You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your great work! I am very impressed by your research. According to your ViT KD paper, the reported baseline performance of DeiT-tiny and DeiT-small in your experiments seems significantly higher than that of typical models.
Could you please clarify which models you used and what differences they have compared to the original models? Your response would be extremely helpful.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
Thank you for your great work! I am very impressed by your research. According to your ViT KD paper, the reported baseline performance of DeiT-tiny and DeiT-small in your experiments seems significantly higher than that of typical models.
As far as I know, The officially released DeiT-tiny usually performs around 72% and DeiT-small around 80% in the official DeiT code.
https://github.com/facebookresearch/deit/blob/main/README_deit.md
Could you please clarify which models you used and what differences they have compared to the original models? Your response would be extremely helpful.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: