[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Everything's Coming Up Rainbows~

oifaaa:

oifaaa:

I know I was joking the other day about Korra but I do fear it should be common knowledge at this point that all avatars are just causing messes the next avatars after have to clean up and yes that very much includes Aang

My boy Aang really got a guided tour of the inequality happening in Ba Sing Se and said “I have a war to deal with I’ll let the next avatar deal with this shit”

#i still need to read the female airbender novels#but ive read kyoshi and yeah its bad guys#they should honestly just include it as part of the avatar title at this point#master of all 4 elements bridge between the spirit and human world cleaner upper of the previous avatars oppsies

206 notes

it’s so true, and also so critical to the avatars that they had to Pick Their Lane. When everything is falling apart, you have to pick your One Thing to fix and sure hope the next guy gets one of the other things

kiragecko:

silverwhittlingknife:

umbrellajam:

dustorange-moved:

Something critical is that probably the real dick grayson would absolutely never ever casually call BW Dad to his face, and truthfully even post-adoption in GK#17 the father-son thing is only like 49% of the Bruce & Dick rs although dick absolutely does lasso bruce into conversations as in “oh my dad does the same thing!” when hes having conversations w total strangers faraway from anywhere on the eastern seaboard where word could never get back and associations could not be made BUT WITH ALL OF IT SAID THAT DICK WOULD NEVER CALL BRUCE DAD TO HIS FACE, in Bruce’s like deepest, most potent fantasies, like daydreams and nightdreams and also canonically that issue where bruce is in that feartoxin dreamscape world in Batman/superman #65 where his parents are alive and bruce is romantically stable and dick is his son, Dick absolutely, and invariably, calls him Dad. But that element absolutely isnt on the table in the real world at all. It isnt even that Bruce Wants That—he doesn’t want a change to the very precarious working current order, not even a very small one bc its very precious & risk aversion reasons—but it’s also like a satisfying recognition of some real under-the-surface order in the world that bruce perceives but which just isnt in play in the real world. But it is something explicit and certain in Bruce’s head and something that Bruce is aware of. And sometimes he like closes his eyes and thinks of it or something.

#YEAH YES PERFECT #one of the things that i loved about the post-crisis batfamily #is that it was constantly TEASING family without ever quite getting there #everyone was very hesitant about words like ‘father’ or 'son’ or 'brother’ #and they all tended to get defensively couched in 'the closest thing i have to a brother’ 'he was like a father to me’ #'maybe that’s what it’s like… between fathers and sons’ #or all the times dick & tim call each other brother but put it in air quotes. or the workarounds: my friend. my closest ally. #or when dick & bruce are performing themselves for strangers so then dick can say anything because it’s half pretense #it’s this dynamic where you alllllmost say you think of the other person as your family but you don’t QUITE say it #and i loved this because i love the dynamic of 'we both care more about this than we’re willing to admit’ #and there’s so much productive tension in that restraint & that unwillingness to say the words #and i feel like it loses so much of what i loved when you just retcon it and dick’s just casually calling bruce dad. no!! no!!! #dick would not say that!!! he might think about it. or imply it. he might hint at it. he might put it in air quotes #but he would not say it straight out sincerely to bruce for all kinds of complicated reasons#and bruce would never expect it. not even want it precisely. because the person he loves is dick-grayson-as-he-is #and not really dick-grayson-if-he’d-never-had-other-parents-and-uncomplicatedly-grew-up-calling-bruce-dad #and yet sometimes. in the secret daydream of his own mind. (tags via @silverwhittlingknife)

#YES \o/#the tension of it all is the best part#how big and bedrock the emotions are vs. the unstable shatterpoint fragility they feel re: talking about them#like speaking a thing aloud could be enough to break it#vulnerability!! rejection!! giving up emotional leverage to someone who may (probably definitely) use it against you!!#the universe will conspire to steal from you those you love the moment you give away how important they are to you!!#these traumatized people#the bittersweet double-edged sword for Bruce of both wanting and not wanting to hear it (h/t @umbrellacam)

I really wish the West had more recognition of 'martial family’ - the East Asian concept of mentor-student (and student-student) bonds. We’ve watered down the concept of mentorship so much that superhero-sidekick (and fellow sidekick) relationships just … don’t have a box, anymore.

Like, Dick and Bruce’s relationship is DEFINITELY more complicated than that! Bruce took him in as his ward, and later adopted him! (Though, those thing can also happen in martial/mentor relationships.) They are in this weird, delicate place that isn’t quite what either of them wants, but also is the only thing they both could accept.

But, even if mentor-student bonds don’t ENCOMPASS everything their relationship is, understanding them would help push back on the modern idea of nuclear family that seems to get applied to the Bats these days. Dick would TOTALLY have called Tim 'shixiong’ if he was in a wuxia show, and it would perfectly encapsulate their relationship. It would also have helped EVERYONE to provide Dick with the same term for Jason. Tim could correct people when they called Bruce his dad by explaining he’s Tim’s 'shifu’, and maybe fans would stop snickering 'doth thou protest too much?’ Cass IS Tim and Steph’s 'shijie’, and that allows us to place her in the Batfamily without reaching or twisting her actual relationships.

The challenge that Dick and Bruce have is that they started out as mentor-student, and then both later realized that father-son MIGHT fit better, but neither is sure. If we don’t understand how they started, and how safe and rich and deep that relationship can be, it’s really hard to chart their journey!

national Park service didn’t remove the T. It was done to them by DOGE. More info on their FB page, they’re were very upset about it too!

Anonymous

beemovieerotica:

janusisasnakeyboi:

beemovieerotica:

maybe i’m stupid but why don’t they change it back? like why are they sitting around as if they can’t go back in and change their own website. sorry but if this is the “non-compliance” that’s happening where, sure, they don’t take initiative to comply with executive orders, but they just sit back and let someone else do it anyway and go “oh well, that’s that”, should we really be patting them on the back lol

image

I don’t think they can. Somebody asked the same question as a response to this post 2 days ago (February 14th) and this was their response

[Image ID: a comment thread between Alt National Park Service and another Facebook user. Thread reads as follows:

NPS (directed at Elon Musk): Why all the pettiness? We are proud supporters, and many in our coalition are LGBTQ+.

Sam Perkins-Harbin: can you put it back online?

NPS: Access has been denied to those who previously had it. This is getting ridiculous.

End ID.]

They also cite having severe staffing shortages, especially with emergency personnel, and fearing essential operations are going to completely shut down in a different post one day later.

oh snap ok i was ignorant, thank you for the info!

estrangeloedessa:

viejospellejos:

Uncredited art makes me sad :( The artist’s name is David Nott

helly-ena:

image
image
image
image

Severance
1.01 / 2.05

+

image
In order to stop the culture of faking orgasms, we need to stop the culture of shaming others for their sexual experiences.

oldenoughtobeyourfather:

silkbox:

  • Can’t get your partner off on the first try? Cool. You can still be thoughtful and make them feel good.
  • Can get your partner off within 30 seconds? Awesome, good for you both, don’t let it get to your head.
  • Can make someone cum in less than 5, but for others, it’s a process that takes an hour? That’s alright, everyone’s different. 
  • Does it take you 30 minutes to cum? That’s okay, you’re not broken, you’re not a failure.
  • Does it take you 10 seconds to cum? That’s great, you’re not a slut, you’re not overly sensitive or dirty. 
  • Can’t cum without toys/vibrators? That’s awesome, that’s a valid part of sexual play!
  • Can only cum with loving, vanilla sex? That’s perfectly normal, and you will find lots of great partners to experience that with!
  • Can’t orgasm at all? THAT’S ALSO COOL. It’s not a bad thing, you can still enjoy sex TONNES just like others.

Orgasms are NOT the defining characteristic of your sexual prowess. They are great, they’re lovely when they happen, but for the love of science, stop bringing them up higher than they need to be. 

This one’s a pretty big deal.  “Did you come?”  

  • No, but it still felt great
  • Yes, and it felt really great
  • Yes, but coming isn’t that big a deal for me
  • No, can you keep going?
  • Yes, can you keep going?
  • No, do you want to watch me get myself off?
  • Yes, but don’t get a big head about it – I come so easily it doesn’t matter what you do.
  • No, but I bet I can get you up again
  • Yes, but I’d rather keep edging because I always get a huge drop after coming and it really puts me off sex for a while
  • No, thank you, orgasm denial leaves me deliciously horny for days
  • No, and I’m really frustrated, let’s brainstorm how to change that

All of these are fucking awesome answers.  Including the last one.  They’re also 100% legitimate answers.  Including the last one.

Only the last one is even a little bit “negative,” and, really, how bad, arrogant, or egocentric a lover do you have to be that you’d rather not know when your partner says “here are some great ways to help me come next time, lover?”

If on the other hand you’re going to panic or be unhappy about that last answer then you’re not a bad lover (no shame either way) but your sex life will be less workable.  With the result that you’ll continue having, well, the same result.

To be honest, whether you or your partner comes isn’t the most important thing about sex.  It’s whether you’re both satisfied afterwards.  The only trick being that 

  • You get to decide what “satisfied” means for you
  • You don’t get to decide what “satisfied” means for your partner(s.)  

Asking “did you come” isn’t really the right question.  “Does this work for you” is way healthier.  That’s the culture we want to look for and encourage.

P.S. Your partner isn’t a video game.  His or her orgasms aren’t a boss fight.  The question you want to ask isn’t “did I beat the previous high score” but “would you like to play again.”

the-prophesied-disco-gay:

Literally sobbing. A judge, a US judge defended us. A judge brought up intersex people, uaing the term intersex, to *defend* us by not allowing our erasure. I’m having a lot of feelings right now


image

mylittleredgirl:

i wonder who names the trill symbionts.

their natural form of communication when unjoined is electrical, not a syllabic language or a sound-based language at all. at first i thought they might be given names by the trill who tend the symbiont pools once they’re ready for joining… but wouldn’t it be lovely if it were the first host?

i think a lot about how the first joining must be an incredible experience, unique from the others because the symbiont has no humanoid memories, nothing that would be familiar to the first host—and unlike with subsequent hosts, the symbiont also doesn’t know how to be joined yet. they’re learning the whole thing together, two sentient beings who are not like each other but are now inseparably part of each other.

and what else would the host’s first question be except who are you?

and the answer is unmistakable, but also untranslatable. i assume the symbiont has a sense of identity pre-joining, but they’ve never identified themselves aloud before. they only learn about spoken language after they’re joined.

maybe the naming is a rite of passage for the first host, proof that the joining is complete—that the host understands the true essence of the symbiont enough to give them a name, that the symbiont understands what that means enough to agree, and all together it’s a gift that will stay with the symbiont for centuries.

marvelsmostwanted:

image
image

There are people – some in my own Party – who think that if you just give Donald Trump everything he wants, he’ll make an exception and spare you some of the harm. I’ll ignore the moral abdication of that position for just a second to say — almost none of those people have the experience with this President that I do. I once swallowed my pride to offer him what he values most — public praise on the Sunday news shows — in return for ventilators and N95 masks during the worst of the pandemic. We made a deal. And it turns out his promises were as broken as the BIPAP machines he sent us instead of ventilators. Going along to get along does not work – just ask the Trump-fearing red state Governors who are dealing with the same cuts that we are. I won’t be fooled twice.

I’ve been reflecting, these past four weeks, on two important parts of my life: my work helping to build the Illinois Holocaust Museum and the two times I’ve had the privilege of reciting the oath of office for Illinois Governor.

As some of you know, Skokie, Illinois once had one of the largest populations of Holocaust survivors anywhere in the world. In 1978, Nazis decided they wanted to march there.

The leaders of that march knew that the images of Swastika clad young men goose stepping down a peaceful suburban street would terrorize the local Jewish population – so many of whom had never recovered from their time in German concentration camps.

The prospect of that march sparked a legal fight that went all the way to the Supreme Court. It was a Jewish lawyer from the ACLU who argued the case for the Nazis – contending that even the most hateful of speech was protected under the first amendment.

As an American and a Jew, I find it difficult to resolve my feelings around that Supreme Court case – but I am grateful that the prospect of Nazis marching in their streets spurred the survivors and other Skokie residents to act. They joined together to form the Holocaust Memorial Foundation and built the first Illinois Holocaust Museum in a storefront in 1981 – a small but important forerunner to the one I helped build thirty years later.

I do not invoke the specter of Nazis lightly. But I know the history intimately — and have spent more time than probably anyone in this room with people who survived the Holocaust. Here’s what I’ve learned – the root that tears apart your house’s foundation begins as a seed – a seed of distrust and hate and blame.

The seed that grew into a dictatorship in Europe a lifetime ago didn’t arrive overnight. It started with everyday Germans mad about inflation and looking for someone to blame.

I’m watching with a foreboding dread what is happening in our country right now. A president who watches a plane go down in the Potomac – and suggests — without facts or findings — that a diversity hire is responsible for the crash. Or the Missouri Attorney General who just sued Starbucks – arguing that consumers pay higher prices for their coffee because the baristas are too “female” and “nonwhite.” The authoritarian playbook is laid bare here: They point to a group of people who don’t look like you and tell you to blame them for your problems.

I just have one question: What comes next? After we’ve discriminated against, deported or disparaged all the immigrants and the gay and lesbian and transgender people, the developmentally disabled, the women and the minorities – once we’ve ostracized our neighbors and betrayed our friends – After that, when the problems we started with are still there staring us in the face – what comes next.

All the atrocities of human history lurk in the answer to that question. And if we don’t want to repeat history – then for God’s sake in this moment we better be strong enough to learn from it.

I swore the following oath on Abraham Lincoln’s Bible: “I do solemnly swear that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the state of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of Governor …. according to the best of my ability.

My oath is to the Constitution of our state and of our country. We don’t have kings in America – and I don’t intend to bend the knee to one. I am not speaking up in service to my ambitions — but in deference to my obligations.

If you think I’m overreacting and sounding the alarm too soon, consider this:

It took the Nazis one month, three weeks, two days, eight hours and 40 minutes to dismantle a constitutional republic. All I’m saying is when the five-alarm fire starts to burn, every good person better be ready to man a post with a bucket of water if you want to stop it from raging out of control.

Those Illinois Nazis did end up holding their march in 1978 – just not in Skokie. After all the blowback from the case, they decided to march in Chicago instead. Only twenty of them showed up. But 2000 people came to counter protest. The Chicago Tribune reported that day that the “rally sputtered to an unspectacular end after ten minutes.” It was Illinoisans who smothered those embers before they could burn into a flame.

Tyranny requires your fear and your silence and your compliance. Democracy requires your courage. So gather your justice and humanity, Illinois, and do not let the “tragic spirit of despair” overcome us when our country needs us the most.

Sources:

• NBC Chicago & J.B. Pritzker, Democratic governor of Illinois, State of the State address 2025: Watch speech here | Full text

Betches News on Instagram (screencaps)