Property talk:P1340
Latest comment: 3 years ago by LiftedStarfish in topic Scope
eye color
color of the irises of a person's eyes
color of the irises of a person's eyes
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Value type “eye color (Q23786)”: This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value eye color (Q23786) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1340#Value type Q23786, SPARQL
Type “human (Q5), fictional character (Q95074), house cat (Q146), sex doll (Q10832), cat breed (Q43577), horse (Q726), horse breed (Q1160573), dog (Q144), dog breed (Q39367), literary character (Q3658341), comics character (Q1114461), humanoid robot (Q584529), animal (Q729)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)” with classes “human (Q5), fictional character (Q95074), house cat (Q146), sex doll (Q10832), cat breed (Q43577), horse (Q726), horse breed (Q1160573), dog (Q144), dog breed (Q39367), literary character (Q3658341), comics character (Q1114461), humanoid robot (Q584529), animal (Q729)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1340#Type Q5, Q95074, Q146, Q10832, Q43577, Q726, Q1160573, Q144, Q39367, Q3658341, Q1114461, Q584529, Q729, hourly updated report, SPARQLScope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1340#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQLNone of black (Q23445), brown (Q47071), light brown (Q71404162), dark brown (Q15699769), dark brown (Q3985184), blue (Q1088), light blue (Q1602687), dark blue (Q3641131), green (Q3133), dark green (Q22963901), light green (Q4405716), red (Q3142), dark red (Q5223370), garnet (Q244822), light red (Q69692146), pink (Q429220), yellow (Q943), purple (Q3257809), grey (Q42519), dark grey (Q71392381), light grey (Q24837023), lavender (Q2468392), chestnut (Q2040833), silver (Q317802), cyan (Q180778), white (Q23444), copper (Q120609071): value must not be any of the specified items.
Replacement property:
Replacement values: (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). Known exceptions: Walter Blythe (Q7964329)Replacement property:
Replacement values: (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1340#none of, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200), Wikibase MediaInfo (Q59712033): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1340#Entity types
This property is being used by:
Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
Scope
editStatements about eye colour could be made for many species or individuals thereof, so I am wondering whether having a property dedicated to humans is useful, especially since the item eye color (Q23786) the property is referring to does not make that destinction. --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 04:28, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- As many other properties, its meant for specific persons not humans in general.
- BTW en:eye color linked on eye color (Q23786) is primarily about humans. --- Jura 08:32, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- It is better to use something like:
- <typical color>
- [brown]
- [black]
- <applies to part, aspect, or form (P518)> [clutch]
- [black]
- <typical color>
- for species. — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 11:37, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- I guess you mean color (P462), since there is no "typical color" property. However then the value type could not be an instance of eye color (Q23786). -- LaddΩ chat ;) 19:07, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- If you're gonna do that, I don't see a reason for why you just don't just get rid of the 'eye color' trait to begin with. On top of this, I am fairly certain that fictional humans can have any eye color that the creator wants them to. I really don't understand this constraint, or why there needs to be a distinction between what is an 'eye color' and a 'color', because, as previously mentioned, fictional entities, even humans, can have whatever color their creator wants. I'd rather just get rid of the 'eye color' instances of any color, as well as get rid of the bot that converts them, because I see no reason for their existences. If for some reason, a color is different when it's an eye color than it's typical form, that information would be made clear by the fact that it's being applied to the eye color property! LiftedStarfish (talk) 06:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)