[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Schalcher et al., 2024 - Google Patents

Landing force reveals new form of motion-induced sound camouflage in a wild predator

Schalcher et al., 2024

View HTML
Document ID
14508879068416589092
Author
Schalcher K
Milliet E
Séchaud R
Bühler R
Almasi B
Potier S
Becciu P
Roulin A
Shepard E
Publication year
Publication venue
Elife

External Links

Snippet

Predator-prey arms races have led to the evolution of finely tuned disguise strategies. While the theoretical benefits of predator camouflage are well established, no study has yet been able to quantify its consequences for hunting success in natural conditions. We used high …
Continue reading at elifesciences.org (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; CARE OF BIRDS, FISHES, INSECTS; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K31/00—Housing birds
    • A01K31/14—Nest-boxes, e.g. for singing birds or the like
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01M—CATCHING OR TRAPPING OF ANIMALS; APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS ANIMALS OR NOXIOUS PLANTS
    • A01M29/00—Scaring or repelling devices, e.g. bird-scaring apparatus
    • A01M29/16—Scaring or repelling devices, e.g. bird-scaring apparatus using sound waves
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01M—CATCHING OR TRAPPING OF ANIMALS; APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS ANIMALS OR NOXIOUS PLANTS
    • A01M29/00—Scaring or repelling devices, e.g. bird-scaring apparatus
    • A01M29/06—Scaring or repelling devices, e.g. bird-scaring apparatus using visual means, e.g. scarecrows, moving elements, specific shapes, patterns or the like
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01M—CATCHING OR TRAPPING OF ANIMALS; APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS ANIMALS OR NOXIOUS PLANTS
    • A01M31/00—Hunting appliances
    • A01M31/002—Detecting animals in a given area
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N3/00—Computer systems based on biological models
    • G06N3/02—Computer systems based on biological models using neural network models
    • G06N3/04—Architectures, e.g. interconnection topology
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; CARE OF BIRDS, FISHES, INSECTS; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K79/00—Methods or means of catching fish in bulk not provided for in groups A01K69/00 - A01K77/00, e.g. fish pumps; Detection of fish; Whale fishery
    • A01K79/02—Methods or means of catching fish in bulk not provided for in groups A01K69/00 - A01K77/00, e.g. fish pumps; Detection of fish; Whale fishery by electrocution ; Attracting or stunning fish; Scaring sharks
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; CARE OF BIRDS, FISHES, INSECTS; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K15/00—Devices for taming animals, e.g. nose-rings, hobbles; Devices for overturning animals in general; Training equipment; Covering boxes

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Penteriani et al. Individual status, foraging effort and need for conspicuousness shape behavioural responses of a predator to moon phases
Stake et al. Patterns of snake predation at songbird nests in Missouri and Texas
Furrer et al. The evolution of urgency-based and functionally referential alarm calls in ground-dwelling species
Støen et al. Brown bear (Ursus arctos) attacks resulting in human casualties in Scandinavia 1977–2016; management implications and recommendations
Hernandez-Pliego et al. Combined use of tri-axial accelerometers and GPS reveals the flexible foraging strategy of a bird in relation to weather conditions
Shifferman et al. Movement and direction of movement of a simulated prey affect the success rate in barn owl Tyto alba attack
Schalcher et al. Landing force reveals new form of motion-induced sound camouflage in a wild predator
Lewanzik et al. Continued source level reduction during attack in the low‐amplitude bat Barbastella barbastellus prevents moth evasive flight
Oudman et al. Diet preferences as the cause of individual differences rather than the consequence
Castañeda et al. Barn Owls select uncultivated habitats for hunting in a winegrape growing region of California
Bullock et al. The behaviour and recovery of juvenile lemon sharks Negaprion brevirostris in response to external accelerometer tag attachment
Taylor et al. Video monitoring reveals novel threat to Critically Endangered captive-bred and released Regent Honeyeaters
Maeno et al. Defence tactics cycle with diel microhabitat choice and body temperature in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria
Guerrero‐Sanchez et al. The effect of oil palm‐dominated landscapes on the home range and distribution of a generalist species, the Asian water monitor
Wood et al. Illuminating the nocturnal habits of owls with emerging tagging technologies
Kilfoil et al. Human effects on brown bear diel activity may facilitate subadults foraging on Pacific salmon
Hügel et al. Species‐specific strategies increase unpredictability of escape flight in eared moths
Lailvaux It’s not easy being green: Behavior, morphology, and population structure in urban and natural populations of green anole (Anolis carolinensis) lizards
Montero et al. Behavioural strategies associated with using an ephemeral roosting resource in Spix's disc-winged bat
York et al. Juvenile collared lizards adjust tail display frequency in response to variable predatory threat
Lee et al. Behavioral responses of chinstrap and gentoo penguins to a stuffed skua and human nest intruders
Steen et al. Diel activity of foraging Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) in the winter revealed by camera traps
Eberhart-Phillips Dancing in the moonlight: evidence that killdeer foraging behaviour varies with the lunar cycle
Grey et al. Optimal control of harvest timing in discrete population models
Schalcher et al. Stealth hunters: landing force predicts hunting success in Barn Owls