Property talk:P4766
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 99of9 in topic Use as a value not just a reference qualifier?
Documentation
Australian honours ID
ID for an instance of an Australian honour being awarded to an Australian citizen
ID for an instance of an Australian honour being awarded to an Australian citizen
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4766#Format, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Scope is as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4766#Scope, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4766#Entity types
Item “award received (P166)”: Items with this property should also have “award received (P166)”. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4766#Item P166, hourly updated report, search, SPARQLItem “country of citizenship (P27): Australia (Q408)”: Items with this property should also have “country of citizenship (P27): Australia (Q408)”. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4766#Item P27, hourly updated report, search, SPARQLType “human (Q5)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “human (Q5)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4766#Type Q5, hourly updated report, SPARQL
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Use as a value not just a reference qualifier?
edit@Pintoch, Danrok, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Harryboyles:
Notified participants of WikiProject Australia Does anyone have an objection to using this as a main statement as is done on Cyril Burke (Q3008975), instead of solely using it as a qualifier in a reference as was originally proposed on Rechelle Hawkes (Q272139). This would make it easier to query, and we could also link it to the existing Mix'n'match set: https://mix-n-match.toolforge.org/#/catalog/66 . --99of9 (talk) 06:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Support. Makes sense to me. —Sam Wilson 06:53, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Oppose I started out thinking "yeah, that sounds OK", then thought some more - the number is not an identity for the person, it is the ID of an event that happened to the person. A specific award happens to only one person (so should have a uniqueness constraint in that direction), but a person can receive more than one honour. ID things should be unique for the person, which this will not be. --ScottDavis (talk) 11:38, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- @ScottDavis: That's right. So we would set a distinct-values constraint (Q21502410) but not a single-value constraint (Q19474404). One that we use like this in Chemistry is SPLASH (P4964) because each compound can be smashed up into multiple mass spectra, but any mass spectrum corresponds to exactly one compound (and does not deserve it's own wikidata item). --99of9 (talk) 04:01, 14 August 2020 (UTC)