-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[metrics] meetup raw data #14
Comments
Hi @vchrombie , What do you think about the following metrics?
|
Hi @valeriocos, sorry for the late reply. I have some doubts and would like to define these metrics more clearly.
these two metrics can be defined as per day like number os RSVPS per day and number of comments per day, perfect
I was wondering how can we implement these. The both metrics would be a number. Did I miss anything? |
No worries @vchrombie
perfect!
Do the pointers above help with clarifying how to implement these metrics? |
Hi @valeriocos, thanks for the reply.
Ya, I know that they exist in the raw data. Sorry for not being clear with the doubt. I was asking something different. I meant that these metrics (number of topics and number of users per meetup group) wouldn't go like the other metrics which are defined per day as the number of RSVPs per day. I felt 'number of topics created per day' doesn't sound interesting and at the same time, they cannot be extracted as we don't have any datetime field in that. I was asking if the number of topics is just a number, not like a 'per day'. It can be 'per event'. 🤔 Let me know if it is still not clear. |
I see, thank you for the clarification @vchrombie.
Probably these metrics cannot be calculated with the current data, it seems that topics and group members show only their last values. Thus, even if we calculate them 'per event', we can see a difference in these metrics only when getting incremental data (not on the first collection). We could discard these metrics, wdyt? What about having a metric that uses I understand that 'per event' metrics should be used with caution in a quality model, since they would make sense only if we consider the average/median of their values, does it make sense?
|
Hi @valeriocos
Yes, I agree with you.
I got it. The metric number of yes rsvp seems good to me.
True, I understand the point. Also, I had one doubt. What datetime should be good to use in this metric? Right now, we have
|
The actual event data looks better and makes much more sense |
planned metrics are implemented, so closing this issue |
Opening this issue to discuss the possible metrics which can be extracted from the meetup raw data for meetupqm enricher.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: