US6265867B1 - Position encoder utilizing fluxgate sensors - Google Patents
Position encoder utilizing fluxgate sensors Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US6265867B1 US6265867B1 US09/315,205 US31520599A US6265867B1 US 6265867 B1 US6265867 B1 US 6265867B1 US 31520599 A US31520599 A US 31520599A US 6265867 B1 US6265867 B1 US 6265867B1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- sensor
- signal
- pair
- radial
- tangential
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R33/00—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
- G01R33/02—Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux
- G01R33/04—Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux using the flux-gate principle
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01D—MEASURING NOT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR A SPECIFIC VARIABLE; ARRANGEMENTS FOR MEASURING TWO OR MORE VARIABLES NOT COVERED IN A SINGLE OTHER SUBCLASS; TARIFF METERING APPARATUS; MEASURING OR TESTING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01D5/00—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable
- G01D5/12—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable using electric or magnetic means
- G01D5/14—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable using electric or magnetic means influencing the magnitude of a current or voltage
- G01D5/20—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable using electric or magnetic means influencing the magnitude of a current or voltage by varying inductance, e.g. by a movable armature
- G01D5/22—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable using electric or magnetic means influencing the magnitude of a current or voltage by varying inductance, e.g. by a movable armature differentially influencing two coils
- G01D5/2208—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable using electric or magnetic means influencing the magnitude of a current or voltage by varying inductance, e.g. by a movable armature differentially influencing two coils by influencing the self-induction of the coils
- G01D5/2216—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable using electric or magnetic means influencing the magnitude of a current or voltage by varying inductance, e.g. by a movable armature differentially influencing two coils by influencing the self-induction of the coils by a movable ferromagnetic element, e.g. a core
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01P—MEASURING LINEAR OR ANGULAR SPEED, ACCELERATION, DECELERATION, OR SHOCK; INDICATING PRESENCE, ABSENCE, OR DIRECTION, OF MOVEMENT
- G01P3/00—Measuring linear or angular speed; Measuring differences of linear or angular speeds
- G01P3/42—Devices characterised by the use of electric or magnetic means
- G01P3/44—Devices characterised by the use of electric or magnetic means for measuring angular speed
- G01P3/48—Devices characterised by the use of electric or magnetic means for measuring angular speed by measuring frequency of generated current or voltage
- G01P3/481—Devices characterised by the use of electric or magnetic means for measuring angular speed by measuring frequency of generated current or voltage of pulse signals
- G01P3/487—Devices characterised by the use of electric or magnetic means for measuring angular speed by measuring frequency of generated current or voltage of pulse signals delivered by rotating magnets
Definitions
- the present invention relates to position encoders, and more particularly to position encoders that utilize fluxgate sensors to produce an output signal that is a linear function of the position of a movable object with respect to a fixed reference.
- position encoders are devices which determine the instantaneous physical position of a movable object with respect to a fixed reference point, and translate such position information into a form that can be utilized by a processing tool.
- a position encoder typically transforms position information into an electrical signal, and provides the electrical signal to an analog or digital signal processor.
- Position encoders may determine angular position, as in the case of a rotatable shaft or toroidal structure, or they may determine linear position, as in the case of a slidable control actuator.
- An ideal position encoder produces an output signal that is a linear function of the position of the movable object.
- Instantaneous position information, sampled over time may be used to determine higher derivatives of position such as velocity and acceleration.
- Typical position encoders operate either mechanically, electrically (e.g., capacitive sensors), optically or magnetically.
- a mechanical encoder relies upon physical contact with the movable object; actuators on the movable object physically interact with an electromechanical transducer to produce an electrical signal.
- An optical encoder receives light reflected from illuminated markings associated with the movable object and translates variations in the received light into an electrical signal.
- a magnetic encoder typically utilizes either fluxgate sensors, magneto-resistive sensors, giant magneto-resistive sensors, or Hall effect sensors.
- a fluxgate sensor magnetic encoder uses fluxgate sensors to detect the magnetic field generated by magnetic elements attached to the movable object, and translates aspects of the magnetic field such as magnitude and polarity into an electrical signal corresponding to the position and direction of motion of the object.
- a Hall effect sensor magnetic encoder translates the Hall effect of a magnetic field on a current carrying conductor to produce a signal corresponding to the position of the object. Fluxgate position encoders are several orders of magnitude more sensitive than Hall effect position encoders and are thus preferred in applications where it may be difficult to have the sensors in close proximity of the magnetic element producing the magnetic field.
- a Hall effect sensor requires is difficult to maintain because of the harsh environment created by road dirt, oil, grease, ice and snow, whereas a fluxgate sensor can operate at a distance of several inches.
- a fluxgate sensor includes one or more turns of an electrical conductor wound about a core, which is disposed along a sensing axis.
- the core may be any magnetically saturating material, including highly permeable materials such as alloys of iron and nickel. Saturable alloys exhibiting high permeability and low coercive strength are preferred.
- An external driving circuit alternately drives the sensor into saturation in one polarity and then into the opposite polarity.
- An improved fluxgate driving circuit is described and claimed in my copending application, U.S. application Ser. No. 09/314,322, filed contemporaneously herewith, and assigned to the present assignee (Attorney Docket No. ADL-092). The external driving circuit drives current through the windings in one direction until the core saturates.
- the driving circuit reverses current in the windings until the core saturates in the opposite polarity.
- the amount of time the driving circuit drives current in each direction is the same; i.e., the current waveform through the windings as a function of time is symmetrical.
- the presence of an external magnetic field “helps” (i.e., enhances) the saturation of the core in one polarity, while the external magnetic field impedes the saturation of the core in the opposite polarity.
- the waveform of the current through the windings as a function of time is asymmetrical, since saturation occurs more quickly for the polarity of the saturation enhanced by the external field.
- the amount of asymmetry can be used to determine characteristics of the external magnetic field, such as magnitude and direction.
- a fluxgate sensor having a fixed position and orientation at the perimeter of a rotating magnetic element produces a periodic sinusoidal output.
- a fluxgate sensor having a fixed position and orientation alongside a magnetic element, movable along its polar axis produces approximately one cycle of a sinusoid as the magnetic element moves from pole to pole past the fluxgate sensor.
- Prior art fluxgate position encoders map the resulting sinusoid from the fluxgate sensor to an output signal that is a linear function of the position of the magnetic element.
- mapping requires a significant amount of processing resources and is subject to error, since the resulting sinusoid is not a true closed-form sinusoid and the resulting sinusoid tends to change shape due to various factors such as temperature and shaft run-out (i.e., movement of the axis of rotation). As the sinusoid changes shape, the output of the mapping function will be less than linear and will introduce an error in the position representation.
- the mapping function may be designed to be adaptive so as to compensate for such variations, but an adaptive mapping function further increases the mapping complexity.
- some prior art fluxgate position encoders utilize the fluxgate sensor output directly, and limit the range of motion of the magnetic element, so as to constrain the sensor output to the linear range.
- the limited range of motion is a significant disadvantage to this type of encoder. Further, even within the limited range of motion, the error (with respect to a true linear transfer function) increases as the motion of the magnetic element moves the output away from the sinusoid zero crossing.
- a further disadvantage to prior art position encoders is a sensitivity to run-out.
- Run-out is defined as any movement of the movable object from its intended path of movement.
- the movable object in a rotational position encoder, is typically a shaft that rotates about a rotational axis, such that the outer perimeter of the shaft maintains a circular envelope as the shaft rotates.
- the rotation about the ideal rotational axis may become eccentric, such that the outer perimeter of the shaft traces an irregular envelope as the shaft rotates. This deviation from the ideal circular envelope is known in the art as run-out.
- the movable object ideally moves along a linear axis. Run-out occurs when the motion of the movable object deviates from this linear axis of movement (e.g., side to side movement).
- the present invention is a position encoder for providing an output signal representative of a position of a movable body, relative to a reference position.
- the system includes at least one magnetic element fixedly attached to the movable body, and having opposing magnetic poles disposed along a polar axis and producing a magnetic field.
- the magnetic element and the movable body may be combined into a single, integrated unit.
- the system further includes a first spatially orthogonal fluxgate sensor pair and a second spatially orthogonal fluxgate sensor pair for detecting the magnetic field.
- the first sensor pair is disposed adjacent to the polar axis at a first predetermined distance
- the second pair is disposed adjacent to the polar axis at a second predetermined distance, e.g., twice the first predetermined distance.
- the system further includes a signal processor for receiving a signal from the first sensor pair and a signal from the second sensor pair.
- the signal processor produces an output signal, representative of the relative position of the movable body and a function of the signal from the first sensor pair and the signal from the second pair.
- the resulting relationship between the output signal and the position of the movable body is substantially linear.
- the output signal includes information representative of the relative angular position of the movable body
- the movable body includes a rotatable shaft having a rotational axis.
- the rotating magnetic element defines a mean plane of rotation substantially normal to the rotational axis.
- the first sensor pair and the second sensor pair each includes a radial sensor for sensing a radial component of the magnetic field, and a tangential sensor for sensing a tangential component of the magnetic field.
- the radial sensor of the first sensor pair is electrically connected in series opposition with the radial sensor of the second sensor pair, so as to produce a radial component signal
- the tangential sensor of the first sensor pair is electrically connected in series opposition to the tangential sensor of the second sensor pair, so as to produce a tangential component signal.
- all of the sensors are disposed along a sensor axis within the mean plane of rotation and normal to the rotational axis.
- the tangential sensor of the first sensor pair is disposed at a distance R1
- the tangential sensor of the second sensor pair is disposed at a distance R2
- the radial sensor of the first sensor pair is disposed at a distance of R3
- the radial sensor of the second sensor pair is disposed at a distance of R4.
- the distances R1, R2, R3 and R4 are chosen such that a first ratio R3/R1 is substantially equal to 2 1 ⁇ 3 , a second ratio R4/R2 is substantially equal to 2 1 ⁇ 3 , a third ratio R2/R1 is substantially equal to 2, and a fourth ratio R4/R3 substantially equal to 2.
- the position of the movable body includes rectilinear position, and the movable body includes an elongated bar element disposed along an axis of motion parallel with the polar axis.
- the first and second fluxgate sensor pairs are fixed relative to the reference position.
- the first sensor pair and the second sensor pair preferably each includes a radial sensor for sensing a radial component of the magnetic field, and a tangential sensor for sensing a tangential component of the magnetic field.
- the radial sensor of the first sensor pair is electrically connected in series opposition with the radial sensor of the second sensor pair, so as to produce a radial component signal
- the tangential sensor of the first sensor pair is electrically connected in series opposition to the tangential sensor of the second sensor pair, so as to produce a tangential component signal
- all of the sensors are disposed along an axis substantially normal to the linear axis of motion, the tangential sensor of the first sensor pair is disposed at a distance R1, the tangential sensor of the second sensor pair is disposed at a distance R2, the radial sensor of the first sensor pair is disposed at a distance of R3, and the radial sensor of the second sensor pair is disposed at a distance of R4.
- the distances R1, R2, R3 and R4 are preferably chosen such that a first ratio R3/R1 is substantially equal to 2 1 ⁇ 3 , a second ratio R4/R2 is substantially equal to 2 1 ⁇ 3 , a third ratio R2/R1 is substantially equal to 2 and a fourth ratio R4/R3 substantially equal to 2.
- the system in another embodiment, includes a plurality of magnetic elements, each having opposing magnetic poles disposed along a polar axis so as to define a polar orientation.
- Each of the magnetic elements produces a magnetic field, the elements are uniformly distributed about, and fixedly attached to, the movable body, such that adjacent magnetic elements alternate polar orientation.
- the system further includes a pair of fluxgate sensors substantially aligned with adjacent poles of two adjacent magnetic elements, and fixed with respect to the reference position.
- the system also includes a signal processor for receiving a first signal and a second signal from the pair of fluxgate sensors, the first signal representing the magnetic field from a first magnetic element of the two adjacent elements, the second signal representing the magnetic field from a second magnetic element of the two adjacent elements.
- the signal processor produces the output signal representative of the position of the movable body and a function of the first signal and the second signal.
- the system in another embodiment, includes an elongated magnetic element having a length L and having opposing magnetic poles disposed along a polar axis.
- the system further includes a first fluxgate sensor and a second fluxgate sensor disposed along a first sensor axis extending from and substantially normal to the polar axis.
- the first sensor is disposed at a first predetermined distance R1 and the second sensor is disposed at a second predetermined distance R2.
- the system further includes a third fluxgate sensor and a fourth fluxgate sensor disposed along a second sensor axis extending from and substantially normal to the polar axis, and at a distance D from said first sensor axis, substantially one half of the magnet length L.
- the third sensor is disposed at said first predetermined distance R1 and a fourth sensor is disposed at a second predetermined distance R2.
- the system further includes a signal processor for receiving a plurality of signals from the first, second, third and fourth fluxgate sensors, and for producing the output signal representative of the position of the movable body as a function of the plurality of signals, wherein the range of motion of the movable body is substantially greater than the length L.
- the system includes a magnetic element fixedly attached to a rotatably movable body, offset from the of rotation of the body such that the magnetic element rotates eccentrically with respect to the movable body.
- the system further includes a radial fluxgate sensor for detecting a radial component of the magnetic field.
- the radial sensor is disposed adjacent to the polar axis at a first predetermined distance.
- the system includes a tangential fluxgate sensor for detecting a tangential component of the magnetic field.
- the tangential sensor is disposed adjacent to the polar axis at a second predetermined distance.
- the system further includes a signal processor for receiving a signal from the radial sensor and a signal from the tangential sensor.
- the signal processor produces the output signal representative of the relative position of the movable body, and as a function of the at least one signal from the radial sensor and the at least one signal from the tangential sensor.
- the resulting relationship between the output signal and the position of the movable body is substantially linear for a range of the angular position.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic view of one preferred embodiment of an improved position encoder
- FIG. 2A illustrates a schematic view of another embodiment of the position encoder from FIG. 1;
- FIG. 2B illustrates a variation of the embodiment shown in FIG. 2A
- FIG. 3 graphically shows the linearization of the relationship between magnetic element motion and sensor output
- FIG. 4 schematically illustrates another embodiment of the position encoder from FIG. 1;
- FIG. 5 graphically illustrates the fluxgate sensor outputs from the embodiment of FIG. 4, along with a composite signal and an ideal sinusoid;
- FIG. 6A illustrates a schematic view of another embodiment of the position encoder from FIG. 1;
- FIG. 6B illustrates a variation of the embodiment shown in FIG. 6A
- FIG. 7 illustrates the composite sensor outputs along with the processor output for an extended range linear motion position encoder
- FIG. 8 illustrates a schematic view of another embodiment of the position encoder from FIG. 1;
- FIG. 9A graphically illustrates a sensor output from the embodiment shown in FIG. 8;
- FIG. 9B graphically illustrates a sensor output from the embodiment shown in FIG. 8;
- FIG. 9C graphically illustrates a sensor output from the embodiment shown in FIG. 8;
- FIG. 10 shows a schematic view of a variation of the embodiment described in FIG. 8;
- FIG. 11 illustrates a deformation of the rotatably movable body described in FIG. 8.
- FIG. 12 graphically illustrates a phase shift of the H C2 pulses with respect to the H C1 pulses.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic view of one preferred embodiment of an improved position encoder 100 according to the present invention, including a first spatially orthogonal fluxgate sensor pair 102 , a second spatially orthogonal fluxgate sensor pair 104 , a magnetic element 106 and a processor 108 .
- the first sensor pair 102 includes a first tangential sensor 110 and a first radial sensor 112 .
- the second sensor pair 104 includes a second tangential sensor 114 and a second radial sensor 116 .
- the magnetic element 106 includes a north pole 118 and a south pole 120 disposed along a polar axis PA.
- the magnetic element 106 rotates about a rotational axis RA so as to define a mean plane of rotation.
- the rotational axis RA intersects the polar axis approximately midway between the north pole 118 and the south pole 120 , and is substantially normal to the polar axis, PA.
- the first tangential sensor 110 , the first radial sensor 112 , the second tangential sensor 114 and the second radial sensor 116 are disposed along a sensor axis SA that lies within the mean plane of rotation.
- the longitudinal centerline of the first tangential sensor 110 is preferably disposed along the sensor axis SA at a predetermined distance R1.
- the midpoint of the first radial sensor 112 is preferably disposed along the sensor axis SA at a predetermined distance R3.
- the midpoint of the second tangential sensor 114 is preferably disposed along the sensor axis SA at a predetermined distance R2.
- the midpoint of the second radial sensor 116 is disposed along the sensor axis SA at a predetermined distance R4.
- the first tangential sensor 110 which produces a first tangential output signal H T1
- the second tangential sensor 114 which produces a second tangential output signal H T2
- the first radial sensor 112 which produces a first radial magnetic output signal H R1 and the second radial sensor 116 , which produces a second radial magnetic output signal H R2
- signals are occasionally described herein as ‘magnetic’ signals, it should be noted that such signals are representative of magnetic field phenomena, and the signals themselves may be electrical, magnetic, or of other types known to those in the art.
- An homogenous magnetic field that is common to sensors connected in series opposition produces current components in the sensor windings having opposite polarities. These resulting current components cancel, thus sensors connected in series opposition (e.g., sensors 110 , 114 and sensors 112 , 116 ) tend to reject common, homogenous magnetic fields.
- Rotation of the magnetic element 106 about the rotational axis RA defines a rotation angle ⁇ from the polar axis PA to the sensor axis SA, as shown in FIG. 1 .
- the sensor output signals H Tn and H Rn also vary as R ⁇ 3 , where R is the distance from the rotational axis to the individual sensors. Since the magnitude of the radial sensor output signal is twice the magnitude of the tangential sensor output signal at a given distance R, it is possible to use the R ⁇ 3 variation and place the sensors of a radial/tangential sensor pair at different distances along the sensor axis, so as to produce equal radial and tangential signal amplitudes at a given rotational angle ⁇ . As shown in FIG.
- the first tangential sensor 110 is disposed along the sensor axis SA at a distance R1 from the rotational axis RA and the first radial sensor 112 is disposed along the sensor axis SA at a distance R3 from the rotational axis RA.
- the distances R1 and R3 are chosen such that the ratio of R3/R1 is preferably substantially equal to 2 1 ⁇ 3 .
- the distances R2 and R4 are chosen such that the ratio of R4/R2 is preferably substantially equal to 2 1 ⁇ 3 . Because of the R ⁇ 3 variation in signal amplitude, such a placement results in equal radial and tangential signal amplitudes for a given rotational angle ⁇ .
- the electrically connected pairs reject homogenous external magnetic fields common to both sensors (e.g., the earth's magnetic field). Consequently, if the electrically connected sensors (i.e., 110 and 114 or 112 and 116 ) are disposed along the sensor axis SA at the same distance from the rotational axis RA, the sensors will also reject the local field produced by the magnetic element 106 .
- the electrically connected sensors are disposed along the sensor axis SA at unequal distances from the rotational axis RA, the electrically connected sensors will together produce a net output equal to the difference between the magnetic field strength that each sensor detects, due to the R ⁇ 3 variation of the magnetic field strength as a function of distance from the magnetic element 106 .
- the composite tangential sensor output signal H T will be 7 ⁇ 8 or 87.5% of the signal produced by the closer individual sensor (i.e., the first tangential sensor 110 ).
- the first radial sensor output H R1 will be 8 times greater than the second radial sensor output signal H R2
- the composite radial sensor output H R will be 7 ⁇ 8 or 87.5% of the signal produced by the closer individual sensor (the first radial sensor 112 ).
- the output signal OUT 1 of the processor 108 is a substantially linear function of rotational angle ⁇ . Because the output signal OUT 1 is ratiometric (i.e., the output depends upon the ratio of the tangential and radial magnetic field magnitudes rather than their actual values), and the sensors providing input to the ratio are disposed along the same radius within the mean plane of rotation, the output OUT 1 is substantially immune from error due to run-out. Run-out tends to produce small changes in the distances R1, R2, R3 and R4 on a percentage basis.
- FIG. 2A illustrates a schematic view of another embodiment of an improved position encoder 200 according to the present invention, including a first spatially orthogonal fluxgate sensor pair 202 , a second spatially orthogonal fluxgate sensor pair 204 , a magnetic element 206 and a processor 208 .
- the first sensor pair 202 includes a first tangential sensor 210 and a first radial sensor 212 .
- the second sensor pair 204 includes a second tangential sensor 214 and a second radial sensor 216 .
- the magnetic element 206 includes a north pole 218 and a south pole 220 disposed along a polar axis PA.
- the magnetic element 206 travels along a linear axis LA which is substantially collinear with the polar axis PA.
- the magnetic element 206 may be fixedly attached to a movable object (not shown).
- the first tangential sensor 210 , the first radial sensor 212 , the second tangential sensor 214 and the second radial sensor 216 are disposed along a sensor axis SA that is substantially normal to the linear axis LA.
- the longitudinal centerline of the first tangential sensor 210 is preferably disposed along the sensor axis SA at a predetermined distance R1.
- the approximate midpoint of the first radial sensor 212 is preferably disposed along the sensor axis SA at a predetermined distance R3.
- the longitudinal centerline of the second tangential sensor 214 is preferably disposed along the sensor axis SA at a predetermined distance R2.
- the approximate midpoint of the second radial sensor 216 is disposed along the sensor axis SA at a predetermined distance R4.
- the first tangential sensor 210 which produces a first tangential output magnetic signal H T1
- the second tangential sensor 214 which produces a second tangential output magnetic signal H T2
- the first radial sensor 212 which produces a first radial output signal H R1 and the second radial sensor 216 , which produces a second radial output signal H R2 , are electrically connected in series opposition as shown in FIG.
- H R H R1 ⁇ H R2 to the processor 208 .
- An homogenous magnetic field that is common to sensors connected in series opposition produces current components in the sensor windings having opposite polarities. These resulting current components cancel, thus sensors (e.g., sensors 210 , 214 and 212 , 216 ) connected in series opposition tend to reject common, homogenous magnetic fields.
- Movement of the magnetic element 206 along the linear axis LA defines an offset distance OD from the centerline 222 of the magnetic element 206 to the sensor axis SA, as shown in FIG. 2 A.
- the individual sensor output signals H Tn and H Rn are quasi-sinusoidal functions of the offset distance OD.
- the sensor output signals H Tn and H Rn also vary as approximately R ⁇ 3 , where R is the distance from the polar axis PA to the individual sensors.
- the variation may be more accurately represented as R ⁇ 2 or R ⁇ 1 , depending on the actual distance. Since the magnitude of the radial sensor output signal is twice the magnitude of the tangential sensor output signal at a given distance R, it is possible to use the R ⁇ 3 variation and place the sensors of a radial/tangential sensor pair at different distances along the sensor axis, so as to produce equal signal magnitudes at a given offset distance OD. As shown in FIG.
- the first tangential sensor 210 is disposed along the sensor axis SA at a distance R1 from the polar axis PA and the first radial sensor 212 is disposed along the sensor axis SA at a distance R3 from the polar axis PA.
- the distances R1 and R3 are chosen such that the ratio of R3/R1 is substantially equal to 2 1 ⁇ 3 .
- the distances R2 and R4 are chosen such that the ratio of R4/R2 is substantially equal to 2 1 ⁇ 3 . Because of the R ⁇ 3 variation in signal magnitude, such a placement results in equal radial and tangential signal magnitudes for a given offset distance OD.
- the electrically connected pairs reject homogenous external magnetic fields common to both sensors (e.g., the earth's magnetic field). Consequently, if the electrically connected sensors (i.e., 210 and 214 or 212 and 216 ) are disposed along the sensor axis SA at the same distance from the polar axis PA, the sensors will also reject the local field produced by the magnetic element 206 .
- the electrically connected sensors are disposed along the sensor axis SA at unequal distances from the polar axis PA (or on opposite sides of the polar axis PA at equal distances from PA for radial component sensors), the electrically connected sensors will together produce a net output equal to the difference between the magnetic field strength that each sensor detects due to the approximate R ⁇ 3 variation of the magnetic field strength as a function of distance from the magnetic element 206 .
- the composite tangential sensor output signal H T will be 7 ⁇ 8 or 87.5% of the signal produced by the closer individual sensor (i.e., the first tangential sensor 110 ).
- the first radial sensor output H R1 will be 8 times greater than the second radial sensor output signal H R2
- the composite radial sensor output H R will be 7 ⁇ 8 or 87.5% of the signal produced by the closer individual sensor (the first radial sensor 112 ).
- Other ratios of R2/R1 and R4/R3 may be used to produce similar results.
- the output OUT 2 of the processor 208 is a substantially linear function of the offset distance OD. Since the output is ratiometric, i.e., the output depends upon the ratio of the tangential and radial magnetic field magnitudes rather than their actual values, the output OUT 2 is substantially immune from error due to run-out. Run-out tends to produce small changes in the distances R1, R2, R3 and R4 on a percentage basis.
- FIG. 2B illustrates a variation of the embodiment shown in FIG. 2 A.
- the radial sensors 212 and 216 are located on opposite sides of the magnetic element 206 at an equal distance R3.
- the radial components of the field on opposite sides of the magnetic element 206 are in opposite directions, so the sensors 212 and 216 , when arranged in series opposition, will add the radial components of the magnetic element 206 equally while rejecting any magnetic fields common to both sensors.
- FIG. 3 shows, in graphical form, the extent to which the algorithm of equation 3 linearizes the relationship between motion of the magnetic element 206 and the sensor output.
- the vertical axis 250 represents the output of the sensor in Gauss multiplied by a factor of 10
- the horizontal axis 252 represents the position of the magnetic element 106 in millimeters, relative to the sensor axis SA .
- zero represents the point at which the sensor axis SA intersects the polar axis PA midway between the north pole 218 and the south pole 220 .
- the first curve 254 represents the composite tangential sensor output magnetic signal H T
- the second curve 256 represents the composite radial sensor output magnetic signal H R
- the third curve 258 represents the output OUT 2 of the processor 208 .
- the output OUT 2 is substantially linear, with linearity errors of 0.46%, 1.08% and 1.37% at offset distances, OD, of +/ ⁇ 20 mm, +/ ⁇ 24 mm and +/ ⁇ 28 mm, respectively.
- R1 the distance from the first tangential sensor 210 to the polar axis PA
- the length of the magnetic element 206 from pole to pole is 50 mm
- the distance R1 is 18 mm.
- FIG. 4 schematically illustrates another embodiment of an improved position encoder 300 according to the present invention, including a first fluxgate sensor 302 , a second fluxgate sensor 304 , a magnetic element 306 , a rotatably movable object 308 such as a cylindrical shaft and a processor 310 .
- the magnetic element 306 includes a north pole 312 and a south pole 314 disposed along a polar axis PA.
- the rotatably movable object 308 rotates about a rotational axis RA so as to define a mean plane of rotation.
- the magnetic element 306 is fixedly attached to the rotatably movable object 308 within the mean plane of rotation, offset from the rotational axis RA such that the polar axis PA is parallel to a radial axis of the rotatably movable object 308 (i.e., an axis that passes through the rotational axis RA), and the distance from the rotational axis RA to the polar axis PA is a predetermined distance R3.
- the angular position of the rotatably movable object 308 is described by ⁇ , an angle between a fixed reference such as the first sensor axis SA 1 and a radius of the object 308 .
- the first sensor 302 is disposed along a first sensor axis SA 1 that intersects the rotational axis RA.
- the distance from the first sensor 302 to the rotational axis RA is a predetermined distance R1.
- the second sensor 304 is disposed along a second sensor axis SA 2 that intersects the rotational axis RA and is substantially normal to the first sensor axis SA 1 .
- the distance from the second sensor 304 to the rotational axis RA is a predetermined distance R2.
- the first sensor 302 which produces a tangential output signal H T
- the second tangential sensor 304 which produces a radial output signal H R
- are electrically connected in series as shown in FIG. 4, so as to provide a composite sensor output signal H C H T +H R to the processor 308 .
- FIG. 5 graphically illustrates the sensor outputs H T and H R along with the composite signal H C and an ideal sinusoid 320 .
- eccentrically offsetting the magnetic element 306 from the rotational axis RA significantly extends the linear region.
- summing the two sensor outputs extends the linear region even further, to approximately +/ ⁇ 90 degrees.
- the standard deviation of curve H C with respect to true linear is approximately 0.78%.
- the processor 310 does not need to perform complex mapping functions, as long as the range of angular position ⁇ is limited to 180 degrees or less.
- the processor 310 may include only a simple buffer circuit to drive the output OUT 3 and isolate the sensors 302 and 304 from an external device receiving the output OUT 3 .
- FIG. 6A illustrates a schematic view of another embodiment of an improved position encoder 400 according to the present invention, including a first fluxgate sensor 402 , a second fluxgate sensor 404 , a third fluxgate sensor 406 , a fourth fluxgate sensor 408 , a magnetic element 410 , and a processor 412 .
- the four sensors 402 , 404 , 406 and 408 are all oriented to detect magnetic field components in a direction substantially normal to the polar axis PA, although those skilled in the art will recognize that other orientations of the sensors will produce similar results.
- the magnetic element 410 includes a north pole 414 and a south pole 416 disposed along a polar axis PA.
- the magnetic element 410 travels along a linear axis LA which is substantially collinear with the polar axis PA.
- the magnetic element may be fixedly attached to a movable object (not shown).
- the first sensor 402 and the second sensor 404 are disposed along a first sensor axis SA 1
- the third sensor 406 and the fourth sensor 408 are disposed along a second sensor axis SA 2 .
- the sensor axes SA 1 and SA 2 are substantially normal to the linear axis LA, substantially parallel to one another, and separated by a distance R3, where R3 is substantially equal to one half of the pole-to-pole length of the magnetic element 410 .
- the first sensor 402 and the third sensor 406 are disposed along the first sensor axis SA 1 and the second sensor axis SA 2 , respectively, at a predetermined distance R1.
- the second sensor 404 and the fourth sensor 408 are disposed along the first sensor axis SA 1 and the second sensor axis SA 2 , respectively, at a predetermined distance R2.
- the first sensor 402 which produces a first radial output signal H R1
- the second sensor 404 which produces a second radial output signal H R2
- are electrically connected in series opposition as shown in FIG. 6A, so as to provide a first composite sensor output signal H C1 H R1 ⁇ H R2 to the processor 412 .
- a homogenous magnetic field that is common to sensors connected in series opposition produces current components in the sensor windings having opposite polarities. These resulting current components cancel, thus sensors connected in series opposition tend to reject common, homogenous magnetic fields.
- Movement of the magnetic element 410 along the linear axis defines an offset distance OD from the centerline of the magnetic element 420 to the sensor axis SA, as shown in FIG. 6 A.
- the individual sensor output signals H Rn (n being 1, 2, 3 or 4) are quasi-sinusoidal functions of the offset distance OD. Since the first and second sensors 402 and 404 are electrically connected in series opposition and the third and fourth sensors 406 and 408 are electrically connected in series opposition, the electrically connected pairs reject homogenous external magnetic fields common to both sensors (e.g., the earth's magnetic field).
- the electrically connected sensors 402 and 404 or 406 and 408 are disposed along their respective sensor axes SA 1 or SA 2 , respectively, at the same distance from the polar axis PA, the sensors will also reject the local field produced by the magnetic element 410 .
- the electrically connected sensors are disposed along their respective sensor axes at unequal distances from the polar axis PA, the electrically connected sensors will together produce a net output equal to the difference between the magnetic field strength that each sensor detects due to the R ⁇ 3 variation of the magnetic field strength as a function of distance from the magnetic element 410 .
- the first sensor output signal H R1 will be 8 times greater than the second sensor output signal H R2 , due to the R ⁇ 3 variation of magnetic field strength.
- the first composite sensor output signal H C1 will be 7 ⁇ 8 or 87.5% of the signal produced by the closer individual sensor (i.e., the first sensor 402 ).
- the second composite sensor output H C2 will be 7 ⁇ 8 or 87.5% of the signal produced by the closer individual sensor (the third sensor 406 ).
- Other ratios of R2/R1 and R4/R3 may be used to produce similar results.
- the output OUT 4 of the processor 412 is a substantially linear function of the offset distance OD.
- the sinusoidal nature of the sensor outputs is preserved for a limited distance as either end of the magnetic element 410 passes beyond a sensor axis.
- the output OUT 4 provides a substantially linear function of the offset distance OD over a range of motion of the magnetic element 410 that exceeds the overall pole-to-pole length of the magnetic element 410 .
- FIG. 6B illustrates a variation of the embodiment shown in FIG. 6 A.
- the radial sensor pair 402 and 404 are disposed on opposite sides of the magnetic element 410 at an equal distance R1.
- the radial sensor pair 406 and 408 are likewise disposed on opposite sides of the magnetic element 410 .
- the radial components of the field on opposite sides of the magnetic element 410 are in opposite directions, so the sensors 402 and 404 (and similarly for sensors 406 and 408 ), when arranged in series opposition, will add the radial components of the magnetic element 410 equally while rejecting any magnetic fields common to each sensor pair.
- two sets of sensor pairs (first pair— 402 and 404 ; second pair— 406 and 408 ) provide a quadrature sampling of the radial magnetic field produced by the magnetic element 410 .
- a single pair of sensors (either 402 and 404 , or 406 and 408 ) may be used to provide position information, albeit at an increased signal to noise ratio relative to the dual sensor pair configuration of FIGS. 6A and 6B.
- the RMS error of OUT 4 with respect to true linear over the entire 33 mm range of movement of the magnetic element 410 is approximately 0.69% of full scale.
- FIG. 8 illustrates a schematic view of another embodiment of an improved position encoder according to the present invention, including a first fluxgate sensor 502 , a second fluxgate sensor 504 , a plurality of magnetic elements 506 , a rotatably movable object 508 and a processor 510 .
- Each of the magnetic elements 506 includes a north pole and a south pole disposed along a polar axis PA (not shown).
- the relative locations of the north pole and south pole along the polar axis PA define a polar orientation of each of the magnetic elements 506 .
- the rotatably movable object 508 rotates about a rotational axis RA, normal to a reference axis A 1 , so as to form a mean plane of rotation.
- the reference axis A 1 intersects the rotational axis RA and lies within the mean plane of rotation.
- the magnetic elements 506 are distributed about and fixedly attached to the perimeter of the rotatably movable object 508 within the mean plane of rotation, such that adjacent magnetic elements 506 alternate polar orientation. In FIG. 8, only one pole of each of the magnetic elements 506 is shown, and the alternating polar orientation is illustrated by the alternating N-S pattern.
- the first flux gate sensor 502 and the second flux gate sensor 504 are disposed along a first sensor axis SA 1 and a second sensor axis SA 2 , respectively, upon alternate sides the reference axis A 1 and adjacent to the movable object 508 , so as to be substantially aligned with two adjacent magnetic elements.
- the relative orientation between a sensor and the corresponding magnetic element when the sensor and magnetic element are aligned is preferably such that the sensor detects a maximum amount of the available magnetic field.
- a sensor disposed along the polar axis PA of a magnetic element 506 should be oriented as a radial magnetic field sensor, because the radial component of the magnetic element will predominate over other components of the magnetic field.
- Other embodiments of the invention may include sensors that are otherwise imperfectly oriented with respect to the field of a corresponding magnetic element.
- the first flux gate sensor 502 which provides a first sensor signal S 1
- the second fluxgate sensor 504 which provides a second sensor signal S 2
- the first flux gate sensor 502 which provides a first sensor signal S 1
- the second fluxgate sensor 504 which provides a second sensor signal S 2
- FIGS. 9A, 9 B and 9 C illustrate the output signals H 1 , H 2 and, H C , respectively. The contemporaneous peaks that occur in FIGS.
- 9A, 9 B and 9 C represent the point in the rotation of the rotatably movable object 508 at which a particular sensor axis (i.e., sensor axis SA 1 for FIG. 9 A and sensor axis SA 2 for FIG. 9B) intersects the polar axis PA of the magnetic element 506 with which it is aligned.
- the peaks alternate in polarity because of the alternating nature of adjacent magnetic elements 506 . Since the peaks are contemporaneous and the sensors are electrically connected in series opposition, the signals from the individual sensors 502 and 504 add constructively and the composite signal H C also includes contemporaneous peaks with the same polarity as H 1 .
- the processor 510 determines dynamic rotational parameters of the object 508 from the rate at which the H C peaks and zero crossings occur, along with information regarding the spatial distribution of the magnetic elements 506 .
- An example of an application of the embodiment shown in FIG. 8 is determining the angular velocity and acceleration of an automobile tire.
- the alternating pattern of magnetic poles is disposed along the tire sidewall, and the sensors are mounted to the automobile frame, such that the tire sidewall passes substantially adjacent to the sensors as the tire rotates.
- a first pair of sensors 520 and 522 are distributed along sensor axes SA 1 and SA 2 at a first radius R1
- a second pair of sensors 524 and 526 are distributed along sensor axes SA 1 and SA 2 at a second radius R2, as illustrated in FIG. 10 .
- the first pair of sensors 520 and 522 are electrically connected to one another in series opposition so as to produce a first composite signal H C1
- the second pair of sensors 524 and 526 are electrically connected to one another in series opposition so as to produce a second composite signal H C2 .
- Such an arrangement allows the processor 510 to calculate the angular velocity and acceleration from either pair of sensors as with the embodiment of FIG. 8, but the embodiment of FIG.
- any or all of the embodiments of the position encoder described herein may further include a temperature compensation component that compensates for system parameter variations corresponding to variations in ambient temperature.
- system parameter variations may include magnetic field variations of the magnetic element, or dimensional variations (i.e., length, diameter, etc.) of the system components. Such compensation is especially necessary when the fluxgate sensors are remotely located with respect to the processor and driver circuits.
- any one of several temperature compensation techniques known to those in the art may be used.
- One method of determining the component temperatures is to collocate a temperature sensing device 111 (such as a thermister, thermocouple or other temperature sensing device) with the component, as shown in FIG. 1 .
- Another method of determining the component temperature is to utilize the fluxgate sensors.
- the resistance of an electrical conductor is directly related to the temperature of the conductor.
- a fluxgate sensor includes several hundred windings of relatively fine wire, thus a temperature variation of the fluxgate sensor corresponds to a readily measurable variation of resistance of the windings.
- the position encoder can determine the temperature of the fluxgate sensors and compensate the sensing signals (and thereby compensate the output signal) accordingly.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
- Transmission And Conversion Of Sensor Element Output (AREA)
- Measuring Magnetic Variables (AREA)
- Measurement Of Length, Angles, Or The Like Using Electric Or Magnetic Means (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (31)
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/315,205 US6265867B1 (en) | 1999-05-19 | 1999-05-19 | Position encoder utilizing fluxgate sensors |
CA2373381A CA2373381C (en) | 1999-05-19 | 2000-05-18 | Position encoder utilizing fluxgate sensors |
JP2000618685A JP4907770B2 (en) | 1999-05-19 | 2000-05-18 | Position encoder using fluxgate sensor |
EP00930811A EP1183498B1 (en) | 1999-05-19 | 2000-05-18 | Position encoder utilizing fluxgate sensors |
PCT/US2000/013657 WO2000070300A1 (en) | 1999-05-19 | 2000-05-18 | Position encoder utilizing fluxgate sensors |
AT00930811T ATE532028T1 (en) | 1999-05-19 | 2000-05-18 | POSITION TRANSMITTERS WITH RIVER GATE RECEIVER |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/315,205 US6265867B1 (en) | 1999-05-19 | 1999-05-19 | Position encoder utilizing fluxgate sensors |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US6265867B1 true US6265867B1 (en) | 2001-07-24 |
Family
ID=23223356
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/315,205 Expired - Lifetime US6265867B1 (en) | 1999-05-19 | 1999-05-19 | Position encoder utilizing fluxgate sensors |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6265867B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1183498B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4907770B2 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE532028T1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2373381C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2000070300A1 (en) |
Cited By (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030010108A1 (en) * | 2001-07-10 | 2003-01-16 | Continental Aktiengessellschaft | Method and system for measuring vehicle tire deformation and a tire having such a system |
US20030020466A1 (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2003-01-30 | Lewis Clifford William | Electromechanical rotation sensing device |
US20040017190A1 (en) * | 2002-07-17 | 2004-01-29 | Mcdearmon Graham F. | Apparatus and method for absolute angular position sensing |
US20040036467A1 (en) * | 2002-04-23 | 2004-02-26 | May Lutz Axel | Magnetic displacement transducer |
US6731108B2 (en) * | 2001-03-23 | 2004-05-04 | Sentron Ag | Device with a magnetic position encoder |
WO2004110793A2 (en) * | 2003-06-16 | 2004-12-23 | Societe De Technologie Michelin | Detection of revolutions of a tyre and wheel assembly by means of the earth magnetic field |
WO2005085763A3 (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2005-10-20 | Scient Generics Ltd | Position sensor |
US20060164077A1 (en) * | 2002-11-20 | 2006-07-27 | Walter Mehnert | Position detector |
EP1698862A1 (en) * | 2005-03-02 | 2006-09-06 | Carl Freudenberg KG | Encoder |
US20080046214A1 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2008-02-21 | Tiax Llc | Sensor system |
US20080204001A1 (en) * | 2005-07-11 | 2008-08-28 | Nct Engineering Gmbh | Angle Sensor Device |
CN100437136C (en) * | 2002-12-02 | 2008-11-26 | 霍尼韦尔国际公司 | Use of a ring magnet to achieve a magnetic sensor pulse train output |
US20080315867A1 (en) * | 2005-07-07 | 2008-12-25 | Joachim Spratte | Joint for a Motor Vehicle |
US20090039874A1 (en) * | 2004-12-14 | 2009-02-12 | Darran Kreit | Inductive position sensor |
US20090192669A1 (en) * | 2008-01-30 | 2009-07-30 | Continental Automotive France | Method for detecting the motion of a vehicle and corresponding device |
US20100180664A1 (en) * | 2007-07-31 | 2010-07-22 | Baumer Hubner Gmbh | Rotary Transducer with Monitoring of the Bearing Wear and Method Therefor |
US20110006757A1 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2011-01-13 | Walter Mehnert | Linear segment or revolution counter with a ferromagnetic element |
EP2469240A1 (en) * | 2010-12-22 | 2012-06-27 | Festo AG & Co. KG | Method for evaluating sensor signals and sensor assembly for same |
US8710827B2 (en) | 2008-03-19 | 2014-04-29 | Sagentia Limited | Processing circuitry for use with a position sensor |
US20140197818A1 (en) * | 2013-01-11 | 2014-07-17 | Bourns, Inc. | Position measurement using a variable flux collector |
US20170168189A1 (en) * | 2011-07-01 | 2017-06-15 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Walk Through Metal Detection System |
EP3447501A4 (en) * | 2016-06-09 | 2019-07-31 | Aichi Steel Corporation | Rotary machine |
US11519710B2 (en) | 2020-02-26 | 2022-12-06 | Honeywell Limited | High accuracy and high stability magnetic displacement sensor in the presence of electromagnetic interferences |
US11573072B2 (en) | 2018-12-13 | 2023-02-07 | Analog Devices International Unlimited Company | Magnetic position determination systems and methods |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA2762637C (en) | 2009-11-04 | 2012-08-28 | Technologies Numetrix Inc. | Device and method for obtaining three-dimensional object surface data |
US10048091B1 (en) * | 2017-05-30 | 2018-08-14 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Magnetic multimedia control element |
CN113639789B (en) * | 2021-07-20 | 2024-06-04 | 支付宝(杭州)信息技术有限公司 | System and method for detecting closing of cabinet door |
Citations (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3342070A (en) * | 1964-10-01 | 1967-09-19 | Rockwell Mfg Co | Fluid meter |
US3605011A (en) | 1967-05-25 | 1971-09-14 | Honeywell Inc | Control apparatus |
US3644825A (en) * | 1969-12-31 | 1972-02-22 | Texas Instruments Inc | Magnetic detection system for detecting movement of an object utilizing signals derived from two orthogonal pickup coils |
US3824456A (en) | 1973-02-23 | 1974-07-16 | Atomic Energy Commission | Magnetometer flowmeter using permanent magnets and magnetometer elements aligned with the flow |
US3855525A (en) * | 1973-10-05 | 1974-12-17 | Illinois Tool Works | Angular velocity sensor |
US4088954A (en) | 1975-02-04 | 1978-05-09 | Nasa | Magnetometer with a miniature transducer and automatic scanning |
US4293815A (en) | 1978-05-01 | 1981-10-06 | Century Geophysical Corporation | Fluxgate magnetometer circuit with earth's field elimination |
US4384254A (en) | 1980-06-06 | 1983-05-17 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Oscillator/driver circuit for fluxgate magnetometer |
US4673827A (en) * | 1984-10-18 | 1987-06-16 | Gebhard Balluff Fabrik Feinmechanischer Erzenguisse Gmbh & Co. | Proximity switch insensitive to interference fields |
US4717873A (en) * | 1985-11-12 | 1988-01-05 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Magnetic displacement transducer system having a magnet that is movable in a tube whose interior is exposed to a fluid and having at least one magnetometer outside the tube |
US4719419A (en) * | 1985-07-15 | 1988-01-12 | Harris Graphics Corporation | Apparatus for detecting a rotary position of a shaft |
US4859944A (en) | 1987-08-25 | 1989-08-22 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Single-winding magnetometer with oscillator duty cycle measurement |
US5115197A (en) | 1990-03-26 | 1992-05-19 | Giusseppe Brandolino | Fluxgate sensor having adjustable core extending beyond a coil winding and a gradiometer incorporating a pair of sensors |
US5124648A (en) | 1987-08-25 | 1992-06-23 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Single winding saturable core magnetometer with field nulling |
US5170566A (en) | 1990-06-05 | 1992-12-15 | Arthur D. Little, Inc. | Means for reducing interference among magnetometer array elements |
US5560115A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1996-10-01 | Arthur D. Little Enterprises, Inc. | Gimbaled magnetometer with inductive coupling |
US5670877A (en) | 1994-12-05 | 1997-09-23 | Hughes Electronics | Shaft rotation sensor with magnetic sensors angularly spaced apart with respect to a magnetic source |
US5742160A (en) * | 1993-01-15 | 1998-04-21 | Hughes Electronics | Apparatus for determining angular position and rotational speed using a rotating magnet and a directional magnetometer |
US5744950A (en) * | 1996-05-09 | 1998-04-28 | Ssi Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus for detecting the speed of a rotating element including signal conditioning to provide a fifty percent duty cycle |
US5895854A (en) * | 1996-11-08 | 1999-04-20 | Continental Aktiengesellschaft | Vehicle wheel provided with a pneumatic tire having therein a rubber mixture permeated with magnetizable particles |
WO1999044072A1 (en) | 1998-02-24 | 1999-09-02 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Micro-power magnetometer |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0191223A3 (en) * | 1984-11-09 | 1988-02-24 | The Superior Electric Company | Magnetically-coupled transducer means |
DE19621886C2 (en) * | 1996-05-31 | 2000-11-30 | Heidenhain Gmbh Dr Johannes | Magnetic position measuring device |
-
1999
- 1999-05-19 US US09/315,205 patent/US6265867B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2000
- 2000-05-18 EP EP00930811A patent/EP1183498B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-05-18 JP JP2000618685A patent/JP4907770B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-05-18 CA CA2373381A patent/CA2373381C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-05-18 AT AT00930811T patent/ATE532028T1/en active
- 2000-05-18 WO PCT/US2000/013657 patent/WO2000070300A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3342070A (en) * | 1964-10-01 | 1967-09-19 | Rockwell Mfg Co | Fluid meter |
US3605011A (en) | 1967-05-25 | 1971-09-14 | Honeywell Inc | Control apparatus |
US3644825A (en) * | 1969-12-31 | 1972-02-22 | Texas Instruments Inc | Magnetic detection system for detecting movement of an object utilizing signals derived from two orthogonal pickup coils |
US3824456A (en) | 1973-02-23 | 1974-07-16 | Atomic Energy Commission | Magnetometer flowmeter using permanent magnets and magnetometer elements aligned with the flow |
US3855525A (en) * | 1973-10-05 | 1974-12-17 | Illinois Tool Works | Angular velocity sensor |
US4088954A (en) | 1975-02-04 | 1978-05-09 | Nasa | Magnetometer with a miniature transducer and automatic scanning |
US4293815A (en) | 1978-05-01 | 1981-10-06 | Century Geophysical Corporation | Fluxgate magnetometer circuit with earth's field elimination |
US4384254A (en) | 1980-06-06 | 1983-05-17 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Oscillator/driver circuit for fluxgate magnetometer |
US4673827A (en) * | 1984-10-18 | 1987-06-16 | Gebhard Balluff Fabrik Feinmechanischer Erzenguisse Gmbh & Co. | Proximity switch insensitive to interference fields |
US4719419A (en) * | 1985-07-15 | 1988-01-12 | Harris Graphics Corporation | Apparatus for detecting a rotary position of a shaft |
US4717873A (en) * | 1985-11-12 | 1988-01-05 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Magnetic displacement transducer system having a magnet that is movable in a tube whose interior is exposed to a fluid and having at least one magnetometer outside the tube |
US4859944A (en) | 1987-08-25 | 1989-08-22 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Single-winding magnetometer with oscillator duty cycle measurement |
US5124648A (en) | 1987-08-25 | 1992-06-23 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Single winding saturable core magnetometer with field nulling |
US5115197A (en) | 1990-03-26 | 1992-05-19 | Giusseppe Brandolino | Fluxgate sensor having adjustable core extending beyond a coil winding and a gradiometer incorporating a pair of sensors |
US5170566A (en) | 1990-06-05 | 1992-12-15 | Arthur D. Little, Inc. | Means for reducing interference among magnetometer array elements |
US5742160A (en) * | 1993-01-15 | 1998-04-21 | Hughes Electronics | Apparatus for determining angular position and rotational speed using a rotating magnet and a directional magnetometer |
US5670877A (en) | 1994-12-05 | 1997-09-23 | Hughes Electronics | Shaft rotation sensor with magnetic sensors angularly spaced apart with respect to a magnetic source |
US5560115A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1996-10-01 | Arthur D. Little Enterprises, Inc. | Gimbaled magnetometer with inductive coupling |
US5744950A (en) * | 1996-05-09 | 1998-04-28 | Ssi Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus for detecting the speed of a rotating element including signal conditioning to provide a fifty percent duty cycle |
US5895854A (en) * | 1996-11-08 | 1999-04-20 | Continental Aktiengesellschaft | Vehicle wheel provided with a pneumatic tire having therein a rubber mixture permeated with magnetizable particles |
WO1999044072A1 (en) | 1998-02-24 | 1999-09-02 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Micro-power magnetometer |
Cited By (42)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6731108B2 (en) * | 2001-03-23 | 2004-05-04 | Sentron Ag | Device with a magnetic position encoder |
US20030010108A1 (en) * | 2001-07-10 | 2003-01-16 | Continental Aktiengessellschaft | Method and system for measuring vehicle tire deformation and a tire having such a system |
US20030020466A1 (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2003-01-30 | Lewis Clifford William | Electromechanical rotation sensing device |
US6949924B2 (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2005-09-27 | Adaptive Instruments Llc | Electromechanical rotation sensing device |
US20040036467A1 (en) * | 2002-04-23 | 2004-02-26 | May Lutz Axel | Magnetic displacement transducer |
US7521923B2 (en) * | 2002-04-23 | 2009-04-21 | Abas, Incorporated | Magnetic displacement transducer |
US20040017190A1 (en) * | 2002-07-17 | 2004-01-29 | Mcdearmon Graham F. | Apparatus and method for absolute angular position sensing |
US7598733B2 (en) * | 2002-11-20 | 2009-10-06 | Walter Mehnert | Position detector |
US20060164077A1 (en) * | 2002-11-20 | 2006-07-27 | Walter Mehnert | Position detector |
CN100437136C (en) * | 2002-12-02 | 2008-11-26 | 霍尼韦尔国际公司 | Use of a ring magnet to achieve a magnetic sensor pulse train output |
WO2004110793A2 (en) * | 2003-06-16 | 2004-12-23 | Societe De Technologie Michelin | Detection of revolutions of a tyre and wheel assembly by means of the earth magnetic field |
US7360411B2 (en) | 2003-06-16 | 2008-04-22 | Michelin Recherche Et Technique, S.A. | Detection of revolutions of a tire and wheel assembly by means of the Earth's magnetic field |
WO2004110793A3 (en) * | 2003-06-16 | 2006-03-09 | Michelin Soc Tech | Detection of revolutions of a tyre and wheel assembly by means of the earth magnetic field |
US20060152212A1 (en) * | 2003-06-16 | 2006-07-13 | Michelin Recherche Et Technique, S.A. | Detection of revolutions of a tire and wheel assembly by means of the Earth's magnetic field |
US20070194781A1 (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2007-08-23 | Zhitomirskiy Victor E | Position sensor |
EP1721130B2 (en) † | 2004-03-01 | 2014-04-30 | Sagentia Limited | Position sensor |
US7868609B2 (en) | 2004-03-01 | 2011-01-11 | Sagentia Limited | Position sensor |
WO2005085763A3 (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2005-10-20 | Scient Generics Ltd | Position sensor |
US20090039874A1 (en) * | 2004-12-14 | 2009-02-12 | Darran Kreit | Inductive position sensor |
US8020453B2 (en) * | 2004-12-14 | 2011-09-20 | Darran Kreit | Inductive position sensor |
EP1698862A1 (en) * | 2005-03-02 | 2006-09-06 | Carl Freudenberg KG | Encoder |
US20080315867A1 (en) * | 2005-07-07 | 2008-12-25 | Joachim Spratte | Joint for a Motor Vehicle |
US20080204001A1 (en) * | 2005-07-11 | 2008-08-28 | Nct Engineering Gmbh | Angle Sensor Device |
US8129986B2 (en) | 2005-07-11 | 2012-03-06 | Nct Engineering Gmbh | Angle sensor device |
US7555398B2 (en) | 2006-04-13 | 2009-06-30 | Tiax Llc | Sensor system error reduction |
US20080046214A1 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2008-02-21 | Tiax Llc | Sensor system |
US20100180664A1 (en) * | 2007-07-31 | 2010-07-22 | Baumer Hubner Gmbh | Rotary Transducer with Monitoring of the Bearing Wear and Method Therefor |
US8539811B2 (en) * | 2007-07-31 | 2013-09-24 | Baumer Hubner Gmbh | Rotary transducer with monitoring of the bearing wear and method therefor |
US20110006757A1 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2011-01-13 | Walter Mehnert | Linear segment or revolution counter with a ferromagnetic element |
US8766625B2 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2014-07-01 | Walter Mehnert | Linear segment or revolution counter with a ferromagnetic element |
US8126608B2 (en) * | 2008-01-30 | 2012-02-28 | Continental Automotive France | Method for detecting the motion of a vehicle and corresponding device |
US20090192669A1 (en) * | 2008-01-30 | 2009-07-30 | Continental Automotive France | Method for detecting the motion of a vehicle and corresponding device |
US8710827B2 (en) | 2008-03-19 | 2014-04-29 | Sagentia Limited | Processing circuitry for use with a position sensor |
EP2469240A1 (en) * | 2010-12-22 | 2012-06-27 | Festo AG & Co. KG | Method for evaluating sensor signals and sensor assembly for same |
DE102010055736A1 (en) * | 2010-12-22 | 2012-06-28 | Festo Ag & Co. Kg | Method for evaluating sensor signals and sensor arrangement suitable for this purpose |
US20170168189A1 (en) * | 2011-07-01 | 2017-06-15 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Walk Through Metal Detection System |
US20140197818A1 (en) * | 2013-01-11 | 2014-07-17 | Bourns, Inc. | Position measurement using a variable flux collector |
US9018942B2 (en) * | 2013-01-11 | 2015-04-28 | Bourns, Inc. | Position measurement using a variable flux collector |
EP3447501A4 (en) * | 2016-06-09 | 2019-07-31 | Aichi Steel Corporation | Rotary machine |
US10900988B2 (en) | 2016-06-09 | 2021-01-26 | Aichi Steel Corporation | Rotary machine |
US11573072B2 (en) | 2018-12-13 | 2023-02-07 | Analog Devices International Unlimited Company | Magnetic position determination systems and methods |
US11519710B2 (en) | 2020-02-26 | 2022-12-06 | Honeywell Limited | High accuracy and high stability magnetic displacement sensor in the presence of electromagnetic interferences |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2002544509A (en) | 2002-12-24 |
JP4907770B2 (en) | 2012-04-04 |
EP1183498A4 (en) | 2002-07-31 |
CA2373381A1 (en) | 2000-11-23 |
WO2000070300A9 (en) | 2002-06-27 |
EP1183498B1 (en) | 2011-11-02 |
EP1183498A1 (en) | 2002-03-06 |
WO2000070300A1 (en) | 2000-11-23 |
ATE532028T1 (en) | 2011-11-15 |
CA2373381C (en) | 2010-04-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6265867B1 (en) | Position encoder utilizing fluxgate sensors | |
CN102472642B (en) | Multi-periodic absolute position sensor | |
US8373410B2 (en) | Rotary or linear position sensor having a variable magnet profile | |
CN108303562B (en) | Demagnetization field robust torsion sensitive magnetic speed sensor | |
US9316482B2 (en) | Magnetic multi-turn absolute position detection device | |
JP4410566B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting moving and rotating motion | |
Treutler | Magnetic sensors for automotive applications | |
US6154025A (en) | Contactless potentiometer and device for contactlessly sensing a position of an object | |
CN101253389B (en) | Rotation angle detection apparatus | |
CN101680777B (en) | Magnetic field sensor | |
US20120262162A1 (en) | Bidirectional Magnetic Position Sensor Having Field Rotation | |
US20040017187A1 (en) | Magnetoresistive linear position sensor | |
US7215112B1 (en) | Non-contact linear absolute position sensor | |
JPH0626884A (en) | Position detection device | |
KR20080030081A (en) | Device for recording the speed of rotation of a wheel with an increased intrinsic safety | |
US7548060B2 (en) | Magnetic sensor system | |
Wang et al. | An angle displacement sensor using a simple gear | |
US7463023B1 (en) | Non-contacting rotary and linear travel sensor | |
US20020171417A1 (en) | Angle detector with magnetoresistive sensor elements | |
JP2007518091A (en) | Magnetoresistive speed sensor | |
JPH03276014A (en) | Magnetic rotational angle detector | |
JPH0526748A (en) | Measuring device for torque on shaft | |
JP4230576B2 (en) | Wind regulator device | |
JPH05196478A (en) | Position detection apparatus | |
Nyce | 6.9 Magnetic Displacement Sensors |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ARTHUR D. LITTLE, INC., MASSACHUSETTS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FOWLER, J. THOMAS;REEL/FRAME:009984/0127 Effective date: 19990518 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ABLECO FINANCE LLC, AS AGENT, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ARTHUR D. LITTLE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:011944/0921 Effective date: 20010611 |
|
CC | Certificate of correction | ||
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ARTHUR D. LITTLE, INC., MASSACHUSETTS Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ABLECO FINANCE LLC;REEL/FRAME:013089/0838 Effective date: 20020531 Owner name: CAMBRIDGE CONSULTANTS, LTD., A UNITED KINGDOM CORP Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ABLECO FINANCE LLC;REEL/FRAME:013089/0838 Effective date: 20020531 Owner name: ARTHUR D. LITTLE ENTERPRISES, INC., A MASSACHUSETT Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ABLECO FINANCE LLC;REEL/FRAME:013089/0838 Effective date: 20020531 Owner name: ENTERPRISE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., A MASSACHUS Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ABLECO FINANCE LLC;REEL/FRAME:013089/0838 Effective date: 20020531 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: TIAX LLC, MASSACHUSETTS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ARTHUR D. LITTLE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:013240/0342 Effective date: 20020510 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
SULP | Surcharge for late payment |
Year of fee payment: 11 |