[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

JP5253968B2 - Method for judging running stability of railway vehicles - Google Patents

Method for judging running stability of railway vehicles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5253968B2
JP5253968B2 JP2008283916A JP2008283916A JP5253968B2 JP 5253968 B2 JP5253968 B2 JP 5253968B2 JP 2008283916 A JP2008283916 A JP 2008283916A JP 2008283916 A JP2008283916 A JP 2008283916A JP 5253968 B2 JP5253968 B2 JP 5253968B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
wheel
tread
wear
vehicle
railway vehicle
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2008283916A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2010111189A (en
Inventor
大輔 山本
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Railway Technical Research Institute
Original Assignee
Railway Technical Research Institute
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Railway Technical Research Institute filed Critical Railway Technical Research Institute
Priority to JP2008283916A priority Critical patent/JP5253968B2/en
Publication of JP2010111189A publication Critical patent/JP2010111189A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5253968B2 publication Critical patent/JP5253968B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • A Measuring Device Byusing Mechanical Method (AREA)

Description

本発明は、鉄道車両の走行安定性判定方法に係り、特に車輪踏面の摩耗状態による鉄道車両の走行安定性を判定する方法に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a method for determining the running stability of a railway vehicle, and more particularly to a method for determining the running stability of a railway vehicle according to the wear state of wheel treads.

鉄道車両は、長期間走行するにつれて車輪踏面が摩耗し走行安定性が低下する。このため、車両基地では車両の走行期間や車両機器のメンテナンス周期に応じて定められた期間ごとに、車輪踏面を元の形状に削る作業が実施されている。
一方、車両に突然異常振動が発生した場合、測定した車輪踏面形状から車輪とレール間の接触特性を求める計算を実施し、等価踏面勾配の算出や、この接触特性を用いた車両運動シミュレーションから安定性の判定を実施することにより異常振動の原因を解明している。しかし、これは異常振動等の問題発生後に行うものであり、作業が煩雑になるなどの理由から問題を未然に防止するための手段としては実施されていない。
As a railway vehicle travels for a long period of time, its wheel treads wear and travel stability decreases. For this reason, at the vehicle base, work for cutting the wheel treads into the original shape is performed every period determined according to the traveling period of the vehicle and the maintenance cycle of the vehicle equipment.
On the other hand, when abnormal vibration suddenly occurs in the vehicle, calculation is performed to obtain the contact characteristics between the wheels and rails from the measured wheel tread shape, and stable calculation can be performed from the calculation of the equivalent tread slope and vehicle motion simulation using this contact characteristics. The cause of abnormal vibration is clarified by carrying out sex determination. However, this is performed after the occurrence of a problem such as abnormal vibration, and has not been implemented as a means for preventing the problem in advance because the work becomes complicated.

また、従来は、車輪踏面形状測定器により踏面の断面形状の摩耗量を計測したり、車輪径測定器により車輪径を計測するようにしている(下記特許文献1〜3参照)。
図8は従来の車輪径測定装置を示す図である。
この図において、101は鉄道車両の車輪、102はその車輪101の車輪径測定器、103は車輪踏面、104は判定表示器、105〜107は車輪径測定用接触プローブである。
Further, conventionally, or to measure the wear amount of the cross-sectional shape of the Ri踏 surface by the wheel tread shape measuring device, with which (see below Patent Documents 1 to 3) which is adapted to measure a wheel diameter by the wheel diameter measuring instrument.
FIG. 8 shows a conventional wheel diameter measuring device.
In this figure, 101 is a wheel of a railway vehicle, 102 is a wheel diameter measuring device of the wheel 101, 103 is a wheel tread, 104 is a judgment indicator, and 105 to 107 are contact probes for measuring wheel diameter.

また、車輪踏面の形状や車輪径寸法、車輪幅寸法を測定する装置が提案されている(下記特許文献4参照)。
特開2004−258007号公報 特開2000−203429号公報 特開平11−108654号公報 特開平6−123608号公報
In addition, an apparatus for measuring the shape of the wheel tread, the wheel diameter dimension, and the wheel width dimension has been proposed (see Patent Document 4 below).
JP 2004-258007 A JP 2000-203429 A Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-108654 JP-A-6-123608

しかしながら、上記した従来の測定法により得られた状態量を用いた走行安定性判定方法は、作業が煩雑であり、現場において簡便に判定できるものではなかった。
本発明は、上記状況に鑑みて、時間のかかる車輪とレール間の接触特性を求める計算や車両運動シミュレーションを実施することなく、現場において日常的に実施されている車輪の状態量を測定するだけで、あらかじめ求めておいた安定性マップに照らし合わせて鉄道車両の走行安定性の良否を判定することができる鉄道車両の走行安定性判定方法を提供することを目的とする。
However, the running stability determination method using the state quantity obtained by the conventional measurement method described above is complicated and cannot be easily determined on site.
The present invention is, in view of the above situation, measuring the state quantity of the wheel that is routinely performed in the calculation and without performing vehicle motion simulation, the site to determine the contact characteristics between the time-consuming wheels and rails Teisu It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for determining the running stability of a railway vehicle that can determine whether the running stability of the railway vehicle is good or not in light of a stability map obtained in advance.

本発明は、上記目的を達成するために、
〔1〕鉄道車両の走行安定性判定方法において、鉄道車両の車輪踏面の車軸方向の3点であって、第2の位置と、この第2の位置と比較して相対的に摩耗し難い第1の位置及び第3の位置とからなる3点における、車輪踏面摩耗モデル形状を用いた接触特性の計算結果から3点間の関数と等価踏面勾配の関係を示したマップをあらかじめ作成しておき、鉄道車両の安定走行に影響を及ぼす前記鉄道車両の車輪踏面の車軸方向の前記3点における摩耗量の3点間の相対変位を測定し、前記相対変位を前記3点間の関数と前記鉄道車両の諸元を用いた車両運動シミュレーションにより求めた等価踏面勾配の関係を示したマップと照合し、前記鉄道車両の車輪踏面の摩耗状態による鉄道車両の走行安定性を判定することを特徴とする。
In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides
[1] In the running stability determination method for a railway vehicle , there are three points in the axle direction of the wheel treads of the railway vehicle , and the second position is relatively hard to wear compared to the second position. in three points comprising a first position and a third position, from the calculation result of the contact characteristic with wheel tread wear model shape, previously creating a map showing the relationship between the function and the equivalent tread gradient between 3 points Place, to determine the relative displacement between the three points of the wear amount in the three points of the axle direction of the wheel tread of said railway vehicle affects the stable running of the railway vehicle, the relative displacement, and functions between the three said relationship against the map showing the equivalent tread gradient was determined by the vehicle motion simulation using specifications of the railway vehicle, to determine the running stability of the railway vehicle due to wear state of the vehicle wheel tread of said railway vehicle Features.

〔2〕上記〔1〕記載の鉄道車両の走行安定性判定方法において、前記第1、第2及び第3の位置がそれぞれ、車輪のフランジ背面からそれぞれ40mm付近、65mm及び110mm付近であることを特徴とする。 [2] In the traveling stability determination method for a railway vehicle described in [1] above, the first, second, and third positions are respectively about 40 mm, 65 mm, and 110 mm from the rear surface of the wheel flange. Features.

本発明によれば、鉄道車両の安定走行に影響を及ぼす車軸方向の車輪踏面の3箇所の位置での摩耗量の相対変位を測定し、簡便に鉄道車両の安定走行の判定を実施することができる。   According to the present invention, it is possible to measure the relative displacement of the wear amount at three positions on the wheel tread surface in the axle direction that affects the stable running of the railway vehicle, and to easily determine the stable running of the railway vehicle. it can.

本発明の鉄道車両の走行安定性判定方法は、鉄道車両の車輪踏面の車軸方向の3点であって、第2の位置と、この第2の位置と比較して相対的に摩耗し難い第1の位置と第3の位置とからなる3点における、車輪踏面摩耗モデル形状を用いた接触特性の計算結果から3点間の関数と等価踏面勾配の関係を示したマップをあらかじめ作成しておき、鉄道車両の安定走行に影響を及ぼす前記鉄道車両の車輪踏面の車軸方向の前記3点における摩耗量の3点間の相対変位を測定し、前記相対変位を前記3点間の関数と前記鉄道車両の諸元を用いた車両運動シミュレーションにより求めた等価踏面勾配の関係を示したマップと照合し、前記鉄道車両の車輪踏面の摩耗状態による鉄道車両の走行安定性を判定する。 The method for determining the running stability of a railway vehicle according to the present invention includes three points in the axle direction of the wheel tread of the railway vehicle , and the second position is relatively less likely to be worn than the second position. in three points consisting of the first position and the third position, from the calculation result of the contact characteristic with wheel tread wear model shape, previously creating a map showing the relationship between the function and the equivalent tread gradient between 3 points Place, to determine the relative displacement between the three points of the wear amount in the three points of the axle direction of the wheel tread of said railway vehicle affects the stable running of the railway vehicle, the relative displacement, and functions between the three the relationship against the map showing the equivalent tread gradient was determined by the vehicle motion simulation using specifications of the rail vehicle, it determines the running stability of the railway vehicle due to wear state of the vehicle wheel tread of said railway vehicle.

以下、本発明の実施の形態について詳細に説明する。
図1は本発明に係る鉄道車両の車輪径を測定する測定器を示す図、図2は本発明の実施例を示す鉄道車両の車輪踏面の摩耗測定による鉄道車両の走行安定性判定のフローチャートである。
図1において、1は車輪踏面の車軸方向の摩耗測定装置、2は車輪、3は車輪2のフランジ、3Aはフランジ3の背面、4は車輪踏面、4Aは踏面勾配、5〜7は車輪踏面4の車軸方向の摩耗測定用接触プローブ、8は車軸、9はジャーナルである。ここでは、第1の摩耗測定用接触プローブ5はフランジ3の背面3Aから40mm付近の位置、第2の摩耗測定用接触プローブ6はフランジ3の背面3Aから65mmの位置、第3の摩耗測定用接触プローブ7はフランジ3の背面3Aから110mm付近の位置に配置する。フランジ3の背面3Aから40mm付近、110mm付近の位置は、65mmの位置に比べて相対的に摩耗し難い位置である。換言すれば、フランジ3の背面3Aから65mmの位置が40mm付の位置、110mm付の位置に比べて大きく摩耗すると、車両の走行安定性が大幅に低下する。
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail.
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a measuring instrument for measuring the wheel diameter of a railway vehicle according to the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a flowchart for determining running stability of the railway vehicle by measuring wear on the wheel treads of the railway vehicle according to an embodiment of the present invention. is there.
In FIG. 1, 1 is a wear measuring device for wheel treads in the axle direction, 2 is a wheel, 3 is a flange of wheel 2, 3A is the back of flange 3, 4 is a wheel tread, 4A is a tread gradient, and 5-7 are wheel treads. 4 is a contact probe for wear measurement in the axle direction, 8 is an axle, and 9 is a journal. Here, the first wear measurement contact probe 5 is located at a position in the vicinity of 40 mm from the back surface 3A of the flange 3, and the second wear measurement contact probe 6 is located at a position 65 mm from the back surface 3A of the flange 3, for the third wear measurement. The contact probe 7 is disposed at a position near 110 mm from the back surface 3A of the flange 3. The positions near 40 mm and 110 mm from the back surface 3 </ b> A of the flange 3 are relatively hard to wear compared to the 65 mm position. In other words, the position of 65mm from the back 3A of the flange 3 is positioned in the near with 40 m m, the greater wear than the proximal position with 110m m, the running stability of the vehicle is greatly reduced.

図2を参照しながら鉄道車両の車輪踏面の摩耗測定による走行安定性判定方法について説明する。
(A)図1に示すように、鉄道車両の安定走行に影響を及ぼす車輪踏面4の車軸8方向の3箇所において、それぞれ車輪2の直径を測定し、下記の式(1)から車輪径の3点間の相対変位を算出する(ステップS1)。
With reference to FIG. 2, a traveling stability determination method based on measurement of wheel treads of a railway vehicle will be described.
(A) As shown in FIG. 1, Oite to 3箇plants axle eight directions affects wheel tread 4 in a stable traveling of the railway vehicle, respectively to measure the diameter of the wheel 2, from the following equation (1) It calculates the relative displacement between the three points of the car Wa径 (step S1).

δ(x)=f(x)−g(x)−f(65) …(1)
ここで、f(x):測定した車輪踏面形状
g(x):使用している車輪踏面の設計形状
f(65):フランジ背面3Aから65mmの位置における摩耗量
(B)次いで、フランジ背面3Aから40mm付近の位置と110mm付近の位置のδ(x)と一致するパターンを選択する。そのためにあらかじめ複数パターンの摩耗評価線図を用いて、車輪・レール間の接触特性を計算で求めておく。この車輪・レール間の接触特性の計算値は車輪踏面の車軸方向の摩耗測定装置1に記憶させておく(ステップS2)。
δ (x) = f (x) −g (x) −f (65) (1)
Where f (x): measured wheel tread shape
g (x): Design shape of the wheel tread used
f (65): Wear amount at a position 65 mm from the flange back surface 3A (B) Next, a pattern that matches δ (x) at a position near 40 mm from the flange back surface 3A and a position near 110 mm is selected. For this purpose, the contact characteristics between the wheels and the rails are calculated in advance using a plurality of patterns of wear evaluation diagrams. The calculated value of the contact characteristic between the wheel and the rail is stored in the wear measuring device 1 in the axle direction of the wheel tread (step S2).

(C)次に、測定した車輪2の等価踏面勾配がわかるので、あらかじめ計算で求めておいた限度値と比較する。この限度値は、走行安定性に悪影響を及ぼすと考えられる等価踏面勾配(限度値)を、車両形式毎に車両運動シミュレーションの計算であらかじめ求めておくものである。すなわち、車輪転削を実施するなどの措置を行うか否かの限度値を求めておく。なお、この等価踏面勾配(限度値)は車輪踏面の車軸方向の摩耗測定装置1に記憶させておく(ステップS3)。   (C) Next, since the measured equivalent tread slope of the wheel 2 is known, it is compared with a limit value obtained in advance by calculation. This limit value is obtained in advance by calculation of a vehicle motion simulation for each vehicle type for an equivalent tread surface gradient (limit value) that is considered to adversely affect running stability. That is, a limit value is determined for determining whether or not to perform measures such as wheel turning. The equivalent tread gradient (limit value) is stored in the wear measuring device 1 in the axle direction of the wheel tread (step S3).

(D)最後に、測定した車輪2の等価踏面勾配が限度値に近ければ、鉄道車両の走行安定性が劣化しているので、車輪転削を実施するなどの措置により対策を行う(ステップS4)。
図3は鉄道レールへの鉄道車両の車輪の接触状態を示す図であり、図3(a)は鉄道レールの曲線部における内軌側接触状態を示す図、図3(b)はその外軌側接触状態を示す図である。ここで、11はレール頭頂面、12は車輪踏面の断面形状で、輪軸が外軌側レールに向かって変位している。13はそれぞれの変位量に対する車輪とレールの接触点位置である。輪軸の左右変位量と接触点位置における車輪径の関係を示すと図4となる。A1とA2、B1とB2のそれぞれの線が交差する位置が輪軸中立位置であり、左右の車輪の接触円半径は同じとなる。
(D) Finally, if the measured equivalent tread slope of the wheel 2 is close to the limit value, the running stability of the railway vehicle has deteriorated, so measures are taken by implementing measures such as wheel turning (step S4). ).
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a contact state of the wheels of the railway vehicle with the rail, FIG. 3 (a) is a diagram showing a contact state on the inner rail side in a curved portion of the rail, and FIG. 3 (b) is an outer track thereof. It is a figure which shows a side contact state. Here, 11 is the rail top surface, 12 is the cross-sectional shape of the wheel tread surface, and the wheel axis is displaced toward the outer rail side rail. Reference numeral 13 denotes a contact point position between the wheel and the rail with respect to each displacement amount. FIG. 4 shows the relationship between the amount of lateral displacement of the wheel shaft and the wheel diameter at the contact point position. The position where the lines A1 and A2 and B1 and B2 intersect is the wheel shaft neutral position, and the contact circle radii of the left and right wheels are the same.

図4は車輪踏面形状の違いによる接触円半径の関係を示す図である。
この図において、横軸は輪軸左右変位量(mm)、縦軸は接触円半径(mm)を示しており、A1,A2は設計時の車輪踏面形状、B1,B2は摩耗時の車輪踏面形状を示している。
ここで、設計時の車輪踏面形状A1,A2は、輪軸の中立位置0mm位置であるが、摩耗時の車輪踏面形状B1,B2を見ると、輪軸の中立位置は左側へ変位している。
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the relationship of the contact circle radius depending on the wheel tread shape.
In this figure, the horizontal axis indicates the wheel shaft lateral displacement (mm), the vertical axis indicates the contact circle radius (mm), A1 and A2 are the wheel tread shape at the time of design, and B1 and B2 are the wheel tread shape at the time of wear. Is shown.
Here, the wheel tread surface shapes A1 and A2 at the time of design have a neutral position of the wheel shaft of 0 mm, but the wheel tread surface shapes B1 and B2 at the time of wear are displaced to the left.

図5は車輪踏面形状とその摩耗形状を対象に計算した結果を示す図である。図5(a)は車輪踏面形状を示しており、Cは設計時の車輪踏面形状、Dは摩耗時の車輪踏面形状を示している。図5(b)は摩耗形状を対象に計算した結果を示す図であり、図5(a)における摩耗時の車輪踏面形状Dを対象に計算した結果がD′として示されている。
図6は本発明の実施例を示す測定した車輪踏面形状に対して3点間の関数を求めた図である。
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the calculation results for the wheel tread surface shape and its wear shape. FIG. 5A shows a wheel tread shape, C denotes a wheel tread shape at the time of design, and D denotes a wheel tread shape at the time of wear. FIG. 5B is a diagram showing the result of calculation for the wear shape, and the result of calculation for the wheel tread shape D during wear in FIG. 5A is shown as D ′.
FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a function between three points for the measured wheel tread shape showing an embodiment of the present invention.

この図において、車輪踏面のフランジ背面から40mm付近の第1の点Eと、車輪踏面のフランジ背面から65mmの第2の点Fと、車輪踏面のフランジ背面から110mm付近の第3の点Gに対して、上記点Eと点Fとの関数Hと、上記した点Fと点Gとの関数Iとによる等価踏面勾配をあらかじめ記憶しておく。
そこで、摩耗した車輪踏面形状のフランジ背面から40mm付近、65mm、110mm付近の位置の摩耗量を測定し、計算した相対変位から求めた車輪踏面勾配を、あらかじめ記憶されている3点間の関数と等価踏面勾配の関係を示したマップと照合して鉄道車両の走行安定性が劣化しているか否かを判定する。3点間の関数と等価踏面勾配の関係は式(1)を逆算して求める。なお、等価踏面勾配小さいほど鉄道車両の走行安定性は良好であると言える。
In this figure, the first point E of 40mm around the flange back of the wheel tread, and F second point 65mm from the flange back of the wheel tread, the G third point of 110mm near the flange back of the wheel tread On the other hand , an equivalent tread gradient based on the function H between the points E and F and the function I between the points F and G is stored in advance.
Therefore, the amount of wear at positions near 40 mm, 65 mm, and 110 mm from the rear face of the worn wheel tread shape flange is measured, and the wheel tread gradient obtained from the calculated relative displacement is a function between three points stored in advance. It is determined whether or not the running stability of the railway vehicle has deteriorated by checking against a map showing the relationship of the equivalent tread gradient. The relationship between the function between the three points and the equivalent tread gradient is obtained by back-calculating Equation (1). It can be said that the smaller the equivalent tread gradient, the better the running stability of the railway vehicle.

図7は本発明の実施例を示す等価踏面勾配と相対変位量の関係を示す図であり、縦軸は等価踏面勾配の逆数(1/γe)、横軸は相対変位量(mm)を示しており、フランジ背面から65mm位置に対する40mm付近位置と110mm付近位置の相対変位量を同じ値とした条件での計算結果を示している。
同様に、車輪踏面の摩耗状態を考慮して40mm付近位置と110mm付近位置の相対変位量を若干左右方向に動かしたり、40mm付近位置と110mm付近位置の相対変位量を異なる値にして、等価踏面勾配を数パターン計算する。
FIG. 7 is a diagram showing the relationship between the equivalent tread surface gradient and the relative displacement amount according to the embodiment of the present invention. The vertical axis represents the reciprocal of the equivalent tread surface gradient (1 / γe), and the horizontal axis represents the relative displacement amount (mm). The calculation results are shown under the condition that the relative displacement amount at the position near 40 mm and the position near 110 mm with respect to the 65 mm position from the flange back surface is the same value.
Similarly, in consideration of the wear state of the wheel tread, the relative displacement between the position near 40 mm and the position near 110 mm is moved slightly in the left-right direction, or the relative displacement between the position near 40 mm and the position near 110 mm is changed to a different value. Calculate the gradient several patterns.

本発明では、現場で通常実施されている車輪踏面の測定作業の中で同時に走行安定性の良否を判定できるようになり、保守の省力化を図り、乗り心地の良い鉄道車両を提供することができる。
なお、本発明は上記実施例に限定されるものではなく、本発明の趣旨に基づき種々の変形が可能であり、これらを本発明の範囲から排除するものではない。
In the present invention, it is possible to determine whether the running stability is good or not at the same time during the measurement work of the wheel tread that is normally performed at the work site, to save labor for maintenance, and to provide a railway vehicle with good riding comfort. it can.
In addition, this invention is not limited to the said Example, Based on the meaning of this invention, a various deformation | transformation is possible and these are not excluded from the scope of the present invention.

本発明の鉄道車両の走行安定性判定方法は、鉄道車両の車輪踏面の車軸方向の3点における摩耗状態を測定することにより、その走行安定性を簡便に判定することができる鉄道車両の走行安定性判定ツールとして利用可能である。   According to the method for determining the running stability of a railway vehicle of the present invention, the running stability of the railway vehicle can be easily determined by measuring the wear state at three points in the axle direction of the wheel tread of the railway vehicle. It can be used as a sex determination tool.

本発明に係る鉄道車両の車輪径を測定する測定器を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the measuring device which measures the wheel diameter of the rail vehicle which concerns on this invention. 本発明の実施例を示す鉄道車両の車輪踏面の摩耗測定による鉄道車両の走行安定性判定のフローチャートである。It is a flowchart of the running stability determination of a railway vehicle by the abrasion measurement of the wheel tread of the railway vehicle which shows the Example of this invention. 鉄道レールへの鉄道車両の車輪の接触状態を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the contact state of the wheel of a railroad vehicle to a railroad rail. 車輪踏面形状の違いによる接触円半径の関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship of the contact circle radius by the difference in a wheel tread shape. 車輪踏面形状とその摩耗形状を対象に計算した結果を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the result of having calculated the wheel tread shape and its wear shape. 本発明の実施例を示す測定した車輪踏面形状に対して3点間の関数を求めた図である。It is the figure which calculated | required the function between 3 points | pieces with respect to the measured wheel tread shape which shows the Example of this invention. 本発明の実施例を示す等価踏面勾配と相対変位量の関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between the equivalent tread surface gradient and relative displacement amount which shows the Example of this invention. 従来の車輪径測定装置を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the conventional wheel diameter measuring apparatus.

1 車輪踏面の車軸方向の摩耗測定装置
2 車輪
3 車輪のフランジ
3A フランジの背面
4 車輪踏面
4A 踏面勾配
5〜7 車輪踏面の車軸方向の摩耗測定用接触プローブ
5 第1の摩耗測定用接触プローブ
6 第2の摩耗測定用接触プローブ
7 第3の摩耗測定用接触プローブ
8 車軸
9 ジャーナル
11 レール
12 フランジ
13 フランジ部分(フランジ背面から40mm付近の位置)
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Wheel tread surface wear direction measuring device 2 Wheel 3 Wheel flange 3A Back surface of flange 4 Wheel tread surface 4A Tread surface gradient 5-7 Contact probe for measuring wheel tread surface direction 5 5 First contact probe for wear measurement 6 Second contact probe for wear measurement 7 Third contact probe for wear measurement 8 Axle 9 Journal 11 Rail 12 Flange 13 Flange portion (position about 40 mm from the back of the flange)

Claims (2)

(a)鉄道車両の車輪踏面の車軸方向の3点であって、第2の位置と、該第2の位置と比較して相対的に摩耗し難い第1の位置及び第3の位置とからなる3点における、車輪踏面摩耗モデル形状を用いた接触特性の計算結果から3点間の関数と等価踏面勾配の関係を示したマップをあらかじめ作成しておき、
(b)鉄道車両の安定走行に影響を及ぼす前記鉄道車両の車輪踏面の車軸方向の前記3点における摩耗量の3点間の相対変位を測定し、
(c)前記相対変位を前記3点間の関数と前記鉄道車両の諸元を用いた車両運動シミュレーションにより求めた等価踏面勾配の関係を示したマップと照合し、
(d)前記鉄道車両の車輪踏面の摩耗状態による鉄道車両の走行安定性を判定することを特徴とする鉄道車両の走行安定性判定方法。
(A) From three points in the axle direction of the wheel tread of the railway vehicle , from the second position and the first position and the third position that are relatively less likely to wear compared to the second position. From the calculation results of the contact characteristics using the wheel tread wear model shape at the three points , a map showing the relationship between the function between the three points and the equivalent tread slope is prepared in advance.
(B) measuring the relative displacement between the three points of the amount of wear at the three points in the axle direction of the wheel tread surface of the rail vehicle that affects the stable running of the rail vehicle;
(C) the relative displacement, against a map showing the relationship between the equivalent tread gradient was determined by the vehicle motion simulation using specifications of the rail vehicle as a function between the three points,
(D) running stability determining method of a railway vehicle, characterized by determining the running stability of the railway vehicle due to wear state of the vehicle wheel tread of said railway vehicle.
請求項1記載の鉄道車両の走行安定性判定方法において、前記第1、第2及び第3の位置がそれぞれ、車輪のフランジ背面からそれぞれ40mm付近、65mm及び110mm付近であることを特徴とする鉄道車両の走行安定性判定方法。 The railway vehicle running stability determination method according to claim 1, wherein the first, second, and third positions are about 40 mm, 65 mm, and 110 mm, respectively, from a rear surface of a wheel flange. Vehicle running stability determination method.
JP2008283916A 2008-11-05 2008-11-05 Method for judging running stability of railway vehicles Expired - Fee Related JP5253968B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008283916A JP5253968B2 (en) 2008-11-05 2008-11-05 Method for judging running stability of railway vehicles

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008283916A JP5253968B2 (en) 2008-11-05 2008-11-05 Method for judging running stability of railway vehicles

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2010111189A JP2010111189A (en) 2010-05-20
JP5253968B2 true JP5253968B2 (en) 2013-07-31

Family

ID=42300124

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2008283916A Expired - Fee Related JP5253968B2 (en) 2008-11-05 2008-11-05 Method for judging running stability of railway vehicles

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5253968B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU2483958C1 (en) * 2011-12-28 2013-06-10 Открытое Акционерное Общество "Российские Железные Дороги" Monitoring system of tread surface of railway wheel pair
CN103673825A (en) * 2013-12-16 2014-03-26 唐山轨道客车有限责任公司 Device for measuring distance difference between treading surface and journal surface of railway vehicle wheel set
CN110245415B (en) * 2019-06-12 2023-02-07 中国神华能源股份有限公司 Wheel tread concave abrasion threshold value determining method and device
CN110263403B (en) * 2019-06-12 2023-04-18 中国神华能源股份有限公司 Wheel tread scratch threshold determination method and wheel tread scratch threshold determination device

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004258007A (en) * 2003-02-28 2004-09-16 Hitachi Industries Co Ltd Wheel shape measurement method
JP4657767B2 (en) * 2005-03-14 2011-03-23 財団法人鉄道総合技術研究所 Program, information storage medium and contact characteristic evaluation device
JP4759744B2 (en) * 2006-06-13 2011-08-31 住友金属工業株式会社 Method for detecting contact position between railroad vehicle wheel and rail

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2010111189A (en) 2010-05-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6610557B2 (en) Flange wear measurement method for railway vehicle wheels
WO2017149954A1 (en) Tire wear life estimating system
JP5378477B2 (en) Method for monitoring the thickness of at least one mutual friction member of a vehicle friction brake, in particular the brake lining of a vehicle brake device
CN104321615A (en) Track status monitoring device
Heller et al. Optimizing the wheel profile to improve rail vehicle dynamic performance
CN105026917A (en) System to image and measure rail offset
JP5253968B2 (en) Method for judging running stability of railway vehicles
CN105517874A (en) Method for measuring track state using in-operation car, and in-operation car for measuring track state
CN110245415B (en) Wheel tread concave abrasion threshold value determining method and device
JP5467027B2 (en) Tire wear test apparatus, method, and program
CN112414651A (en) Method and Device for Determining Track Stiffness Based on Mobile Line Loading Vehicle
JP2015152409A (en) Circularity measuring method and device of wheel for railway vehicle
JP5752633B2 (en) Speed detection device, travel position calculation device, and speed calculation method
KR20160013988A (en) Method for simulating a deflection radius of a motor vehicle tyre
JP6833434B2 (en) Railway vehicle anomaly detection method
CN112836313A (en) A design method for the grinding profile of turnout rails based on the position of the contact light strip
JP6770414B2 (en) Ride comfort measurement method and equipment
CN115063376B (en) A method and system for correcting the error of asphalt pavement wear caused by vehicle deviation
WO2023199369A1 (en) Life evaluation device and method
JP7430622B2 (en) Wear diagnosis system and method for wheel flanges of railway vehicles
CN109615258A (en) Evaluation Method of Automobile Brake Pedal Feel
JP2023031374A (en) Processing method of lateral pressure measurement data and processing device of lateral pressure measurement data
JP7207148B2 (en) Railroad vehicle track condition evaluation method and railroad vehicle bogie
JP2008037284A (en) Railway vehicle wheel measuring device
JP6586845B2 (en) Tire wear evaluation method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20110310

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20120725

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20120828

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20120913

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20130416

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20130417

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5253968

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20160426

Year of fee payment: 3

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees