- American Fami~and Trust (AFT). Transfer of Development Rights: Fact Sheet American Familand Trust, Washington D.C. (2001c). Annotated Code of Maryland. Agricultural Article, 2-501 Subtitle 5. Anselin, L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press. (198 8a).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- American Familand Trust (AFT). Status of Selected Local PACE Programs: Fact Sheet American Faniiland Trust, Washington D.C. (2001a).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- American Familand Trust (AFT). Status of State PACE Programs: Fact Sheet American Familand Trust, Washington D.C. (2001b).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Anselin, L. and R. Florax. New Directions in Spatial Econometrics, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, (1995) Anselin, L. and A. Bera. Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, eds. A. Ullah and D.
- Anselin, L. Model Validation in Spatial Econometrics: A Review and Evaluation of Alternative Approaches. International Regional Science Review, 11:279-3 16. (1988b).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Anselin, L. SpaceStat Version ].80 Users Guide, Urbana, II: University of Illinois, iittp://www.spacestaLcomidocs/Vi8Oman.pdf (1995). Version 1.9 Update (1998).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bay Journal. Maryland Enacts Sweeping Growth Management Law, 7 (3) May (1997) Beasly, S. D., W. G. Workman, and N. A. Wffliams. 1986. Estimating Amenity Values of Urban Fringe Familand: A Contingent Valuation Approach: Note. Growth and Change 17(Oct. 1986): 70-8.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bell, K. and N. Bockstael, Applying the Generalized-Moments Estimation Approach to Spatial Problems Involving Microlevel Data, The Review of Economics and Statistics, (February 2000), 82(1):72-82.
Bergstrom, J. C., B. L. DilIman, and J. R. Stoll. Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land. Southern Journal ofAgricultural Economics 17(July 1985): 139-50.
- Berndt, E.R.,1991. The Practice of Econometrics. Reading MA: Addison-Welsey Publishing Co.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Blakely, M. An Economic Analysis of the Effects of Development Rights Purchases on Land Values in King County, Washington. M.S. Thesis, Washington State University (1991).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bowen, G. 2000. Calvert County Office of Planning and Zoning, personal communication.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bowers, D. Farmland Preservation Report. 10(9):1-7, (2000).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bowers, D. Sonoma, Berks, Lancaster gain most acres; top 12 named, Farmland Preservation Report~ 11(9): 1-6, (July-Aug. 2001).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bromley, D. W., and I. Hodge. 1990. Private Property Rights and Presumptive Policy Entitlements: Reconsidering the Premises of Rural Policy. European Review ofAgricultural Economics 17(2): 197-214.
Brunstad, R. J., I. Gaasland, and E. Vardal. 1999. Agricultural Production and the Optimal Level of Landscape Preservation. Land Economics 75(4): 538-46. (1999) Chesapeake Bay Commission and The Trust for Public Land. Keeping Our Commitment: Preserving Land in the Chesapeake Watershed. Annapolis, MD. (February 2001).
- Cliff, A., and J. K. Ord, Spatial Autocorrelation. London: Pion Publishing, (1973).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Drake, L. The Non-Market Value of Swedish Agricultural Landscape. European Review ofAgricultural Economics 19(3): 35 1-64. (1992) Fischel, W. M. 1985. The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Properly Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Foster, J. H., J. M. Halstead and T. H. Stevens. 1982. Measuring the Nonmarket Value of Agricultural Land: A Case Study. Research Bulletin 672, Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gardner, B. D. 1977. The Economics of Agricultural Land Preservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59(Dec.): 1027-36.
Halstead, J. M. 1984. Measuring the Non-market Value of Massachusetts Agricultural Land: A Case Study. Northeastern Journal ofAgricultural Economics 14(Apr.): 12-9.
- Hushak, L. J., and K. Sadr. A Spatial Model of Land Market Behavior. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 61(Nov.):697-701, 1979.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kelejian, H. and D. Robinson. A suggested method of estimation for Spatial interdependent models with autoconelated enors, and an application to a county expenditure model. Papers in Regional Science, 72, 297-3 12, (1993).
Kline, J., and D. Wichelns. 1996. Public Preferences Regarding the Goals of Familand Preservation Programs. Land Economics 72(4): 538-49. Land Trust Alliance, More Than $7.3 Biffion Committed To Open Space Protection, http://wwwItaorg/policv/referenda2000.htiiil.
Lopez, R. A., F. A. Shah, and M. A. Altobello. 1994. Amenity Benefits and the Optimal Allocation of Land. Land Economics 70(1): 53-62.
- Lynch, L. and J. R. Horowitz. 1998. Comparison of Familand Programs in Maryland. In The Performance of State Programs for Farmland Preservation. Proceedings of a Conference in Columbus, Ohio, Sept. 10-11, Ohio State University.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lynch, L., and S. J. Lovell, Factors Influencing Participation in Agricultural Land Preservation Programs, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics Working Paper #01-05, 2001 University of Maryland, College Park.
Lynch, L., and W. N. Musser, A Relative Efficiency Analysis of Familand Preservation Programs, Land Economics, 77 (4)(November 2001) :577-594.
- Maryland Department of Agriculture. 1998. Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation Report. http://www.mda~state~nid~us/agIand/preserva.htm Maiyland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation 2001. Report of the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Task Force, (2001). http://www.mdp.state.md.us/planning/MALPP/FINAL2.pdf Maiyland Department of State Planning (MDSP). Natural Soil Groups Technical Report. HUD Project Number MD-P-1008-100, 1973.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Maryland Department of Agriculture. 2001. Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation Annual Report for FY 2001. Annapolis, MD.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
McConnell, K. E. 1989. The Optimal Quantity of Land in Agriculture. Northeastern Journal ofAgri cultural and Resource Economics 18(Oct.): 63-72.
Nickerson, C. J., and L. Lynch, The Effect of Familand Preservation Programs on Fami~and Prices, American Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 83(2):341-351, 2001. Plantinga, A. and D. Mifier, Agricultural Land Values and Future Development, Land Economics, 77(1 )(February 200 1):56-67.
Pruckner, G. J. 1995. Agricultural Landscape Cultivation in Austria: An Application of the CVM. European Review ofAgricultural Economics 22(2): 173-90.
Shi, Y.J., T.T. Phipps, and D. Colyer. 1997. Agricultural Land Values Under Urbanizing Influences. Land Econ. 73(February 1997):90-100.
- The Rural Legacy Program Grants Manual December 2001 Revision, 2001. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, MD United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistic Service, Agricultural Statistics 1997.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Weibe, K., A. Tegene, and B. Kuhn. 1996. Partial Interests in Land: Policy Tools for Resource Use and Conservation. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report No. 744.
- Whittle, P., 1954. On Stationary Processes in the Plane, Biometrica 41:434-449.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wichelns, D. and J. D. Kline. 1993. The Impact of Parcel Characteristics on the Cost of Development Rights to Farmland, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 150-158.