[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
Productivity convergence trends within Russian industries: firm-level evidence. (2019). Tsvetkova, Anna ; Bessonova, Evguenia.
In: Bank of Russia Working Paper Series.
RePEc:bkr:wpaper:wps51.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 83

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Productivity growth and inefficient firms exit from the market. (2020). Tsvetkova, A ; Bessonova, E.
    In: Journal of the New Economic Association.
    RePEc:nea:journl:y:2020:i:48:p:185-196.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. 1 1,431 3.02*** -0.21 0.15-0.11*** 0.02*** -0.02*** -0.06*** 0 0 0.09*** 10.34*** 1.68*** -1.57*** (0.295) (0.140) (0.094) (0.033) (0.005) (0.006) (0.019) (0.012) (0.006) (0.011) (1.289) (0.079) (0.049) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WTHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 59 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code Number of observations 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝛾 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑢 2 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑣 2
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. 1 474 1.47*** -0.34-0.23-0.19*** 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.04* 0 0.03* 16.46*** 1.84*** -1.19*** (0.440) (0.227) (0.217) (0.058) (0.008) (0.014) (0.035) (0.023) (0.012) (0.018) (1.971) (0.120) (0.091) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WTHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 63 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code Number of observations 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝛾 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑢 2 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑣 2
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. 1 503 2.32*** -0.05-0.42** -0.13** 0.01 0-0.03 0.01 0.02*** 0 12.42*** 1.43*** -0.88*** (0.545) (0.173) (0.179) (0.063) (0.006) (0.013) (0.025) (0.024) (0.007) (0.019) (1.811) (0.154) (0.078) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WTHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 62 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code Number of observations 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝛾 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑢 2 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑣 2
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. 2 1.57*** 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.02*** 0-0.07*** 0.03** -0.01-0.14-0.58*** -0.64*** -0.83*** -0.94*** 11.58*** (0.282) (0.110) (0.109) (0.029) (0.004) (0.010) (0.017) (0.010) (0.005) (0.097) (0.147) (0.161) (0.177) (0.194) (1.076) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WITHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 69 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. 2 2,150 1.83*** 0.01-0.11 0.06** 0.01*** -0.01*** -0.08*** 0 0.01*** 0.02*** 11.35*** 1.46*** -1.63*** (0.215) (0.101) (0.068) (0.026) (0.004) (0.004) (0.014) (0.010) (0.004) (0.008) (0.889) (0.066) (0.039) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WTHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 56 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code Number of observations 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝛾 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑢 2 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑣 2
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. 2 2.21*** -0.15** -0.11-0.06*** 0.02*** 0.02* -0.06*** 0 0 0.03 0.02-0.03-0.02-0.13* 12.04*** (0.170) (0.073) (0.082) (0.020) (0.002) (0.008) (0.011) (0.008) (0.003) (0.046) (0.061) (0.069) (0.071) (0.076) (0.716) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WITHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 73 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. 2 2.41*** -0.02-0.67*** -0.17*** 0 0-0.02 0.08*** 0.02*** 0.04-0.17* -0.07-0.08-0.05 13.35*** (0.288) (0.100) (0.128) (0.031) (0.003) (0.012) (0.012) (0.013) (0.005) (0.072) (0.099) (0.106) (0.106) (0.104) (1.017) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WITHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 71 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. 2 3.02*** -0.29 0.41* -0.13*** 0.01*** -0.06*** -0.02* -0.08*** 0.02** -0.22-0.26-0.17-0.07 0.29 11.47*** (0.388) (0.194) (0.234) (0.035) (0.005) (0.024) (0.012) (0.016) (0.009) (0.151) (0.197) (0.210) (0.203) (0.182) (1.909) 24 2.08*** -0.19*** -0.02-0.09*** 0.01*** -0.03*** -0.02** 0.02*** 0.01*** -0.17*** -0.28*** -0.32*** -0.31*** -0.19*** 12.79*** (0.141) (0.064) (0.065) (0.014) (0.002) (0.007) (0.009) (0.005) (0.003) (0.046) (0.063) (0.071) (0.071) (0.066) (0.623) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WITHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 67 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. 3 0.78*** 0.1-0.08-0.01 0-0.01 0 0.05*** 0 0.03-0.06-0.05-0.07-0.1 13.96*** (0.298) (0.097) (0.114) (0.043) (0.004) (0.011) (0.017) (0.012) (0.005) (0.059) (0.077) (0.088) (0.090) (0.091) (0.943) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WITHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 74 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. 3 2.77*** -0.74* -0.16-0.04 0.04*** -0.01-0.09** -0.01 0.02** -0.14-0.23-0.36-0.44-0.39 15.99*** (0.606) (0.428) (0.236) (0.055) (0.013) (0.021) (0.041) (0.021) (0.011) (0.179) (0.243) (0.291) (0.311) (0.315) (4.033) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WITHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 68 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. 4 560 3.08*** -0.89*** -0.1-0.1** 0.04*** -0.01-0.09*** 0.01 0.01 0.06*** 16*** 1.21*** -1.56*** (0.380) (0.171) (0.142) (0.043) (0.007) (0.009) (0.028) (0.017) (0.009) (0.020) (1.593) (0.132) (0.075) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WTHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 58 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code Number of observations 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝛾 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑢 2 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑣 2
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. 5 347 1.16** -0.21 0.12-0.05 0.01 0.05*** 0-0.01-0.02* 0.14*** 13.99*** 1.38*** -1.59*** (0.503) (0.327) (0.179) (0.055) (0.009) (0.011) (0.031) (0.024) (0.011) (0.023) (3.010) (0.172) (0.092) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WTHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 57 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code Number of observations 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝛾 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑢 2 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑣 2
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. 6 2.4*** -0.07 0.09-0.19*** 0.01-0.04* 0.01 0.09*** -0.01-0.1-0.13-0.34-0.41* -0.3 10.56*** (0.566) (0.185) (0.237) (0.064) (0.006) (0.024) (0.024) (0.022) (0.009) (0.138) (0.189) (0.234) (0.247) (0.224) (1.887) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WITHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 72 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. 7 679 2.38*** -0.52** -0.78*** -0.16*** 0.02** 0.01-0.01 0.07*** 0.02*** 0.04** 16.36*** 1.56*** -1.54*** (0.448) (0.260) (0.161) (0.052) (0.008) (0.008) (0.027) (0.015) (0.009) (0.015) (2.403) (0.127) (0.068) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WTHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 55 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code Number of observations 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝛾 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑢 2 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑣 2
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. 8 1,727 1.76*** 0.44*** 0.06-0.06* -0.01** -0.01** -0.03* 0.02 0 0.04*** 9.55*** 2.05*** -1.12*** (0.291) (0.090) (0.094) (0.035) (0.003) (0.007) (0.014) (0.013) (0.005) (0.009) (0.950) (0.067) (0.048) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WTHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 64 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code Number of observations 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝛾 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑢 2 𝑙𝑛𝜎𝑣 2
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. 9 2.86*** -0.68*** -0.32*** -0.04 0.04*** 0-0.09*** 0 0.02*** -0.07-0.12-0.16-0.19* -0.17* 13.98*** (0.280) (0.180) (0.122) (0.028) (0.006) (0.010) (0.018) (0.010) (0.006) (0.064) (0.084) (0.095) (0.096) (0.098) (1.417) Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WITHIN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 66 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Industry code 𝑙 𝑘 𝑡 𝑙2 𝑘2 𝑡2 𝑙 ∗ 𝑘 𝑙 ∗ 𝑡 𝑘 ∗ 𝑡 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Abreu, M., De Groot, H. L., Florax, R. J. (2005) A meta‐analysis of β‐ convergence: The legendary 2%. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(3), 389-420.

  18. Adalet McGowan M, D Andrews and V Millot (2017). Insolvency regimes, zombie firms and capital reallocation. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1399, pp. 1-54.

  19. Adetutu M., Glass, A. J, Kenjegalieva K., Sickles, R. C. (2015) The effects of efficiency and TFP growth on pollution in Europe: a multistage spatial analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 43(3), pp. 307-326.

  20. Aghion, P., Bergeaud A., Boppart T., Klenow, P. J., Li, H. (2019) Missing growth from creative destruction. American Economic Review, 109(8), pp. 2795-2822.

  21. Aigner, D. J., Chu, S., F. (1968) On estimating the industry production function. The American Economic Review, 58(4), pp. 826-839.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  22. Akcigit U., Ates, S. T. (2019) What Happened to US Business Dynamism? (No. w25756). National Bureau of Economic Research.

  23. Akcigit, U., Alp, H., Peters, M. (2016) Lack of selection and limits to delegation: firm dynamics in developing countries (No w21905) National Bureau of Economic Research.

  24. Akcigit, U., Baslandze, S., Lotti F (2018) Connecting to power: political connections, innovation, and firm dynamics (No. w25136) National Bureau of Economic Research.

  25. Alon T., Berger., D., Dent, R., Pugsley., B (2018) Older and slower: The startup deficit’s lasting effects on aggregate productivity growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 93, pp. 68-85.

  26. Andrews, D., Criscuolo, C., Gal, P. (2016). The best versus the rest: The global productivity slowdown, divergence across firms and the role of public policy. OECD Productivity Working Papers, No. 5, pp. 1-50

  27. Ayyagari, M., Demirguc-Kunt, A., Maksimovic, V. (2011). Small vs. young firms across the world: contribution to employment, job creation, and growth. The World Bank; 2011 Apr 1.

  28. Bahar, D. (2018) The middle productivity trap: Dynamics of productivity dispersion. Economics Letters, 167, 60-66.

  29. Baily, M., N., Montalbano, N. (2016) Why is US productivity growth so slow? Possible explanations and policy responses. Brookings Institution, September, 1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Barro, R. J. (2012) Convergence and modernization revisited (No. w18295). National Bureau of Economic Research.

  31. Bartelsman, E., Haltiwanger, J., Scarpetta, S. (2013) Cross-country differences in productivity: The role of allocation and selection. American Economic Review, 103(1), pp. 305-334. PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WITHIN IN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 31 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  32. Battese, G. E., Coelli, T. J. (1992) Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India. Journal of productivity analysis, Vol. 3(1-2), pp. 153-169.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  33. Bergeaud. A., Cette, G., Lecat, R. (2016) Productivity trends in advanced countries between 1890 and 2012. Review of Income and Wealth, 62(3), pp. 420-444.

  34. Berlingieri, G., Blanchenay, P., Calligaris, S., Criscuolo, C. (2017) Firm-level Productivity Differences: Insights from the OECD’s MultiProd Project. International Productivity Monitor, 32, pp. 97-115.

  35. Bournakis I, Mallick, S. (2018) TFP estimation at firm level: The fiscal aspect of productivity convergence in the UK. Economic Modelling, 70, pp. 579-590.

  36. Brown, J. D., G. A. Crespi, L. Iacovone, and L. Marcolin (2015). Productivity ,Convergence at Firm Level: New Evidence from Americas. In: Understanding Latin America and the Caribbean’s Income Gap, World Bank, Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Brynjolfsson, E., A. McAfee (2011) Race Against The Machine: How the Digital Revolution is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy, Digital Frontier Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Carreira, C., Teixeira, P. (2011) The shadow of death: analysing the pre-exit productivity of Portuguese manufacturing firms. Small Business Economics, 36(3), pp. 337351.

  39. Cette, G., Corde. S., Lecat, R. (2018). Firm-level productivity dispersion and convergence. Economics Letters, 166, pp. 76-78.

  40. Chevalier, P. A., Lecat, R., Oulton, N. (2012) Convergence of firm-level productivity, globalisation and information technology: Evidence from France. Economics Letters, 116(2), pp. 244-246.

  41. Coelli, T., Estache A, Perelman S, Trujillo L (2003) A primer on efficiency measurement for utilities and transport regulators. The World Bank.

  42. Coelli, T., Perelman, S., Romano, E. (1999) Accounting for environmental influences in stochastic frontier models: with application to international airlines. Journal of productivity analysis, 11(3), pp. 251-273.

  43. Conway, P., Meehan, L., Zheng, G. (2015) Do New Zealand firms catch up to the domestic productivity frontier. New Zealand Productivity Commission Working Paper, 3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Crafts, N., O’Rourke, K. H. (2014) Twentieth Century Growth, in Handbook of Economic Growth, Editor(s): Philippe Aghion, Steven N. Durlauf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  45. Cunningham, C., Foster, L., Grim, C., Haltiwanger, J., Pabilonia, S. W., Stewart, J., Wolf, Z. (2017) Dispersion in Dispersion: Measuring Establishment-Level Differences in Productivity. Working Papers 18-25, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.

  46. Decker R., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., Miranda, J. (2014) The role of entrepreneurship in US job creation and economic dynamism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), pp.3-24. PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WITHIN IN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 32 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  47. Decker, R. A., Haltiwanger J, Jarmin R S, Miranda J (2017) Declining dynamism, allocative efficiency, and the productivity slowdown. American Economic Review, 107(5), pp. 322-26.

  48. Decker, R. A., Haltiwanger, J. C., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2018) Changing business dynamism and productivity: Shocks vs. responsiveness (No. w24236). National Bureau of Economic Research.

  49. Dowrick, S., Rogers, M. (2002) Classical and technological convergence: Beyond the Solow‐Swan growth model. Oxford Economic Papers, 54(3), pp. 369-385.

  50. Faggio, G., Salvanes, K. G., & Van Reenen, J. (2010) The evolution of inequality in productivity and wages: panel data evidence. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), pp. 1919--1951.

  51. Fernald, J. (2014) Productivity and Potential Output Before, During, and After the Great Recession, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2014, Volume 29.

  52. Fukao, K., Ug Kwon, H. (2006) Why did Japan's TFP growth slowdown in the lost decade? An empirical analysis based on firm-level data of manufacturing firms. The Japanese Economic Review, 57(2), pp. 195-228.

  53. Gamberoni, E., Giordano, C., Lopez-Garcia, P. (2016) Capital and Labour (Mis) Allocation in the Euro Area: Some Stylized Facts and Determinants. Bank of Italy Occasional Paper, (349).

  54. Ganau,. R., Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018) Industrial clusters, organized crime, and productivity growth in Italian SMEs. Journal of Regional Science, 58(2), pp. 363-385

  55. Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., McGowan, D., Sanz, I. and Sanz-Sanz, J. F. (2016) Corporate Taxation and Productivity Catch-Up: Evidence from European Firms. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 120(2), pp. 372-399.

  56. Gennaioli, N., La Porta, R., De Silanes., F. L., Shleifer, A. (2014) Growth in regions. Journal of Economic growth, 19(3), pp. 259-309.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  57. Gopinath, G., Kalemli-Özcan, Ş., Karabarbounis, L. and Villegas-Sanchez, C. (2017) Capital allocation and productivity in South Europe. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4), pp. 1915-1967.

  58. Gordon R J (2015) Secular stagnation: A supply-side view. American Economic Review, â„– 105(5), pp. 54-59

  59. Greene, W. H. (1980) Maximum likelihood estimation of econometric frontier functions. Journal of econometrics, 13(1), pp. 27-56.

  60. Griffith, R., Redding, S., Simpson, H. (2009) Technological catch-up and geographic proximity. Journal of Regional Science, 49(4), pp. 689-720

  61. Guner N, Ventura G, Xu Y (2008). Macroeconomic implications of sizedependent policies. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(4), pp. 721-744. PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WITHIN IN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 33 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  62. Haltiwanger J., Jarmin, R., Kulick, R., Miranda, J. (2016) High Growth Young Firms: Contribution to Job, Output and Productivity Growth. US Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies.

  63. Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., Miranda, J. (2013) Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), pp. 347-361.

  64. Hsieh C T, Klenow, P. J. (2009) Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. The Quarterly Journal of economics, 124(4), pp. 1403-1448.

  65. Hsieh, C. T., Klenow, P. J. (2014) The life cycle of plants in India and Mexico. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(3), pp. 1035-1084.

  66. Huergo, E., Jaumandreu, J. (2004) Firms' age, process innovation and productivity growth. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(4), pp. 541-559

  67. Inklaar R, Diewert W E (2016) Measuring Industry Productivity Across Time and Space and Cross Country Convergence. In 34th International Association for Research in Income and Wealth General Conference Dresden, Germany.

  68. Jones, B. F. (2012) The Burden of Knowledge and the 'Death of the Renaissance Man': Is Innovation Getting Harder?, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 76, pp. 283-317.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  69. Kim, H. (1992) The Translog Production Function and Variable Returns to Scale. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(3), pp. 546-552.

  70. Klaus, S., Xavier, M. (2016) The global competitiveness report 2016-2017. In World Economic Forum.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Kumbhakar, S. C., Lovell, C. A. K. (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis, 2000, N. Y.: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Labour productivity growth was the highest in 2012, and the most significant decline was in 2015; labour productivity growth was the highest in mining and quarrying (sector C).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  73. Midrigan V., Xu, D. Y. (2014) Finance and misallocation: Evidence from plantlevel data. American economic review, 104(2), pp. 422-458.

  74. OECD (2001) Measuring Productivity - OECD Manual: Measurement of Aggregate and Industry-level Productivity Growth, OECD Publishing, Paris.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  75. Pagano P., Schivardi, F. (2003) Firm size distribution and growth. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 105(2), pp. 255-274

  76. Petrin A., Levinsohn, J. (2012) Measuring aggregate productivity growth using plant-level data. The RAND Journal of Economics, 43(4), pp. 705-725.

  77. Quah, D. (1993) Galton's Fallacy and Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 427-443.

  78. Skrondal, A., Rabe‐Hesketh, S. (2014) Handling initial conditions and endogenous covariates in dynamic/transition models for binary data with unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 63(2), pp. 211-237.

  79. Syverson, C. (2011) What determines productivity? Journal of Economic literature, 49(2), pp. 326-65. PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE TRENDS WITHIN IN RUSSIAN INDUSTRIES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE OCTOBER 2019 34 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  80. We find positive correlation between size and labour productivity growth. This is supported by studies based on US firm-level data (Decker et al. 2017) as well as on 18 European industry-level data (Pagano and Schivardi, 2003). At the same time negative correlation between size and labour productivity growth is found in studies based on Italian firm-level data (Akcigit et al., 2017; Ganau and Rodríguez Pose, 2018).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  81. Westmore, B., Jin, Y. (2018) Reforms for sustainable productivity growth in Ireland, No. 1489, OECD Publishing.

  82. Wooldridge, J. (2005) Simple Solutions to the Initial Conditions Problem in Dynamic, Nonlinear Panel Data Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20, pp. 39-54.

  83. Wooldridge, J. M. (2009) On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics Letters, 104(3), pp. 112-114.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Open regional science. (2014). Rey, Sergio.
    In: The Annals of Regional Science.
    RePEc:spr:anresc:v:52:y:2014:i:3:p:825-837.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Use renewables to be cleaner: Meta-analysis of the renewable energy consumption-economic growth nexus. (2014). Sebri, Maamar.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:53247.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Development, growth and decline in Europe: New patterns of economic convergence and divergence?. (2013). Cornett, Andreas ; Soerensen, Nils Karl .
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa13p320.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Publication bias in the returns to R&D literature. (2013). Møen, Jarle ; Thorsen, Helge Sandvig.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2013_012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The use of Meta-Regression Analysis to harmonize LCA literature: an application to GHG emissions of 2nd and 3rd generation biofuels. (2013). Chèze, Benoît ; Chze, Benot ; Patouillard, Laure ; Bouvart, Frdrique ; Menten, Fabio .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:apu:wpaper:2013/01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The spatial dimension of trade- and FDI-driven productivity growth in Chinese provinces: A global cointegration approach. (2012). Özyurt, Selin ; Mitze, Timo.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa12p512.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Income and Preventable Mortality: The Case of Youth Traffic Fatalities. (2012). Freeman, Donald.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:shs:wpaper:1201.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Military expenditure and economic growth: A meta-analysis. (2012). Levine, Paul ; Alptekin, Aynur.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:28:y:2012:i:4:p:636-650.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The natalist bias of pollution control. (2012). de la Croix, David ; Gosseries, Axel ; Delacroix, David .
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:63:y:2012:i:2:p:271-287.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Structural change and convergence of energy intensity across OECD countries, 1970–2005. (2012). Mulder, Peter ; de Groot, Henri ; de Groot, Henri L. F., ; de Groot, Henri L. F., .
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:34:y:2012:i:6:p:1910-1921.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Cross-country convergence in energy and electricity consumption, 1971–2007. (2012). Mohammadi, Hassan ; Ram, Rati.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:34:y:2012:i:6:p:1882-1887.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Demand for gasoline is more price-inelastic than commonly thought. (2012). Janda, Karel ; Irsova, Zuzana ; Havranek, Tomas.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:34:y:2012:i:1:p:201-207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Agricultural Trade Bias in Exchange Rate Volatility Effect Estimation: An Application of Meta-Regression Analysis. (2012). Wilson, Norbert ; Shen, Xuan ; Li, Sheng ; Wesley, J. D..
    In: 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington.
    RePEc:ags:aaea12:124870.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The Emergence of New Regional Convergence Clubs in a Nordic and Baltic Perspective. (2011). Cornett, Andreas ; Soerensen, Nils Karl .
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa10p628.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Wage effects of on-the-job training. A meta-analysis. (2011). Borghans, Lex ; Lex, Borghans ; Carla, Haelermans .
    In: ROA Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umaror:2011011.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Wage effects of on-the-job training; a meta-analysis. (2011). Borghans, Lex ; Lex, Borghans ; Carla, Haelermans .
    In: Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umamet:2011054.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Editorial. (2011). Roberts, Mark ; Monastiriotis, Vassilis ; McCann, Philip ; McCombie, John ; Le Gallo, Julie ; Igliori, Danilo ; Garretsen, Harry ; Fingleton, Bernard ; Cheshire, Paul ; Moore, B..
    In: Spatial Economic Analysis.
    RePEc:taf:specan:v:6:y:2011:i:4:p:351-357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Corruption and economic growth: A meta-analysis of the evidence on low-income countries and beyond. (2011). Ugur, Mehmet ; Dasgupta, Nandini .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:31226.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Technological Leadership and Sectoral Employment Growth:A Spatial Econometric Analysis for U.S. Counties. (2011). Pede, Valerien ; de Groot, Henri ; Florax, Raymond ; Henri L. F. de Groot, ; Raymond J. G. M. Florax, ; Raymond J. G. M. Florax, ; Henri L. F. de Groot, ; Henri L. F. de Groot, ; Henri L. F. de Groot, .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pae:wpaper:11-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Convergence Across the EU Regions: Economic Composition and Structural Transformation. (2011). Sassi, Maria .
    In: International Advances in Economic Research.
    RePEc:kap:iaecre:v:17:y:2011:i:1:p:101-115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. From Estimation Results to Stylized Facts Twelve Recommendations for Empirical Research in International Activities of Heterogeneous Firms. (2011). Wagner, Joachim.
    In: De Economist.
    RePEc:kap:decono:v:159:y:2011:i:4:p:389-412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Wage Effects of On-the-Job Training: A Meta-Analysis. (2011). Borghans, Lex ; Haelermans, Carla.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp6077.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. ¿Condiciona la apertura exterior el tamaño del sector público? Un panorama. (2011). Sabate, Marcela ; Gadea, María ; Rodriguez, Estela Saenz ; Sort, Marcela Sabate ; Mª. Dolores Gadea Rivas, .
    In: Hacienda Pública Española.
    RePEc:hpe:journl:y:2011:v:198:i:3:p:131-149..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. How to Solve the Price Puzzle? A Meta-Analysis. (2011). Rusnák, Marek ; Horvath, Roman ; Havranek, Tomas.
    In: Working Papers IES.
    RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp2011_24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. How to Solve the Price Puzzle? A Meta-Analysis. (2011). Rusnák, Marek ; Horvath, Roman ; Havranek, Tomas.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cnb:wpaper:2011/02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. How to Solve the Price Puzzle? A Meta-Analysis. (2011). Rusnák, Marek ; Horvath, Roman ; Havranek, Tomas.
    In: CERGE-EI Working Papers.
    RePEc:cer:papers:wp446.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Spatial and non spatial approaches to agricultural convergence in Europe. (2011). Sassi, Maria ; Gutierrez, Luciano.
    In: 122nd Seminar, February 17-18, 2011, Ancona, Italy.
    RePEc:ags:eaa122:99362.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Rose effect and the euro: is the magic gone?. (2010). Havranek, Tomas.
    In: Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv).
    RePEc:spr:weltar:v:146:y:2010:i:2:p:241-261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Consequences of effect size heterogeneity for meta-analysis: a Monte Carlo study. (2010). Koetse, Mark ; de Groot, Henri ; Florax, Raymond.
    In: Statistical Methods & Applications.
    RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:19:y:2010:i:2:p:217-236.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Military Expenditure and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis. (2010). Levine, Paul ; Alptekin, Aynur ; Alptekin, Aynur / A, ; Levine, Paul / P, .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:28853.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Quantifying the effects of modelling choices on hospital efficiency measures: A meta-regression analysis. (2009). Nguyen, Kim ; Coelli, Timothy.
    In: CEPA Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:qld:uqcepa:74.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The Russian regional convergence process. (2009). Siliverstovs, Boriss ; Oshchepkov, Aleksey ; Kholodilin, Konstantin.
    In: KOF Working papers.
    RePEc:kof:wpskof:09-216.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Factors explaining local privatization: a meta-regression analysis. (2009). Fageda, Xavier ; Bel, Germà.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:139:y:2009:i:1:p:105-119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. A spatial econometric analysis of the regional growth and volatility in Europe. (2009). Sinabell, Franz ; Falk, Martin.
    In: Empirica.
    RePEc:kap:empiri:v:36:y:2009:i:2:p:193-207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Rose Effect and the Euro: The Magic is Gone. (2009). Havranek, Tomas.
    In: Working Papers IES.
    RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp2009_20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. A spatially filtered mixture of ?-convergence regressions for EU regions, 1980–2002. (2008). Di Vaio, Gianfranco ; Battisti, Michele.
    In: Empirical Economics.
    RePEc:spr:empeco:v:34:y:2008:i:1:p:105-121.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. International vs. Intra-national Convergence in Europe – an Assessment of Causes and Evidence. (2008). Sørensen, Nils Karl ; Cornett, Andreas ; Sorensen, Nils Karl .
    In: INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH.
    RePEc:ris:invreg:0108.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Parametric variability in cross-country growth regressions: An application of quantile-regression methodology. (2008). Ram, Rati.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:99:y:2008:i:2:p:387-389.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. The internal market and the Dutch economy: implications for trade and economic growth. (2008). Straathof, Sebastiaan (Bas) ; Linders, Gert-Jan ; Lejour, Arjan ; Mohlmann, Jan .
    In: CPB Document.
    RePEc:cpb:docmnt:168.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Models of Regional Growth: Past, Present and Future. (2008). Harris, Richard.
    In: SERC Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:sercdp:0002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. A META-ANALYSIS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INCOME INEQUALITY AND ECONOMIC GROWTH. (2008). de Groot, Henri ; Florax, Raymond ; de Dominicis, Laura.
    In: Scottish Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:55:y:2008:i:5:p:654-682.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence. (2007). Mulder, Peter ; de Groot, Henri.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:36:y:2007:i:1:p:85-112.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Factors explaining local privatization: A meta-regression analysis. (2006). Fageda, Xavier ; Bel, Germà.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:xrp:wpaper:creap2006-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. GEOGRAPHIC AND INSTITUTIONAL DETERMINANTS OF REAL INCOME:A SPATIO-TEMPORAL SIMULTANEOUS EQUATION APPROACH. (2006). Ngeleza, Guyslain ; Masters, William ; Florax, Raymond.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pae:wpaper:06-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Convergence and FDI in an enlarged EU: what can we learn from the experience of cohesion countries for the CEECS?. (2006). Levasseur, Sandrine.
    In: Documents de Travail de l'OFCE.
    RePEc:fce:doctra:0612.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Energy intensity in transition economies: Is there convergence towards the EU average?. (2006). MARKANDYA, ANIL ; Galinato, Suzette ; Streimikiene, Dalia ; Pedroso-Galinato, Suzette.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:28:y:2006:i:1:p:121-145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Procreation, migration and tradable quotas. (2006). de la Croix, David ; Clara, DELAVALLADE ; Axel, GOSSERIES.
    In: Discussion Papers (ECON - Département des Sciences Economiques).
    RePEc:ctl:louvec:2006056.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Uncovering the Factors behind Comparative Regional Economic Performance: A Dynamic CGE Approach. (2006). Madden, John ; Giesecke, James.
    In: Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers.
    RePEc:cop:wpaper:g-165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. The Role of Knowledge Externalities in the Spatial Distribution of Economic Growth: A Spatial Econometric Analysis for US Counties, 1969-2003. (2006). Pede, Valerien ; de Groot, Henri ; Florax, Raymond.
    In: 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea06:21157.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. THE EMERGENCE OF A KNOWLEDGE AGGLOMERATION: A SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL IN INDIANA. (2005). Waldorf, Brigitte.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa05p558.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-24 17:49:49 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.