[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
Delegated Decision-Making in Finance. (2019). Wengström, Erik ; Holmen, Martin ; Stefan, Matthias ; Kirchler, Michael ; Holzmeister, Felix ; Wengstrom, Erik.
In: Working Papers.
RePEc:inn:wpaper:2019-21.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 4

Citations received by this document

Cites: 72

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Investment preferences and risk perception: Financial agents versus clients. (2023). Trautmann, Stefan T ; Konig-Kersting, Christian ; Kling, Luisa.
    In: Journal of Banking & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:154:y:2023:i:c:s0378426622000887.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. You can’t always get what you want—An experiment on finance professionals decisions for others. (2022). Wengstrom, Erik ; Kirchler, Michael ; Holzmeister, Felix ; Holmen, Martin ; Stefan, Matthias.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2022-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Risk-taking on behalf of others. (2020). Kvaløy, Ola ; Luzuriaga, Miguel ; Eriksen, Kristoffer W.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance.
    RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:26:y:2020:i:c:s221463502030023x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Investment Preferences and Risk Perception: Financial Agents versus Clients. (2019). Trautmann, Stefan T ; Konig-Kersting, Christian ; Kling, Luisa.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0674.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abdellaoui, M., Baillon, A., Placido, L., & Wakker, P. P. (2011). The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. American Economic Review, 101(2), 695–723.

  2. Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & Kammoun, H. (2013). Do �nancial professionals behave according to prospect theory? An experimental study. Theory and Decision, 74(3), 411–429.

  3. Alevy, J. E., Haigh, M. S., & List, J. A. (2007). Information cascades: Evidence from a �eld experiment with �nancial market professionals. Journal of Finance, 62(1), 151–180.

  4. Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J.-R., & Wengström, E. (2016). Deciding for others reduces loss aversion. Management Science, 62(1), 29–36.

  5. Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J.-R., & Wengström, E. (2019). Risking other people’s money: Experimental evidence on bonus schemes, competition, and altruism. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, online �rst, 1–27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Böhm, M., Metzger, D., & Strömberg, P. (2018). Since you are so rich, you must be really smart: Talent and the �nance wage premium. Riksbank Research Paper Series No. 137.

  7. Banks, J., Carvalho, L., & Perez-Arce, F. (2018). Education, decision-making, and economic rationality. Review of Economics and Statistics, 101(3), 428–441.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Bartling, B., & Fischbacher, U. (2012). Shifting the blame: On delegation and responsibility. Review of Economic Studies, 79(1), 67–87.

  9. Bebchuk, L., & Spamann, H. (2010). Regulating bankers’ pay. Georgetown Law Journal, 98(2), 247–287.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Bolton, G., & Ockenfels, A. (2010). Betrayal aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States: Comment. American Economic Review, 100(1), 628–633.

  11. Calcagno, R., & Monticone, C. (2015). Financial literacy and the demand for �nancial advice. Journal of Banking and Finance, 50, 363–380.

  12. Carhart, M. M. (1997). On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82.

  13. Chakravarty, S., Harrison, G., Haruvy, E., & Rutström, E. (2011). Are you risk averse over other peoples’ money? Southern Economic Journal, 77(4), 901–913.

  14. Chang, T., Solomon, D., & Wester�eld, M. (2016). Looking for someone to blame: Delegation, cognitive dissonance, and the disposition e�ect. The Journal of Finance, 71(1), 267–302.

  15. Chen, D. L., Schonger, M., & Wickens, C. (2016). oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and �eld experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 88–97.

  16. Cipriani, M., & Guarino, A. (2009). Herd behavior in �nancial markets: An experiment with �nancial market professionals. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(1), 206–233.

  17. Collins, J. M. (2012). Financial advice: A substitute for �nancial literacy? Financial Services Review, 21(4), 307–322.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  18. D’Acunto, F., Prabhala, N., & Rossi, A. (2019). The promises and pitfalls of robo-advising. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1983–2020.

  19. Dewatripont, M., & Freixas, X. (2012). Bank resolution: Lessons from the crisis. In M. Dewatripont & X. Freixas (Eds.), The crisis aftermath: New regulatory paradigms. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Diamond, D. W., & Rajan, R. G. (2009). The credit crisis: Conjectures about causes and remedies. American Economic Review, 99(2), 606–610.

  21. Dietvorst, B., Simmons, J., & Massey, C. (2014). Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 114–126.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  22. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Hu�man, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522–550.

  23. Dulleck, U., & Kerschbamer, R. (2006). On doctors, mechanics, and computer specialists: The economics of credence goods. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(1), 5–42.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Echenique, F., Lee, S., & Shum, M. (2011). The Money Pump as a measure of revealed preference violations.

  25. Edin, P., & Fredriksson, P. (2000). LINDA: Longitudinell individual data for Sweden. Working Paper.

  26. Eriksen, K., & Kvaløy, O. (2010). Myopic investment management. Review of Finance, 14(3), 521–542.

  27. Eriksen, K., Kvaløy, O., & Luzuriaga, M. (2017). Risk-taking on behalf of others. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 6378.

  28. Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Hu�man, D., & Sunde, U. (2018). Global evidence on economic preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(4), 1645–1692.

  29. Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Hu�man, D., & Sunde, U. (2016). The Preference Survey Module: A validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences. IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 9674.

  30. Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. (2011). The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report: Final report of the National Commission on the causes of the �nancial and economic crisis in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing O�ce.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Foerster, S., Linnaimaa, J. T., Melzer, B. T., & Previtero, A. (2017). Retail �nancial advice: Does one size �t all? Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1441–1482.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Following Banks et al. (2018), we use the di�erence between the maximum expected return of a portfolio that provides the same minimum payo� as the chosen portfolio and the expected return of the chosen T ails Heads h⇤ j t⇤ j 45 Line xi,j Ti,j Hi,j x0 i,j T 0 i,j = Hi,j H0 i,j > Ti,j Figure C1: Violation of the principle of �rst order stochastic dominance (FOSD). The chosen portfolio xi,j is �rst order stochastically dominated by the alternative portfolio xÕ i,j because TÕ i,j = Hi,j and HÕ i,j > Ti,j.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive re�ection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25– 42.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  34. French, K. R. (2008). Presidential Address: The cost of active investing. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1537– 1573.

  35. Gennaioli, N., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2015). Money doctors. Journal of Finance, 70(1), 91–114.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Gruber, M. J. (1996). Another puzzle: The growth in actively managed mutual funds. The Journal of Finance, 51(3), 783–810.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2004). The role of social capital in �nancial development. American Economic Review, 94(3), 526–556.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Trusting the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2557– 2600.

  39. Hackethal, A., Haliassos, M., & Jappelli, T. (2012). Financial advisors: A case of babysitters? Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(2), 509–524.

  40. Hadar, J., & Russell, W. (1969). Rules for ordering uncertain prospects. American Economic Review, 59(1), 25–34.

  41. Haigh, M. S., & List, J. A. (2005). Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. Journal of Finance, 60(1), 523–534.

  42. Harvey, C., Rattray, S., Sinclair, A., & Van Hemert, O. (2017). Man vs. machine: Comparing discretionary and systematic hedge fund performance. Journal of Portfolio Management, 43(4), 55–69.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  43. Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive E�ects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.

  44. Holzmeister, F., Huber, J., Kirchler, M., Lindner, F., Weitzel, U., & Zeisberger, S. (2019). What drives risk perception? A global survey with �nancial professionals and lay people. Management Science, forthcoming.

  45. Ifcher, J., & Zarghamee, H. (2019). Behavioral economic phenomena in decision-making for others. Journal of Economic Psychology, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  46. Inderst, R., & Ottaviani, M. (2012a). Competition through commissions and kickbacks. American Economic Review, 102(2), 780–809.

  47. Inderst, R., & Ottaviani, M. (2012b). Financial advice. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(2), 494–512.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Inderst, R., & Ottaviani, M. (2012c). How (not) to pay for advice: A framework for consumer �nancial protection. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(2), 393–411.

  49. Jensen, M. C. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. The Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389–416.

  50. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the �rm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

  51. Kaustia, M., Alho, E., & Puttonen, V. (2008). How much does expertise reduce behavioral biases? The case of anchoring e�ects in stock return estimates. Financial Management, 37(3), 391–412.

  52. Kirchler, M., Lindner, F., & Weitzel, U. (2018a). Delegated decision making and social competition in the �nance industry. Working Papers in Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Kirchler, M., Lindner, F., & Weitzel, U. (2018b). Rankings and risk-taking in the �nance industry. Journal of Finance, 73(5), 2271–2302.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  54. Kling, L., König-Kersting, C., & Trautmann, S. T. (2019). Investment preferences and risk perception: Financial agents versus clients. AWI Discussion Paper Series No. 674.

  55. Lachance, M.-E., & Tang, N. (2012). Financial advice and trust. Financial Services Review, 21(3), 209–226.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Linnainmaa, J. T., Melzer, B., & Previtero, A. (2019). The misguided beliefs of �nancial advisors. The Journal of Finance, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Logg, J., Minson, J., & Moore, D. (2017). Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 90–103.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Longoni, C., Bonezzi, A., & Morewedge, C. K. (2019). Resistance to medical arti�cial intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(4), 629–650.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Mullainathan, S., Noeth, M., & Schoar, A. (2012). The market for �nancial advice: An audit study. NBER Working Paper No. 17929.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  60. Personality and Individual Di�erences, 11(10), 1037–1044. Appendices Delegated Decision-Making in Finance Felix Holzmeister† Martin Holmén‡,ú Michael Kirchler†,‡ Matthias Stefan† Erik Wengström, † University of Innsbruck, Department of Banking and Finance ‡ University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics, Centre for Finance Lund University, Department of Economics Hanken School of Economics, Department of Finance and Economics ú

  61. Rajan, R. G. (2006). Has �nance made the world riskier? European Financial Management, 12(4), 499–533.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  62. Rud, O. A., Rabanal, J. P., & Horowitz, J. (2018). Does competition aggravate moral hazard? A multiprincipal -agent experiment. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 33, 115–121.

  63. Schwaiger, R., Kirchler, M., Lindner, F., & Weitzel, U. (2019). Determinants of investor expectations and satisfaction: A study with �nancial professionals. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  64. Shefrin, H. (2007). Beyond greed and fear: Understanding behavioral �nance and the psychology of investing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  65. Sutter, M. (2009). Individual behavior and group membership: Comment. American Economic Review, 99(5), 2247–2257.

  66. The numeracy task is based on the Rasch-validated inventory proposed by Weller et al. (2013). Two of the eight questions in the original set are well-known items from the Cognitive Re�ection Test (CRT) introduced by Frederick (2005). Since this three-item test has been widely spread on the Internet, many people will know the questions and the corresponding answers. Therefore, the two items on cognitive re�ection skills have been replaced by items from the CRT proposed by Toplak et al. (2014). For answering the eight questions, participants faced a time constraint of four minutes. Since the items, by construction of the test, di�er considerably in di�culty, the order of the questions has been randomized to avoid systematic e�ects arising from the time constraint. The questions used in the numeracy task are listed in Table D2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Re�ection Test. Thinking and Reasoning, 20(2), 147–168.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  68. van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A., & Alessie, R. (2011). Financial literacy and stock market participation. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2), 449–472.

  69. Vieider, F. M., Villegas-Palacio, C., Martinsson, P., & Mejía, M. (2016). Risk taking for oneself and others: A structural model approach. Economic Inquiry, 54(2), 879–894.

  70. Weitzel, U., Huber, C., Huber, J., Kirchler, M., Lindner, F., & Rose, J. (2019). Bubbles and �nancial professionals. Review of Financial Studies, forthcoming.

  71. Weller, J. A., Dieckmann, N. F., Tusler, M., Mertz, C. K., Burns, W. J., & Peters, E. (2013). Development and testing of an abbreviated numeracy scale: A Rasch analysis approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(2), 198–212.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Wilson, G., Gray, J., & Barrett, P. (1990). A factor analysis of the Gray-Wilson personality questionnaire.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Incoherent Preferences. (2021). Charles-Cadogan, G.
    In: CRETA Online Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:wrk:wcreta:69.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. A Tale of Two Tails: On the Coexistence of Overweighting and Underweighting of Rare Extreme Events. (2017). Epper, Thomas ; Fehr-Duda, Helga.
    In: Economics Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:usg:econwp:2017:05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. No Two Experiments are Identical. (2017). Halevy, Yoram ; Epstein, Larry.
    In: Microeconomics.ca working papers.
    RePEc:ubc:pmicro:yoram_halevy-2014-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Certainty Preference, Random Choice, and Loss Aversion: A Comment on Violence and Risk Preference: Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan. (2016). Vieider, Ferdinand.
    In: Economics & Management Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rdg:emxxdp:em-dp2016-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Ellsberg re-revisited: An experiment disentangling model uncertainty and risk aversion. (2016). Bosetti, Valentina ; Berger, Loïc.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:igi:igierp:576.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. PROBABILISTIC SOPHISTICATION, SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY, AND COGNITIVE ABILITY: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE. (2016). Almeida, Sergio ; Rangel, Marcos .
    In: Anais do XLII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 42nd Brazilian Economics Meeting].
    RePEc:anp:en2014:131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Is Prelec’s function discontinuous at p = 1? (for the Einhorn Award of SJDM). (2015). .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:64672.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Within- versus between-country differences in risk attitudes: implications for cultural comparisons. (2015). Vieider, Ferdinand ; Martinsson, Peter ; Chmura, Thorsten ; Thompson, Frauke Mattison ; Sunday, Adewara ; Fisher, Tyler ; Kusakawa, Takao .
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:78:y:2015:i:2:p:209-218.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Model Uncertainty. (2015). Marinacci, Massimo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:igi:igierp:553.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. A behavioral experiment on inventory management with supply chain disruption. (2015). Sarkar, Sourish ; Kumar, Sanjay.
    In: International Journal of Production Economics.
    RePEc:eee:proeco:v:169:y:2015:i:c:p:169-178.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Benevolent and Malevolent Ellsberg Games. (2015). Dürsch, Peter ; Dominiak, Adam ; Duersch, Peter.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0592.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Quantum decision making by social agents. (2015). Sornette, D. ; Yukalov, V. I..
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1202.4918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Measuring Ambiguity Preferences. (2014). Schroder, David ; Cavatorta, Elisa .
    In: Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc14:100593.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Sadder but wiser: The Effects of Affective States and Weather on Ambiguity Attitudes. (2014). Koellinger, Philipp ; Aurélien Baillon, ; Treffers, Theresa .
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20140044.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Risk behavior for gain, loss, and mixed prospects. (2014). Brooks, Peter ; Peters, Simon ; Zank, Horst.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:77:y:2014:i:2:p:153-182.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The explanatory and predictive power of non two-stage-probability theories of decision making under ambiguity. (2014). Pace, Noemi ; Hey, John.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:49:y:2014:i:1:p:1-29.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. An experimental test of prospect theory for predicting choice under ambiguity. (2014). Wakker, Peter ; Spinu, Vitalie ; Kothiyal, Amit.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:48:y:2014:i:1:p:1-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Willingness to Pay for Voluntary Climate Action and Its Determinants: Field-Experimental Evidence. (2014). Goeschl, Timo ; Diederich, Johannes.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:57:y:2014:i:3:p:405-429.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Behavioral determinants of home bias - theory and experiment. (2014). Dlugosch, Dennis ; Wang, Mei ; Horn, Kristian .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2014-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Insensitivity to Prices in a Dictator Game. (2014). Mishagina, Natalia ; Engle-Warnick, Jim.
    In: CIRANO Working Papers.
    RePEc:cir:cirwor:2014s-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Comparing Decisions under Compound Risk and Ambiguity: The Importance of Cognitive Skills. (2014). Prokosheva, Sasha .
    In: CERGE-EI Working Papers.
    RePEc:cer:papers:wp525.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. A Test of Mechanical Ambiguity. (2014). Oechssler, Jörg ; Roomets, Alex .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0555.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Manipulating decision making of typical agents. (2014). Sornette, D. ; Yukalov, V. I..
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1409.0636.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Farmers Climate Change Risk Perceptions: An Application of the Exchangeability Method. (2014). Menapace, Luisa ; Colson, Gregory ; Raffaell, Roberta .
    In: 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
    RePEc:ags:eaae14:183086.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Risk preferences and development revisited: A field experiment in Vietnam. (2013). Martinsson, Peter ; Vieider, Ferdinand M. ; Nam, Pham Khanh ; Truong, Nghi .
    In: Discussion Papers, WZB Junior Research Group Risk and Development.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbrad:spii2013403.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Variation in risk seeking behavior following large losses: A natural experiment. (2013). Torgler, Benno ; Savage, David ; Page, Lionel.
    In: QuBE Working Papers.
    RePEc:qut:qubewp:wp007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. On the impossibility of insider trade in rational expectations equilibria. (2013). Zimper, Alexander.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pre:wpaper:201379.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The impact of statistical learning on violations of the sure-thing principle. (2013). Zimper, Alexander ; Romm, Aylit ; Nicholls, Nicky .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pre:wpaper:201364.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. To Give or Not to Give: The Price of Contributing and the Provision of Public Goods. (2013). Goeschl, Timo ; Diederich, Johannes.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19332.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Ambiguity Aversion and Household Portfolio Choice: Empirical Evidence. (2013). Mitchell, Olivia ; Kouwenberg, Roy ; Dimmock, Stephen ; Peijnenburg, Kim.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:18743.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. A Life-Cycle Model with Ambiguous Survival Beliefs. (2013). Zimper, Alexander ; Ludwig, Alexander ; Groneck, Max.
    In: MEA discussion paper series.
    RePEc:mea:meawpa:201305.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Buying and Selling Risk - An Experiment Investigating Evaluation Asymmetries. (2013). Ploner, Matteo ; Güth, Werner ; Soraperra, Ivan ; Guth, Werner ; WERNER GÜTH, .
    In: Jena Economic Research Papers.
    RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2013-047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The Impact of Political Uncertainty: A Robust Control Approach. (2013). Svec, Justin ; Baumann, Robert.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hcx:wpaper:1306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Prospect Theory for joint time and money consequences in risk and ambiguity. (2013). Kemel, Emmanuel ; Paraschiv, Corina.
    In: Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.
    RePEc:eee:transb:v:56:y:2013:i:c:p:81-95.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Risk attitudes, development, and growth: Macroeconomic evidence from experiments in 30 countries. (2012). Martinsson, Peter ; Chmura, Thorsten.
    In: Discussion Papers, WZB Junior Research Group Risk and Development.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbrad:spii2012401.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Risk Aversion and Religion. (2012). Vellekoop, Nathanaël ; Trautmann, Stefan ; Noussair, Charles ; Kuilen, Gijs ; van de Kuilen, G..
    In: Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:tiu:tiucen:b611b08c-0053-41df-82aa-c3724036c8ae.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Social risk and ambiguity in the trust game. (2012). Weitzel, Utz ; Vyrastekova, Jana ; Fairley, Kim ; Sanfey, Alan .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:42302.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The price for information about probabilities and its relation with risk and ambiguity. (2012). Montesano, Aldo ; Attanasi, Giuseppe.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:73:y:2012:i:1:p:125-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. How much ambiguity aversion?. (2012). Stewart, Lisa ; Binmore, Ken ; Voorhoeve, Alex.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:45:y:2012:i:3:p:215-238.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Aggregating imprecise or conflicting beliefs: An experimental investigation using modern ambiguity theories. (2012). Wakker, Peter ; Baillon, Aurelien ; Cabantous, Laure.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:44:y:2012:i:2:p:115-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Variation in Risk Seeking Behavior in a Natural Experiment on Large Losses Induced by a Natural Disaster. (2012). Torgler, Benno ; Savage, David ; Page, Lionel.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2012.54.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Moderate stake variations for risk and uncertainty, gains and losses: Methodological implications for comparative studies. (2012). Vieider, Ferdinand M..
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:117:y:2012:i:3:p:718-721.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Are Groups more Rational than Individuals? A Review of Interactive Decision Making in Groups. (2012). Kocher, Martin ; Kausel, Edgar ; Kugler, Tamar .
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_3701.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Do monetary incentives and chained questions affect the validity of risk estimates elicited via the Exchangeability Method? An experimental investigation. (2012). Shaw, W. ; Cerroni, Simone ; Notaro, Sandra.
    In: 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil.
    RePEc:ags:iaae12:125468.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Do Monetary Incentives and Chained Questions Affect the Validity of Risk Estimates Elicited via the Exchangeability Method? An Experimental Investigation. (2011). Shaw, W. ; Cerroni, Simone ; Notaro, Sandra.
    In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:trn:utwpde:1110.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. The midweight method to measure attitudes towards risk and ambiguity. (2011). Wakker, Peter ; Kuilen, Gijs ; van de Kuilen, G..
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:c58a6884-24cc-4cab-ae2f-a9db08d02d03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Reference dependent ambiguity aversion: theory and experiment. (2011). Weitzel, Utz ; Qiu, Jianying .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:35289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Is imprecise knowledge better than conflicting expertise? Evidence from insurers’ decisions in the United States. (2011). Michel-Kerjan, Erwann ; Cabantous, Laure ; Kunreuther, Howard ; Hilton, Denis.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:42:y:2011:i:3:p:211-232.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Willingness to Pay for Individual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions: Evidence from a Large Field Experiment. (2011). Goeschl, Timo ; Diederich, Johannes.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0517.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. The Explanatory and Predictive Power of Non Two-Stage-Probability Theories of Decision Making Under Ambiguity. (). Pace, Noemi ; Hey, John.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:yor:yorken:11/22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-20 03:41:12 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.