[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
Mitigating Hypothetical Bias in Value of Time Studies: Lab-Experiment Results. (2010). Hultkrantz, Lars ; Shengcong, Xue .
In: Working Papers.
RePEc:hhs:oruesi:2009_014.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 31

References cited by this document

Cocites: 30

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Willingness to accept commuting time within the household: stated preference evidence. (2016). Swardh, Jan-Erik ; Algers, Staffan.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:43:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11116-014-9573-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Akter, S., Bennet J., Akhter S., 2008, Preference uncertainty in contingent valuation. Ecological Economics 67:345-351.

  2. Börjesson, M. , 2010, Swedish Values of Travel Time and their application in appraisal. Centre of Transport Studies, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Becker, S.G., 1965, A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal 75, 493-517.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  4. Blomquist G.C., Blumenschein K., Johannesson M., 2009, Eliciting willingness to pay without bias using follow-up certainty statements: comparisons between probably/definitely and a 10-point certainty scale. Environmental and Resource Economics 43:473-502.

  5. Blumenschein K., Johannesson M., Blomquist G.C., Liljas B., O’Conor R.M. , 1998, Experimental results on expressed certainty and hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Southern Economic Journal 65:169-177.2.

  6. Blumenschein, K., G. C. Blomquist, Magnus Johannesson, Nancy Horn and Patricia Freeman, 2008), Eliciting willingness to pay without bias: evidence from a field experiment. The Economic Journal 118 (January), 114–137.

  7. Brownstone, D. and K. A. Small, 2005, Valuing time and reliability: assessing the evidence from road pricing demonstrations. Transportation Research Part A 39,279–293.

  8. Cameron, T.A. "A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-Market Goods using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression, 1988," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15. 355-379.

  9. Champ, P. A. and R. C. Bishop , 2001), Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias. Environmental and Resource Economics 19(4), 383-402.

  10. Cummings, R. , Taylor,L.O., 1999, Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method. American Economic Review, 89(3), 649-665.

  11. deSerpa, A.C., 1971, A theory of the economics of time. Economic Journal 81, 828-845.

  12. Fosgerau, M., 2007, Using nonparametrics to specify a model to measure the value of travel time. Transportation Research Part A, 41, 842-856.

  13. Gaudry, M., S.R. Jara-Diaz, and J. De D. Ortúzar, 1989, Value of Time Sensitivity to Model Specification. Transportation Research 23B, 151-58.

  14. Harrison, G.W. and E Ruthström, 2008, Experimental evidence on the existence of hypothetical bias in value elicitation methods. In Plott, C. and V.L. Smith (eds). Handbook of experimental economics results. Elsevier Science, New York.

  15. Harrison, G.W., 2006, Experimental Evidence on Alternative Environmental Valuation Methods. Environmental and Resource Economics 34, 125-62.

  16. Hedemark Lundhede, T., Olsen, S.B., Jacobsen, J.B., and Jellesmark thorsen, B., 2009, Handling respondent uncertainty in Choice Experiments: Evaluating recoding approaches against explicit modeling of undertainty. Journal of Choice Modelling, 2(2), 118-147.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Hensher, D. A., 2009, Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay. Forthcoming, Special Issue of Transportation Research B.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  18. Hultkrantz L., and R. Mortazavi, 2001, Anomalies in the Value of Travel-Time Change. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 35, Part 2, 285-300.

  19. Hultkrantz, L., C. Li, and G.Lindberg, 1996, ‘Some Problems in the Consumer Preference Approach to Multimodal Transport Planning’. Presented at the conference Transport and Environment, FEEM, Venice, November 9-10, 1995. CTS Working Paper 1996:5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Hultkrantz, L., G.Lindberg, and C. Andersson, 2006), The value of improved road safety. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 32, 151-170.

  21. Isacsson, G, 2008, The trade off between time and money: Is there a difference between real and hypothetical choices? Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute Transport Economics Research Unit (available at the Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics web site).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  22. Jara-Diaz, S.R, and J. Videla, 1989, Detection of Income Effect in Mode Choice. Transportation Research23B, 393-400.

  23. Johannesson M, Blomquist GC, Blumenschein K, Johansson P-O, Liljas B, O’Conor RM., 1999, Calibrating hypothetical willingness to pay responses. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 18:21-3 Kagel, J. H..Roth, A.E., 1995, The handbook of experimental economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  24. Johannesson M, Liljas B, Johansson P-O, 1998, An experimental comparison of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisions. Applied Economics 1998;30:643647.

  25. List, J. A. and C. A. Gallet, 2001, What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?. Environmental and Resource Economics 20(3), 241-254.

  26. List, J. A. and J.F. Shogren ,1998, Calibration of the difference between actual and hypothetical valuations in a field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 37, 193-205 Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher and J. D. Swait, 2002, Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  27. McFadden, D. and K. Train, 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15(5), 447-70.

  28. McFadden, D., 1974, The Measurement of Urban Travel Demand. Journal of Public Economics 3, 303-28.

  29. Sund, B., 2009, Certainty calibration in contingent valuation - exploring the within-difference between dichotomous choice and open-ended answers as a certainty measure. Örebro University, Dept of Economics Working Paper 2009:1.

  30. Svensson, M. , 2009, The Value of a Statistical Life in Sweden Estimates from Two Studies using the “Certainty Approach” Calibration, Accident Analysis and Prevention, forthcoming.

  31. Swärdh, Jan-Erik ,2009, Hypothetical bias and certainty calibration in a value of time experiment. Örebro University, dissertation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Equilibrium investment with random risk aversion. (2023). Steffensen, Mogens ; Desmettre, Sascha.
    In: Mathematical Finance.
    RePEc:bla:mathfi:v:33:y:2023:i:3:p:946-975.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Public support for community microgrid services. (2022). Kaczmarski, Jesse I.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:115:y:2022:i:c:s014098832200473x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Mitigating hypothetical bias in willingness to pay studies: post-estimation uncertainty and anchoring on irrelevant information. (2019). Bobinac, Ana.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:20:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10198-018-0983-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Factors Explaining the Hypothetical Bias: How to Improve Models for Meta-analyses. (2019). Tamini, Lota ; Doyon, Maurice ; Bergeron, Stephane ; Atozou, Baoubadi.
    In: CIRANO Working Papers.
    RePEc:cir:cirwor:2019s-30.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Is ‘referencing’ a remedy to hypothetical bias in value of time elicitation? Evidence from economic experiments. (2018). Hultkrantz, Lars ; Savsin, Selen.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:45:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s11116-017-9803-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Respondent Uncertainty and Ordering Effect on Willingness to Pay for Salt Marsh Conservation in the Brest Roadstead (France). (2017). Voltaire, Louinord ; Donfouet, Hermann ; Larzilliere, Agathe ; Pirrone, Claudio ; Pierre, Hermann Pythagore.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:137:y:2017:i:c:p:47-55.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Waiting or acting now? The effect on willingness-to-pay of delivering inherent uncertainty information in choice experiments. (2017). Torres Figuerola, Catalina M. ; Font, Antoni Riera ; Faccioli, Michela .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:131:y:2017:i:c:p:231-240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Uncertainty of Monetary Valued Ecosystem Services – Value Transfer Functions for Global Mapping. (2016). Seppelt, Ralf ; Manceur, Ameur M ; Schmidt, Stefan.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0148524.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Decision uncertainty in multi-attribute stated preference studies. (2016). Hofkes, Marjan ; Dekker, Thijs ; Brouwer, Roy ; Hess, Stephane.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:43:y:2016:i:c:p:57-73.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Valuing the Impacts of An Invasive Biological Control Agent: A Choice Experiment on the Asian Ladybird in France. (2016). Gozlan, Estelle ; David, Maia ; CHAKIR, RAJA ; Sangare, Aminata .
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:67:y:2016:i:3:p:619-638.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Eliciting preferences for public goods in non-monetized communities: Accounting for preference uncertainty. (2015). Rehdanz, Katrin ; Pondorfer, Andreas .
    In: Kiel Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:ifwkwp:2010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Waiting or acting now? The effects on willingness-to-pay of delivering inherent uncertainty information in choice experiments. (2015). Torres Figuerola, Catalina M. ; Faccioli, Michela ; Riera, Antoni.
    In: DEA Working Papers.
    RePEc:ubi:deawps:74.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Modelling Heterogeneity and Uncertainty in Contingent Valuation: an Application to the Valuation of Informal Care. (2014). Mentzakis, Emmanouil ; McNamee, Paul ; Paul Mc Namee, ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Scottish Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:61:y:2014:i:1:p:1-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Family-forest Owners’ Willingness to Harvest Sawlogs and Woody Biomass: The Effect of Price on Social Availability. (2014). Aguilar, Francisco X. ; Cai, Zhen ; Daniel, Marissa aJoa .
    In: Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:arerjl:180419.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Family-forest Owners’ Willingness to Harvest Sawlogs and Woody Biomass: The Effect of Price on Social Availability. (2014). Aguilar, Francisco X. ; Cai, Zhen ; Daniel, Marissa aJoa .
    In: Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:arerjl:172410.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Preference uncertainty in stated preference studies: facts and artefacts. (2013). Bennett, Jeffrey ; Akter, Sonia.
    In: Applied Economics.
    RePEc:taf:applec:45:y:2013:i:15:p:2107-2115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Dealing with preference uncertainty in contingent willingness to pay for a nature protection program: A new approach. (2013). Pirrone, Claudio ; Voltaire, Louinord ; Bailly, Denis.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:88:y:2013:i:c:p:76-85.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Retail demand for voluntary carbon offsets – a choice experiment among Swiss consumers. (2012). Farsi, Mehdi ; Blasch, Julia.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:41259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Risk aversion under preference uncertainty. (2012). Siegmann, Arjen ; Lucas, Andre ; Kräussl, Roman ; Krussl, Roman .
    In: Finance Research Letters.
    RePEc:eee:finlet:v:9:y:2012:i:1:p:1-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Soccer Attendees’ Preferences for Facilities at the Fionia Park Stadium: An Application of the Discrete Choice Experiment. (2011). .
    In: Journal of Sports Economics.
    RePEc:sae:jospec:v:12:y:2011:i:2:p:179-199.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Using contingent valuation in the design of payments for environmental services mechanisms: a review and assessment. (2011). Whittington, Dale ; Pagiola, Stefano.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:32730.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Risk aversion under preference uncertainty. (2010). Siegmann, Arjen ; Lucas, Andre ; Kräussl, Roman ; Kraussl, Roman.
    In: CFS Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:cfswop:201024.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Risk Aversion under Preference Uncertainty. (2010). Siegmann, Arjen ; Lucas, Andre ; Kräussl, Roman ; Kraeussl, Roman .
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20100117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. `Been there done that: Disentangling option value effects from user heterogeneity when valuing natural resources with a use component.. (2010). Martinez-Espineira, Roberto ; Lyssenko, Nikita.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:21976.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Mitigating Hypothetical Bias in Value of Time Studies: Lab-Experiment Results. (2010). Hultkrantz, Lars ; Shengcong, Xue .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:oruesi:2009_014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Willingness to pay, attitudes and fundamental values -- On the cognitive context of public preferences for diversity in agricultural landscapes. (2010). Fischer, Anke ; Sauer, Uta .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:70:y:2010:i:1:p:1-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation: the case of whale conservation in Newfoundland and Labrador. (2009). Martinez-Espineira, Roberto ; Lyssenko, Nikita.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:21969.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Respondent uncertainty in a contingent market for carbon offsets. (2009). Brouwer, Roy ; Akter, Sonia ; Brander, Luke ; van Beukering, Pieter.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:68:y:2009:i:6:p:1858-1863.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. A cognitive psychological approach of analyzing preference uncertainty in contingent valuation. (2009). Bennett, Jeffrey.
    In: 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare09:47938.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-26 16:58:49 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.