Insecure dev machines.
Insecure dev machines.
Posted Oct 22, 2024 8:40 UTC (Tue) by epa (subscriber, #39769)In reply to: Insecure dev machines. by LtWorf
Parent article: Python PGP proposal poses packaging puzzles
Posted Oct 22, 2024 14:57 UTC (Tue)
by mricon (subscriber, #59252)
[Link]
Posted Oct 22, 2024 17:21 UTC (Tue)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Oct 22, 2024 19:43 UTC (Tue)
by LtWorf (subscriber, #124958)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Oct 22, 2024 20:44 UTC (Tue)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link]
Posted Oct 23, 2024 8:13 UTC (Wed)
by farnz (subscriber, #17727)
[Link]
On the assumption that you trust GitHub, this guarantees you that the source visible on GitHub is the corresponding source for the binary built on GitHub. With a developer doing the signing, I can build a binary that does not correspond to the given source, sign it, and upload it.
Reproducible builds would, of course, be better.
Insecure dev machines.
Insecure dev machines.
Insecure dev machines.
Insecure dev machines.
Builds on GitHub instead of compromised developer machine