Published online Dec 26, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e6
Advancing Systemic Therapy in Gastric Cancer: Key Updates From the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024
The Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer, developed by the Korean Gastric Cancer Association, are high-certainty, evidence-based guidelines established through comprehensive systematic reviews exceeding the scope of other national gastric cancer guidelines. They reflect a multidisciplinary approach involving experts from both therapeutic and diagnostic fields. Since their initial publication in 2004, these guidelines have undergone periodic updates, with the fifth edition being released in 2024 [1].
EVOLUTION TOWARD EVIDENCE-BASED, MULTIDISCIPLINARY GUIDELINES
The transition from the first edition in 2004 to the second in 2014, and subsequently to the third in 2018, marked a pivotal advancement toward an evidence-based, multidisciplinary framework [2, 3]. The guideline development process followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology [4] and employed a multidisciplinary approach. The fourth edition in 2022 further strengthened its adherence to the principles of clinical practice guidelines [5] which are defined as “statements that include recommendations intended to optimize patient care based on a systematic review of evidence and an assessment of the benefits and harms of alternative care options.” This version broadened its scope beyond treatment recommendations, incorporating diagnostic strategies, follow-up protocols, and commonly encountered clinical dilemmas. This ensured a systematic review of clinical evidence, involving an interdisciplinary team of experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. A total of 33 key questions (KQs) were developed, 26 of which were addressed through meta-analyses, with recommendations finalized after expert panels considered the level of evidence, potential benefits, risks, and patient preferences.
KEY UPDATES IN THE 2024 FIFTH EDITION
The 2024 fifth edition is an updated version of the fourth, comprising 34 KQs with corresponding levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Among these, 6 KQs were newly updated, supported by systematically searched published literature; quality assessments; meta-analyses; and evidence levels and recommendation grades classified on the basis of GRADE methodology. One of the newly updated KQs focused on comparing laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Systemic treatment updates were the focus of 5 KQs, highlighting significant advances in perioperative and palliative systemic therapies.
Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for AGC
The recently published 5-year survival data from the JLSSG0901 trial [6] prompted a meta-analysis that included the KLASS-02, CLASS-01, and JLSSG0901 trials, which confirmed that both laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy provide comparable survival outcomes, reaffirming that laparoscopic distal gastrectomy can be recommended for AGC.
Advances in systemic therapy for AGC
Surgical resection remains the standard treatment for resectable AGC, supplemented by systemic therapy to reduce recurrence and improve survival. Despite recent efforts to enhance systemic therapy with anti-programmed cell death-l (PD-1) antibodies in the perioperative setting, S-1 or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin remains the most strongly recommended post-surgery regimen. Meta-analyses incorporating long-term data from the Asian phase III PRODIGY and RESOLVE trials have confirmed overall survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemotherapy [7, 8]. However, with the need for multidisciplinary discussions on the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, there remains a need to optimize its application among various therapeutic approaches including up-front surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, this has led to the current guidelines maintaining the previous edition’s “conditional for” recommendation.
In locally advanced unresectable or metastatic AGC, conventional cytotoxic agents such as fluoropyrimidines; platinum-based agents (cisplatin, oxaliplatin); taxanes (docetaxel, paclitaxel); and irinotecan remain the cornerstone of treatment. However, the introduction of molecularly targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the systemic treatment landscape, significantly improving survival outcomes. Nivolumab was the first successful ICI approved for combination with chemotherapy as palliative first-line therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric cancer. Until the 2022 guidelines, palliative first-line nivolumab combined with fluoropyrimidine/platinum-based chemotherapy was recommended for gastric cancer patients with a HER2-negative and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥5 [5]. Additionally, the KEYNOTE-859 trial demonstrated significant survival benefits with pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy, regardless of PD-L1 status, with a more pronounced effect observed in PD-L1-positive patients [9]. A meta-analysis of 5 phase III trials comparing anti-PD-1 antibodies plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone further reinforced the role of anti-PD-1 antibodies in first-line systemic therapy for PD-L1-positive AGC [1], strengthening the evidence supporting this combination in clinical practice. As the integration of anti-PD-1 antibodies into standard chemotherapy regimens for first-line treatment of HER2-negative gastric cancer has improved survival outcomes, these results have been extended to HER2-positive gastric cancer as well. The randomized, phase III KEYNOTE-811 trial demonstrated the efficacy of combining pembrolizumab and trastuzumab with standard fluoropyrimidine/platinum chemotherapy versus trastuzumab with standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-postive gastric cancer [10]. In patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1, the pembrolizumab group exhibited a more pronounced survival improvement. Consequently, the addition of pembrolizumab to trastuzumab and chemotherapy is recommended for gastric cancer patients with HER2-positive and PD-L1 CPS ≥1.
In addition, zolbetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting claudin 18.2, demonstrated significant survival benefits when combined with chemotherapy as palliative first-line systemic therapy for HER2-negative gastric cancer in the phase III SPOTLIGHT and GLOW trials [11, 12]. A meta-analysis of these 2 phase III trials conducted for the current guidelines confirmed the significant survival benefits of zolbetuximab in combination therapy [1], providing stronger supporting evidence for its clinical application. Therefore, zolbetuximab combined with fluoropyrimidine/platinum chemotherapy is recommended as a first-line treatment in patients with HER2-negative and claudin 18.2-positive locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic gastric cancer.
Although no major changes were made regarding second-line or later therapies, emerging agents and clinical trial results were highlighted, indicating potential future updates.
CONCLUSIONS
The 2024 edition of the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer is a significant milestone in advancing systemic therapy through robust, evidence-based recommendations supported by high-quality meta-analyses. They integrate ICIs, molecularly targeted therapies, and optimized systemic therapy regimens, providing a comprehensive framework within which to manage gastric cancer. As the treatment landscape evolves, these guidelines serve to improve patient care, foster innovation, and guide future research in the pursuit of better outcomes.
Conflict of Interest:The corresponding author of this editorial, Keun Won Ryu, serves as the journal’s Editor-in-Chief. This potential conflict of interest has been appropriately disclosed and managed in accordance with the journal’s editorial policies.
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization: R.M.H.
Supervision: R.K.W.
Writing - original draft: R.M.H.
Writing - review & editing: R.K.W.
References
-
Kim IH, Kang SJ, Choi W, Seo AN, Eom BW, Kang B, et al. Korean practice guidelines for gastric cancer 2024: an evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach (update of 2022 guideline). J Gastric Cancer 2025;25:5–114.
-
-
Guideline Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA), Development Working Group & Review Panel. Korean practice guideline for gastric cancer 2018: an evidence-based, multi-disciplinary approach. J Gastric Cancer 2019;19:1–48.
-
-
Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach [Internet]. [place unknown]: GRADE Working Group; 2013 [cited 2023 Jan 1].Available from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html..
-
-
Zhang X, Li Z, Liang H, Xue Y, Wang Y, Zhou Z, et al. LBA78 overall survival of perioperative or postoperative adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 versus adjuvant oxaliplatin with capecitabine in locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma undergoing D2 gastrectomy: an updated analysis of RESOLVE trial. Ann Oncol 2023;34:S1318–S1319.
-
-
Janjigian YY, Kawazoe A, Bai Y, Xu J, Lonardi S, Metges JP, et al. Pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy for HER2-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: interim analyses from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-811 randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2023;402:2197–2208.
-
-
Shitara K, Lordick F, Bang YJ, Enzinger P, Ilson D, Shah MA, et al. Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, untreated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (SPOTLIGHT): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023;401:1655–1668.
-