[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Carter et al., 2000 - Google Patents

Worst case'methodology for the initial assessment of societal risk from proposed major accident installations

Carter et al., 2000

Document ID
13208892797563045019
Author
Carter D
Hirst I
Publication year
Publication venue
Journal of hazardous materials

External Links

Snippet

This paper considers the application of one of the weighted risk indicators used by the Major Hazards Assessment Unit (MHAU) of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) in formulating advice to local planning authorities on the siting of new major accident hazard installations …
Continue reading at www.sciencedirect.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
    • G06Q10/063Operations research or analysis
    • G06Q10/0635Risk analysis

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Christou et al. The control of major accident hazards: The land-use planning issue
Bottelberghs Risk analysis and safety policy developments in the Netherlands
Cozzani et al. Quantitative assessment of domino scenarios by a GIS-based software tool
Ale Risk analysis and risk policy in the Netherlands and the EEC
Carter et al. Worst case'methodology for the initial assessment of societal risk from proposed major accident installations
Papadakis Assessment of requirements on safety management systems in EU regulations for the control of major hazard pipelines
Hirst et al. A “worst case” methodology for obtaining a rough but rapid indication of the societal risk from a major accident hazard installation
Scenna et al. Road risk analysis due to the transportation of chlorine in Rosario city
Cassini Road transportation of dangerous goods: quantitative risk assessment and route comparison
Lee et al. Evaluating the severity of building fires with the analytical hierarchy process, big data analysis, and remote sensing
Sebos et al. Land-use planning in the vicinity of major accident hazard installations in Greece
Papazoglou et al. Land use planning policies stemming from the implementation of the SEVESO-II Directive in the EU
Raj et al. Risk analysis based LNG facility siting standard in NFPA 59A
Seddik et al. Fuzzy approach and possibility to solve uncertainty weaknesses in conventional quantitative risk assessment
Duijm et al. Acceptance criteria in Denmark and the EU
Markiewicz Analysis of spatial planning documents and strategic environmental assessment reports with regard to hazards of major industrial accidents: a case study involving six Polish cities
Papazoglou et al. Supporting decision makers in land use planning around chemical sites. Case study: expansion of an oil refinery
Spadoni et al. A numerical procedure for assessing risks from road transport of dangerous substances
Hirst et al. A “worst case” methodology for risk assessment of major accident installations
KR101937310B1 (en) Assessment method for fire risk of bridge
Hirschler Fire hazard and fire risk assessment
Suffo et al. Evolution of the chemical-environmental risk of territorial compatibility under the framework of the Seveso Directive: A case study of the autonomous community of Andalusia (southern Spain)
Alp et al. Risk quantification for meteorology-and direction-dependent hazards due to point and linear risk sources
Basta et al. Implementing Art. 12 of the Seveso II Directive-Overview of Roadmaps for Land-Use Planning in Selected Member States
Jones et al. Multiple sustainability criteria mapping of gas station incident consequences and subsequent decision optimisation