[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
Decisional enhancement and autonomy: public attitudes towards overt and covert nudges. (2013). Felsen, Gidon ; Reiner, Peter B. ; Castelo, Noah .
In: Judgment and Decision Making.
RePEc:jdm:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:3:p:202-213.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 41

Citations received by this document

Cites: 48

References cited by this document

Cocites: 23

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Encouraging sustainable food consumption through nudges: An experiment with menu labels. (2024). Lotti, Lorenzo ; Buratto, Arianna.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:216:y:2024:i:c:s0921800923002872.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. When do people accept government paternalism? Theory and experimental evidence. (2023). Treger, Clareta.
    In: Regulation & Governance.
    RePEc:wly:reggov:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:195-214.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The role of autonomy and reactance for nudging — Experimentally comparing defaults to recommendations and mandates. (2023). Perino, Grischa ; Bruns, Hendrik.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:106:y:2023:i:c:s2214804323000733.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The impact on nudge acceptability judgements of framing and consultation of the targeted population. (2022). Jullien, Dorian ; Ribaillier, Arthur ; Rafai, Ismael.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03747844.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The impact on nudge acceptability judgements of framing and consultation of the targeted population. (2022). Jullien, Dorian ; Ribaillier, Arthur ; Rafai, Ismael.
    In: Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers).
    RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-03747844.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Opt-out policy and its improvements promote COVID-19 vaccinations. (2022). Zheng, Rui ; Li, Shu ; Zhao, Ning ; Liu, Xin.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:307:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622004269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. A review of nudges: Definitions, justifications, effectiveness. (2022). Moscati, Ivan ; Congiu, Luca.
    In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
    RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:36:y:2022:i:1:p:188-213.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The ethics of nudging: Using moral foundations theory to understand consumers approval of nudges. (2022). , Rafi.
    In: Journal of Consumer Affairs.
    RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:56:y:2022:i:2:p:703-742.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The impact on nudge acceptability judgments of framing and consultation of the targeted population. (2021). Jullien, Dorian ; Ribaillier, Arthur ; Rafai, Ismael.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03228638.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. The impact on nudge acceptability judgments of framing and consultation of the targeted population. (2021). Jullien, Dorian ; Ribaillier, Arthur ; Rafai, Ismael.
    In: Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers).
    RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-03228638.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The Impact on Acceptability Judgments about Nudges of Framing and Consultation with the Targeted Population. (2021). Rafaï, Ismaël ; Jullien, Dorian ; Ribaillier, Arthur.
    In: GREDEG Working Papers.
    RePEc:gre:wpaper:2021-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Public Acceptability of Policy Interventions to Reduce Sugary Drink Consumption in Urban Vietnam. (2021). de Steur, Hans ; Nguyen, Lan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13422-:d:694688.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Nudging users into digital service solutions. (2020). Benlian, Alexander ; Adam, Martin ; Klumpe, Johannes ; Schneider, David.
    In: Electronic Markets.
    RePEc:spr:elmark:v:30:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s12525-019-00373-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Which nudges do businesses like? Managers’ attitudes towards nudges directed at their business or at their customers. (2020). Feldman, Yuval ; Pe, Eyal ; Tikotsky, Ariel.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:170:y:2020:i:c:p:43-51.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Viewpoint: Effectiveness or consumer acceptance? Tradeoffs in selecting healthy eating nudges. (2019). Chandon, Pierre ; Cadario, Romain.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02508983.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Towards a Discourse-Based Understanding of Sustainability Education and Decision Making. (2019). Bottcher, Florian ; Meisert, Anke.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:5902-:d:279673.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Viewpoint: Effectiveness or consumer acceptance? Tradeoffs in selecting healthy eating nudges. (2019). Chandon, Pierre ; Cadario, Romain.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:85:y:2019:i:c:p:1-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. A worldwide consensus on nudging? Not quite, but almost. (2018). Rauber, Julius ; Reisch, Lucia A ; Sunstein, Cass R.
    In: Regulation & Governance.
    RePEc:wly:reggov:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:3-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. A Novel Sequential Mixed-method Technique for Contrastive Analysis of Unscripted Qualitative Data. (2018). .
    In: Sociological Methods & Research.
    RePEc:sae:somere:v:47:y:2018:i:3:p:532-548.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Can nudges be transparent and yet effective?. (2018). Bruns, Hendrik ; Rahali, Bilel ; Jonsson, Marijane Luistro ; Klement, Katharina ; Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:65:y:2018:i:c:p:41-59.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. The Marginal Cost of Transparency: Do honest nudges work?. (2017). , John ; John , .
    In: Economics, Finance and Accounting Department Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:may:mayecw:n289-17.pdf.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Viewpoint: Beyond carrots and sticks: Europeans support health nudges. (2017). Reisch, Lucia A ; Gwozdz, Wencke ; Sunstein, Cass R.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:69:y:2017:i:c:p:1-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Green nudges: Do they work? Are they ethical?. (2017). Schubert, Christian.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:132:y:2017:i:c:p:329-342.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Decision sciences and the new case for paternalism: three welfare-related justificatory challenges. (2016). Fumagalli, Roberto.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:47:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s00355-016-0972-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Public Acceptability in the UK and USA of Nudging to Reduce Obesity: The Example of Reducing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Consumption. (2016). Marteau, Theresa M ; Ng, Yin-Lam ; Couturier, Dominique-Laurent ; Hollands, Gareth J ; Petrescu, Dragos C.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0155995.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Fifty Shades of Manipulation. (2016). Sunstein, Cass.
    In: Journal of Marketing Behavior.
    RePEc:now:jnljmb:107.00000014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Green nudges: Do they work? Are they ethical?. (2016). Schubert, Christian.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:201609.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Do Europeans like nudges?. (2016). Reisch, Lucia A ; Sunstein, Cass R.
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:11:y:2016:i:4:p:310-325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. American attitudes toward nudges. (2016). Jung, Janice Y ; Mellers, Barbara A.
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:62-74.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The promise of asymmetric interventions for addressing risks to environmental systems. (2015). Arvai, Joseph ; Campbell-Arvai, Victoria.
    In: Environment Systems and Decisions.
    RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:35:y:2015:i:4:d:10.1007_s10669-015-9566-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. On the ethics of public nudging: Autonomy and Agency. (2015). Schubert, Christian.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:201533.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Redesigning Cockpits. (2014). Sunstein, Cass ; Reisch, Lucia .
    In: Journal of Consumer Policy.
    RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:37:y:2014:i:3:p:333-339.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. (2011). Behaviour Change - Second Report.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York: Harper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Blumenthal-Barby, J. S., & Burroughs, H. (2012). Seeking better health care outcomes: the ethics of using the “nudge.” The American Journal of Bioethics, 12, 1–10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Bovens, L. (2009). The ethics of nudge. In T. GrüneYanoff & S. O. Hansson (Eds.), Preference Change: Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 3, May 2013 Acceptability of conscious and subconscious influences 209 Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology (pp. 207–220). Berlin and New York: Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Branson, C., Duffy, B., Perry, C., & Wellings, D. (2011). Acceptable behaviour? Public opinion on behaviour change policy. Ipsos Social Research Institute.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Burstin, K., Doughtie, E. B., & Raphaeli, A. (1980). Contrastive vignette technique: An indirect methodology designed to address reactive social attitude measurement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 147– 165.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 1211–1254.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Castelo, N., Reiner, P. B., & Felsen, G. (2012). Balancing autonomy and decisional enhancement: An evidencebased approach. The American Journal of Bioethics, 12, 30–31.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Chang, J. B., Lusk, J. L., & Norwood, F. B. (2009). How closely do hypothetical surveys and laboratory experiments predict field behavior? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91, 518–534.

  10. Chapman, K., & Ogden, J. (2012). Nudging customers towards healthier choices: an intervention in the university canteen. Journal of Food Research, 1, 13–21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Christman, J. (1991). Autonomy and personal history. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 21, 1–24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  12. Downs, J. S., Loewenstein, G., & Wisdom, J. (2009). Strategies for promoting healthier food choices. American Economic Review, 99, 159–164.

  13. Duffy, S., & Verges, M. (2008). It matters a hole lot: Perceptual affordances of waste containers influence recycling compliance. Environment and Behavior, 41, 741–749.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Dworkin, G. (1976). Autonomy and behavior control. Hastings Center Report, 6, 23–28.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Dworkin, G. (1988). The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Farah, M. J., Illes, J., Cook-Deegan, R., Gardner, H., Kandel, E., King, P., Parens, E., Sahakian, B, & Wolpe, P. R. (2004). Neurocognitive enhancement: What can we do and what should we do? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 421–425.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Felsen, G., & Reiner, P. B. (2011). How the neuroscience of decision making informs our conception of autonomy. AJOB Neuroscience (Special issue: Free will and agency in neuroscience), 2, 3–14.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Frankfurt, H. (1971). Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. The Journal of Philosophy, 68, 5–20.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472–482.

  20. Harnack, L. J., & French, S. A. (2008). Effect of pointof -purchase calorie labeling on restaurant and cafeteria food choices: A review of the literature. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5, 51.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Hausman, D. M., & Welch, B. (2010). Debate: To nudge or not to nudge. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18, 123–136.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Hill, C. (2007). Anti-Anti-Anti-Paternalism. New York University Journal of Law and Liberty, 2, 444–454. House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Demographics of mechanical turk. Retrieved from http://www.ipeirotis.com/ wp-content/uploads/2012/02/CeDER-10-01.pdf. Accessed 8/13/2012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Jolls, C., Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. (1998). A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Review, 50, 1471–1550.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 3, May 2013 Acceptability of conscious and subconscious influences 211
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Marteau, T. M., Ogilvie, D., Roland, M., Suhrcke, M., & Kelly, M. P. (2011). Judging nudging: Can nudging improve population health? BMJ, 342, 263–265.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Mitchell, G. (2004). Libertarian paternalism is an oxymoron.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Nichols, A., & Maner, J. (2008). The Good-Subject Effect: Investigating Participant Demand Characteristics. The Journal of General Psychology, 135, 151–165.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913–923.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776–783.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.

  33. Pulos, E., & Leng, K. (2010). Evaluation of a voluntary menu-labeling program in full-service restaurants.

  34. Rachlinski, J. J. (2002). The uncertain psychological case for paternalism. Northwestern University Law Review, 97, 1165–1225.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  35. Roberto, C. A., Larsen, P. D., Agnew, H., Baik, J., & Brownell, K. D. (2010). Evaluating the impact of menu labeling on food choices and intake. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 312–318.

  36. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 3, May 2013 Acceptability of conscious and subconscious influences 210 debate? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645– 665.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672–695.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  39. Sugden, R. (1991). Rational choice: A survey of contributions from economics and philosophy. The Economic Journal, 101, 751–785.

  40. Sugden, R. (2008). Why incoherent preferences do not justify paternalism. Constitutional Political Economy, 19, 226–248.

  41. Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (2003). Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. University of Chicago Law Review, 70, 1159–1202.

  42. Tandon, P. S., Zhou, C., Chan, N. L., Lozano, P., Couch, S. C., Glanz, K., Krieger, J., & Saelens, B. E. (2011). The impact of menu labeling on fast-food purchases for children and parents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41, 434–438.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Taylor, J. (2005). Personal autonomy: New essays on personal autonomy and its role in contemporary moral philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Trout, J. D. (2005). Paternalism and cognitive bias. Law and Philosophy, 24, 393–434.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124– 1131.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. White, M. D. (2008). Behavioral law and economics: the assault on consent, will, and dignity. In G. Gaus, C. Favor, & J. Lamont (Eds.), Essays on philosophy, politics and economics: Integration and common research projects (pp. 201–224). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Wisdom, J., Downs, J. S., & Loewenstein, G. (2010). Promoting healthy choices: information versus convenience. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 164–178.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. RELEASING THE TRAP: A METHOD TO REDUCE INATTENTION BIAS IN SURVEY DATA WITH APPLICATION TO U.S. BEER TAXES. (2019). Lusk, Jayson ; Malone, Trey.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:57:y:2019:i:1:p:584-599.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The link between response time and preference, variance and processing heterogeneity in stated choice experiments. (2018). Olsen, Søren ; Campbell, Danny ; Morkbak, Morten Raun.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:88:y:2018:i:c:p:18-34.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Behavioral implications of providing real incentives in stated choice experiments. (2014). Olsen, Søren ; Mørkbak, Morten ; Campbell, Danny ; Morkbak, Morten Raun.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:45:y:2014:i:c:p:102-116.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Decisional enhancement and autonomy: public attitudes towards overt and covert nudges. (2013). Felsen, Gidon ; Reiner, Peter B. ; Castelo, Noah .
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:3:p:202-213.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Do experimental auction estimates pass the scope test?. (2013). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Loureiro, Maria ; Gracia, Azucena .
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:37:y:2013:i:c:p:7-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Suit the action to the word, the word to the action: Hypothetical choices and real decisions in Medicare Part D. (2013). Winter, Joachim ; McFadden, Daniel ; Kesternich, Iris ; Heiss, Florian.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:32:y:2013:i:6:p:1313-1324.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. MOVING FORWARD BY LOOKING BACK: COMPARING LABORATORY RESULTS WITH EX ANTE MARKET DATA. (2013). Krause, Kate ; Chermak, Janie ; Brookshire, David ; BURNESS, STU H..
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:51:y:2013:i:1:p:1035-1049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The Comparison of three Non-hypothetical Valuation Methods: Choice Experiments, Contingent Valuation, and Experimental Auction. (2013). Gao, Zhifeng ; Xie, Jing.
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, February 2-5, 2013, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:saea13:143103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. A Nonhypothetical Ranking and Auction Mechanism for Novel Products. (2013). Palma, Marco ; Ishdorj, Ariun ; Hall, Charles R. ; McAdams, Callie P..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:ags:joaaec:143658.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Purchase Intention Effects in Experimental Auctions and Real Choice Experiments. (2013). Gao, Zhifeng ; House, Lisa ; Xie, Jing.
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:151595.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Sources of Hypothetical Bias in Public Goods Experiments: A Disaggregated Approach. (2013). Uchida, Emi ; Swallow, Stephen ; Santos, Julie I. ; Anderson, Christopher .
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:150389.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Do ‘locally grown’ claims influence artisanal food purchase? Evidence from a natural field experiment.. (2013). Menapace, Luisa ; Raffaelli, Roberta .
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:150282.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Suit the action to the word, the word to the action: Hypothetical choices and real decisions in Medicare Part D. (2012). Winter, Joachim ; McFadden, Daniel ; Kesternich, Iris ; Heiss, Florian.
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:lmu:muenec:14124.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Effectiveness of cigarette tax in Japan. (2012). Kamimura, Kazuki .
    In: Keio/Kyoto Joint Global COE Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:kei:dpaper:2011-035.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Willingness to pay for environmental attributes of non-food agricultural products: a real choice experiment. (2012). Joly, Iragaël ; Michaud, C. ; Llerena, D..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gbl:wpaper:201201.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Eliciting donor preferences. (2012). Alfnes, Frode ; Wik, Mette ; Bachke, Maren .
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00098.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. A Comparison Of Choice Experiments And Actual Grocery Store Behavior: An Empirical Application To Seafood Products. (2012). Hudson, Darren ; Gallardo, R. Karina ; Hanson, Terrill .
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:ags:joaaec:120453.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The Combination of Lab and Field Experiments for Benefit-Cost Analysis. (2011). Roosen, Jutta ; marette, stéphan ; Blanchemanche, Sandrine.
    In: Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis.
    RePEc:bpj:jbcacn:v:2:y:2011:i:3:n:2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Can Stated Preference Methods Accurately Predict Responses to Environmental Policies? The Case of a Plastic Bag Regulation in China. (2010). He, Haoran.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0444.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. THE ROLE OF PRODUCTION METHODS IN FRUIT PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR: HYPOTHETICAL VS ACTUAL CONSUMERS’ PREFERENCES AND STATED MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. (2010). Moser, Riccarda ; Notaro, Sandra ; Raffaelli, Roberta .
    In: 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
    RePEc:ags:eaa115:116426.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. A Cost-Benefit Framework for the Assessment of Non-Tariff Measures in Agro-Food Trade. (2009). van Tongeren, Frank ; marette, stéphan ; Beghin, John.
    In: Staff General Research Papers Archive.
    RePEc:isu:genres:13146.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Design of stated preference surveys: Is there more to learn from behavioral economics?. (2009). Carlsson, Fredrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0418.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. A comparison of hypothetical survey rankings with consumer shopping behavior and product knowledge. (). Menapace, Luisa ; Grebitus, Carola ; Colson, Gregory.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:ags:joaaec:120448.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-26 17:17:52 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.