-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
Report image Element Timing algorithm doesn't report intrinsic size for LCP #31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
One other note. The current Chrome implementation doesn't consider image scaling of CSS background images. I believe the intention is to have scaled background images report the same as they would if they were an |
I'll address the original issue on the LCP side by scaling the size by Regarding the background-size not being captured in Chrome comment, can you file a new bug in crbug.com/new? |
This feels like the opposite of the recent feature request to add I suspect Element Timings should have a |
Actually, I think Element Timing exposes |
My understanding is LCP is supposed to factor in the intrinsic sizes of images and not consider the rendered size for LCP in cases where the image is stretched or enlarged (e.g. a 1px transparent gif).
But as currently spec'ed, the natural width and height of the image are set after 3.5 sub-item 3:
At this point in the algorithm,
intersectionRect
has only considered the visual width and height, not the intrinsic width and height, thus 3 sub-item 9 in the LCP spec will report the visual size, which I do not believe is the intention.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: