-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
Ubuntu Core for Docker #851
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I would consider Alpine as an alternative. Ubuntu Core doesn't seem to have an official image (yet?). If you're really looking to minimize the container's disk footprint, Alpine weighs in at 5MB. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.brianchristner.io/docker-image-base-os-size-comparison/amp/ |
Alpine is not stable enough for Meteor or Docker. |
@xet7 I'd like to hear what issues you had with Alpine. Although I'm not involved directly in the project anymore, I'm more than happy to get back to it if it could result in using Alpine for Docker image. |
Although Alpine is offtopic for this (please create separate issue if you are interested), previous issues with more info: #867 wefork#33 If you get Wekan working reliably in Alpine, or Alpine running Docker running Wekan, submit new issue to Wekan, and pull request to Wekan devel branch. Some time ago I did see somewhere Docker Hub Alpine base image that includes same Meteor version than Wekan. |
@rubberduck203 , @barthalion see |
I think it's enought that there already is Ubuntu snap |
What do you think about using [https://www.ubuntu.com/core](Ubuntu Core) as a base for Docker Container?
Maybe it could make container smaller and faster.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: