[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
A Financial Appraisal of Business Improvement Districts in the UK. (2014). .
In: Environment and Planning C.
RePEc:sae:envirc:v:32:y:2014:i:4:p:680-696.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 41

References cited by this document

Cocites: 25

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Adair A, Hutchison N, Burgess J, Roulac S, , 2005, “The appraisal of urban regeneration land: a contemporary perspective allowing for uncertainty†Journal of Property Investment and Finance 23 213–233.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. Alberini A, Riganti P, Longo A, , 2003, “Can people value the aesthetic and use of services of urban sites? Evidence from a survey of Belfast residents†Journal of Cultural Economics 27 193–213.

  3. Bailey N, Pill M, , 2011, “The continuing popularity of the neighbourhood and neighbourhood governance in the transition from the ‘big state’ to the ‘big society’ paradigm†Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29 927–942.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Berry J, Godfrey A, McGreal S, Adair A, , 2010, “Business improvement districts in Great Britain: governance, finance and stakeholder engagement†Journal of Town and City Management 1 128–147.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Blackwell M, , 2011, “Maximising occupier value from business improvement districts†Journal of Town and City Management 2 65–74.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. BRC, 2012, “Towards competitiveness: BRC budget submission 2012†, British Retail Consortium, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Carpenter J, , 2011, “‘Money's too tight to mention’? Urban regeneration in a recession and beyond: the case of Oxford†Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal 4 228–239.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Caruso G, Weber R, , 2006, “Getting the max for tax: an examination of BID performances and measures†International Journal of Public Adminstration 29 187–219.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. CEDOS, 2010, “Recession and post-recession: taking forward economic development and regeneration†, Chief Economic Development Officers' Society, July, http://www.cedos.org/publications/1007%20Recession%20Report.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Cook I R, , 2008, “Mobilising urban policies: the policy transfer of US business improvement districts to England and Wales†Urban Studies 45 773–795.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Coombes M G, Raybould S, Wong C, , 1992 Developing Indicators to Assess the Potential for Urban Regeneration (HMSO, London).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Core Cities, 2010, “Core Cities—driving economy recovery: a new partnership with a new government†, Manchester.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Dawkins G, Grail J, , 2007, “Business improvement districts: past, present, future†Economic Affairs March, pages 79–82. DCLG, Department for Communities and Local Government, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Dolan P, Metcalfe R, , 2008, “Comparing willingness to pay and subjective well-being in the context of non-market goods†, DP 890, Centre for Economic Performance, London.

  15. Eglene O, Dawes S S, , 2006, “Challenges and strategies for conducting international public management research†Policy and Society 38 596–622.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Gopal-Agge D, Hoyt L, , 2008, “The BID model in Canada and the United States: the retail-revitalisation nexus†, in Business Improvement Districts: Research, Theories and Controversies Eds Morçöl G, Hoyt L, Meek J W, Zimmermann U, (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL) pp 139–158.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Gould-Ellen I, Schwartz A E, Voicu I, , 2007, “The impact of business improvement districts on property values: evidence from New York City†, WP 07–01, http://furmancenter.org/files/publications/ImpactofBIDcombined_000.pdf http://furmancenter.org/files/publications/ImpactofBIDcombined_000.pdf .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Greene F, , 2009, “Assessing the impact of policy interventions: the influence of evaluation methodology†Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27 216–229.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Grossman S A, , 2010, “Elements of public—private partnership management: examining the promise and performance criteria of business improvement districts†Journal of Town and City Management 1 148–163.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Hemphill L A, Berry J N, McGreal W S, , 2004, “An indicator-based approach to measuring sustainable urban regeneration performance: part 1, conceptual foundations and methodological framework†Urban Studies 41 725–755.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. HM Government, 2010 Local Growth White Paper: Realising Everyone's Potential (The Stationery Office, London).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Hoyt L, Gopal-Agge D, , 2007, “The business improvement district model: a balanced review of contemporary debates†Geography Compass 1 946–958.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Jones C, Watkins C, , 1996, “Urban regeneration and sustainable markets†Urban Studies 33 1129–1140.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Lawless P, , 2011, “Understanding the scale and nature of outcome change in area-regeneration programmes—evidence from the New Deal for Communities programme in England†Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29 520–532.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Leinberger C, , 2005 Turning around Downtown:12 Steps to Revitalisation (The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Levy P R, , 2003, “Introduction†, in Business Improvement Districts 2nd edition, Ed. Houstoun L O, (Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC) pp 1–8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Lloyd M G, McCarthy J, McGreal S, Berry J, , 2003, “Business improvement districts, planning and urban regeneration†International Planning Studies 8 295–321.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Local Government Act, 2003 Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 26, Part 4: Business Improvement Districts (The Stationery Office, London).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Loftman P, Nevin B, , 1995, “Prestige projects and urban regeneration in the 1980s and 1990s: a review of the benefits and limitations†Planning Practice and Research 10 299–315.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Mitchell J, , 1999, “Business improvement districts and innovative service delivery†, grant report for the PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government, Arlington, VA.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Mitchell J, , 2001, “Business improvement districts and the management of innovation†American Review of Public Administration 31 201–217.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. ODPM, 2004 Assessing the Impact of Spatial Interventions: Regeneration, Renewal and Regional Development. The 3R's Guidance. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. ODPM, 2006 State of the English Cities: Urban Research 21. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Parkinson M, Ball M, Blake N, Key T, , 2009, “The credit crunch and regeneration: impact and implications†, Department of Communities and Local Government, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Peel D, Lloyd G, , 2008, “Regenerating learning in the public realm: evidence based policy making and business improvement districts in the UK†Public Policy and Adminstration 23 189–205.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Pollicino M, Maddison D, , 2001, “Valuing the benefits of cleaning Lincoln Cathedral†Journal of Cultural Economics 25 131–148.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Portas M, , 2011 The Portas Review: An Independent Review into the Future of our High Streets. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. PwC, 2008 Unlocking City Growth Interim Findings on New Funding Mechanisms. PriceWaterhouseCooper, Manchester.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Spash C L, , 2008, “Contingent valuation design and data treatment: if you can't shoot the messenger, change the message†Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26 34–53.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Symes M, Steel M, , 2003, “Lessons from America: the role of business improvement districts as an agent of urban regeneration†Town Planning Review 74 301–313.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Treasury H M, , 1997 The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government Treasury Guidance (The Stationery Office, London).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Urban transformations and complex values: insights from Beirut. (2022). Pietrostefani, Elisabetta.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:113897.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Urban Transformations and Complex Values: Insights From Beirut. (2022). Pietrostefani, Elisabetta.
    In: Urban Planning.
    RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:7:y:2022:i:1:p:142-154.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Together or not? Spill-over effects of cultural goods displacement. (2021). Meleddu, Marta ; Brandano, Maria Giovanna.
    In: Tourism Economics.
    RePEc:sae:toueco:v:27:y:2021:i:6:p:1202-1220.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. ‘Quality food’ for cultural policies. Quality attributes in the non-market stated-preference based valuation of cultural goods. (2019). Wiśniewska, Aleksandra ; Winiewska, Aleksandra.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2019-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Quality attributes in the non-market stated-preference based valuation of cultural goods. (2019). Wiśniewska, Aleksandra ; Aleksandra, Winiewska.
    In: Central European Economic Journal.
    RePEc:vrs:ceuecj:v:6:y:2019:i:53:p:132-150:n:8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Willingness to Pay for Basic Research: A Contingent Valuation Experiment on the Large Hadron Collider. (2016). Catalano, Gelsomina ; Giffoni, Francesco.
    In: Departmental Working Papers.
    RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2016-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Drivers of heritage value: A meta-analysis of monetary valuation studies of cultural heritage. (2016). , William ; Eppink, Florian V.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:130:y:2016:i:c:p:277-284.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. A Financial Appraisal of Business Improvement Districts in the UK. (2014). .
    In: Environment and Planning C.
    RePEc:sae:envirc:v:32:y:2014:i:4:p:680-696.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Consumer preferences for cultural heritage and tourism e-sevices: A case study of three European cities. (2013). Wang, Jing ; Strielkowski, Wadim ; Platt, Stephen .
    In: Tržište/Market.
    RePEc:zag:market:v:25:y:2013:i:2:p:161-176.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Valuing Local Environmental Amenity with Discrete Choice Experiments: Spatial Scope Sensitivity and Heterogeneous Marginal Utility of Income. (2013). Provins, Allan ; Lanz, Bruno.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:56:y:2013:i:1:p:105-130.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Assessment of value in heritage regulation. (2013). Throsby, David .
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:14326_23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Assessing preferences for mega shopping centres: A conjoint measurement approach. (2011). Borgers, Aloys ; Vosters, Cindy.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:18:y:2011:i:4:p:322-332.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Valuing Local Environmental Amenity with Discrete Choice Experiments: Spatial Scope Sensitivity and Heterogeneous Marginal Utility of Income. (2011). Provins, Allan ; Lanz, Bruno.
    In: CEPE Working paper series.
    RePEc:cee:wpcepe:11-79.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Cultural heritage and creative cities: an economic evaluation perspective. (2009). Rouwendal, Jan ; Nijkamp, Peter ; Lazrak, F ; Rietveld, P.
    In: Serie Research Memoranda.
    RePEc:vua:wpaper:2009-36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. A Comparative Econometric Analysis of Museum Attendance by Locals and Foreigners: The Cases of Padua and Seville/Un análisis econométrico comparado de las asistencias a los museos por parte del púb. (2009). Cuccia, Tiziana.
    In: Estudios de Economía Aplicada.
    RePEc:lrk:eeaart:27_1_4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. A contingent ranking study on the preferences of tourists across seasons. (2008). Cuccia, Tiziana ; Tiziana, Cuccia.
    In: EBLA Working Papers.
    RePEc:uto:eblawp:200802.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Is cultural heritage really important for tourists? A contingent rating study. (2007). Cuccia, Tiziana ; Cellini, Roberto.
    In: Applied Economics.
    RePEc:taf:applec:v:39:y:2007:i:2:p:261-271.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Using Surveys to Compare the Public’s and Decisionmakers’ Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale. (2006). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.137.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Using Surveys to Compare the Publics and Decision-makers Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale. (2006). Riganti, Patrizia ; Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna.
    In: Sustainability Indicators and Environmental Valuation Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:feemsi:12221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Public Preferences for Land usesÂ’ changes - valuing urban regeneration projects at the Venice Arsenale. (2005). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa05p756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Employing Travel Time to Compare the Value of Competing Cultural Organizations. (2005). Rouwendal, Jan ; Wedel, Michel ; Boter, Jaap.
    In: Journal of Cultural Economics.
    RePEc:kap:jculte:v:29:y:2005:i:1:p:19-33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Valuing cultural heritage benefits to urban and regional development. (2004). Nijkamp, Peter ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa04p314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Employing Travel Costs to Compare the Use Value of Competing Cultural Organizations. (2004). Rouwendal, Jan ; Boter, Jaap ; Wedel, Michel .
    In: Serie Research Memoranda.
    RePEc:vua:wpaper:2004-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Irish Public Service Broadcasting - A Contingent Valuation Analysis. (2004). Delaney, Liam ; OToole, Francis.
    In: The Economic and Social Review.
    RePEc:eso:journl:v:35:y:2004:i:3:p:321-350.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-01 01:25:08 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.