[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

WO2002097648A1 - Method of impr0ving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads - Google Patents

Method of impr0ving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2002097648A1
WO2002097648A1 PCT/US2002/016028 US0216028W WO02097648A1 WO 2002097648 A1 WO2002097648 A1 WO 2002097648A1 US 0216028 W US0216028 W US 0216028W WO 02097648 A1 WO02097648 A1 WO 02097648A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
servers
peer
file
connection speed
list
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2002/016028
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Fredrick Robert Chang
Sreenivasa Rao Gorti
Jennifer Lynne Joy
Original Assignee
Sbc Technology Resources, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. filed Critical Sbc Technology Resources, Inc.
Priority to EP02739315A priority Critical patent/EP1390862A4/en
Publication of WO2002097648A1 publication Critical patent/WO2002097648A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01—Protocols
    • H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • H04L67/104—Peer-to-peer [P2P] networks
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/40—Network security protocols
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01—Protocols
    • H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01—Protocols
    • H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
    • H04L67/1004—Server selection for load balancing
    • H04L67/101—Server selection for load balancing based on network conditions
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01—Protocols
    • H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
    • H04L67/1004—Server selection for load balancing
    • H04L67/1014—Server selection for load balancing based on the content of a request
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01—Protocols
    • H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
    • H04L67/1036—Load balancing of requests to servers for services different from user content provisioning, e.g. load balancing across domain name servers
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01—Protocols
    • H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
    • H04L67/1038—Load balancing arrangements to avoid a single path through a load balancer
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01—Protocols
    • H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • H04L67/104—Peer-to-peer [P2P] networks
    • H04L67/1061—Peer-to-peer [P2P] networks using node-based peer discovery mechanisms
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/30—Definitions, standards or architectural aspects of layered protocol stacks
    • H04L69/32—Architecture of open systems interconnection [OSI] 7-layer type protocol stacks, e.g. the interfaces between the data link level and the physical level
    • H04L69/322—Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions
    • H04L69/329—Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions in the application layer [OSI layer 7]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/40—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass for recovering from a failure of a protocol instance or entity, e.g. service redundancy protocols, protocol state redundancy or protocol service redirection
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/50—Network services
    • H04L67/51—Discovery or management thereof, e.g. service location protocol [SLP] or web services
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/50—Network services
    • H04L67/60—Scheduling or organising the servicing of application requests, e.g. requests for application data transmissions using the analysis and optimisation of the required network resources

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to peer-to-peer networks and more particularly to a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads.
  • a computer connected to the network acts as both a server and a client.
  • a person may store JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) photograph files on his . computer.
  • Other computers on the network can see the JPEG photograph files on his computer and request that they be downloaded to their computer.
  • this person can see the JPEG
  • peer-to- peer networks very versatile.
  • One problem that occurs with peer-to- peer networks is that errors can occur during a download. The user then has to start the downloading process over. Since the "server” is not a dedicated server, this problem is even more likely to occur.
  • Some of the sources of errors (failures) are: power down by a user during a download; server IP (Internet Protocol) address is dynamically re-assigned by the ISP (Internet Service Provider); and the server is not able to handle the load of requests. Note that this list is not meant to be exclusive, just representative.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of peer-to-peer network in accordance with one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the steps used in a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads in accordance with one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a downloading system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a downloading system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a downloading system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 6 is an example of a list of servers that satisfy a search query in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 7 is an example of a list of servers that satisfy a search query in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a flow chart of the steps used in a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a flow chart of the steps used in a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIGs. lOa-c are a flow chart of the steps used in a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. Detailed Description of the Drawings
  • a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads includes the steps of initiating a search from a client on a peer-to-peer network. Next, a list of servers is downloaded that satisfies the search. At least one of the servers is selected from the list of servers. Next, one of a plurality of downloading systems is selected based on a predetermined criteria. A file is downloaded using one of the plurality of downloading systems. One of the downloading systems is a multiple concurrent download system. Using this system the client downloads two or more identical versions of the file simultaneously. As a result, a failure on one of the servers does not result in the file not being downloaded. Generally this download system is only used if the bandwidth connection of the client is at least two times the potential download speed of the server.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of peer-to-peer network 20 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • the peer-to- peer network 20 has a plurality of peers (computers) 22, 24, 26, 28 connected together by a network 30. Note that two peers 26, 28 may be directly connected to each other.
  • the peer-to-peer network may contain a central index server 32. If the network 20 contains a central index server, the server 32 indexes the files (programs) that are available to members of the network 20 and handles queries for those files.
  • the queries may be text queries.
  • the queries are a unique key. In the unique key embodiment, a hashing code is used to determine the unique key for each file.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the steps used in a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • the process starts, step 40, by originating a search from a client on a peer-to- peer network at step 42.
  • a search query is broadcast over the peer- to-peer network at step 44.
  • a list of servers and a list of associated document names that satisfy the search query is received at the client at step 46.
  • At least one of the servers is selected from the list of servers at step 48.
  • a downloading system is determined based on a predetermined criteria.
  • a file is downloaded which ends the process at step 54. Note that once a user selects the correct file for downloading, the system may select exact copies of that file for downloading. In another embodiment, the downloading system may select files having the same content but a different compression level for downloading.
  • a unique key that identifies the file is entered as the search query.
  • the user may also receive the file size, a source node and unique key with the list of servers.
  • the system measures a connection speed to the plurality of servers. The connection speed of the plurality of server is compared to an available bandwidth at the client. This information is used to determine which download system is used. Next it is determined if an available bandwidth is less than a connection speed to two of the servers. When the available bandwidth is less than the connection speed to two of the servers, a serial concatenated download system is selected. A serial concatenated download system selects a first server (one of the list of servers) to start a download.
  • a second server is selected.
  • the download is requested to start at a next byte after a last byte received.
  • a multiple concurrent download system is selected. This system starts downloading from multiple servers (at least two servers) at the same time.
  • a multiple concatenated download system is selected when the available bandwidth is not less than the connection speed to two of the servers.
  • the multiple concatenated download system starts a first download at a first byte of the file for one of the at least two servers.
  • a second download is started at a second byte of the file for a second of the at least two servers.
  • the files are combined to create a complete file.
  • the system can be expanded to n-servers.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a downloading system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. This figure shows an example of a serial concatenated download system.
  • a first server 60 starts downloading a file 62 to the client from the beginning of the file (BOF).
  • a second server 66 begins downloading the exact same file to the client at the point the error occurred. This reduces the time to download the file since only the parts of the file not received are downloaded.
  • the two (or more) parts of the file are then concatenated to form the complete file 68.
  • the system may be expanded to include n-servers, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a downloading system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • This figure shows a multiple concurrent download system.
  • a first server 70 and a second server 72 concurrently start to download the file 74, 76 to the client. If an error occurs with one of the servers the other server continues to download the file to the client. This increases the reliability of the download. If one servers completes the download first the other download is canceled. This can be accomplished by having two processes running on the client machine that send a message to each other when one of them has finished downloading the file or this can be done with two threads of the same process. Note that this system can be expanded to n-servers as will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a downloading system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • This figure shows a multiple concatenated download system.
  • a first server 80 starts downloading a file 82 at a first start byte 84 to the client. Note that the start of file 84 need not be the beginning of the file 86.
  • a second server 88 starts downloading the file 82 at a second start byte 90 to the client.
  • the download is terminated and the portions are concatenated to form the complete file 92. This can be accomplished by having two processes running on the client machine that send a message to each other when an overlapping byte is downloaded or this can be down with two threads of the same process. Note that this technique can also be expanded to n-servers.
  • FIG. 6 is an example of a list of servers 100 that satisfy a search query in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • the figure shows an example of the information a user might receive in response to a text query.
  • the user would receive a list of servers 102, an associated file name (file path) 104, a file size 106 for each of the files.
  • file sizes 106 vary by the encoding scheme used 108.
  • a source node 110 may also be provided for the file.
  • a source node 110 is the server (file) from which the file was copied.
  • a bandwidth (download speed) 112 is included that shows how fast a file can be downloaded from the server.
  • FIG. 7 is an example of a list of servers that satisfy a search query in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • Figure 7 is similar to figure 6 except that the search was based on a unique key (hashing code).
  • the file sizes 106 and encoding schemes 108 are exactly the same for all the servers. This is because the hashing code that determines the unique key is derived from the complete file. As a result a file encoded with two different encoding systems will have two different unique keys.
  • FIG. 8 is a flow chart of the steps used in a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • the process starts, step 150, by initiating a search from a client on a peer-to-peer network at step 152.
  • a list of servers that satisfy the search is received at the client at step 154.
  • At least one of the servers from the list of servers is selected at step 156.
  • a user selects the server.
  • the client selects one of the files based on a file size, encoding scheme, download speed or other criteria.
  • One of the plurality of downloading systems is selected based on a predetermined criteria at step 158.
  • a file is downloaded using one of the plurality of downloading system which ends the process at step 162.
  • the step of selecting a download system includes the choice of: a multiple concurrent download system; a multiple concatenated download system; or a serial concatenated download system.
  • One of the predetermined criteria for selecting between the downloading systems is a connection speed to one of the servers.
  • the connection speed is compared to an available bandwidth at the client.
  • initiating the search includes entering a text string.
  • initiating the search includes entering a unique key.
  • the search may be broadcast to the peer-to-peer network.
  • the search query is transmitted to a central server.
  • the response to the query may include a document name, a file size, an available bandwidth at a server and a source node for the file.
  • step 170 by initiating a search from a first peer to the peer-to-peer network at step 172.
  • a list of peer servers that meet a search query is received at step 172.
  • One of the plurality of downloading systems is selected based on a predetermined criteria at step 176.
  • a file is downloaded using the one of the plurality of downloading system which ends the process at step 180.
  • the predetermined criteria includes determining a connection speed to each of the peer server on the list of peer servers. A subset of the list of peer servers is selected based on the connection speed.
  • One method of determining the connection speed is to receive a test file from each of the peer servers.
  • Another method of determining the connection speed is to determine an order of response from each of the servers.
  • Yet another method of determining connection speed is to ping each of the servers.
  • a server is selected with the fastest connection speed.
  • the download is started from the server with the fastest connection speed. If the server with the fastest connection speed has an error before the file is downloaded, a second server is selected. A last byte received is determined. A download starting from a next byte command is transmitted to a second server.
  • a plurality of servers is selected from the list of servers.
  • a plurality of simultaneous downloads is started from the plurality of servers. If the client has received a complete version of the file from one of the plurality of servers, the rest of the downloads are terminated.
  • a plurality of simultaneous offset downloads is started from the plurality of servers. When a complete file can be formed from the plurality of simultaneous offset downloads, the complete file is constructed.
  • FIGs. lOa-c are a flow chart of the steps used in a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • the process starts, step 190, by initiation a search form a first peer to the peer-to-peer network at step 192.
  • a list of peer servers, a plurality of associated file names, a plurality of file sizes, a plurality of bandwidths and a plurality of source nodes that meet a search query are received at step 194.
  • a connection speed to each of the peer servers on the list of peer servers is determined at step 196.
  • a subset of the list of peer servers is selected based on the connection speed at step 198.
  • a server with a fastest connection speed is selected at step 200.
  • a download is started from the server with the fastest connection speed at step 202.
  • a second server is selected at step 206.
  • a last byte that was received is determined at step 208.
  • a download starting from a next byte command is transmitted to a second server at step 210.
  • a plurality of servers are selected from the list of servers at step 212.
  • a plurality of simultaneous downloads is started from the plurality of servers at step 214.
  • step 216 it is determined if one of the plurality of servers has received a complete version of the file at step 216.
  • the rest of the downloads are terminate which ends the process at step 220.
  • the methods described herein can be implemented as computer- readable instructions stored on a computer-readable storage medium that when executed by a computer will perform the methods described herein.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
  • Computer And Data Communications (AREA)

Abstract

A method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads includes the steps of initiating a search from a client on a peer-to-peer network (152). Next, a list of servers is downloaded that satisfies the search (154). At least one of the server is selected from the list of servers (156). Next, one of a plurality of downloading systems is selected based on a predetermined criteria (158). A file is downloaded using one of the plurality of downloading systems.

Description

METHOD OF IMPROVING THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-TO-PEER
NETWORK DOWNLOADS
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to peer-to-peer networks and more particularly to a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads.
Background of the Invention
In a peer-to-peer network a computer connected to the network acts as both a server and a client. In one example a person may store JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) photograph files on his . computer. Other computers on the network can see the JPEG photograph files on his computer and request that they be downloaded to their computer. On the other hand this person can see the JPEG
> photograph on other network user's computers and may request that * one of the files be downloaded to his computer. This makes peer-to- peer networks very versatile. One problem that occurs with peer-to- peer networks is that errors can occur during a download. The user then has to start the downloading process over. Since the "server" is not a dedicated server, this problem is even more likely to occur. Some of the sources of errors (failures) are: power down by a user during a download; server IP (Internet Protocol) address is dynamically re-assigned by the ISP (Internet Service Provider); and the server is not able to handle the load of requests. Note that this list is not meant to be exclusive, just representative.
Thus there exists a need for a method of downloading files on a peer-to-peer network that increases the reliability and efficiency of the downloading process. rief Description of the Drawings
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of peer-to-peer network in accordance with one embodiment of the invention; FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the steps used in a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a downloading system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention; FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a downloading system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a downloading system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 6 is an example of a list of servers that satisfy a search query in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 7 is an example of a list of servers that satisfy a search query in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 8 is a flow chart of the steps used in a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 9 is a flow chart of the steps used in a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads in accordance with one embodiment of the invention; and
FIGs. lOa-c are a flow chart of the steps used in a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. Detailed Description of the Drawings
A method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads includes the steps of initiating a search from a client on a peer-to-peer network. Next, a list of servers is downloaded that satisfies the search. At least one of the servers is selected from the list of servers. Next, one of a plurality of downloading systems is selected based on a predetermined criteria. A file is downloaded using one of the plurality of downloading systems. One of the downloading systems is a multiple concurrent download system. Using this system the client downloads two or more identical versions of the file simultaneously. As a result, a failure on one of the servers does not result in the file not being downloaded. Generally this download system is only used if the bandwidth connection of the client is at least two times the potential download speed of the server.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of peer-to-peer network 20 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The peer-to- peer network 20 has a plurality of peers (computers) 22, 24, 26, 28 connected together by a network 30. Note that two peers 26, 28 may be directly connected to each other. In one embodiment, the peer-to-peer network may contain a central index server 32. If the network 20 contains a central index server, the server 32 indexes the files (programs) that are available to members of the network 20 and handles queries for those files. In one embodiment, the queries may be text queries. In another embodiment, the queries are a unique key. In the unique key embodiment, a hashing code is used to determine the unique key for each file. The indexing method is separate from whether the peer-to-peer network has a central index server or uses a broadcast query method. FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the steps used in a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The process starts, step 40, by originating a search from a client on a peer-to- peer network at step 42. A search query is broadcast over the peer- to-peer network at step 44. A list of servers and a list of associated document names that satisfy the search query is received at the client at step 46. At least one of the servers is selected from the list of servers at step 48. At step 50, a downloading system is determined based on a predetermined criteria. At step 52, a file is downloaded which ends the process at step 54. Note that once a user selects the correct file for downloading, the system may select exact copies of that file for downloading. In another embodiment, the downloading system may select files having the same content but a different compression level for downloading.
In one embodiment, a unique key that identifies the file is entered as the search query. In another embodiment, the user may also receive the file size, a source node and unique key with the list of servers. In one embodiment, the system measures a connection speed to the plurality of servers. The connection speed of the plurality of server is compared to an available bandwidth at the client. This information is used to determine which download system is used. Next it is determined if an available bandwidth is less than a connection speed to two of the servers. When the available bandwidth is less than the connection speed to two of the servers, a serial concatenated download system is selected. A serial concatenated download system selects a first server (one of the list of servers) to start a download. If there is a failure at the first server, a second server is selected. The download is requested to start at a next byte after a last byte received. When the available bandwidth is not less than the connection speed to two of the servers, a multiple concurrent download system is selected. This system starts downloading from multiple servers (at least two servers) at the same time. In another embodiment a multiple concatenated download system is selected when the available bandwidth is not less than the connection speed to two of the servers. The multiple concatenated download system starts a first download at a first byte of the file for one of the at least two servers. Then a second download is started at a second byte of the file for a second of the at least two servers. The files are combined to create a complete file. As will be apparent to those skilled in the art the system can be expanded to n-servers.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a downloading system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. This figure shows an example of a serial concatenated download system. A first server 60 starts downloading a file 62 to the client from the beginning of the file (BOF). When an error 64 occurs, a second server 66 begins downloading the exact same file to the client at the point the error occurred. This reduces the time to download the file since only the parts of the file not received are downloaded. The two (or more) parts of the file are then concatenated to form the complete file 68. Note that the system may be expanded to include n-servers, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a downloading system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. This figure shows a multiple concurrent download system. A first server 70 and a second server 72 concurrently start to download the file 74, 76 to the client. If an error occurs with one of the servers the other server continues to download the file to the client. This increases the reliability of the download. If one servers completes the download first the other download is canceled. This can be accomplished by having two processes running on the client machine that send a message to each other when one of them has finished downloading the file or this can be done with two threads of the same process. Note that this system can be expanded to n-servers as will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a downloading system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. This figure shows a multiple concatenated download system. A first server 80 starts downloading a file 82 at a first start byte 84 to the client. Note that the start of file 84 need not be the beginning of the file 86. A second server 88 starts downloading the file 82 at a second start byte 90 to the client. When a various portions of the file can be combined to from a complete copy of the file, the download is terminated and the portions are concatenated to form the complete file 92. This can be accomplished by having two processes running on the client machine that send a message to each other when an overlapping byte is downloaded or this can be down with two threads of the same process. Note that this technique can also be expanded to n-servers.
FIG. 6 is an example of a list of servers 100 that satisfy a search query in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The figure shows an example of the information a user might receive in response to a text query. The user would receive a list of servers 102, an associated file name (file path) 104, a file size 106 for each of the files. Note that the file sizes 106 vary by the encoding scheme used 108. A source node 110 may also be provided for the file. A source node 110 is the server (file) from which the file was copied. Finally a bandwidth (download speed) 112 is included that shows how fast a file can be downloaded from the server.
FIG. 7 is an example of a list of servers that satisfy a search query in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. Figure 7 is similar to figure 6 except that the search was based on a unique key (hashing code). In this case the file sizes 106 and encoding schemes 108 are exactly the same for all the servers. This is because the hashing code that determines the unique key is derived from the complete file. As a result a file encoded with two different encoding systems will have two different unique keys.
FIG. 8 is a flow chart of the steps used in a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The process starts, step 150, by initiating a search from a client on a peer-to-peer network at step 152. A list of servers that satisfy the search is received at the client at step 154. At least one of the servers from the list of servers is selected at step 156. In one embodiment, a user selects the server. In another embodiment, the client selects one of the files based on a file size, encoding scheme, download speed or other criteria. One of the plurality of downloading systems is selected based on a predetermined criteria at step 158. At step 160 a file is downloaded using one of the plurality of downloading system which ends the process at step 162.
In one embodiment the step of selecting a download system includes the choice of: a multiple concurrent download system; a multiple concatenated download system; or a serial concatenated download system. One of the predetermined criteria for selecting between the downloading systems is a connection speed to one of the servers. In one embodiment, the connection speed is compared to an available bandwidth at the client. In one embodiment, initiating the search includes entering a text string. In another embodiment, initiating the search includes entering a unique key. The search may be broadcast to the peer-to-peer network. In another embodiment, the search query is transmitted to a central server. The response to the query may include a document name, a file size, an available bandwidth at a server and a source node for the file. FIG. 9 is a flow chart of the steps used in a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The process starts, step 170, by initiating a search from a first peer to the peer-to-peer network at step 172. A list of peer servers that meet a search query is received at step
174. One of the plurality of downloading systems is selected based on a predetermined criteria at step 176. At step 178 a file is downloaded using the one of the plurality of downloading system which ends the process at step 180. In one embodiment, the predetermined criteria includes determining a connection speed to each of the peer server on the list of peer servers. A subset of the list of peer servers is selected based on the connection speed. One method of determining the connection speed is to receive a test file from each of the peer servers. Another method of determining the connection speed is to determine an order of response from each of the servers. Yet another method of determining connection speed is to ping each of the servers.
When an available bandwidth at the client is less than two times a connection speed, a server is selected with the fastest connection speed. The download is started from the server with the fastest connection speed. If the server with the fastest connection speed has an error before the file is downloaded, a second server is selected. A last byte received is determined. A download starting from a next byte command is transmitted to a second server.
When an available bandwidth at the client is not less than two times a connection speed, a plurality of servers is selected from the list of servers. A plurality of simultaneous downloads is started from the plurality of servers. If the client has received a complete version of the file from one of the plurality of servers, the rest of the downloads are terminated. In another embodiment, a plurality of simultaneous offset downloads is started from the plurality of servers. When a complete file can be formed from the plurality of simultaneous offset downloads, the complete file is constructed.
FIGs. lOa-c are a flow chart of the steps used in a method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The process starts, step 190, by initiation a search form a first peer to the peer-to-peer network at step 192. A list of peer servers, a plurality of associated file names, a plurality of file sizes, a plurality of bandwidths and a plurality of source nodes that meet a search query are received at step 194. A connection speed to each of the peer servers on the list of peer servers is determined at step 196. A subset of the list of peer servers is selected based on the connection speed at step 198. When an available bandwidth is less than two times the connection speed, a server with a fastest connection speed is selected at step 200. A download is started from the server with the fastest connection speed at step 202. Next it is determined if the server with the fastest connection speed had an error before the file was download at step 204. When the server with the fastest connection speed had an error before the file was downloaded, a second server is selected at step 206. A last byte that was received is determined at step 208. A download starting from a next byte command is transmitted to a second server at step 210. When an available bandwidth is not less than two times a connection speed, a plurality of servers are selected from the list of servers at step 212. A plurality of simultaneous downloads is started from the plurality of servers at step 214. Next it is determined if one of the plurality of servers has received a complete version of the file at step 216. When one of the plurality of servers has received a complete version of the file at step 218, the rest of the downloads are terminate which ends the process at step 220. Thus there has been described a technique that increases the reliability, ease and efficiency of downloading files over a peer-to-peer network. The method is flexible and adapts for the best solution depending on available bandwidth, connection speeds, etc.
The methods described herein can be implemented as computer- readable instructions stored on a computer-readable storage medium that when executed by a computer will perform the methods described herein.
While the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alterations, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications, and variations in the appended claims.

Claims

ClaimsWhat is claimed is:
1 . A method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads, comprising:
a) initiating a search from a client on a peer-to-peer network; b) receiving a list of servers that satisfy the search; c) selecting at least one of the servers from the list of servers; d) selecting one of a plurality of downloading systems based on a predetermined criteria; and e) downloading a file using one of the plurality of downloading systems.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein step (d) further includes the step of:
dl) selecting a multiple concurrent download system.
3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein step (d) further includes the step of:
dl) selecting a multiple concatenated download system.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein step (d) further includes the step of:
dl) selecting a serial concatenated download system.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein step (d) further includes the step of:
dl) determining a connection speed to the at least one of the servers.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein step (d) further includes the step of:
dl) comparing a connection speed to the at least one of the servers to an available bandwidth.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein step (a) further includes the steps of:
al) entering a text string.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein step (a) further includes the step of:
al) entering a unique key.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein step (a) further includes the step of:
al) broadcasting a search query to the peer-to-peer network.
1 0. The method of claim 1, wherein step (a) further includes the step of:
al) transmitting a search query to a central server.
1 1 . The method of claim 1, wherein step (b) further includes the step of:
bl) receiving a document name.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein step (b) further includes the step of:
bl) receiving a file size.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein step (b) further includes the step of:
bl) receiving a source node for a file.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein step (b) further includes the step of:
bl) receiving an available bandwidth at a server.
15. A method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads, comprising the steps of:
a) originating a search from a client on a peer-to-peer network; b) broadcasting a search query over the peer-to-peer network; c) receiving a list of servers and a list of associated document names that satisfy the search query; d) selecting at least one of the servers from the list of servers; e) determining one of a plurality of downloading systems based on a predetermined criteria; and f) downloading a file.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein step (a) further including the step of:
al) entering a unique key that identifies the file.
17. The method of claim 15, wherein step (c) further includes the step of:
cl) receiving a file size, a source node and a unique key.
1 8. The method of claim 15, wherein step (d) further includes the step of:
dl) measuring a connection speed to a plurality of servers ; d2) comparing the connection speed of the plurality of servers to an available bandwidth to the client.
19. The method of claim 15, wherein step (e) further includes the steps of:
el) determining if an available bandwidth is less than a connection speed to two of the servers; e2) when the available bandwidth is less than the connection speed to two of the servers, selecting a serial concatenated download system.
20. The method of claim 19, further including the steps of:
e3) when the available bandwidth is not less than the connection speed to two of the servers, selecting a multiple concurrent download system.
2 1 . The method of claim 19, further including the steps of:
e3) when the available bandwidth is not less than the connection speed to two of the servers, selecting a multiple concatenated download system.
22. The method of claim 19 wherein step (e2) further includes the steps of:
i) starting a download from one of the list of servers; ii) if the one of the list of servers is interrupted during the download, selecting a second of the list of server to start a download; iii) requesting the download to start at a next byte after a last received byte.
23. The method of claim 20, wherein step (e3) further includes the steps of:
i) starting a download from at least two of the servers; ii) if any of the at least two of the servers finishes the download, terminating the download for any other servers.
24. The method of claim 21 , wherein step (e3) further includes the steps of:
i) starting a first download at a first byte of the file for one of the at least two servers; ii) starting a second download at a second byte of the file for a second of the at least two servers; iii) determining when a complete file has been downloaded by combining the first download and the second download.
25. A method of operating a peer-to-peer network comprising the steps of:
a) initiating a search from a first peer to the peer-to-peer network; b) receiving a list of peer servers that meet a search query; c) selecting one of a plurality of downloading systems based on a predetermined criteria; and d) downloading a file using the one of the plurality of downloading systems.
26. The method of claim 25, wherein step (c) further includes the steps of:
cl) determining a connection speed to each of the peer servers on the list of peer servers; c2) selecting a subset of the list of peer servers based on the connection speed.
27. The method of claim 26, wherein step (cl) further includes the step of:
i) receiving a< test file from each of the servers on the list of servers.
28. The method of claim 26, wherein step (cl) further includes the step of:
i) determining an order of response receipt from each of the servers on the list of servers.
29. The method of claim 26, wherein step (cl) further includes the step of:
i) pinging each of the servers on the list of servers.
30. The method of claim 25, wherein the step (d) further includes the steps of:
dl) when an available bandwidth is less than a two times a connection speed, selecting a server with a fastest connection speed; d2) starting a download from the server with the fastest connection speed.
3 1 . The method of claim 29, further including the steps of:
d3) determining • if the server with the fastest connection speed had an error before the file was downloaded; d4) when the server with the fastest connection speed had an error before the file was downloaded, selecting a second server; d5) determining a last byte received; d6) transmitting a download starting from a next byte command to a second server.
32. The method of claim 25, wherein the step (d) further includes the steps of:
dl) when an available bandwidth is not less than a two times a connection speed, selecting a plurality of servers from the list of servers; d2) starting a plurality of simultaneous downloads from the plurality of servers.
33. The method of claim 32, further including the steps of:
d3) determining if the client has received a complete version of the file from one of the plurality of servers; d4) when the client has received a complete version of the file from one of the plurality of servers, terminating a rest of the downloads.
34. The method of claim 25, wherein the step (d) further includes the steps of:
dl) when an available bandwidth is not less than a two times a connection speed, selecting a plurality of servers from the list of servers; d2) starting a plurality of simultaneous offset downloads from the plurality of servers.
35 . The method of claim 34, further including the step of:
d3) when a complete file can be formed from the plurality of simultaneous offset downloads, constructing a complete file.
36. A method of operating a peer-to-peer network comprising the steps of:
a) initiating a search from a first peer to the peer-to-peer network; b) receiving a list of peer servei s, a plurality of associated .fije names, a plurality of file sizes, a plurality of bandwidths and a ή\ plurality of source .nodes .-that meet a search query; c) determining a connection speed to each of the peer servers on the list of peer servers; . d) selecting a subset of the list of peer servers based on the . - connection speed; e) when an available bandwidth is less than a two times the connection speed, selecting a server with a fastest connection speed; f) starting a download from the server with the fastest connection speed; g) determining if the server with the fastest connection speed had an error before the file was downloaded; h) when the server with the fastest connection speed had an error before the file was downloaded, selecting a second server; i) determining a last byte received; j) transmitting a download starting from a next byte command to a second server; k) when an available bandwidth is not less than a two times a connection speed, selecting a plurality of servers from the list of servers;
1) starting a plurality of simultaneous downloads from the plurality of servers; m) determining if the client has received a complete version of the file from one of the plurality of servers; and n) when the client has received a complete version of the file from one of the plurality of servers, terminating a rest of the downloads.
PCT/US2002/016028 2001-05-25 2002-05-16 Method of impr0ving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads WO2002097648A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP02739315A EP1390862A4 (en) 2001-05-25 2002-05-16 Method of impr0ving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/866,502 US7272645B2 (en) 2001-05-25 2001-05-25 Method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads
US09/866,502 2001-05-25

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2002097648A1 true WO2002097648A1 (en) 2002-12-05

Family

ID=25347746

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2002/016028 WO2002097648A1 (en) 2001-05-25 2002-05-16 Method of impr0ving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (2) US7272645B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1390862A4 (en)
WO (1) WO2002097648A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1880302A2 (en) * 2005-05-12 2008-01-23 International Business Machines Corporation Peer data transfer orchestration

Families Citing this family (72)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7277950B1 (en) 2000-12-29 2007-10-02 Swarmcast, Inc. Packet transfer mechanism over a peer to peer network
US20020138576A1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2002-09-26 Schleicher Jorg Gregor Method and system for generating revenue in a peer-to-peer file delivery network
US7653552B2 (en) * 2001-03-21 2010-01-26 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Digital file marketplace
US20020198929A1 (en) * 2001-06-25 2002-12-26 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus to encourage client into a distributed peer to peer sharing technology
US20020198930A1 (en) * 2001-06-25 2002-12-26 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for wide-spread distribution of electronic content in a peer to peer fashion
US7124191B2 (en) * 2001-06-26 2006-10-17 Eastman Kodak Company Method and system for managing images over a communication network
US7243153B2 (en) * 2001-06-26 2007-07-10 Eastman Kodak Company System and method for managing images over a communication network
US7509372B2 (en) * 2001-09-13 2009-03-24 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for redirecting data requests in peer-to-peer data networks
US8041803B2 (en) * 2001-09-26 2011-10-18 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Method and system for delivering files in digital file marketplace
JP2003125445A (en) * 2001-10-10 2003-04-25 Toshiba Corp System information downloading method and mobile communication terminal
US20050066219A1 (en) 2001-12-28 2005-03-24 James Hoffman Personal digital server pds
US7130921B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2006-10-31 International Business Machines Corporation Centrally enhanced peer-to-peer resource sharing method and apparatus
DE10241957A1 (en) * 2002-09-10 2004-03-18 Siemens Ag Data communication system and system for updating of software of computers connected to the network wherein prior to transfer of upgrade data, the type of communications medium is first determined
JP2004193787A (en) * 2002-12-09 2004-07-08 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Receiver, receiving system, and receiving method
KR100427143B1 (en) * 2003-01-17 2004-04-14 엔에이치엔(주) Method for Transmitting and Dowloading Streaming Data
US7555559B2 (en) * 2003-02-28 2009-06-30 Onion Networks, KK Parallel data transfer over multiple channels with data order prioritization
FR2855691B1 (en) * 2003-06-02 2005-11-11 Canon Kk SECURING THE DISTRIBUTION OF DIGITAL DOCUMENTS IN A PAIRING NETWORK
US8291062B2 (en) * 2003-08-20 2012-10-16 Aol Inc. Managing access to digital content sources
US8234414B2 (en) 2004-03-31 2012-07-31 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Proxy caching in a photosharing peer-to-peer network to improve guest image viewing performance
US8364829B2 (en) * 2004-09-24 2013-01-29 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for ascribing resource consumption to activity in a causal path of a node of a distributed computing system
JP2006126894A (en) * 2004-10-26 2006-05-18 Sony Corp Content delivery method, program and information processor
US7698386B2 (en) * 2004-11-16 2010-04-13 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Serving content from an off-line peer server in a photosharing peer-to-peer network in response to a guest request
US7596618B2 (en) * 2004-12-07 2009-09-29 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Splitting a workload of a node
US7636325B2 (en) * 2004-12-07 2009-12-22 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Determining highest workloads for nodes in an overlay network
US20060136526A1 (en) * 2004-12-16 2006-06-22 Childress Rhonda L Rapid provisioning of a computer into a homogenized resource pool
US8051170B2 (en) * 2005-02-10 2011-11-01 Cisco Technology, Inc. Distributed computing based on multiple nodes with determined capacity selectively joining resource groups having resource requirements
DE102005010131A1 (en) * 2005-03-02 2006-09-07 Arvato Mobile Gmbh A method of transmitting digital contents of a content provider to the users of an online content transmission system
US8688801B2 (en) 2005-07-25 2014-04-01 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Syndication feeds for peer computer devices and peer networks
US8005889B1 (en) 2005-11-16 2011-08-23 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Systems, methods, and computer program products for synchronizing files in a photosharing peer-to-peer network
US8560456B2 (en) 2005-12-02 2013-10-15 Credigy Technologies, Inc. System and method for an anonymous exchange of private data
KR100655600B1 (en) * 2005-12-06 2006-12-11 한국전자통신연구원 Streaming service providing method and apparatus for p2p based network
US8788572B1 (en) 2005-12-27 2014-07-22 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Caching proxy server for a peer-to-peer photosharing system
CN100384127C (en) * 2006-01-06 2008-04-23 华为技术有限公司 Downloading user's terminal and its method for downloading shared data
US7720091B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2010-05-18 Utbk, Inc. Systems and methods to arrange call back
US8125931B2 (en) * 2006-01-10 2012-02-28 Utbk, Inc. Systems and methods to provide availability indication
US8788706B2 (en) * 2006-02-27 2014-07-22 Vudu, Inc. Method and system for managing data transmission between devices behind network address translators (NATs)
CN101136911B (en) * 2006-08-31 2010-12-15 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 Method to download files using P2P technique and P2P download system
US8312449B2 (en) * 2006-10-31 2012-11-13 International Business Machines Corporation Viral installation of operating systems in a network
CN101005606B (en) * 2006-12-31 2012-07-04 华为技术有限公司 Method and device for reducing medium playing delay
US8520535B2 (en) * 2007-05-31 2013-08-27 International Business Machines Corporation Optimization process and system for a heterogeneous ad hoc Network
US8320414B2 (en) 2007-05-31 2012-11-27 International Business Machines Corporation Formation and rearrangement of lender devices that perform multiplexing functions
US8620784B2 (en) 2007-05-31 2013-12-31 International Business Machines Corporation Formation and rearrangement of ad hoc networks
US10419360B2 (en) 2007-05-31 2019-09-17 International Business Machines Corporation Market-driven variable price offerings for bandwidth-sharing ad hoc networks
US10623998B2 (en) 2007-05-31 2020-04-14 International Business Machines Corporation Price offerings for bandwidth-sharing ad hoc networks
US8249984B2 (en) 2007-05-31 2012-08-21 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for fair-sharing in bandwidth sharing ad-hoc networks
US8429286B2 (en) * 2007-06-28 2013-04-23 Apple Inc. Methods and systems for rapid data acquisition over the internet
CN101146110B (en) * 2007-09-25 2011-06-29 深圳市迅雷网络技术有限公司 A method for playing stream media
CN101399729B (en) * 2007-09-28 2010-12-08 鸿富锦精密工业（深圳）有限公司 Management system and method for file download and upload
WO2009061829A1 (en) 2007-11-05 2009-05-14 Limelight Networks, Inc. End to end data transfer
US8219283B2 (en) * 2007-11-14 2012-07-10 Ford Global Technologies Active steering nibble control algorithm for electric steering systems
US7908362B2 (en) * 2007-12-03 2011-03-15 Velocix Ltd. Method and apparatus for the delivery of digital data
US8775678B1 (en) * 2007-12-19 2014-07-08 Symantec Corporation Automated wireless synchronization and transformation
US20090271611A1 (en) * 2008-04-23 2009-10-29 Proscape Technologies, Inc. System and method of managed content distribution
US20090313317A1 (en) * 2008-06-12 2009-12-17 Integra Micro Systems (P) Ltd. Wider Delivery Of Multimedia Content
CN101753610B (en) * 2008-12-19 2012-11-21 华为技术有限公司 Distributed network structure method, device, system and task processing method
US9727569B2 (en) * 2009-02-10 2017-08-08 Autodesk, Inc. Transitive file copying
CN101854374A (en) * 2009-04-01 2010-10-06 日电（中国）有限公司 Data node device, method and system for acquiring opposite end information
US9948708B2 (en) * 2009-06-01 2018-04-17 Google Llc Data retrieval based on bandwidth cost and delay
US8103769B1 (en) * 2009-09-03 2012-01-24 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Dynamic isolation of shared resources
US20110264762A1 (en) * 2010-04-22 2011-10-27 Nokia Corporation Method and Apparatus for Handling Different Path Structures in Multiple CDN Vendors
JP5716302B2 (en) * 2010-06-30 2015-05-13 ソニー株式会社 Information processing apparatus, content providing method, and program
CN102055805A (en) * 2010-12-30 2011-05-11 Tcl集团股份有限公司 Device and method for point-to-point (P2P) downloading based on internetwork protocol standards
US9571566B2 (en) 2011-06-15 2017-02-14 Juniper Networks, Inc. Terminating connections and selecting target source devices for resource requests
US9363327B2 (en) 2011-06-15 2016-06-07 Juniper Networks, Inc. Network integrated dynamic resource routing
US8504723B2 (en) * 2011-06-15 2013-08-06 Juniper Networks, Inc. Routing proxy for resource requests and resources
US9406153B2 (en) * 2011-12-14 2016-08-02 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Point of interest (POI) data positioning in image
CN104969534B (en) * 2012-10-18 2018-07-24 吉拉飞克科技股份有限公司 The jamming control method of communication linkage handling capacity can dynamically be expanded
US10410244B2 (en) 2013-11-13 2019-09-10 Bi Science (2009) Ltd Behavioral content discovery
US9648098B2 (en) 2015-05-28 2017-05-09 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Predictive peer determination for peer-to-peer digital content download
WO2020153797A1 (en) 2019-01-23 2020-07-30 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for managing data in a network based on swarm intelligence
CN111949605B (en) * 2019-05-15 2024-07-19 伊姆西Ip控股有限责任公司 Method, apparatus and computer program product for implementing a file system
US11184833B2 (en) * 2019-06-19 2021-11-23 Citrix Systems, Inc. Bandwidth sharing amongst trusted peers

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5848231A (en) * 1996-02-12 1998-12-08 Teitelbaum; Neil System configuration contingent upon secure input
US6029195A (en) * 1994-11-29 2000-02-22 Herz; Frederick S. M. System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects
US6046980A (en) * 1996-12-09 2000-04-04 Packeteer, Inc. System for managing flow bandwidth utilization at network, transport and application layers in store and forward network
US6339785B1 (en) * 1999-11-24 2002-01-15 Idan Feigenbaum Multi-server file download

Family Cites Families (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5553083B1 (en) * 1995-01-19 2000-05-16 Starburst Comm Corp Method for quickly and reliably transmitting frames of data over communications links
US6003030A (en) * 1995-06-07 1999-12-14 Intervu, Inc. System and method for optimized storage and retrieval of data on a distributed computer network
US5913028A (en) * 1995-10-06 1999-06-15 Xpoint Technologies, Inc. Client/server data traffic delivery system and method
US5740423A (en) * 1995-12-28 1998-04-14 Csg Systems, Inc. System and method for accessing distributed data on a plurality of databases
US6098180A (en) * 1997-02-18 2000-08-01 E-Parcel, Llc Robust delivery system
US6049892C1 (en) * 1997-02-24 2002-06-04 Ethos Software Corp Process and apparatus for downloading data from a server computer to a client computer
US6216163B1 (en) * 1997-04-14 2001-04-10 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus providing for automatically restarting a client-server connection in a distributed network
US6105029A (en) * 1997-09-17 2000-08-15 International Business Machines Corporation Retrieving network files through parallel channels
US7756892B2 (en) * 2000-05-02 2010-07-13 Digimarc Corporation Using embedded data with file sharing
US6108703A (en) * 1998-07-14 2000-08-22 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Global hosting system
US6195680B1 (en) * 1998-07-23 2001-02-27 International Business Machines Corporation Client-based dynamic switching of streaming servers for fault-tolerance and load balancing
US6742023B1 (en) * 2000-04-28 2004-05-25 Roxio, Inc. Use-sensitive distribution of data files between users
US6606643B1 (en) * 2000-01-04 2003-08-12 International Business Machines Corporation Method of automatically selecting a mirror server for web-based client-host interaction
US6377974B1 (en) * 2000-01-19 2002-04-23 Speedbit Ltd. Methods and apparatus for downloading a file from a server
US20020049760A1 (en) * 2000-06-16 2002-04-25 Flycode, Inc. Technique for accessing information in a peer-to-peer network
US20020073204A1 (en) * 2000-12-07 2002-06-13 Rabindranath Dutta Method and system for exchange of node characteristics for DATA sharing in peer-to-peer DATA networks
US6636854B2 (en) * 2000-12-07 2003-10-21 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for augmenting web-indexed search engine results with peer-to-peer search results
US7047406B2 (en) * 2001-03-21 2006-05-16 Qurlo Holdings, Inc. Method and system for providing a secure peer-to-peer file delivery network
US20020138576A1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2002-09-26 Schleicher Jorg Gregor Method and system for generating revenue in a peer-to-peer file delivery network
US7539664B2 (en) * 2001-03-26 2009-05-26 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for operating a rating server based on usage and download patterns within a peer-to-peer network
US6983326B1 (en) * 2001-04-06 2006-01-03 Networks Associates Technology, Inc. System and method for distributed function discovery in a peer-to-peer network environment

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6029195A (en) * 1994-11-29 2000-02-22 Herz; Frederick S. M. System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects
US5848231A (en) * 1996-02-12 1998-12-08 Teitelbaum; Neil System configuration contingent upon secure input
US6046980A (en) * 1996-12-09 2000-04-04 Packeteer, Inc. System for managing flow bandwidth utilization at network, transport and application layers in store and forward network
US6339785B1 (en) * 1999-11-24 2002-01-15 Idan Feigenbaum Multi-server file download

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP1390862A4 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1880302A2 (en) * 2005-05-12 2008-01-23 International Business Machines Corporation Peer data transfer orchestration
EP1880302A4 (en) * 2005-05-12 2010-05-26 Ibm Peer data transfer orchestration

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20020178261A1 (en) 2002-11-28
US7272645B2 (en) 2007-09-18
EP1390862A4 (en) 2009-10-28
US7475132B2 (en) 2009-01-06
US20070271380A1 (en) 2007-11-22
EP1390862A1 (en) 2004-02-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7272645B2 (en) Method of improving the reliability of peer-to-peer network downloads
JP5065734B2 (en) Peer-to-peer file sharing system and method using downloadable data segments
US11194719B2 (en) Cache optimization
US6963914B1 (en) Method and apparatus for retrieving a network file using a logical reference
JP5951071B2 (en) System and method for combining pull mode and push mode
AU2001238189B8 (en) System and method for representing and maintaining redundant data sets utilizing DNA transmission and transcription techniques
EP1721438B1 (en) Server, method and system for caching data streams
US8321503B2 (en) Context-specific network resource addressing model for distributed services
JP4358581B2 (en) System and method for generating an improved overlay network with an efficient distributed data structure
US7203764B2 (en) System and method for distributing load among redundant independent stateful world wide web server sites
US7783684B2 (en) Efficient, robust file handle invalidation
US20060089954A1 (en) Scalable common access back-up architecture
US20060112422A1 (en) Data transfer using hyper-text transfer protocol (HTTP) query strings
US20080016240A1 (en) Method for obtaining information objects in a communication system
WO2011150830A1 (en) Method and node for obtaining the content and content network
US8103631B2 (en) Merging files on storage and retrieve
WO2014056428A1 (en) File uploading method and system
WO2005072473A2 (en) System and method for binding a client to a server
CN101588287B (en) Method, device and system for scheduling and downloading peer-to-peer network data
CN103731472A (en) Method and system for downloading files by adopting P2P technology and client-side
EP2656244A1 (en) Searching in peer to peer networks
KR100279735B1 (en) Multimedia Content Delivery Method Using Metadata
CN118677710A (en) Ad hoc network group for message restriction for computing device peer matching
US20230104788A1 (en) Method of distributing files through a content delivery network based also on artificial intelligence algorithms, telematic system and servers that allow to implement it
Osmani et al. Swift: The missing link between peer-to-peer and information-centric networks

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2002739315

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2002739315

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP