ACH would fit in here too, we could get a chargeback but it's actually for not enough funds and we could retry it
Description
Details
Related Objects
Event Timeline
The returns for ACH and SEPA re not chargebacks and shouldn't be tagged as such. They are a delayed bank response. Can we count ACH and SEPA returns as rejects vs CB's? Counting them as chargebacs at all is misleading, there is no consumer dispute process in the ACH/SEPA networks as there is in Credit card networks. For ACH and SEPA they are not disputes but bank returns. Can we therefore label them accordingly?
Change #1054404 had a related patch set uploaded (by Cstone; author: Cstone):
[wikimedia/fundraising/SmashPig@master] Pass through reason to refund queue
Change #1054404 merged by jenkins-bot:
[wikimedia/fundraising/SmashPig@master] Pass through reason to refund queue
Change #1070075 had a related patch set uploaded (by Cstone; author: Cstone):
[wikimedia/fundraising/crm@master] WIP: Don't cancel SEPA recurrings on retryable chargeback
Change #1070075 merged by jenkins-bot:
[wikimedia/fundraising/crm@master] Don't cancel SEPA recurrings on retryable chargeback