GOL et al., 2005 - Google Patents
Vulnerability and damage analysis of existing buildingsGOL et al., 2005
View PDF- Document ID
- 13898578814739085791
- Author
- GOL A
- Bakhshi A
- Tabeshpour M
- Publication year
External Links
Snippet
The assessment of seismic performance of buildings under future earthquakes is becoming an important problem in earthquake engineering. Some important buildings are considerably old and therefore their strengths and ductilities are less than strength and …
- 238000004458 analytical method 0 title abstract description 27
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04C—STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS; BUILDING MATERIALS
- E04C3/00—Structural elongated elements designed for load-supporting
- E04C3/02—Joists; Girders, trusses, or trusslike structures, e.g. prefabricated; Lintels; Transoms; Braces
- E04C3/12—Joists; Girders, trusses, or trusslike structures, e.g. prefabricated; Lintels; Transoms; Braces of wood, e.g. with reinforcements, with tensioning members
- E04C3/18—Joists; Girders, trusses, or trusslike structures, e.g. prefabricated; Lintels; Transoms; Braces of wood, e.g. with reinforcements, with tensioning members with metal or other reinforcements or tensioning members
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Elnashai et al. | Overstrength and force reduction factors of multistorey reinforced‐concrete buildings | |
| Kowalsky | Deformation limit states for circular reinforced concrete bridge columns | |
| Uriz et al. | Seismic performance assessment of concentrically braced steel frames | |
| Fotopoulou et al. | Vulnerability assessment of low-code reinforced concrete frame buildings subjected to liquefaction-induced differential displacements | |
| Chaulagain et al. | Seismic safety assessment of existing masonry infill structures in Nepal | |
| Bolea | The seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete frame structures with infill masonry in the Bucharest area | |
| Bosco et al. | A design procedure for pin‐supported rocking buckling‐restrained braced frames | |
| Siyam et al. | Collapse fragility evaluation of ductile reinforced concrete block wall systems for seismic risk assessment | |
| Saghafi et al. | Analytical assessment of reinforced concrete frames equipped with TADAS dampers | |
| GOL et al. | Vulnerability and damage analysis of existing buildings | |
| El Jisr et al. | Proposed nonlinear macro‐model for seismic risk assessment of composite‐steel moment resisting frames | |
| Samimifar et al. | Deflection amplification factor for estimating seismic lateral deformations of RC frames | |
| Tabeshpour et al. | Vulnerability and damage analyses of existing buildings | |
| Massumi et al. | Prediction of seismic overstrength in concrete moment resisting frames using incremental static and dynamic analyses | |
| Ardalani et al. | Nonlinear seismic performance assessment of energy-based steel structures with semi-rigid connections | |
| Tabeshpour | Nonlinear dynamic analysis of chimney-like towers | |
| Williamson et al. | Investigating the impact of design criteria on the expected seismic losses of multi-storey office buildings | |
| Lupoi et al. | Comparison of different approaches for seismic assessment of existing buildings | |
| Benavent-Climent | A seismic index method for vulnerability assessment of existing frames: application to RC structures with wide beams in Spain | |
| Su et al. | Seismic drift demand and capacity of non-seismically designed concrete buildings in Hong Kong | |
| Abass et al. | Seismic evaluation and retrofitting of an existing buildings-state of the art | |
| Freddi et al. | Seismic Life-Cycle Cost-Benefit Analysis of a BRBs Retrofitted Frame | |
| Baros et al. | An overview of pushover procedures for the analysis of buildings susceptible to torsional behavior | |
| Faella et al. | Unsymmetric-plan masonry buildings: Pushover vs nonlinear dynamic analysis | |
| Chiu et al. | Crack-based damage assessment method for HSRC shear-critical beams and columns |