The unexpected effectiveness of Python in science
The unexpected effectiveness of Python in science
Posted Jun 6, 2017 13:18 UTC (Tue) by anselm (subscriber, #2796)In reply to: The unexpected effectiveness of Python in science by Sesse
Parent article: The unexpected effectiveness of Python in science
That's great but often (a) even the academic licenses cost their users non-trivial amounts of money, and (b) you don't necessarily get to keep your academic licenses after you graduate and/or move to another institution. Especially if you start working for a commercial company in your field of research you will require a full license for the software, which your company will need to pay for and which they probably would prefer not to. (The whole point of cheap academic licenses is to make people dependent on the software in question so they, or someone, will eventually have to pay up when they start using the software “for real”.)
Software that (like Python and its extensions for scientific computing) is free as in beer/speech from the get-go is preferable in this context.
Posted Jun 6, 2017 19:03 UTC (Tue)
by MattJD (subscriber, #91390)
[Link]
But I'm not bitter. I won't do business with the company that sells that software. But I'm not bitter.
The unexpected effectiveness of Python in science