[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Imaging Behav. 2015 Dec;9(4):913–926. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9356-x

Table 1.

Comparison of performances of M2TL, DTSVM, LapSVM, and SVM for MCI-C/MCI-NC classification using different types of modalities

Modality Method ACC (%) SEN (%) SPE (%) AUC
Multimodal (MRI+CSF+PET) M2TL 77.8 83.9 69.8 0.814
DTSVM 69.4 64.3 73.5 0.736
LapSVM 69.1 74.3 62.1 0.751
SVM 63.8 58.8 67.7 0.683
MRI M2TL 72.1 75.1 68.2 0.768
DTSVM 63.3 59.8 66.0 0.700
LapSVM 65.9 69.6 61.0 0.686
SVM 53.9 47.6 57.7 0.554
CSF M2TL 66.7 74.6 60.5 0.668
DTSVM 66.2 60.3 70.8 0.701
LapSVM 62.1 66.2 56.8 0.660
SVM 60.8 55.2 65.0 0.647
PET M2TL 68.1 71.5 63.7 0.734
DTSVM 67.0 59.6 12.1 0.732
LapSVM 61.6 65.7 56.1 0.661
SVM 58.0 52.1 62.5 0.612

ACC Accuracy, SEN Sensitivity, SPE Specificity