[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Nov 1, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 1, 2024 - Dec 27, 2024
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Effectiveness of GP-referral vs. self-referral pathways to guided ICBT for depression, panic disorder and social anxiety disorder: a naturalistic study

  • Jill Bjarke; 
  • Rolf Gjestad; 
  • Tine Nordgreen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Therapist guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (guided ICBT) appears to be efficacious for depression, panic disorder (PD) and social anxiety disorder (SAD) in routine care clinical settings. However, implementation of guided ICBT is limited partly due to low referral rates from general practitioners (GP). In response, self-referral systems were introduced in mental health care about a decade ago to improve access to care. Yet, little is known about how referral pathways may affect treatment outcomes in guided ICBT.

Objective:

This study aims to compare the overall treatment effectiveness of GP-referral and self-referral to guided ICBT for patients with depression, PD or SAD in a specialized routine care clinic. This study also explores if the treatment effectiveness varies between referral pathways and the respective diagnoses.

Methods:

This naturalistic open effectiveness study compares treatment outcomes from pre-treatment to post-treatment and from pre- to 6-month follow-up across two referral pathways. All participants underwent module based guided ICBT lasting up to 14 weeks, with weekly therapist guidance through asynchronous messaging. Participants self-reported symptoms before, during, immediately after, and 6-months post-treatment. Level and change in symptom severity were measured across all diagnoses.

Results:

In total 460 patients met inclusion criteria, 305 GP-referred (GP), and 155 self-referred (Self). Across the total sample about 60% were female, mean age 32 years, average duration of disorder 10 years. We found no significant differences in pre-treatment symptom levels between referral pathways, across the diagnoses. Estimated effect sizes based on Linear Mixed Modelling showed large improvements from pre- to post-treatment and from pre- to follow-up across all diagnoses, with statistically significant differences between referral pathways (GP: 0.97 - 1.22, Self: 1.34 - 1.58, P: <.001 - .002) and for the diagnoses separately: depression (GP: 0.86 – 1.26, Self: 1.97 -2.07, P: <.001 - .018), PD (GP: 1.32 – 1.60, Self: 1.64 – 2.08, P: .065 - .016 ) and SAD (GP: 0.80 - 0.99, Self: 0.99 – 1.19, P: .178 - .222 ).

Conclusions:

Self-referral to guided ICBT for depression and panic disorder appears to yield greater treatment outcomes compared to GP-referrals. We found no difference in outcome between referral pathway for SAD. This study underscores the potential of self-referral pathways to improve access and treatment outcomes within healthcare services.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bjarke J, Gjestad R, Nordgreen T

Effectiveness of GP-referral vs. self-referral pathways to guided ICBT for depression, panic disorder and social anxiety disorder: a naturalistic study

JMIR Preprints. 01/11/2024:68165

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.68165

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/68165

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time. Copyright

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.