- (θs − θM ) + RH,t θM The 2004 Survey of Consumer Finance Survey establishes θ2 ≈ .45. To estimate the consumption process predicted by this setup requires an estimate of θM . Estimating individual and aggregate human capital is a complex problem that is the focus of ongoing research (see Folloni and Vittadini [2010] for a review of the history and modern attempts at measurement). Jorgenson and Fraumeni [1989] estimates the stock of America’s human capital using school enrollment and demographic data. The paper finds human capital to be be about 92 percent of the total capital stock. However, this includes the value of non-market income (especially leisure) and so the numbers are not directly comparable to θM because that measure should only count resources convertible into durable and non-durable consumption. They estimate that the value of labor income only is about 18 percent of the total. This implies θM = .67.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Breeden Douglas T. An intertemporal asset pricing model with stochastic consumption and investment opportunities. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3):265–296, 9 1979. George Tauchen. Finite state markov-chain approximations to univariate and vector autoregressions.
- Christopher Goodman and Steven Mance. Employment loss and the 2007-09 recession: An overview.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Dale Jorgenson and Barbara M. Fraumeni. The Measurement of Saving, Investment, and Wealth, chapter The accumulation of human and nonhuman capital, 1948-84, pages 227 – 286. University of Chicago Press, 1989. URL http://www.nber.org/chapters/c8121.pdf.
Donald R. Haurin and H. Leroy Gill. The impact of transaction costs and the expected length of stay on homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics, 51(3):563–584, 5 2002.
Douglas Gollin. Getting income shares right. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2):pp. 458–474, April 2002. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/338747.
Edward Leamer. Housing is the business cycle. Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 149–233, 2007. URL http://www.kansascityfed.com/publicat/sympos/2007/ PDF/Leamer_0415.pdf.
Eric A. Hanushek and John M. Quigley. What is the price elasticity of housing demand? The review of economics and statistics, 62(3):pp. 449–454, Aug. 1980. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 1927113.
George G. Szpiro. Measuring risk aversion: An alternative approach. The review of economics and statistics, 68(1):156–159, Feb. 1986. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1924939.
George M. Constantinides. Habit formation: A resolution of the equity premium puzzle. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(3):519–543, Jun. 1990. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 2937698.
Giuseppe Folloni and Giorgio Vittadini. Human capital measurement: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(2):248–279, 2010.
Goulder Lawrence H. Tax policy, housing prices, and housing investment. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 19(2):281–304, 5 1989.
Hanno N. Lustig and Stijn G. Van Nieuwerburgh. Housing collateral, consumption insurance, and risk premia: An empirical perspective. The Journal of Finance, 60(3):1167–1219, Jun. 2005. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/3694924.
J. V. Henderson and Y. M. Ioannides. A model of housing tenure choice. The American Economic Review, 73(1):pp. 98–113, Mar. 1983. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1803929.
James Banks, Richard Blundell, and James P. Smith. Wealth portfolios in the uk and the us. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, August 2002. URL http://www.nber.org/ papers/w9128. Working Paper.
James Berkovec and Don Fullerton. A general equilibrium model of housing, taxes, and portfolio choice. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2):pp. 390–429, Apr. 1992. URL http://www.jstor. org/stable/2138612.
John Heaton and Deborah Lucas. Portfolio choice in the presence of background risk. The Economic Journal, 110(460):1–26, 2000.
Jos Van Ommeren and Michiel Van Leuvensteijn. New evidence of the effect of transaction costs on residential mobility*. Journal of Regional Science, 45(4):681–702, 2005.
Karen E. Dynan. Habit formation in consumer preferences: Evidence from panel data. The American Economic Review, 90(3):pp. 391–406, Jun. 2000. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 117335.
Larry G. Epstein and Stanley E. Zin. Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework. Econometrica, 57(4):937–969, Jul. 1989. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1913778.
Luigi Guiso, Tullio Jappelli, and Daniele Terlizzese. Income risk, borrowing constraints, and portfolio choice. The American Economic Review, 86(1):pp. 158–172, Mar. 1996. URL http://www.jstor. org/stable/2118260.
Marjorie Flavin and Shinobu Nakagawa. A model of housing in the presence of adjustment costs: A structural interpretation of habit persistence. American Economic Review, 98(1):474–495, March 2008. URL http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v98y2008i1p474-95.html.
Marjorie Flavin and Takashi Yamashita. Owner-occupied housing and the composition of the household portfolio. The American Economic Review, 92(1):345–362, Mar. 2002. URL http://www. jstor.org/stable/3083338.
Monika Piazzesi, Martin Schneider, and Selale Tuzel. Housing, consumption and asset pricing. Journal of Financial Economics, 83(3):531–569, 3 2007.
- Monthly Labor Review, 1:1–6, 2011.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Nicholas Kaldor. Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth. The Theory of Capital. St. Martin’s Press, 1961.
- Pc PHy2 So yes, it gives the expected results. We can safely work in price per square foot and then rely on gamma to convert them into the proper utility units. But since Flavin and Nakagawa (2008) finds that gamma is essentially 1 (1.015 page 491), this means that the true units are extremely close to square feet. We can work backwards from gamma estimates to get the units of housing that go into the utility function. γf2 γ?2 = ?2 f2 α ⇒ γf2 γ?2 1 α = 1.015 1 −6.7 = 0.9978 = ?2 f2 . Therefore the model fits the utility unit of housing such that gamma is 1 at .9978 the size of a square foot. There is minimal loss of precision to measure housing services in square-feet instead.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Peter Englund, Min Hwang, and John M. Quigley. Hedging housing risk*. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 24(1):167–200, 01/01 2002. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A: 1013942607458. M3: 10.1023/A:1013942607458.
Rajnish Mehra and Edward C. Prescott. The equity premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15(2):145–161, 3 1985.
Rajnish Mehra, Facundo Piguillem, and Edward C. Prescott. Costly financial intermediation in neoclassical growth theory. Quantitative Economics, 2(1):1–36, 2011.
Rajnish Mehra. Handbook of the equity risk premium. Elsevier, 2007. ISBN 0444508996.
Richard Roll. A critique of the asset pricing theory’s tests part i: On past and potential testability of the theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 4(2):129–176, 3 1977. URL http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304405X77900095.
Robert C. Merton. Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case. The review of economics and statistics, 51(3):247–257, Aug. 1969. URL http://www.jstor.org/ stable/1926560.
Robert E. Lucas. Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica, 46(6):1429–1445, Nov. 1978. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1913837.
Robert J. Barro. Rare disasters and asset markets in the twentieth century. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(3):823–866, August 01 2006.
Robert Topel and Sherwin Rosen. Housing investment in the united states. Journal of Political Economy, 96(4):pp. 718–740, Aug. 1988. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1830471.
Sanford J. Grossman and Guy Laroque. Asset pricing and optimal portfolio choice in the presence of illiquid durable consumption goods. Econometrica, 58(1):25–51, Jan. 1990a. URL http://www. jstor.org/stable/2938333.
- Sanford J. Grossman and Guy Laroque. Asset pricing and optimal portfolio choice in the presence of illiquid durable consumption goods. Econometrica, 58(1):25–51, Jan. 1990b. URL http://www. jstor.org/stable/2938333.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Steven C. Bourassa, Donald R. Haurin, Jessica L. Haurin, Martin Edward Ralph Hoesli, and Jian Sun. House price changes and idiosyncratic risk: The impact of property characteristics. Real Estate Economics, 37:259–278, 2009. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6229.2009. 00242.x. George M. Constantinides. Capital market equilibrium with transaction costs. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4):pp. 842–862, Aug. 1986. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1833205.
- Tamara G. Kolda, Robert Michael Lewis, and Virginia Torczon. Optimization by direct search: New perspectives on some classical and modern methods. SIAM Review, 45(3):pp. 385–482, Sep. 2003. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054427.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Thomas A. Rietz. The equity risk premium a solution. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1):117–131, 7 1988.
William Nelson Goetzmann. The single family home in the investment portfolio. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 6(3):201–222, 05/01 1993. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ BF01096958. M3: 10.1007/BF01096958.