- A Pakes, J Porter, K Ho, and J Ishii. Moment inequalities and their application. Technical report, 2011.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
A. Pakes. Alternative models for moment inequalities. Econometrica, 78(6):1783– 1822, 2010.
Alberto Alesina and Enrico Spolaore. On the number and size of nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4):1027–1056, November 1997.
- Alberto Alesina and Enrico Spolaore. The size of nations. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2003. ISBN 0262012049.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Alberto Alesina, Reza Baqir, and Caroline Hoxby. Political jurisdictions in heterogeneous communities. The Journal of Political Economy, 112(2):348–396, April 2004.
Alvin Roth. Deferred acceptance algorithms: history, theory, practice, and open questions. International Journal of Game Theory, 36(3):537–569, March 2008.
Andrew DeWit. Dry rot: The corruption of general subsidies in japan. Journal of the Asia Paciï¬c Economy, 7(3):355–378, October 2002.
- coalitions S, the number of such subsets is still very large. In cases where there are more than 1000 potential subsets S′ ⊂ S for a given S ∈ π, use only the following: 1. S′ is a singleton. 2. S \S′ is a singleton (i.e. subsets that involve leaving out only one municipality).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- D. Gale and L. S. Shapley. College admissions and the stability of marriage. The American Mathematical Monthly, 69(1):9–15, January 1962.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Daniel Diermeier, Hulya Eraslan, and Antonio Merlo. A structural model of government formation. Econometrica, 71(1):27–70, 2003.
Daron Acemoglu. Why not a political coase theorem? social conflict, commitment, and politics. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(4):620–652, December 2003.
Debraj Ray and Rajiv Vohra. Equilibrium binding agreements,. Journal of Economic Theory, 73(1):30–78, March 1997.
- Deï¬nition 1 (Lars 2007). Let < be a dominance operator, and Î VNM ⊆ Î . Then Î VNM is called a stable set for (Î , <) if the following two properties hold: 1. ∀π, π′ ∈ Î VNM , Ï€ ̸< π′ . (Internal stability) 2. ∀π /∈ Î VNM , ∃π′ ∈ Î VNM where Ï€ < π′ . (External stability) 50 The speciï¬c deï¬nition of “alternative†that used here is that they would be deviations as discussed in Appendix B, below.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Donald W. K. Andrews and Patrik Guggenberger. Validity of subsampling and “PlugIn asymptotic†inference for parameters deï¬ned by moment inequalities. Econometric Theory, 25(03):669–709, 2009.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dora L. Costa and Matthew E. Kahn. Civic engagement and community heterogeneity: An economist’s perspective. Perspectives on Politics, 1(01):103–111, 2003.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ehlers Lars. Von Neumann–Morgenstern stable sets in matching problems. Journal of Economic Theory, 134(1):537–547, May 2007.
Effrosyni Diamantoudi and Licun Xue. Coalitions, agreements and efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory, 136(1):105–125, September 2007.
Federico Ciliberto and Elie Tamer. Market structure and multiple equilibria in airline markets. Econometrica, 77(6):1791–1828, November 2009.
Gabrielle Demange. Intermediate preferences and stable coalition structures. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 23(1):45–58, January 1994. ISSN 0304-4068.
J. H. Dreze and J. Greenberg. Hedonic coalitions: Optimality and stability. Econometrica, 48(4):987–1003, May 1980.
- j∈Jmixed g2(Q79 j , β|X) (52) where Q79 j is the actually observed number of municipalities participating in mergers in prefecture j during the 1979-1998 period. There are thus three sample moments calculated from g1 (metro, mixed, and rural), and another three in the same way for g2. On the other hand, g3 is only calculated for “metro†(it will not bind for any value of β for mixed or rural, due to the large number of mergers in these types of prefectures): gmetro 3 (β) = 1 #Jmetro ∑
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Jeffrey Banks and John Duggan. Probabilistic voting in the spatial model of elections: The theory of office-motivated candidates. In David Austen-Smith and John Duggan, editors, Social Choice and Strategic Decisions, Studies in Choice and Welfare, pages 15–56. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jeremy T. Fox. Estimating matching games with transfers. Technical report, NBER, October 2008.
Joseph Greenberg and Shlomo Weber. Strong tiebout equilibrium under restricted preferences domain. Journal of Economic Theory, 38(1):101–117, February 1986. Masayoshi Hayashi, Masashi Nishikawa, and Eric Weese. Inefficient municipal boundaries.
Joseph Greenberg. Stability when mobility is restricted by the existing coalition structure. Journal of Economic Theory, 21(2):213–221, October 1979.
Nobuo Ishihara. Shin Chihou Zaisei Chousei Seido Ron. Gyousei, Tokyo, new edition, 2000. [â€New Local Finance Regulation Systemâ€]. Akihiko Kawaura. Self-Serving mayors and local government consolidations in japan.
Nora Gordon and Brian Knight. A spatial merger estimator with an application to school district consolidation. Journal of Public Economics, 93(5-6):752–765, June 2009.
- Proposition 1. Π∗ = {π|∄π′ such that π → π′ } is a stable set with respect to (Π, ↠). 51 An alternative approach would be to allow only single player deviations, as in Greenberg [1979].
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
S. Barberà and A. Gerber. A note on the impossibility of a satisfactory concept of stability for coalition formation games. Economics Letters, 95(1):85–90, April 2007. Anna Bogomolnaia and Matthew O. Jackson. The stability of hedonic coalition structures.
Suryapratim Banerjee, Hideo Konishi, and Tayfun Sönmez. Core in a simple coalition formation game. Social Choice and Welfare, 18(1):135–153, January 2001.
- The solution set is deï¬ned using the von Neumann and Morgenstern [1944] “stable setâ€. Although the VNM stable set was originally deï¬ned in terms of imputations rather than coalition structures, this paper follows Lars [2007] in deï¬ning the stable set over coalition structures. Speciï¬cally, the von Neumann-Morgenstern solution requires that (i) no coalition structure in the stable set be dominated by another coalition structure in the set, and that (ii) any coalition structure outside of the set is dominated by a coalition structure belonging to the set.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Thomas J. Miceli. The decision to regionalize in the provision of education: An application of the tiebout model. Journal of Urban Economics, 33(3):344–360, May 1993. John Von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior.