[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Kim et al., 2015 - Google Patents

Critical appraisal of implant impression accuracies: a systematic review

Kim et al., 2015

Document ID
7471931007796856258
Author
Kim J
Kim K
Kim S
Publication year
Publication venue
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry

External Links

Snippet

Statement of problem Different assessment methods have been used to measure the accuracy of implant impression techniques; therefore, the readers should understand the benefits and limitations of each assessment method used. Purpose The purpose of this …
Continue reading at www.sciencedirect.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0004—Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C19/05—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for determining occlusion
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0022—Blanks or green, unfinished dental restoration parts
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
    • A61C9/004—Means or methods for taking digitized impressions
    • A61C9/0046—Data acquisition means or methods
    • A61C9/0053—Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4538—Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
    • A61B5/4542—Evaluating the mouth, e.g. the jaw
    • A61B5/4547—Evaluating teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C8/00—Means to be fixed to the jaw-bone for consolidating natural teeth or for fixing dental prostheses thereon; Dental implants; Implanting tools
    • A61C8/0048—Connecting the upper structure to the implant, e.g. bridging bars
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C8/00—Means to be fixed to the jaw-bone for consolidating natural teeth or for fixing dental prostheses thereon; Dental implants; Implanting tools
    • A61C8/0001—Impression means for implants, e.g. impression coping
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C1/00—Dental machines for boring or cutting; General features of dental machines or apparatus, e.g. hand-piece design
    • A61C1/08—Machine parts specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C1/082—Positioning or guiding, e.g. of drills
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C7/00—Orthodontics, i.e. obtaining or maintaining the desired position of teeth, e.g. by straightening, evening, regulating, separating, or by correcting malocclusions

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Kim et al. Critical appraisal of implant impression accuracies: a systematic review
Nakhaei et al. Three-dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques for dental implants
Baig Multi-unit implant impression accuracy: A review of the literature
Papaspyridakos et al. Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review.
Baig Accuracy of impressions of multiple implants in the edentulous arch: a systematic review
Papaspyridakos et al. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non‐splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study
Stimmelmayr et al. Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model—a digital approach
Conrad et al. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants
Elshenawy et al. Cast accuracy obtained from different impression techniques at different implant angulations (in vitro study)
Papaspyridakos et al. Effect of Splinted and Nonsplinted Impression Techniques on the Accuracy of Fit of Fixed Implant Prostheses in Edentulous Patients: A Comparative Study.
Pradíes et al. Using stereophotogrammetric technology for obtaining intraoral digital impressions of implants
Stimmelmayr et al. Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw
Balamurugan et al. Evaluation of accuracy of direct transfer snapon impression coping closed tray impression technique and direct transfer open tray impression technique: An in vitro study
Alikhasi et al. The effect of implant angulation on the transfer accuracy of external‐connection implants
Papaspyridakos et al. Digital evaluation of three splinting materials used to fabricate verification jigs for full‐arch implant prostheses: a comparative study
Osman et al. Implant impression accuracy of parallel and non-parallel implants: a comparative in-vitro analysis of open and closed tray techniques
Liu et al. Accuracy of multi-implant impressions using 3D-printing custom trays and splinting versus conventional techniques for complete arches.
Yilmaz et al. The accuracy of single implant scans with a healing abutment-scanpeg system compared with the scans of a scanbody and conventional impressions: an in vitro study
Pozzi et al. Accuracy of complete‐arch digital implant impression with intraoral optical scanning and stereophotogrammetry: an in vivo prospective comparative study
Pujari et al. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study
Fu et al. Accuracy of intraoral scan with prefabricated aids and stereophotogrammetry compared with open tray impressions for complete‐arch implant‐supported prosthesis: a clinical study
Haghi et al. Effect of technique and impression material on the vertical misfit of a screw-retained, three-unit implant bridge: An: in vitro: study
El Osta et al. Accuracy of conventional impressions and digital scans for implant-supported fixed prostheses in maxillary free-ended partial edentulism: An in vitro study
Michelinakis et al. Influence of different scan body design features and intraoral scanners on the congruence between scan body meshes and library files: An in vitro study
Siadat et al. Comparative evaluation of the effect of impression materials and trays on the accuracy of angulated implants impressions