Driver regression testing with roadtest

Posted Mar 21, 2022 11:23 UTC (Mon) by johill (subscriber, #25196)
In reply to: Driver regression testing with roadtest by pabs
Parent article: Driver regression testing with roadtest

Do you want to propose a couple of patches then? :) Should be pretty simple, I'd think, but if not I guess I can also just write them quickly.

Driver regression testing with roadtest

Posted Mar 22, 2022 1:02 UTC (Tue) by pabs (subscriber, #43278) [Link] (4 responses)

Sorry, I'll have to leave that to you. My Linux kernel knowledge is minimal at this point and I'm not the UML maintainer in Debian, just a bystander that looked it at one point.

Driver regression testing with roadtest

Posted Mar 24, 2022 10:37 UTC (Thu) by riteshsarraf (subscriber, #11138) [Link] (2 responses)

Thank you for bringing this up. I will try to review the set of patches we're carrying in Debian, and what all can be pushed upstream.

Driver regression testing with roadtest

Posted Mar 24, 2022 10:51 UTC (Thu) by pabs (subscriber, #43278) [Link] (1 responses)

One other thing I was thinking; that Debian's src:user-mode-linux should be merged into src:linux (like the RT builds are) so it is always up to date with Debian's other Linux kernel packages.

https://kernel-team.pages.debian.net/kernel-handbook/

Driver regression testing with roadtest

Posted Mar 24, 2022 15:56 UTC (Thu) by riteshsarraf (subscriber, #11138) [Link]

Yes. That is something we've been targeting. Just that this hasn't had the urgency, given that in its current model, it works fine.

Driver regression testing with roadtest

Posted Mar 24, 2022 12:14 UTC (Thu) by johill (subscriber, #25196) [Link]

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-um/list/?serie...