Mandal et al., 2020 - Google Patents
Ensemble averaging based assessment of spatiotemporal variations in ambient PM2. 5 concentrations over Delhi, India, during 2010–2016Mandal et al., 2020
View PDF- Document ID
- 11154398687111167174
- Author
- Mandal S
- Madhipatla K
- Guttikunda S
- Kloog I
- Prabhakaran D
- Schwartz J
- Team G
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Atmospheric Environment
External Links
Snippet
Elevated levels of ambient air pollution has been implicated as a major risk factor for morbidities and premature mortality in India, with particularly high concentrations of particulate matter in the Indo-Gangetic plain. High resolution spatiotemporal estimates of …
- 238000003915 air pollution 0 abstract description 35
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/04—Forecasting or optimisation, e.g. linear programming, "travelling salesman problem" or "cutting stock problem"
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01W—METEOROLOGY
- G01W1/00—Meteorology
- G01W1/10—Devices for predicting weather conditions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
- G01N33/0004—Gaseous mixtures, e.g. polluted air
- G01N33/0009—General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment
- G01N33/0073—Control unit therefor
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Mandal et al. | Ensemble averaging based assessment of spatiotemporal variations in ambient PM2. 5 concentrations over Delhi, India, during 2010–2016 | |
| Stafoggia et al. | Estimation of daily PM10 and PM2. 5 concentrations in Italy, 2013–2015, using a spatiotemporal land-use random-forest model | |
| Chen et al. | Extreme gradient boosting model to estimate PM2. 5 concentrations with missing-filled satellite data in China | |
| Wu et al. | A hybrid kriging/land-use regression model to assess PM2. 5 spatial-temporal variability | |
| Aguilera et al. | A novel ensemble-based statistical approach to estimate daily wildfire-specific PM2. 5 in California (2006–2020) | |
| Zhong et al. | Robust prediction of hourly PM2. 5 from meteorological data using LightGBM | |
| Stafoggia et al. | Estimation of daily PM10 concentrations in Italy (2006–2012) using finely resolved satellite data, land use variables and meteorology | |
| Yang et al. | Development of PM2. 5 and NO2 models in a LUR framework incorporating satellite remote sensing and air quality model data in Pearl River Delta region, China | |
| Fang et al. | Satellite-based ground PM2. 5 estimation using timely structure adaptive modeling | |
| Thongthammachart et al. | An integrated model combining random forests and WRF/CMAQ model for high accuracy spatiotemporal PM2. 5 predictions in the Kansai region of Japan | |
| Di et al. | A hybrid model for spatially and temporally resolved ozone exposures in the continental United States | |
| Tella et al. | GIS-based air quality modelling: Spatial prediction of PM10 for Selangor State, Malaysia using machine learning algorithms | |
| Chen et al. | Estimating PM2. 5 with high-resolution 1-km AOD data and an improved machine learning model over Shenzhen, China | |
| Lefebvre et al. | Validation of the MIMOSA-AURORA-IFDM model chain for policy support: modeling concentrations of elemental carbon in Flanders | |
| Zhang et al. | Predicting daily PM2. 5 concentrations in Texas using high-resolution satellite aerosol optical depth | |
| Requia et al. | Evaluation of predictive capabilities of ordinary geostatistical interpolation, hybrid interpolation, and machine learning methods for estimating PM2. 5 constituents over space | |
| Xiang et al. | Mapping potential wetlands by a new framework method using random forest algorithm and big Earth data: A case study in China's Yangtze River Basin | |
| Lloyd et al. | Predicting spatial variations in annual average outdoor ultrafine particle concentrations in Montreal and Toronto, Canada: Integrating land use regression and deep learning models | |
| Arowosegbe et al. | Ensemble averaging using remote sensing data to model spatiotemporal PM10 concentrations in sparsely monitored South Africa | |
| Papachristopoulou et al. | Aerosol optical depth regime over megacities of the world | |
| Unik et al. | PM2. 5 estimation using machine learning models and satellite data: a literature review | |
| Tuna Tuygun et al. | Estimation of particulate matter concentrations in Türkiye using a random forest model based on satellite AOD retrievals | |
| Alifa et al. | The influence of meteorology and emissions on the spatio-temporal variability of PM10 in Malaysia | |
| Chen et al. | Spatiotemporally continuous PM2. 5 dataset in the Mekong River Basin from 2015 to 2022 using a stacking model | |
| Mandal et al. | Nationwide estimation of daily ambient PM2. 5 from 2008 to 2020 at 1 km2 in India using an ensemble approach |