Baltzell et al., 2018 - Google Patents
Efficient characterization of individual differences in compression ratio preferenceBaltzell et al., 2018
- Document ID
- 14055610887386511054
- Author
- Baltzell L
- Xia J
- Kalluri S
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
External Links
Snippet
While wide dynamic range compression (WDRC) is a standard feature of modern hearing aids, it can be difficult to fit compression settings to individual hearing aid users. The goal of the current study was to develop a practical test to learn the preference of individual listeners …
- 238000007906 compression 0 title abstract description 87
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/50—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics
- H04R25/505—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics using digital signal processing
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/70—Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R2225/00—Details of deaf aids covered by H04R25/00, not provided for in any of its subgroups
- H04R2225/43—Signal processing in hearing aids to enhance the speech intelligibility
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/40—Arrangements for obtaining a desired directivity characteristic
- H04R25/407—Circuits for combining signals of a plurality of transducers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/30—Monitoring or testing of hearing aids, e.g. functioning, settings, battery power
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R2430/00—Signal processing covered by H04R, not provided for in its groups
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Moore et al. | Development of a new method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression: CAMEQ2-HF | |
| Valente et al. | Differences in word and phoneme recognition in quiet, sentence recognition in noise, and subjective outcomes between manufacturer first-fit and hearing aids programmed to NAL-NL2 using real-ear measures | |
| Chung | Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids: Part II. Feedback and occlusion effect reduction strategies, laser shell manufacturing processes, and other signal processing technologies | |
| Schlittenlacher et al. | Audiogram estimation using Bayesian active learning | |
| Scollie | Children’s speech recognition scores: The Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level | |
| Arehart et al. | Effects of noise and distortion on speech quality judgments in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners | |
| Hillock-Dunn et al. | Assessing speech perception in children with hearing loss: What conventional clinical tools may miss | |
| Desloge et al. | Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: Effects of continuous and interrupted noise | |
| Wu et al. | The effect of hearing aid signal-processing schemes on acceptable noise levels: perception and prediction | |
| Rasetshwane et al. | Categorical loudness scaling and equal-loudness contours in listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss | |
| Bentler et al. | Comparison of hearing aids over the 20th century | |
| Van Eeckhoutte et al. | Speech recognition, loudness, and preference with extended bandwidth hearing aids for adult hearing aid users | |
| Smits et al. | The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: Steady-state noise | |
| Lakshmi et al. | A systematic review and meta-analysis of digital noise reduction hearing aids in adults | |
| Chong et al. | A critical review of hearing-aid single-microphone noise-reduction studies in adults and children | |
| Vroegop et al. | Comparing two hearing aid fitting algorithms for bimodal cochlear implant users | |
| Shen et al. | Temporal modulation transfer function for efficient assessment of auditory temporal resolution | |
| Perry et al. | Listener factors explain little variability in self-adjusted hearing aid gain | |
| Van Eeckhoutte et al. | Perceptual benefits of extended bandwidth hearing aids with children: A within-subject design using clinically available hearing aids | |
| Kara et al. | Comparison of two different bone anchored hearing instruments: Baha-5 vs Ponto-plus | |
| Rennies et al. | Evaluation of a near-end listening enhancement algorithm by combined speech intelligibility and listening effort measurements | |
| Healy et al. | The optimal threshold for removing noise from speech is similar across normal and impaired hearing—a time-frequency masking study | |
| Scheidiger et al. | Assessing the efficacy of hearing-aid amplification using a phoneme test | |
| Moore | Listening to music through hearing aids: Potential lessons for cochlear implants | |
| Jürgens et al. | Prediction of consonant recognition in quiet for listeners with normal and impaired hearing using an auditory model |