Groom et al., 2007 - Google Patents
Small-for-gestational-age infants classified by customized or population birthweight centiles: impact of gestational age at deliveryGroom et al., 2007
View PDF- Document ID
- 15237303035726080435
- Author
- Groom K
- Poppe K
- North R
- McCowan L
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
External Links
Snippet
OBJECTIVE: Evidence of placental disease and poor perinatal outcome is more common in infants who are small by customized centiles, compared with population centiles. Because preterm births are more likely to be associated with placental pathology, a greater proportion …
- 206010041092 Small for dates baby 0 title abstract description 150
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Groom et al. | Small-for-gestational-age infants classified by customized or population birthweight centiles: impact of gestational age at delivery | |
Madden et al. | Term small-for-gestational-age infants from low-risk women are at significantly greater risk of adverse neonatal outcomes | |
Crovetto et al. | Differential performance of first‐trimester screening in predicting small‐for‐gestational‐age neonate or fetal growth restriction | |
Burke et al. | Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study | |
Crovetto et al. | First‐trimester screening with specific algorithms for early‐and late‐onset fetal growth restriction | |
Barber et al. | Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate | |
Khalil et al. | Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission? | |
Crovetto et al. | First‐trimester screening for early and late small‐for‐gestational‐age neonates using maternal serum biochemistry, blood pressure and uterine artery Doppler | |
Akolekar et al. | Prediction of miscarriage and stillbirth at 11–13 weeks and the contribution of chorionic villus sampling | |
Sotiriadis et al. | Transvaginal cervical length measurement for prediction of preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labor: a meta‐analysis | |
Huang et al. | Determinants of unexplained antepartum fetal deaths | |
Barber et al. | Contributing indications to the rising cesarean delivery rate | |
Ego et al. | Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: a French multicenter study | |
Chafetz et al. | First-trimester placental protein 13 screening for preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction | |
Figueras et al. | Predictiveness of antenatal umbilical artery Doppler for adverse pregnancy outcome in small‐for‐gestational‐age babies according to customised birthweight centiles: population‐based study | |
Blair et al. | Placental infarction identified by macroscopic examination and risk of cerebral palsy in infants at 35 weeks of gestational age and over | |
Larma et al. | Is sonographic assessment of the cervix necessary and helpful? | |
Gardosi | Clinical strategies for improving the detection of fetal growth restriction | |
Nakling et al. | Pregnancy risk increases from 41 weeks of gestation | |
Scala et al. | Number of episodes of reduced fetal movement at term: association with adverse perinatal outcome | |
Bricker | Optimal antenatal care for twin and triplet pregnancy: the evidence base | |
Van Ravenswaaij et al. | First‐trimester serum PAPP‐A and fβ‐hCG concentrations and other maternal characteristics to establish logistic regression‐based predictive rules for adverse pregnancy outcome | |
Schneuer et al. | First trimester screening of maternal placental protein 13 for predicting preeclampsia and small for gestational age: in-house study and systematic review | |
Malabarey et al. | The effect of pelvic size on cesarean delivery rates: using adolescent maternal age as an unbiased proxy for pelvic size | |
Audibert et al. | No. 262-prenatal screening for and diagnosis of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies |