..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ala:wpaper:2012-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. A Test of Cheap Talk in Different Hypothetical Contexts: The Case of Air Pollution. (2011). CHANEL, Olivier ; AMI, Dominique ; Luchini, Stephane ; Aprahamian, Frederic.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:50:y:2011:i:1:p:111-130.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Interview Effects in an Environmental Valuation Telephone Survey. (2011). Aadland, David ; Gong, Min.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:49:y:2011:i:1:p:47-64.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Social Psychology and Environmental Economics: A New Look at ex ante Corrections of Biased Preference Evaluation. (2011). Shogren, Jason ; James, Alexander ; Jacquemet, Nicolas.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:48:y:2011:i:3:p:413-433.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation. (2011). Shogren, Jason ; James, Alexander ; Jacquemet, Nicolas ; Luchini, Stephane.
    In: PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint).
    RePEc:hal:pseptp:halshs-00584247.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation. (2011). James, Alexander ; Luchini, Stephane ; Jacquemet, Nicolas ; Shogren, Jason.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00584247.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Can unbiased be tighter? Assessment of methods to reduce the bias-variance trade-off in WTP estimation. (2011). Strazzera, Elisabetta ; Genius, Margarita.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:33:y:2011:i:1:p:293-314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Social psychology and environmental economics : a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation. (2010). Shogren, Jason ; Luchini, Stephane ; Jacquemet, Nicolas .
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00462193.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Ordering anomalies in choice experiments. (2010). pinto-prades, jose-luis ; Day, Brett.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:59:y:2010:i:3:p:271-285.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Modeling Shifts in Willingness to Pay from a Bayesian Updating Perspective. (2009). Czajkowski, Jeffrey R..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:85:y:2009:i:2:p:308-328.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Testing the Effectiveness of Certainty Scales, Cheap Talk, and Dissonance-Minimization in Reducing Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies. (2009). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:44:y:2009:i:3:p:307-326.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. ‘Pocket and Pot’: Hypothetical Bias in a No-Free-Riding Public Contribution Game. (2009). McMillan, Melville ; Adamowicz, Wiktor ; Gubanova, Tatiana .
    In: 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
    RePEc:ags:aaea09:49318.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-30 15:15:02 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.