A conversation with Linus at LinuxCon Japan

Posted Jun 7, 2011 10:21 UTC (Tue) by marcH (subscriber, #57642)
In reply to: A conversation with Linus at LinuxCon Japan by elanthis
Parent article: A conversation with Linus at LinuxCon Japan

> Version numbers aren't decimal numbers. A lot of Americans especially tend to forget that, due to our use of the dot rather than the comma to separate whole and fractional parts of numbers.

Interesting... Is this why dots became popular in software version numbers, I mean because they make numbers more or less look like fractions?

> (In many/most other parts of the world, "1,000.25" is written "1.000,25".)

"1 000,25" is also quite common:

<http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/file/tip/src/sha...>

periods in release numbers

Posted Jun 8, 2011 1:58 UTC (Wed) by giraffedata (guest, #1954) [Link]

Interesting... Is this why dots became popular in software version numbers, I mean because they make numbers more or less look like fractions?

I don't see how it can be anything else. Early software products had plain natural numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4. OS/360 got up to the 30s or 40s that way, with several releases a year. Later, the bureaucracy surrounding putting out a new release got so heavy that people wanted a way to improve Release 31 without actually putting out Release 32, so the natural thing was to make it fractional. It was probably a while before they had more than 9 of these subreleases, and then there was probably some dilemma about calling it 31.10, but I guess we got over that. And eventually, as people put more and more stuff into these cheap subreleases, the bureacracy grew up around those too, and so we added another fraction: 31.10.1 etc.

If they weren't thinking of fractions, it would have been more normal to call it "Release 31, Subrelease 10, Modification 1" and abbreviate it "31-10-1".