Low-latency multi-datacenter databases using replicated commit
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2013•dl.acm.org
Web service providers have been using NoSQL datastores to provide scalability and
availability for globally distributed data at the cost of sacrificing transactional guarantees.
Recently, major web service providers like Google have moved towards building storage
systems that provide ACID transactional guarantees for globally distributed data. For
example, the newly published system, Spanner, uses Two-Phase Commit and Two-Phase
Locking to provide atomicity and isolation for globally distributed data, running on top of …
availability for globally distributed data at the cost of sacrificing transactional guarantees.
Recently, major web service providers like Google have moved towards building storage
systems that provide ACID transactional guarantees for globally distributed data. For
example, the newly published system, Spanner, uses Two-Phase Commit and Two-Phase
Locking to provide atomicity and isolation for globally distributed data, running on top of …
Web service providers have been using NoSQL datastores to provide scalability and availability for globally distributed data at the cost of sacrificing transactional guarantees. Recently, major web service providers like Google have moved towards building storage systems that provide ACID transactional guarantees for globally distributed data. For example, the newly published system, Spanner, uses Two-Phase Commit and Two-Phase Locking to provide atomicity and isolation for globally distributed data, running on top of Paxos to provide fault-tolerant log replication. We show in this paper that it is possible to provide the same ACID transactional guarantees for multi-datacenter databases with fewer cross-datacenter communication trips, compared to replicated logging. Instead of replicating the transactional log, we replicate the commit operation itself, by running Two-Phase Commit multiple times in different datacenters and using Paxos to reach consensus among datacenters as to whether the transaction should commit. Doing so not only replaces several inter-datacenter communication trips with intra-datacenter communication trips, but also allows us to integrate atomic commitment and isolation protocols with consistent replication protocols to further reduce the number of cross-datacenter communication trips needed for consistent replication; for example, by eliminating the need for an election phase in Paxos. We analyze our approach in terms of communication trips to compare it against the log replication approach, then we conduct an extensive experimental study to compare the performance and scalability of both approaches under various multi-datacenter setups.
ACM Digital Library