[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip Navigation
Get a Demo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

threat

Dridex

Dridex is a banking trojan commonly distributed through emails containing malicious Excel documents. Researchers have tied Dridex operations to other malware toolkits such as Ursnif, Emotet, TrickBot, and DoppelPaymer ransomware.

Pairs with this song
 

Editor’s note: While the detection opportunities and analysis on this page are still relevant, it has not been updated since 2021.

Analysis

Dridex is a well known banking trojan that shares both code similarities and overlapping infrastructure with Gameover Zeus. The operators of Dridex are referred to by various names, including TA505 and INDRIK SPIDER. When it first showed up on the scene in 2014, it delivered malicious Word documents containing VBA macros. Over the years it has used other formats such as malicious JavaScript and Excel documents. Even though the initial payload delivery format has changed, Dridex has consistently focused on getting into user mailboxes and ushering users into unwittingly executing malicious code on their endpoints. Malicious emails containing Dridex attachments encourage clicking by giving the attached Excel documents enticing names like “Invoice,” “Inv,” “Outstanding,” “Payment,” or “Statement.”

XLM macros

With the most recent shift in 2020, Dridex moved from delivering malicious JavaScript files to delivering malicious Excel documents leveraging the underlying Excel 4.0 macro (XLM) functionality. XLM macros were made available to Excel users in 1992. These macros utilize the Binary Interchange File Format (BIFF), an early cousin of the better-known Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) macros. Excel 4.0 macros offer similar functionality as VBA macros but give adversaries the distinct advantage of being able to hide in plain sight; macro code can be spread throughout a spreadsheet over disparate cells, rendering analysis difficult and making it not immediately obvious that executable code is even present.

Previously, XLM also allowed code execution without being subjected to the scrutiny of the Microsoft Antimalware Scan Interface (AMSI), which made it easier for Dridex and other malware to use XLM to evade defenses. As of March 2021, Microsoft has added AMSI coverage for Excel 4.0 macros, enabling vendors to acquire insight into runtime execution. Ultimately, if your organization doesn’t have a business use for executing macros in your environment, it’s better to disable them altogether.

Later stages

Beyond the initial delivery, one of the most common techniques we observed Dridex using throughout the year was DLL search order hijacking of various legitimate Windows executables. The Dridex operators don’t stick to a single Windows executable when doing search order hijacking, necessitating multiple detection analytics to catch this behavior. We also observed Dridex persisting as a scheduled task. In fact, Dridex’s place in our top 10 threats is due in no small part to scheduled tasks left over from incomplete remediation efforts. This pattern emphasizes the importance of cleaning up persistence when responding to threats.

While Dridex is a threat in and of itself, in 2020 we also observed multiple environments where Dridex led to the ransomware family DoppelPaymer—and we’ve observed the same pattern in early 2021. Similar to other “ransomware precursor” families in our top 10 such as TrickBot, Emotet, and Qbot, the threat of follow-on ransomware emphasizes the need for quick identification and remediation of Dridex in any environment. Given the long history of Dridex consistently evolving to combat modern-day security controls while maintaining the same means of payload delivery, the best way to protect your organization from Dridex is filtering emails at your mail gateways to prevent its delivery.

Detection opportunities

Detection opportunity 1

Scheduled task creation containing system directory
ATT&CK technique(s): T1053.005 Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task
ATT&CK tactic(s): Persistence

Details:
Dridex maintains persistence via the creation of scheduled tasks (schtasks.exe) within system directories such as windows\system32\, windows\syswow64, winnt\system32 and winnt\syswow64. Identifying the instances of schtasks.exe where the command line contains both the flag /create and a system path often helps us identify existing or residual instances of Dridex on an endpoint.

Detection opportunity 2

Excel spawning regsvr32.exe
ATT&CK technique(s): T1218.010 Signed Binary Proxy Execution: Regsvr32
ATT&CK tactic(s): Defense Evasion

Details: Dridex uses Excel macros as a springboard to initiate additional malicious code via Register Server (regsvr32.exe). While files called by regsvr32 traditionally end in .dll (as in the first example below), we often observe this threat and others using different file extensions to avoid recognition as a DLL (as in the second example below). Detecting this type of activity can be as easy as identifying any instances where excel.exe is spawning regsvr32.exe as a child process, as this activity is uncommon in most environments.

Detection opportunity 3

DLL search order hijacking
ATT&CK technique(s): T1574.001 Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Search Order Hijacking
ATT&CK tactic(s): Persistence, Privilege Escalation, Defense Evasion

Details: Another opportunity for detection is based around search order hijacking. This type of attack is successful when a Windows native binary executes from within a directory that contains one or more malicious DLL binaries. These unassuming DLLs are loaded and executed by the trusted native binary due to their location. This type of activity is most easily identified when a native system binary is executed from a non-standard location, such as AppData\Local or AppData\Roaming. This detection opportunity requires some work: start by cataloging all native Windows binaries, and then write detection analytics for any instances where these binaries are executed from anywhere other than their standard locations. Admittedly, this leads to a lot of detection analytics due to the volume of native Windows binaries, but we’ve found that creating these analytics is worth the effort to catch Dridex as well as other threats that use DLL search order hijacking.

Aaron Didier
INTELLIGENCE ANALYST
Aaron is an unconventional autodidact who got their start in information security as a "terminally curious" member of a network operations team at a small regional WISP, addressing abuse@ emails, digging into netflow, and responding to VoIP attacks. Prior to joining the flock at Red Canary, Aaron was a member of the Motorola Solutions SOC, where they contributed to the creation of a Security Onion-inspired RHEL IDS known as Red Onion. They also spent time briefly at Baker McKenzie administering CB Response and Protect while mapping to the ATT&CK Framework. In their off hours, you may catch Aaron digging just about anywhere, be it in the garden, in a book, in a 10-k report, capture the flag event, Twitter post, or documentary. Their fascination for the world knows no bounds and they love sharing everything they've learned with anyone willing to listen.
Aaron is an unconventional autodidact who got their start in information security as a "terminally curious" member of a network operations team at a small regional WISP, addressing abuse@ emails, digging into netflow, and responding to VoIP attacks. Prior to joining the flock at Red Canary, Aaron was a member of the Motorola Solutions SOC, where they contributed to the creation of a Security Onion-inspired RHEL IDS known as Red Onion. They also spent time briefly at Baker McKenzie administering CB Response and Protect while mapping to the ATT&CK Framework. In their off hours, you may catch Aaron digging just about anywhere, be it in the garden, in a book, in a 10-k report, capture the flag event, Twitter post, or documentary. Their fascination for the world knows no bounds and they love sharing everything they've learned with anyone willing to listen.
 
 
Back to Top