[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

CompLognormal: An R Package for Composite Lognormal Distributions

In recent years, composite models based on the lognormal distribution have become popular in actuarial sciences and related areas. In this short note, we present a new R package for computing the probability density function, cumulative density function, and quantile function, and for generating random numbers of any composite model based on the lognormal distribution. The use of the package is illustrated using a real data set.

S. Nadarajah (School of Mathematics, University of Manchester) , S. A. A. Bakar (Institute of Mathematical Sciences, University of Malaya)
2013-11-18

1 Introduction

Two-piece composite distributions arise in many areas of the sciences. The first two-piece composite distribution with each piece described by a normal distribution appears to have been used by (Gibbons and Mylroie 1973). Recently, two-piece composite distributions with the first piece described a lognormal distribution (which we refer to as composite lognormal distributions) have proved popular in insurance and related areas. (Cooray and Ananda 2005) introduced such distributions recently, but one of the referees has pointed out that composite lognormal distributions have been known before at least as early as (Barford and Crovella 1998) in areas like modeling workloads of web servers.

(Cooray and Ananda 2005) showed that composite lognormal distributions can give better fits than standard univariate distributions. They illustrate this fact for the Danish fire insurance data by introducing the composite lognormal-Pareto distribution, a distribution obtained by piecing together lognormal and Pareto probability density functions (pdfs). (Scollnik 2007) improved the composite lognormal-Pareto distribution by using mixing weights as coefficients for each pdf replacing the constant weights applied earlier by (Cooray and Ananda 2005). (Scollnik 2007) also employed generalized Pareto distribution in place of Pareto distribution used by (Cooray and Ananda 2005). (Pigeon and Denuit 2011) provided further extensions of composite lognormal distributions by choosing the cutoff point (the point at which the two pdfs are pieced together) as a random variable. The most recent extensions of composite lognormal distributions are provided in (Nadarajah and Bakar 2012).

Composite lognormal distributions have attracted considerable attention in spite of being introduced only in 2005. Some applications in the last three years include: estimation of insurance claim cost distributions (Bolancé et al. 2010), inflation and excess insurance (Fackler 2010), large insurance claims in case reserves (Lindblad 2011), statistical mechanics (Eliazar and Cohen 2012), and modeling of mixed traffic conditions (Dubey et al. 2013).

The aim of this short note is to present a new contributed package CompLognormal for R that computes basic properties for any composite lognormal distribution. The properties considered include the pdf, cumulative distribution function (cdf), quantile function, and random numbers. Explicit expressions for these properties are given in Section “Properties”. Two illustrations of the practical use of the new R package are given in Section “Illustrations”.

2 Properties

Let \(f_i (\cdot)\), \(i = 1, 2\) be valid pdfs. Let \(F_i (\cdot)\), \(i = 1, 2\) denote the corresponding cdfs. In general, the pdf of a two-piece composite distribution is given by \[\displaystyle f(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle a_{1} f_{1}^{*}(x), & \mbox{if} \quad 0 < x \leq \theta, \\ \displaystyle a_{2} f_{2}^{*}(x), & \mbox{if} \quad \theta < x < \infty, \end{array} \right. \tag{1} \] where \(f_1^{*}(x) = f_1 (x) / F_1 (\theta)\), \(f_2^{*}(x) = f_2 (x) / \{ 1 - F_2 (\theta) \}\), \(\theta\) is the cutoff point, and \(a_1, a_2\) are non-negative weights summing to one. As suggested in (Nadarajah and Bakar 2012), we take \(a_{1}= \frac {1}{1+\phi}\) and \(a_{2}=\frac {\phi}{1+\phi}\) for \(\phi>0\).

The cdf corresponding to ((1)) is \[\displaystyle F(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle \frac {\displaystyle 1}{\displaystyle 1+\phi} \frac {\displaystyle F_{1}(x)}{\displaystyle F_{1}(\theta)}, & \mbox{if } \quad 0 < x \leq \theta, \\ \displaystyle \frac {\displaystyle 1}{\displaystyle 1+\phi} \left[ 1 + \phi \frac {\displaystyle F_{2}(x)-F_{2}(\theta)}{\displaystyle 1-F_{2}(\theta)} \right], & \mbox{if } \quad \theta < x < \infty. \end{array} \right. \label{eq:cdfcomp} \tag{2} \] The quantile function corresponding to ((1)) is \[\displaystyle Q(u) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle F_1^{-1} \left( u (1+\phi) F_{1}(\theta) \right), & \mbox{if } \quad 0 < u \leq \frac {\displaystyle 1}{\displaystyle 1+\phi}, \\ \displaystyle F_2^{-1} \left( F_{2}(\theta) + \left( 1 - F_{2}(\theta) \right) \left( \frac {\displaystyle u(1+\phi)-1}{\displaystyle \phi} \right) \right), & \mbox{if } \quad \frac {\displaystyle 1}{\displaystyle 1+\phi} < u < \infty. \end{array} \right. \label{eq:qfcomp} \tag{3} \] This quantile function can be used to generate random numbers from the two-piece composite distribution.

We are interested in a two-piece composite distribution, where the first piece is specified by the lognormal distribution. So, we take \[\displaystyle f_{1}(x)= \frac {\displaystyle 1}{\displaystyle x \sigma} \psi \left( \frac {\displaystyle \ln x - \mu}{\displaystyle \sigma} \right) \qquad {\rm and} \qquad \displaystyle F_{1}(x)= \Phi \left( \frac {\displaystyle \ln x - \mu}{\displaystyle \sigma} \right),\] where \(\psi(\cdot)\) and \(\Phi(\cdot)\) denote the standard normal pdf and the standard normal cdf, respectively. For this choice, ((1)), ((2)), and ((3)) reduce to \[\displaystyle f(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle \frac {\displaystyle \psi \left( (\ln x - \mu) / \sigma \right)} {\displaystyle (1 + \phi) \sigma x \Phi \left( (\ln \theta - \mu) / \sigma \right)}, & \mbox{if} \quad 0 < x \leq \theta, \\ \displaystyle \frac {\displaystyle \phi f_2 (x)}{\displaystyle (1 + \phi) \left( 1 - F_2 (\theta) \right)}, & \mbox{if} \quad \theta < x < \infty, \end{array} \right. \label{eq:pdf2} \tag{4} \]

\[\displaystyle F(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle \frac {\displaystyle \Phi \left( (\ln x - \mu) / \sigma \right)} {\displaystyle (1 + \phi) \Phi \left( (\ln \theta - \mu) / \sigma \right)}, & \mbox{if } \quad 0 < x \leq \theta, \\ \displaystyle \frac {\displaystyle 1}{\displaystyle 1+\phi} \left[ 1 + \phi \frac {\displaystyle F_{2}(x) - F_{2}(\theta)}{\displaystyle 1 - F_{2}(\theta)} \right], & \mbox{if } \quad \theta < x < \infty, \end{array} \right. \label{eq:cdf2} \tag{5} \] and \[\displaystyle Q(u) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle \exp \left\{ \mu + \sigma \Phi^{-1} \left[ u (1+\phi) \Phi \left( \frac {\displaystyle \ln \theta - \mu}{\displaystyle \sigma} \right) \right] \right\}, & \mbox{if } \quad 0 < u \leq \frac {\displaystyle 1}{\displaystyle 1+\phi}, \\ \displaystyle F_2^{-1} \left( F_{2}(\theta) + \left( 1 - F_{2}(\theta) \right) \left( \frac {\displaystyle u(1+\phi)-1}{\displaystyle \phi} \right) \right), & \mbox{if } \quad \frac {\displaystyle 1}{\displaystyle 1+\phi} < u < \infty, \end{array} \right. \label{eq:qf2} \tag{6} \]

respectively. We shall refer to the distribution given by ((4)), ((5)), and ((6)) as the composite lognormal distribution. Random numbers from the composite lognormal distribution can be generated as

\[x_i = Q \left( u_i \right) \label{eq:r2} \tag{7} \] for \(i = 1, 2, \ldots, n\), where \(u_i\), \(i = 1, 2, \ldots, n\) are random numbers from a uniform \([0, 1]\) distribution. Further statistical properties of the composite lognormal distribution including moment properties can be found in (Bakar 2012).

The pdf of two-piece composite distributions are in general not continuous or differentiable at the cutoff point \(\theta\). To have these properties satisfied, we impose the conditions \(a_1 f_1^{*} (\theta) = a_2 f_2^{*} (\theta)\) and \(a_1 d f_1^{*} (\theta) / d \theta = a_2 d f_2^{*} (\theta) / d \theta\). (Nadarajah and Bakar 2012) have shown that these conditions are equivalent to the following for any composite lognormal distribution: $$ = + ^{2} + ^{2} , = .

\tag{8} $$ The smoothness conditions in ((8)) are imposed for technical reasons—the respective parametric models then become more tractable.

Maximum likelihood estimation is a common method for estimation. Suppose we have a random sample \(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n\) from ((1)). Let \({\mathbf \lambda} = (\lambda_1\), \(\lambda_2\), \(\ldots\), \(\lambda_q)\) be the parameters of \(f_2 (\cdot)\). Suppose also that \(\mu\) and \(\phi\) can be expressed as \(\mu = \mu (\sigma, \theta, {\mathbf \lambda})\) and \(\phi = \phi (\sigma, \theta, {\mathbf \lambda})\), respectively. Then the log-likelihood function is

\[\begin{aligned} \ln L \left( \sigma, \theta, {\mathbf \lambda} \right) &= -n \ln (1 + \phi) + \sum_{x_i \leq \theta} \ln \psi \left( \frac {\ln x_i - \mu}{\sigma} \right) - \sum_{x_i \leq \theta} \ln \left( \sigma x_i \right) \nonumber \\ & -M \ln \Phi \left( \frac {\ln \theta - \mu}{\sigma} \right) + \sum_{x_i > \theta} \ln f_2 \left( x_i \right) \nonumber \\ & -m \ln \left[ 1 - F_2 (\theta) \right] + m \ln \phi, \label{eq:nlogl2} \end{aligned} \tag{9} \] where \(M = \sum_{i = 1}^n I \{ x_i \leq \theta \}\) and \(m = \sum_{i = 1}^n I \{ x_i > \theta \}\). It is clear that the maximum likelihood estimators of \((\sigma, \theta, {\mathbf \lambda})\) cannot be obtained in closed form. They have to be obtained numerically.

The new package CompLognormal, available from CRAN, computes ((4)), ((5)), and ((6)) for any given composite lognormal distribution. It also generates random numbers from the specified composite lognormal distribution. Table 1 summarizes the functions implemented in the package CompLognormal along with their arguments.

Table 1: Quantity and calling sequence for the composite lognormal distribution.
Quantity Calling sequence
\(f(x)\) in ((4)) dcomplnorm(x, spec, sigma=1, theta=1, ...)
\(F(x)\) in ((5)) pcomplnorm(x, spec, sigma=1, theta=1, ...)
\(Q(u)\) in ((6)) qcomplnorm(p, spec, sigma=1, theta=1, ...)
\(x_i\) in ((7)) rcomplnorm(n, spec, sigma=1, theta=1, ...)

The input argument spec (a character string) specifies the distribution of the second piece of the composite lognormal distribution. The distribution should be one that is recognized by R. It could be one of the distributions implemented in the R base package or one of the distributions implemented in an R contributed package or one freshly written by a user. In any case, there should be functions dspec, pspec, qspec and rspec, computing the pdf, cdf, qf and random numbers of the distribution.

Some examples of spec are: spec = "norm", meaning that \(f_2 (x) = (1 / \sigma) \psi ((x - \mu) / \sigma)\) and \(F_2 (x) = \Phi ((x - \mu) / \sigma)\); spec = "lnorm", meaning that \(f_2 (x) = \left\{ 1 / (\sigma x) \right\} \psi ((\ln x - \mu) / \sigma)\) and \(F_2 (x) = \Phi ((\ln x - \mu) / \sigma)\); spec = "exp", meaning that \(f_2 (x) = \lambda \exp (-\lambda x)\) and \(F_2 (x) = 1 - \exp (-\lambda x)\).

dcomplnorm, pcomplnorm, qcomplnorm and rcomplnorm can also take additional arguments in the form of .... These arguments could give inputs (for example, parameter values) for the distribution of the second piece of the composite lognormal distribution. For example, if spec = "norm" then ... can include mean = 1, sd = 1 to mean that \(f_2 (x) = \psi (x - 1)\) and \(F_2 (x) = \Phi (x - 1)\); if spec = "lnorm" then ... can include meanlog = 1, sdlog = 1 to mean that \(f_2 (x) = \psi (\ln x - 1)\) and \(F_2 (x) = \Phi (\ln x - 1)\); if spec = "exp" then ... can include rate = 1 to mean that \(f_2 (x) = \lambda \exp (-x)\) and \(F_2 (x) = 1 - \exp (-x)\). Further details about the calling sequences can be seen from the documentation for the CompLognormal package.

The code for dcomplnorm, pcomplnorm and qcomplnorm currently uses constructs of the form

do.call(paste("d", spec, sep = ""), list(z}, \code{...))

This technique was necessary as in the R base package distributions are no data type but rather are given by the respective four constituent functions <prefix><name>, where <prefix> is one of r, d, p, q and <name> is the name of the distribution. A way to circumvent such constructions would be a data type “distribution”. This has been available on CRAN for quite a while within the distr family of packages, with corresponding S4 classes for distributions. Recently, another approach based on S5-classes has been pursued in the package poweRlaw (Gillespie 2013). We leave these as future work.

3 Illustrations

We describe two simple illustrations of the new package CompLognormal. The following packages should be loaded (after installing them if necessary) in advance:

library(CompLognormal)
library(actuar)
library(SMPracticals)
library(evd)
library(fitdistrplus)
library(stats4)

Illustration 1

The illustration presented here plots the pdf and the cdf of the composite lognormal-loglogistic distribution for varying parameter values.

curve(dcomplnorm(x, "llogis", 0.4, 0.5, shape = 1, scale = 0.8), xlim = c(0, 5),
      ylim = c(0, 0.7), xlab = "x", ylab = "f(x)", n = 250, col = "black", lty = 1)
d1 <- dcomplnorm(0.5, "llogis", 0.4, 0.5, shape = 1, scale = 0.8)
segments(0.5, 0, 0.5, d1, col = "black", lty = 2)
curve(dcomplnorm(x, "llogis", 0.3, 0.2, shape = 0.2, scale = 0.5), add = TRUE,
      col = "red", lty = 1)
d2 <- dcomplnorm(0.2, "llogis", 0.3, 0.2, shape = 0.2, scale = 0.5)
segments(0.2, 0, 0.2, d2, col = "red", lty = 2)
curve(dcomplnorm(x, "llogis", 0.5, 0.4, shape = 0.5, scale = 0.5), add = TRUE,
      col = "blue", lty = 1)
d3 <- dcomplnorm(0.4, "llogis", 0.5, 0.4, shape = 0.5, scale = 0.5)
segments(0.4, 0, 0.4, d3, col = "blue", lty = 2)
legend(1.5, 0.5, legend = 
    c(expression(paste(sigma==0.4, ",", theta==0.5, ",", shape==1, ",", scale==0.8)),
      expression(paste(sigma==0.3, ",", theta==0.2, ",", shape==0.2, ",", scale==0.5)),
      expression(paste(sigma==0.5, ",", theta==0.4, ",", shape==0.5, ",", scale==0.8))),
      col = c("black", "red", "blue"), lty = 1)
curve(pcomplnorm(x, "llogis", 0.4, 0.5, shape = 1, scale = 0.8), xlim = c(0, 5),
      ylim = c(0, 1), xlab =  "x", ylab = "F(x)", n = 250, col = "black", lty = 1)
d1 <- pcomplnorm(0.5, "llogis", 0.4, 0.5, shape = 1, scale = 0.8)
segments(0.5, 0, 0.5, d1, col = "black", lty = 2)
curve(pcomplnorm(x, "llogis", 0.3, 0.2, shape = 0.2, scale = 0.5), add = TRUE,
      col = "red", lty = 1)
d2 <- pcomplnorm(0.2, "llogis", 0.3, 0.2, shape = 0.2, scale = 0.5)
segments(0.2, 0, 0.2, d2, col = "red", lty = 2)
curve(pcomplnorm(x, "llogis", 0.5, 0.4, shape = 0.5, scale = 0.5), add = TRUE,
      col = "blue", lty = 1)
d3 <- pcomplnorm(0.4, "llogis", 0.5, 0.4, shape = 0.5, scale = 0.5)
segments(0.4, 0, 0.4, d3, col = "blue", lty = 2)
graphic without alt text
Figure 1: Pdfs (top) and cdfs (bottom) of the composite lognormal-loglogistic distribution. The top legend applies to both plots.

Figure 1 shows the pdfs and cdfs of the composite lognormal-loglogistic distribution. The parameters, \(\sigma\) and \(\theta\), the scale parameter of the lognormal distribution and the cutoff point, respectively, are as defined in Section “Properties”. The parameters, shape and scale, are the shape and scale parameters of the loglogistic distribution, as defined in the R base package. The vertical lines in the figures correspond to the values for \(\theta\), the cutoff point.

Illustration 2

The illustration presented here fits the composite lognormal-Fréchet distribution to the Danish fire insurance data by the method of maximum likelihood, see ((9)). The data were obtained from the R package SMPracticals (Davison 2012).

x <- danish[1:2492]
nlm(function(p) { 
        -sum(dcomplnorm(x, "frechet", sigma = exp(p[1]),
             theta = exp(p[2]), scale = exp(p[3]), shape = exp(p[4]), log = TRUE))
    }, p = c(0, 0, 0, 0))

The output will be

$minimum
[1] 3859.293

$estimate
[1] -1.7178497  0.1176224 -0.2872701  0.4130180

$gradient
[1] -0.0008301586  0.0031436684  0.0001900844 -0.0004574758

$code
[1] 1

$iterations
[1] 23

The number \(2492\) refers to the actual length of the Danish data set. This output shows that the maximized log-likelihood is \(-3859.293\), the estimated \(\sigma\) is \(\exp(-1.7178497)=0.1794516\), the estimated \(\theta\) is \(\exp(0.1176224)=1.124819\), the estimated scale parameter of the Fréchet distribution is \(\exp(-0.2872701)=0.750309\), and the estimated shape parameter of the Fréchet distribution is \(\exp(0.4130180)=1.511372\). The standard errors of these estimates can be computed by adding hessian = TRUE to the nlm command.

We have chosen the composite lognormal-Fréchet distribution for simplicity of illustration. The purpose of this illustration was not to find the “best fitting” model for the Danish data. Of course, many other composite lognormal distributions can be expected to give better fits than the composite lognormal-Fréchet distribution. (Nadarajah and Bakar 2012) modeled the Danish data using a large class of composite lognormal distributions, including the composite lognormal-Burr, the composite lognormal-inverse Burr, the composite lognormal-\(F\), the composite lognormal-Fréchet, the composite lognormal-generalized Pareto, the composite lognormal-inverse Pareto, and the composite lognormal-loglogistic distributions. The composite lognormal-Burr distribution was shown to give the best fit.

In Illustration 2, we used nlm for optimization of the likelihood function. R has many other model fitting routines like fitdistr from the package MASS (Venables and Ripley 2002), fitdist from the package fitdistrplus (Delignette-Muller et al. 2013), mle from the package stats4, and MLEstimator, MDEstimator from the package distrMod (Kohl and Ruckdeschel 2013). For instance, fitdist can be used to estimate the parameters of the composite lognormal-Fréchet distribution as follows:

dclnormf <- function(x, logsigma, logtheta, logscale, logshape) {
    dcomplnorm(x, spec = "frechet", sigma = exp(logsigma), theta = exp(logtheta),
               scale = exp(logscale), shape = exp(logshape))
}
pclnormf <- function(q, logsigma, logtheta, logscale, logshape) {
    pcomplnorm(q, spec = "frechet", sigma = exp(logsigma), theta = exp(logtheta),
               scale = exp(logscale), shape = exp(logshape))
}
qclnormf <- function(p, logsigma, logtheta, logscale, logshape) {
    qcomplnorm(p, spec = "frechet", sigma = exp(logsigma), theta = exp(logtheta),
               scale = exp(logscale), shape = exp(logshape))
}
fitdist(danish[1:2492], "clnormf", start = list(logsigma = -1.718,
        logtheta = 0.118, logscale = -0.287, logshape = 0.413))

The output will be

Fitting of the distribution ' clnormf ' by maximum likelihood
Parameters:
           estimate Std. Error
logsigma -1.7180280 0.05737326
logtheta  0.1176365 0.02413085
logscale -0.2877565 0.16564834
logshape  0.4130318 0.03704017

Also mle can be used to estimate the parameters of the composite lognormal-Fréchet distribution as follows:

nllh <- function(p1, p2, p3, p4) { 
    -sum(dcomplnorm(danish[1:2492], spec = "frechet",
         sigma = exp(p1), theta = exp(p2), scale = exp(p3), shape = exp(p4), log = TRUE))
}
mle(nllh, start = list(p1 = -1.718, p2 = 0.118, p3 = -0.287, p4 = 0.413))

The output will be

Call:
mle(minuslogl = nllh, start = list(p1 = -1.718, p2 = 0.118, p3 = -0.287,
    p4 = 0.413))

Coefficients:
        p1         p2         p3         p4
-1.7178735  0.1176081 -0.2870383  0.4130586

4 Conclusions

We have developed a new R package for computing quantities of interest for any composite lognormal distribution. The computed quantities include the pdf, cdf, qf, and random numbers. Although the package is specifically designed for composite lognormal distributions, it can be easily altered for any other composite distribution.

5 Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Editor and the two referees for careful reading and for their comments which greatly improved the paper.

CRAN packages used

CompLognormal, CRAN, poweRlaw, SMPracticals, MASS, fitdistrplus, distrMod

CRAN Task Views implied by cited packages

ActuarialScience, Distributions, Econometrics, Environmetrics, MixedModels, NumericalMathematics, Psychometrics, Robust, Survival, TeachingStatistics

Note

This article is converted from a Legacy LaTeX article using the texor package. The pdf version is the official version. To report a problem with the html, refer to CONTRIBUTE on the R Journal homepage.

S. Bakar. Some contributions to actuarial parametric modeling. 2012.
P. Barford and M. Crovella. Generating representative web workloads for network and server performance evaluation. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 26: 151–160, 1998.
C. Bolancé, M. Guillén and J. Nielsen. Transformation kernel estimation of insurance claim cost distributions. In Mathematical and statistical methods for actuarial sciences and finance, pages. 43–51 2010.
K. Cooray and M. Ananda. Modeling actuarial data with a composite lognormal-Pareto model. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 321–334, 2005.
A. Davison. SMPracticals: Practicals for use with davison (2003) statistical models. 2012. URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SMPracticals. R package version 1.4-1.
M. Delignette-Muller, R. Pouillot, J.-B. Denis and C. Dutang. Fitdistrplus: Help to fit of a parametric distribution to non-censored or censored data. 2013. URL http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/fitdistrplus/fitdistrplus.pdf.
S. Dubey, B. Ponnu and S. Arkatkar. Time gap modeling using mixture distributions under mixed traffic conditions. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 13: 91–98, 2013.
I. Eliazar and M. Cohen. A Langevin approach to the log-Gauss-Pareto composite statistical structure. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 391: 5598–5610, 2012.
M. Fackler. Inflation and excess insurance. 2010. ASTIN / AFIR Colloquium, Madrid.
J. Gibbons and S. Mylroie. Estimation of impurity profiles in ionimplanted amorphous targets using joined half-Gaussian distributions. Applied Physics Letters, 22: 568–569, 1973.
C. Gillespie. Fitting heavy tailed distributions: The poweRlaw package. 2013. URL http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/poweRlaw/index.html.
M. Kohl and P. Ruckdeschel. distrMod: Object oriented implementation of probability models. 2013. URL http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/distrMod/index.html.
K.-S. Lindblad. How big is large? A study of the limit for large insurance claims in case reserves. 2011.
S. Nadarajah and S. Bakar. New composite models for the Danish fire insurance data. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2012. DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2012.695748.
M. Pigeon and M. Denuit. Composite lognormal-Pareto model with random threshold. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 177–192, 2011.
D. Scollnik. On composite lognormal-Pareto models. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 20–33, 2007.
W. N. Venables and B. D. Ripley. Modern applied statistics with s. Fourth New York: Springer, 2002. URL http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4. ISBN 0-387-95457-0.

References

Reuse

Text and figures are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0. The figures that have been reused from other sources don't fall under this license and can be recognized by a note in their caption: "Figure from ...".

Citation

For attribution, please cite this work as

Nadarajah & Bakar, "CompLognormal: An R Package for Composite Lognormal Distributions", The R Journal, 2013

BibTeX citation

@article{RJ-2013-030,
  author = {Nadarajah, S. and Bakar, S. A. A.},
  title = {CompLognormal: An R Package for Composite Lognormal Distributions},
  journal = {The R Journal},
  year = {2013},
  note = {https://rjournal.github.io/},
  volume = {5},
  issue = {2},
  issn = {2073-4859},
  pages = {97-103}
}