[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Complexity of Multi-agent Systems Behavior

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2424))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The complexity of multi-agent systems behavior properties is studied. The behavior properties are formulated using first order temporal logic languages and are checked relative to the state transition diagram induced by the multi-agent system. Various tight complexity bounds of the behavior properties are established under natural structural and semantic restrictions on agent programs and actions. There are some interesting cases, where the check problem is decidable in deterministic or nondeterministic polynomial time.

This work was sponsored by the Russian Fundamental Studies Foundation (Grants 01-01-00278, 00-01-00254 and 02-01-00652).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 71.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 89.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Apt, K. R., Logic Programming. In: J. van Leeuwen (Ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science. Volume B. Formal Models and Semantics, Chapter 10, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. 1990, 493–574.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bylander, T., The computational Complexity of Propositional STRIPS Planning, Artificial Intelligence, 69:165–204, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke, E. M., Emerson, E. A. Design and synthesis of synchronization skeletons using branching time temporal logic. In: Proc.of Workshop on Logics of Programs, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, N. 181, 1981, 52–71.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., and Vardi, M.Y., Reasoning about actions and planning in LTL action theories, Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’02), 593–602, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, E. M., Grumberg, O. and Peled, D., Model Checking, MIT Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dekhtyar, M., Dikovsky, A., On Homeostatic Behavior of Dynamic Deductive Data Bases. In: Proc. 2nd Int. A.P.Ershov Memorial Conference “Perspective ofSystems Informatics”, Lect. Notes in CS, N. 1181, 1996, 420–432.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dekhtyar, M., Dikovsky, A., and Valiev, M., Applying temporal logic to analysis of behavior of cooperating logic programs. Lect. Notes in CS, N. 1755, 2000, 228–234.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eiter, T., Fink, M., Sabbatini, G., and Tompits, H., “Reasoning about Evolving Nonmonotonic Knowledge Bases”, Proc. of LPAR01, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Emerson, E. A. Temporal and modal logic. In: J. van Leeuwen (Ed.), "Handbook of Theor. Comput. Sci.", Elsevier Sci. Publishers, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Emerson, E. A. Model checking and the mu-calculus. In: N. Immerman, P. H. Kolaitis (Eds.), “Descriptive Complexity and Finite Models”. Proc. of a DIMACS Workshop, 1996, 185–214.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erol, K., Nau, D.S., and Subrahmanian, V.S., Complexity, Decidability and Undecidability Results for Domain-Independent Planning, Artificial Intelligence Journal, 76(1–2):75–88, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y. and Vardi, M., Reasoning about Knowledge, 1995, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher, M., Wooldridge, M., Specifying and Verifying Distributed Intelligent Systems. In: M. Filgueiras and L. Damas (Eds.) Progress in Artificial Intelligence-Sixth Portuguese Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. LNAI, N. 727, 1993, pp. 13–28, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jennings, N., Sycara, K. and Wooldridge, M. A roadmap of agent research and development Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 1998, 1(1):7–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Müller, J. P., Architectures and applications of intelligent agents: A survey. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 1998, 13(4):353–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kozen, D., Results on the Propositional μ-calculus. Theoretical Computer Science, 1983, v. 27, pp. 333–354.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Petrie, C., What is an agent? In: J.P. Müller, M. J. Wooldridge, and N. R. Jennings (Eds.) Intelligent Agents III-Proc. of the Third Intern. Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, N. 1193, 41–43. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reiter, R. Knowledge in Action: Logical Foundations for Specifying and Implementing Dynamical Systems. MIT Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sistla, A. P., Clarke, E. M., The complexity of propositional linear temporal logic. J.ACM, 32(3), 1985, 733–749.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Subrahmanian, V. S., Bonatti, P., Dix, J., et al., Heterogeneous Agent Systems, MIT Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vardi, M., Wolper, P., An automata-theoretic approach to automatic program verification. In: Proc. of the IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 1986, 332–344.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wooldridge, M., The Computational Complexity of Agent Design Problem. In: E. Durfee, (Ed.) Proc. of the Fourth Intern. Conf. on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 2000), IEEE Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wooldridge, M., Jennings N. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 1995, 10(2).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dekhtyar, M., Dikovsky, A., Valiev, M. (2002). Complexity of Multi-agent Systems Behavior. In: Flesca, S., Greco, S., Ianni, G., Leone, N. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2424. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45757-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45757-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44190-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45757-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics